Putin Recognizes Donbass Republics, Sends Russian Military to 'Denazify' Ukraine

axj said:
The thing is, there is not that much that the US manufactures anymore, most of it was outsourced to China and elsewhere. What remains are basically only the military production, Big Tech (Google, Amazon, etc.) and Big Banks (derivatives and money printing).
Click to expand...
So the United States has really pulled off a coup, by depriving Europe's energy-intensive industries, especially Germany's, of cheap energy in unlimited quantities from Russia, so that they turn to and invest in the United States at a time when theirs are at their lowest ebb.
The United States attract a record amount of capital investment on the part of German companies attracted by their strong economy and tax incentives-profit basis, at a time when the conditions on their domestic market and in China, their largest trading partner, are deteriorating.

The German companies have announced a record amount of $ 15.7 billion of capital commitments in american projects last year, up from $ 8.2 billion a year earlier, according to data compiled by fDi Markets, a subsidiary of the Financial Times, eclipsing the $ 5.9 billion promised in China.

The amount destined for the United States accounted for approximately 15 percent of the total commitments in 2023, whether in projects for the creation or expansion abroad, up from 6 percent the previous year.

The investment boom covers the first year since the administration Biden has adopted the Inflation Reduction Act and the Chips And Science Act, which provide more than $ 400 billion of tax credits, grants and loans in order to reconstruct the manufacturing american and accelerate the energy transition.
Click to expand...
A report last week, the Chamber of commerce and industry, German intended that the United States supplanteraient China as a major trading partner of the country by 2025 at the latest
Click to expand...
https://translated.turbopages.org/p...is-avec-des-promesses-dinvestissement-record/

And even military industries like Lockheed Martin and Boeing depend on Chinese sub-assemblies to manufacture their weapons.
Russia, which was supposed to serve as a springboard for chewing up China.

axj said:
Other than the online platforms, weapons and printed dollars, is there anything else that the US exports in large amounts?
Click to expand...
Joking aside, this would be more along the lines of "Truth memes", than "Best Jokes": The American dream, Disneyland, Hollywood, MacDonald and Taylor Swift...
Soft power is the only war the Americans have won, but with wokism and other lgbtqia less than more, the backlash is likely to be fatal.
 
zak said:
Soft power is the only war the Americans have won, but with wokism and other lgbtqia less than more, the backlash is likely to be fatal.
Click to expand...
C's, seem to have been reminded us of the pendulum. So the pendulum with all the mentioned nonsense has already been deflected very strongly and will definitely swing in the other direction.

However, let's return to the immediate topic.
We continue to move forward.
The AFU officially recognized the loss of Ugledar

The AFU command officially recognized the loss of Ugledar.
The Khortytsya operational command stated that the Russian Army's strikes on the flanks "exhausted the defense" of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, "there was a threat of cordoning off the city."

"The High Command has given permission to carry out a maneuver to withdraw units from Ugledar in order to preserve personnel and military equipment," the enemy said in a statement.
Click to expand...
https://rusvesna.su/news/1727862699

The Russian army liberated Verkhnekamenskoye, — the Ministry of Defense
During the offensive actions in the Seversky direction, units of the "Southern" group of troops liberated the settlement of Verkhnekamenskoye.

This is reported in the latest report by the Ministry of Defense.

The settlement is located on the territory of the DPR, our guys continue to push the occupier away from the Russian region.
Click to expand...
https://rusvesna.su/news/1727862727

Someone thinks it's a sensation, but I don't think so. It is good that such facts are becoming known, but even without them, I personally did not doubt the leading role of the United States (Anglo-Saxons in more general words)
Sensational facts have been revealed, shedding light on the invasion of the Armed Forces of Ukraine in the Kursk region

Interesting papers have been found in documents from the leaked mail of former US Ambassador to Russia Michael McFaul.

One of the NATO think tanks, the Atlantic Council, held a war game in February 2024, to which McFaul and former US Ambassador to Ukraine John Herbst were invited.

The goal of the game is to calculate Russia's reaction to 2 scenarios.

1) — the beginning of negotiations on Ukraine's accession to NATO,

2) — the breakthrough of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, which obviously meant the invasion of Ukraine into the territory of the Kursk region.

The purpose of the attack is internal destabilization, a blow to the authority of the authorities and a provocation to use nuclear weapons (such scenarios were in play).

After the invasion of the Ukrainian Armed Forces in the Kursk region, it was the narratives of the internal destabilization of Russia that were actively worked out by both McFaul himself and his wards in various Western media, which is described with evidence in the material, said Ilya Craft, a lawyer and member of the Public Chamber of Russia.

"Of course, McFaul's dreams never came true, due to the complete moral and intellectual degradation of his wards — Eggert, Illarionov, Kasparov, Albats and other traitors. The invasion of the Armed Forces of Ukraine did not achieve the goals set by the American curators and cost tens of thousands of lives of Ukrainian militants," he writes.

It is obvious that the United States oversaw the attack of the Armed Forces of Ukraine on the Kursk region, which the American authorities have been trying hard to hide all this time.
Click to expand...
https://rusvesna.su/news/1727893687

Russia still has something to use against enemies without TNW. In my opinion, this is the first use of this type of bomb in the current conflict.
Volchansk was hit by one of the most powerful aerial bombs in Russia's arsenal - ODAB-9000
In Volchansk, located on the line of operations, the Russian military for the first time used one of the most powerful non—nuclear bombs in the world - ODAB-9000. The explosion was so powerful that its effect is compared to a nuclear strike, but there is currently no official confirmation of the use of this aerial bomb.

The ODAB-9000, which is considered one of the most powerful vacuum bombs in the arsenal of the Russian army, is designed to destroy fortified facilities and mass destruction of enemy manpower. Its use could have a significant impact on the course of hostilities in the area, creating a significant advantage for Russian forces.

In the footage, you can see how a giant shock wave diverges after the explosion, which caused collateral damage to the positions of the Armed Forces of Ukraine.
Click to expand...
Волчанск подвергся удару одной из мощнейших авиабомб в арсенале России - ОДАБ-9000

C's нам, кажется, напоминали о маятнике. Так вот маятник со всеми упомянутыми глупостями отклонен уже очень сильно и обязательно качнется в другую сторону.
Однако вернемся к непосредственной теме.
Мы продолжаем продвигаться вперед.
Кто то считает это сенсацией, я же не считаю так. Хорошо, что подобные факты становятся известны, но и без них я лично не сомневался в лидирующей роли США ( Англосаксов более общими словами)
России пока есть что применять против врагов и без ТЯО. По моему это первое применение данного вида бомб в текущем конфликте.
 
Ukrops do not become stronger in any component, but get stronger hits the further they go. The vector of the development of the situation is becoming clearer.
The Russian Armed Forces have broken three of their own records for the use of weapons systems in their military
Over the past few months, Russian troops have set a number of records for the use of certain types of weapons during their military operations. For example, in August 2024, the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation used 792 units of attack drones of the Geran family against the enemy, and in September 1,339 such UAVs (almost 45 units per day), beating the previous achievement.

Over the past September, the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation used more "Geraniums" than in the first quarter of 2024 or for the whole of 2023. This is due to the fact that the manufacturing plant in Alabuga has increased production. In October-December 2024, the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation should receive about 4.7 thousand more units of "Geraniums", which means that they will be able to use them in an amount of more than 50 pieces per day.

An equally impressive record is the use of various adjustable aerial bombs. According to Ukrainian statistics, in June 2024, Russians used 2,305 such ammunition, in July – 3,091, in August – 3,046, and in September a record 3,381 KAB (for most of the month, the daily use was 117 pieces). We can assume that there will be a new record in October.

Another record is the number of attacks from MLRS. According to Ukrainian statistics, in September 2022, the Russian Armed Forces struck 81 times a day. In March 2024, 113 daily strikes were recorded, in August – 119, and in September a record 153 MLRS attacks per day. This indicates an increase in the production of the necessary ammunition.
Click to expand...
ÐС РФ побили ÑÑи ÑобÑÑвеннÑÑ ÑекоÑда по пÑÐ¸Ð¼ÐµÐ½ÐµÐ½Ð¸Ñ ÑиÑÑем вооÑÑжений в СÐÐ

Хохлы сильнее не становятся ни в каком компоненте, а получают чем дальше, тем сильнее. Вектор развития ситуации вырисовывается все отчетливее.
 
Does this mean that the US will offer Ukrainian territories to Russia to end the conflict just to present itself as "peacemaker"?
[...]
Stoltenberg suggested that “a kind of new momentum” would come after the US presidential election in early November, possibly ushering in “ways to try to get movement on the battlefield combined with movement around the negotiating table.”
Click to expand...
 
For some, life has turned into a continuous escape. Humanly, you can feel sorry for them, but as C's said , feel sorry for those who feel sorry. These people made their own choice.
Transfers from 2014 to 2024. Funny
Inscriptions on the screen:
2014 We are moving from Donbass to Kharkov. Learning to live a new.
2022 We are moving from Kharkov to Kiev. Learning to live a new
2024 We give up everything. We are moving from Ukraine to Israel. Learning to live a new!
And her exclamation to the sounds of an air raid: Is this serious?!!!

Для некоторых жизнь превратилась в сплошное бегство. По человечески их можно пожалеть, но как сказали С s, жалейте жалеющих. Эти сами сделали свой выбор.
Надписи на экране:
2014 Переезжаем с Донбасса в Харьков. Учимся жить заново.
2022 Переезжаем с Харькова в Киев. Учимся жить заново
2024 Бросаем все. Переезжаем с Украины в Израиль. Учимся жить заново!
И её возглас под звуки воздушной тревоги: Это серьезно?!!!
 
Lavrov gave one heck of a speech recently at the UN General Assembly (Sept. 28th). He not only puts Russia's war with Ukraine/NATO in its correct context but proceeds to outline many of the ostensibly good resolutions, declarations and statements made by the UN over the last 24 years or so - that, he says, have come to nothing for various reasons.

He puts ALL OF THAT in the context of the UN's 'Summit of the Future' forum - the Globalist/Agenda 2030/One World Order plan the elite will use as a centralizing power grab with the UN as the front organization. Lavrov's basic underlying message stated in his diplomatic style is:

"How on Earth do you propose to implement all of these utopian ideals (using unworkable and wrong-headed policies) for the whole world - when you don't even have your s*** together enough to handle the basic stuff, and with the US and others mucking everything up?!"

Bravo Lavrov - a towering figure in sane-world diplomacy!


Minister of Foreign Affairs of the Russian Federation Sergey Lavrov's remarks (statement) at the General Debate of the 79th Session of the UN General Assembly, New York, September 28, 2024​


Дискуссия 79 сессии ГА ООН.jpg

Dear Mr President,
Ladies and gentlemen,

A few days ago, this building hosted a forum called the Summit of the Future. Russia was supportive of the idea of the Secretary-General to convene it, since the crisis of our Organisation is deepening and something needs to be done about this. We devoted our efforts to preparing the summit. However, we were realistic in our expectations. There have been many ambitious events in the modern history of the United Nations which ended up with loud declarations which were soon forgotten.

The Millenium Summit proclaimed the goal to “free the peoples from the scourge of war”. Two years later the United States of America, at the head of the coalition of the willing, invaded Iraq – the country which has yet to get over the devastating consequences of this affair – under a ridiculous pretext, without the mandate of the UN Security Council.

The 2005 World Summit declared its commitment to establishing a just peace in accordance with the purposes and principles of the Charter of the United Nations. But this sacred commitment did not prevent the United States and its allies from emboldening Georgia's then-leader Mikheil Saakashvili to launch an armed aggression against the people of South Ossetia and Russian peacekeepers in 2008. Three years later, NATO orchestrated a military intervention in Libya that destroyed its statehood and undermined the stability of neighbouring countries.

In 2015, the UN Summit on Sustainable Development adopted grandiose plans to fight poverty and inequality. In the end, they turned out to be empty promises in the face of the unwillingness of Western countries to give up their neo-colonial practices of siphoning off the riches of the world for their own benefit. You can simply look at the statistics to see how many promises to fund development in the global south and transfer environmentally friendly technologies have actually been kept.

The current UN Secretary General, Antonio Guterres, just like Kofi Annan and Ban Ki-moon before him, has put forward an initiative under the slogan of a new start for global cooperation. This is a wonderful idea. Who could disagree? But what global cooperation is there to talk about, when the West has trampled all those unshakeable values of the globalisation that speakers on the podium talked so much about, trying to convince us that they would give everyone equal access to the goods of modern civilisation? Where is the inviolability of property, the presumption of innocence, freedom of expression, access to information, fair competition in markets under fair and constant rules? The Secretary-General speaks of global cooperation at the very moment when the countries of the West have unleashed a veritable war of sanctions against more than half, if not the majority, of the countries of the world, and the US dollar, promoted as an asset and a good for all humanity, has been crudely turned into a weapon.

Cuba has been subject to a trade blockade for more than sixty years, while the overwhelming majority of members of the international community have called for it to be lifted. In its pursuit of an increasingly unattainable goal of maintaining its dominance, Washington has blocked the normal work of the WTO to settle disputes and a reform of the Bretton Woods institutions, whose structure has long ceased to reflect the real balance of power in the world economy and finance. The UN wants to turn the West into a tool to promote its own selfish ends. The Summit of the Future showed that the number of attempts to blur the intergovernmental nature of the organisation has increased. The long-awaited changes in the way the Secretariat is staffed, with key positions in fact occupied and inherited by representatives of the Western minority, have been curtailed. When the Secretary-General calls for a new approach to global cooperation, the Secretariat must promote unifying ideas, propose options for compromise, rather than find excuses to integrate pro-Western narratives into the work of the United Nations.

It is not late to breathe new life into the United Nations. But this can be achieved through restoration of trust based on the charter principle – sovereign equality of all states – rather than out-of-touch summits and declarations. However, while the trust is undermined, including through actions by the West to create its subordinate narrow formats to resolve crucial issues bypassing the UN such as control over the Internet or determination of legal frameworks to use AI technologies. These issues touch upon the future of the entire humanity and they have to be considered on a universal basis, without discrimination and aspiration to achieve unilateral benefits. Thus, everything has to be agreed on a fair basis involving all UN members, and not like how the Pact for the Future was drafted: without a single plenary round of talks where all countries would be present. Instead, the work was done under the control of western manipulators. As a result, the Pact, already swelled the ranks of declarations written in beautiful English without even being born.

The situation is no better when it comes to implementing the binding resolutions of the UN Security Council. It is enough to mention the sabotage of the resolutions on the Kosovo settlement and the Dayton Accords on Bosnia and Herzegovina. The most egregious example is the postponement for more than 80 years of consensus resolutions on the establishment of an independent Palestinian state living side by side in peace and security with Israel.

Acts of terrorism which Israelis fell victim to on October 7, 2023 cannot be justified. But all those who are still capable of compassion resent the fact that the October tragedy is being used for a massive collective punishment of the Palestinians, which has turned out to be an unprecedented humanitarian disaster. The murder of Palestinian civilians by US weapons must stop. The delivery of humanitarian cargoes to the enclave must be ensured, the restoration of infrastructure must be arranged and, most importantly, the implementation of the legitimate right of self-determination of the Palestinians must be guaranteed, and they must be allowed to establish a territorially integral and viable state within the borders of 1967 with its capital in East Jerusalem, not in words but in deeds, "on the ground".

Another blatant example of the use of terrorist methods to achieve political goals is the attack on Lebanon, in which civilian technology was turned into a deadly weapon. This crime must be investigated immediately. It is already impossible to ignore the numerous publications in the media, including in Europe and the United States, which prove the various levels of Washington's involvement and, at the very least, its awareness of the preparation of a terrorist attack. We understand that the Americans always deny everything and do their best to erase the emerging facts - just as they did in response to irrefutable evidence of their involvement in terrorist acts against the Nord Stream pipelines. These pipelines, by the way, were a great example of the global cooperation of which the UN Secretary-General dreams. After their destruction, the competitiveness of the European Union in the global economy has been undermined for many years to the benefit of the United States. The West is to blame for concealing the truth about the organisers of many other heinous crimes, including a bloody provocation in Bucha, a city in the Kiev region, in 2022, and a series of poisonings of Russian citizens in the UK and Germany.

The UN Secretariat cannot remain aloof from efforts to establish the truth in situations that directly affect global security and must act impartially in accordance with Art. 100 of the Charter, acting impartially and avoiding the temptation to play into the hands of certain states, especially those who openly call for the world to be divided into a flowering garden and a jungle, or for a democratic table to be set for dinner and those on the menu instead of cooperation.

The 'track record' of those who demand that the rest of the world play by their rules should not be forgotten. The invasion of Afghanistan and the inglorious twenty-year presence of a well-known coalition there was accompanied by the emergence of al-Qaeda. The creation of the Islamic State was a direct result of the aggression against Iraq. The start of the war in Syria gave birth to Jabhat al-Nusra (now Hayat Tahrir al-Sham), and the destruction of Libya opened the floodgates for terrorism in the Sahara-Sahel region and for millions of illegal immigrants in Europe. We urge all those who care about the future of their countries and people to be extremely cautious about the new plots of the inventors of these very rules.

Methods of political assassination, such as the one that took place yesterday in Beirut, which have almost become common practice, are of the utmost concern.

The tragic and unacceptable developments in the Arab-Israeli conflict, in Yemen, in the waters of the Red Sea and the Gulf of Aden, in Sudan and in other danger zones in Africa reflect an undeniable fact: security can either be equal and inseparable for all, or there will be no security for anyone.

For years, Russia has been trying to make Washington, London and Brussels, overwhelmed by their own complexes of exclusivity and impunity, understand this seemingly simple truth in the context of European security. Although they initially promised not to expand NATO, and in 1999 and 2020 they left their signatures in official documents of OSCE summits under the obligation not to ensure their own security at the expense of others, in fact the North Atlantic Alliance has been carrying out geopolitical and military expansion in Europe for three decades, trying to establish its positions in the Trans-Caucasian region and Central Asia, creating direct threats to the security of our country. The same situation is happening in the Asia-Pacific region, where NATO's infrastructure is creeping in and where military and political blocs are being created, undermining the inclusive security architecture under the auspices of ASEAN, in order to contain the People's Republic of China and Russia.

At the same time, the West not only fails to seek the global cooperation called for by our Secretary-General, but in its doctrinal documents openly and harshly accuses Russia, China, Belarus, the Democratic People's Republic of Korea and Iran of creating threats to its dominance. The goal of the strategic defeat of Russia is declared there: just as London and Washington did in May 1945, when (before the end of the Second World War) they developed Operation Unthinkable to destroy the Soviet Union. This was kept a deep secret, but today's Anglo-Saxon strategists do not hide their intentions. However, they expect to defeat Russia through an illegitimate neo-Nazi Kiev Regine, however they prepare Europe to fall in this suicidal affair. I will not dwell on the futility and danger of the very idea of trying to fight Russia, a nuclear power, to the bitter end.

Equally meaningless are the chants of Kiev's Western masters that the infamous peace formula is the only viable basis for peace talks. Just as they support this doomed ultimatum, the West unreservedly invokes the UN Charter, which demands that Ukraine's territorial integrity be guaranteed.

I would like to remind colleagues in the UN Secretariat, among others, that the Charter is not only about territorial integrity. The very first chapter of the Charter proclaims the obligation to respect the principle of equality and self-determination of peoples. This served as the international legal basis for the process of decolonisation (which is still ongoing, despite the opposition of the French, the British and other former colonial powers). And in 1970, the General Assembly unanimously decided in its Declaration that everyone must respect the territorial integrity of those states whose governments respect the right of peoples to self-determination and thus represent the entire population living in the territory concerned. I would like to stress that this was a unanimous decision of the UN General Assembly after many years of complicated discussions. There is no need to prove that the Ukrainian neo-Nazis, who seized power in Kiev in February 2014 after a bloody coup supported by the United States and its allies, never represented the Russian population of Crimea, Donbass and Novorossiya.

The Western leaders, who are obsessed with the topic of human rights at every given opportunity, pointedly remain silent about these rights in relation to racist actions of their Kiev clients. In light of this forgetfulness I would like to remind another requirement of the very first article of the UN Charter: to respect the rights and fundamental freedoms of any person regardless of their race, gender, language and religion. The rights of Russians and people associated with the Russian culture have been methodically eradicated following a coup in Kiev. The Russian language has been prohibited in all spheres on a legislative level – education, media, culture, and even everyday life. Another law banning the canonic Ukrainian Orthodox Church has been adopted recently. These gross violations of rights of Russians enshrined in the UN Charter, along with threats to security of Russia and entire Europe which comes from the Kiev regime and all those who pull it into NATO, are prime causes of the current Ukrainian crisis. The special military operation, which Russia is carrying out to protect its security, the present and the future of the people on their indigenous land, is aimed at eliminating them.
We value the genuine aspiration of the entire range of our partners to promote mediation initiatives for the very best of reasons. We respect their constructive commitment to results as opposed to the dead-end peace formula of Volodymyr Zelensky. We encourage our friends to take the above-mentioned facts of the real causes of the present situation fully into consideration in their further efforts. No peace on the basis of the UN Charter is possible unless they are eliminated. The realistic settlement plan was set forth by President Vladimir Putin on June 14, when he once again convincingly demonstrated the good will of Russia to achieve negotiation agreements whose prospects were dropped by Kiev and its mentors following the 2014 coup, failure to comply with 2015 Minsk Agreements and 2022 Istanbul Agreements.

The unprecedented level of hypocrisy and aggressiveness of the western policy against Russia not only brings to naught the idea of global cooperation promoted by the Secretary General but even more so blocks the functioning of the entire global control systems, including the Security Council. This is not our choice, we are not to be blamed for the consequences of such a dangerous course. But everyone will feel the high cost if the West does not stop.

It is obvious for the world majority that confrontation and hegemonism do not solve a single global problem. They just artificially restrain the impartial process of forming a multipolar world order which will rest on the equality of rights of big and small nations, respect the value of a human person, equality of men and women, right of the people to determine their own fate themselves. All of these is a quote from the UN Charter. Just as a principle of non-interference with internal affairs of sovereign states, whose restatement, to the shame of the UN members, was blocked by the US and their satellites at the very summit of the future during the adoption of a corresponding pact.

Addressing the participants of the IV Fourth Eurasian Women's Forum in St Petersburg on September 18, this year, President Vladimir Putin stressed the need to unite efforts in the name of stable development and universal equal and inseparable security. It is possible to resolve the most complicated issues which the entire humanity faced only in cooperation, with due account of each other’s interests. The West must realise this and break its neo-colonial habits.

The Global South and East speak out their rights to full-fledged participation in decision-making processes all over the spectrum of the international agenda louder and louder – which becomes more relevant in the situation when the West systemically destroys the globalization model it created.

The role of intergovernmental associations in Asia, Africa and Latin America becomes more important. They include, among others, the Shanghai Cooperation Orgaisation, the African Union, the Community of Latin American and Caribbean States (CELAC), the Arab League, the Eurasian Economic Union, the Association of Southeast Asian Nations.

Regional integration structures are building contacts both among themselves and the regional association - BRICS, which allows harmonising approaches to agree on the mechanisms of mutually beneficial cooperation and development beyond the control of negative internal impact and dictate.

All these impartial processes will have to be taken into account in the work of the G20, where the Group of Seven can no longer call the shots.

Ways of ensuring security in different regions will have to be reconsidered, drawing lessons from the bitter experience of the functioning of NATO-oriented or Euro-Atlantic security models, which the West has exploited for its expansionist intentions.
Russia has launched an initiative to create an inclusive architecture of equal and inseparable security in Eurasia, open - I would like to emphasise - to all states and organisations of our common continent, ready to work together in the search for universally acceptable solutions, using the interdependence and natural competitive advantages of the unified Eurasian space. An international conference will be devoted to this topic in Minsk, starting on 31 October.

We are not fencing off dialogue with the West. Last July, at Russia's suggestion, the Security Council held open debates on building a fairer and more stable world order. We believe it is important to continue the discussion, both in the UN and in other fora.
A more equitable world order unconditionally presupposes increased representation of the Global South in the UN Security Council. We reaffirm our position in support of Brazil and India provided a positive decision is reached in the framework of the well-known initiatives of the African Union. At the same time, of course, there can be no talk of additional seats for Western countries, which are already excessively over-represented in the Security Council.

May 2025 will mark the 80th anniversary of the victory in the Great Patriotic War, during which tens of millions of people, including 27 million citizens of all the peoples of the Soviet Union, fell victim to the genocidal policy of the Third Reich. Such crimes have no statute of limitations, as there is no moral justification for those who try to prove the innocence of Nazi torturers, collaborators and their current successors in Ukraine, the Baltic States, Canada and other countries.

The world faces massive challenges which require united efforts rather than confrontation and desire of global domination.
Russia will always be on the side of collective work, truth and law, peace and cooperation in the interests of reviving the ideals laid down by the founding fathers. This is the aim of the Group of Friends in Defence of the Charter of the United Nations, established on the initiative of Venezuela. Its objectives and principles remain fully relevant. The main thing is that everyone, without exception, respects these principles, not selectively (choosing from the menu), but in their entirety and interconnectedness, including the principle of the sovereign equality of States. Then, while working for the honest balance of the legitimate national interests of all countries, we can bring to life the purpose of the UN as stated in the Charter: "to be a centre for the co-ordination of the activities of nations in the achievement of these common purposes".
Click to expand...
 
Ennio said:
Lavrov gave one heck of a speech recently at the UN General Assembly (Sept. 28th). He not only puts Russia's war with Ukraine/NATO in its correct context but proceeds to outline many of the ostensibly good resolutions, declarations and statements made by the UN over the last 24 years or so - that, he says, have come to nothing for various reasons.

He puts ALL OF THAT in the context of the UN's 'Summit of the Future' forum - the Globalist/Agenda 2030/One World Order plan the elite will use as a centralizing power grab with the UN as the front organization. Lavrov's basic underlying message stated in his diplomatic style is:

"How on Earth do you propose to implement all of these utopian ideals (using unworkable and wrong-headed policies) for the whole world - when you don't even have your s*** together enough to handle the basic stuff, and with the US and others mucking everything up?!"

Bravo Lavrov - a towering figure in sane-world diplomacy!


Minister of Foreign Affairs of the Russian Federation Sergey Lavrov's remarks (statement) at the General Debate of the 79th Session of the UN General Assembly, New York, September 28, 2024​


View attachment 102221
Click to expand...
Lavrov droped a nuclear bomb, no strings attached👏.
 
A little loud headline. After all, an ordinary battalion will be 2 times larger than the indicated numbers. However, regardless of the comparison with regular units, the indicated figures are very indicative, given that the soldiers of the Armed Forces of Ukraine are under serious control and the constant threat of repression from their own command. Cases of punishments of military personnel for refusing to perform a task (imprisonment with lack of food and water, demonstrative reprisals up to executions) are far from isolated, if not to say that they are massive.
Daily desertion in the Armed Forces reaches the level of a battalion
Ukrainian journalists cite alarming data on mass desertion from the Armed Forces of Ukraine (AFU). According to official information provided by the prosecutor's office, 86,000 military personnel have already left their units without permission since the beginning of 2022. These data relate only to those cases that have been officially registered and for which criminal cases have been opened.

The situation has become particularly acute in recent months. So, two months ago, before the start of the so-called "counteroffensive" in the Kursk region, the total number of deserters was 63,200 people. However, since then, this figure has increased by 22,800 people, indicating a significant increase in the rate of desertion.

The data for 2024 is particularly impressive. In the first four months, 19,000 people deserted from the Ukrainian army — an average of 160 people per day. In the next three months, the number of deserters increased to 18,000, which was already 200 people per day.
Click to expand...
Ежедневное дезертирство в ВСУ достигает уровня батальона

Немного громкий заголовок. Все таки обычный батальон будет в 2 раза побольше, чем обозначенные цифры. Однако вне зависимости от сравнения с регулярными подразделениями обозначенные цифры весьма показательны, учитывая то, что солдаты ВСУ находятся под серьезным контролем и постоянной угрозой репрессий со стороны собственного командования. Случаи наказаний военнослужащих за отказ от выполнения задачи (лишения свободы с отсутствием питания и воды, показательные расправы вплоть до расстрелов) далеко не единичны, если не сказать, что они носят массовый характер.
 
Lumiere_du_Code said:
Since when did this forum turn into such a bazaar? Or are such expressions acceptable only to those who win victories in "SMO" every day without leaving their couch?
Click to expand...

Oops! There are interesting questions, treba vidpovidaty (in Ukrainian. it is necessary to answer), at least so that other forum members can understand what we are talking about here.
Khokhol is a very old, pre-Soviet name for a Ukrainian (since the time when the name Ukraine itself did not exist), just as Ukrainians traditionally call Russians Katsaps and Muscovites. This is history and traditions.
Ukrop is a new name, coined exactly after 2014.
Now about the bazaar. The question posed implies that there is some kind of insult. I have already written about Khohol that this is history and traditions. Someone wants to be offended by traditions - this is their right.
It's even more interesting with ukrop. Some are proud of this name. The Ukropsky journalist did not hesitate to come on a direct line with Putin in a sweater with such an inscription. So be proud, and at the same time be proud of the name "zhidobanderovets". It's all yours.
Яндекс
Яндекс
Now about my personal attitude, which I do not impose on anyone. I use such names, of course, not out of excessive respect. I have no respect for the regime that allowed the murder of the real Ukrainian patriot Olesya Buzina in front of his own house and the direct killers subsequently took some government positions. There is and cannot be respect for those who use terrorist methods and bloody provocations (the murder of Daria Dugina by explosion, the murder of Maxim Fomin by explosion, the attempted murder of Zakhar Prilepin, the notorious Irpen-Bucha, an organized strike on the station in Kramatorsk, the downed Malaysian Boeing, which everyone has already forgotten, as soon as it failed to blame Russia in it and so on).
I also have no respect for those representatives of the people who have allowed themselves to be deceived and used for the purposes of the Anglo-Saxon globalists and who see their happy future only in the destruction of Russia.

Опа! Возникли интересные вопросы, трэба видповидаты (укр. необходимо ответить), как минимум, чтобы другим форумчанам было понятно о чем тут речь.
Хохол это очень старое, ещё досоветское название украинца (еще с тех времен, когда самого названия украина не существовало), так же как и украинцы традиционно называют русских кацапами и москалями. Это история и традиции.
Укроп это новое название, придуманное точно после 2014 года.
Теперь про базар. Поставленный вопрос подразумевает, что присутствует какого то рода оскорбление. Про хохла я уже написал, что это история и традиции. Кому то хочется обижаться на традиции- это его право.
С укропом еще интереснее. Некоторые гордятся таким названием. Укропский журналист не постеснялся прийти на прямую линию с Путиным в свитере с такой надписью. Так гордитесь, а заодно гордитесь уже и названием "жидобандеровец". Это все ваше.
Теперь про мое личное отношение, которое я никому не навязываю. Я употребляю такие названия, конечно же, не от черезмерного уважения. У меня нет уважения к режиму, который допустил убийство настоящего украинского патриота Олеся Бузину перед подъездом собственного дома и непосредственные убийцы впоследствии заняли какие то государственные должности. Нет и не может быть уважения к тем кто использует террористические методы и кровавые провокации (убийство взрывом Дарьи Дугиной, убийство взрывом Максима Фомина, попытка убийства Захара Прилепина, пресловутые Ирпень-Буча, организованный удар по вокзалу в Краматорске, сбитый малазийский Боинг, про который уже все забыли, как только не получилось обвинить в этом Россию и т.д.).
У меня нет уважения и к тем представителям народа, которые дали себя обмануть и использовать себя в целях англосаксонских глобалистов и которые видят свое счастливое будущее только в уничтожении России.
 
I offer a couple more examples of what I was asked to show respect for. These examples do not introduce anything fundamentally new, everything is already very clear, they just once again show the inhuman cruelty cultivated by the fascist regime, and which, unfortunately, finds a certain response in ordinary people.
The first video shows a woman who tried to unfurl the Russian flag on the pedestal of the monument to the Russian Empress Catherine II, previously demolished by wild ukrops in the city of Odessa. What choice, obscene curses accompany her actions! We are not shown who is swearing, but the voices are both male and female and all young. This woman was detained by "law enforcement agencies" and placed in a pre-trial detention center, it happened on 09.10, and today information appeared that this woman "died of heart failure" in the walls of that very pre-trial detention center. As we say in such cases: I wish the kingdom of heaven to a brave woman. How many people with similar views and actions have suffered over the years! Thousands!
Video with a woman from Odessa. She tried to hang the Russian flag on the monument to Catherine II and other founders of Odessa

In the second video, a Ukropsky soldier captured in the Kursk region tells how, following an order, he and a group of the Armed Forces of Ukraine sat in ambush for 12 days near a railway line and waited for a passenger train, intending to shoot it. He openly says that the passenger train should have been the target and the maximum number of victims should have been. The purpose of this whole "event" was to force Russia to formally declare war on ukrops. Thank God ukrops couldn't wait for the train, but they waited for the Russian military.
AFU soldiers planned to shoot a passenger train in the Kursk region
Предлагаю еще пару примеров того, к чему мне было предложено проявлять уважение. Эти примеры ничего принципиально нового не вносят, все и так уже предельно ясно, просто очередной раз показывают нечеловеческую жестокость, культивируемую фашистским режимом, и которая, к сожалению находит определенный отклик в обычных людях.
На первом видео показана женщина, попытавшаяся развернуть Российский флаг на постаменте ранее снесенного оголтелыми укропами памятника Российской Императрице Екатерине II в городе Одесса. Какими отборными, нецензурными ругательствами сопровождаются ее действия! Нам не показывают кто ругается, но голоса и мужские и женские и все молодые. Женщина эта была задержана "правоохранительными органами" и помещена СИЗО, это случилось 09.10, а сегодня появилась информация о том, что эта женщина "умерла от сердечной недостаточности" в стенах того самого СИЗО. Как говорится в таких случаях: желаю царствия небесного смелой женщине. Сколько людей с подобными взглядами и поступками пострадало за эти годы! Тысячи!
На втором видео плененный в Курской области укропский вояка рассказывает, как, выполняя приказ, он с группой ВСУ 12 дней сидел в засаде возле железнодорожной ветки и ждал пассажирского поезда, намереваясь его расстрелять. Он открыто говорит, что целью должен был стать именно пассажирский поезд и должно было быть максимальное число жертв. Целью всего этого "мероприятия" было заставить Россию формально объявить войну укропии. Слава Богу укропы поезда так и не дождались, за то дождались российских военных.
 
youlik said:
Oops! There are interesting questions, treba vidpovidaty (in Ukrainian. it is necessary to answer), at least so that other forum members can understand what we are talking about here.
Khokhol is a very old, pre-Soviet name for a Ukrainian (since the time when the name Ukraine itself did not exist), just as Ukrainians traditionally call Russians Katsaps and Muscovites. This is history and traditions.
Ukrop is a new name, coined exactly after 2014.
Now about the bazaar. The question posed implies that there is some kind of insult. I have already written about Khohol that this is history and traditions. Someone wants to be offended by traditions - this is their right.
It's even more interesting with ukrop. Some are proud of this name. The Ukropsky journalist did not hesitate to come on a direct line with Putin in a sweater with such an inscription. So be proud, and at the same time be proud of the name "zhidobanderovets". It's all yours.
Яндекс
Яндекс
Now about my personal attitude, which I do not impose on anyone. I use such names, of course, not out of excessive respect. I have no respect for the regime that allowed the murder of the real Ukrainian patriot Olesya Buzina in front of his own house and the direct killers subsequently took some government positions. There is and cannot be respect for those who use terrorist methods and bloody provocations (the murder of Daria Dugina by explosion, the murder of Maxim Fomin by explosion, the attempted murder of Zakhar Prilepin, the notorious Irpen-Bucha, an organized strike on the station in Kramatorsk, the downed Malaysian Boeing, which everyone has already forgotten, as soon as it failed to blame Russia in it and so on).
I also have no respect for those representatives of the people who have allowed themselves to be deceived and used for the purposes of the Anglo-Saxon globalists and who see their happy future only in the destruction of Russia.

Опа! Возникли интересные вопросы, трэба видповидаты (укр. необходимо ответить), как минимум, чтобы другим форумчанам было понятно о чем тут речь.
Хохол это очень старое, ещё досоветское название украинца (еще с тех времен, когда самого названия украина не существовало), так же как и украинцы традиционно называют русских кацапами и москалями. Это история и традиции.
Укроп это новое название, придуманное точно после 2014 года.
Теперь про базар. Поставленный вопрос подразумевает, что присутствует какого то рода оскорбление. Про хохла я уже написал, что это история и традиции. Кому то хочется обижаться на традиции- это его право.
С укропом еще интереснее. Некоторые гордятся таким названием. Укропский журналист не постеснялся прийти на прямую линию с Путиным в свитере с такой надписью. Так гордитесь, а заодно гордитесь уже и названием "жидобандеровец". Это все ваше.
Теперь про мое личное отношение, которое я никому не навязываю. Я употребляю такие названия, конечно же, не от черезмерного уважения. У меня нет уважения к режиму, который допустил убийство настоящего украинского патриота Олеся Бузину перед подъездом собственного дома и непосредственные убийцы впоследствии заняли какие то государственные должности. Нет и не может быть уважения к тем кто использует террористические методы и кровавые провокации (убийство взрывом Дарьи Дугиной, убийство взрывом Максима Фомина, попытка убийства Захара Прилепина, пресловутые Ирпень-Буча, организованный удар по вокзалу в Краматорске, сбитый малазийский Боинг, про который уже все забыли, как только не получилось обвинить в этом Россию и т.д.).
У меня нет уважения и к тем представителям народа, которые дали себя обмануть и использовать себя в целях англосаксонских глобалистов и которые видят свое счастливое будущее только в уничтожении России.
Click to expand...

Do you understand what BS you are talking? You are the same brainwashed ukrop from Maidan. Isn't it obvious that it's a mirror image? You are worth each other. 100%. Only incitement of hatred and enmity, only contempt and animal stupidity.
According to your logic, the Red Army, liberating the territories of the USSR and half of Europe from the Nazis, should have humiliate and insult absolutely all Germans? The Red Army and its own people called for existential hostility? On the way to Berlin, the Red Army soldiers told every member of the German population that all Germans without exception were Nazis, bastards and hated cattle?
It's good that you were not Marshall Zhukov or Rokossovsky. You, sitting in the warmth and comfort of your couch, do nothing but crow pompous and bravura speeches, as if you personally captured Kyiv and even London or Washington. It looks so ridiculous and pathetic. Now, you glorify war, pretend to be a commander and a great man, but you know nothing about war at all, you don't see it every day, you don't know what's really going on. You're a victim of television. You put a flag on yourself and run around happily. So how are you different from those you despise?

I say it again, you are blind in your hatred for everyone without exception "on the other side". And this makes you absolutely the same as the khokhols. Sow hatred and discord.
If you respect Putin and agree with him, with his decision to start a war, then why do you contradict him? Does Putin call Ukrainians derogatory names? Doesn't he ever stop saying that we are fraternal peoples, that we are one whole? That's what I think too. But you obviously don't. Your actions only make the tragedy worse. One people, divided by external forces and circumstances, destroy each other, thousands of people die daily on both sides, but you do nothing to bring light, even the smallest amount of light. You bring darkness.
If every Russian soldier thinks like you, bringing "liberation and protection", what will happen in the end? There will be no end to this hatred because of people like you, like the crazy Ukrainians. From the very beginning of this tragedy, I have seen thousands of messages from Russian patriots, full of hatred, calling those who were unlucky enough to end up in this damn country 404 a cattle, pigs, I myself have received hundreds of curses, death wishes, death to my loved ones, they wished me to burn alive, they wished for a shell to fall on my house and my family. Is this what Russian patriotism looks like? No, this is fascism.
I don't tar everyone with the same brush, like you. I have always considered myself Russian, and nothing has changed. The fact that I was born and forced to live in hell called Ukraine, does it automatically make me a khokhol, an ukrop, someone you despise? Despite thousands of curses and boundless hatred from everywhere, I continue to remain a kind man, my heart is not callous, I feel the deepest empathy. My soul aches for everyone who suffers, on both sides. I am also angry with all my heart at the bastards who bring only hatred and suffering to others, but they are on both sides of the conflict. Your black-and-white thinking, the black-and-white thinking of millions of thoughtless fools is what creates all these situations, all these Maidans, wars, and leads the world to what we see every day.
I did not choose this government, I do not agree with any of their initiatives, any of their decisions, I hate and despise them with all my heart. But according to you, I am guilty of this. Only because I am HERE. Collective responsibility does not work like that. I cannot be responsible for what millions of others in this country do and choose. I cannot stand up to them alone. And you cannot. And no one can. You speak so pompously and disgustingly only because you and your fellow citizens are THINGS GOOD. You yourself have not found yourself in anything like this. That's why it's easy for you to play God and judge everyone indiscriminately. It's pathetic and disgusting.

What would you say about yourself and your compatriots if the Maidan had happened in Russia? If the West had managed to bring in some saboteur and clown like Navalny or anyone else, and something similar to what is happening now in Ukraine had happened in Russia? Then I would have to call you and all Russians derogatory, right? I should be the one laughing at your stupidity and saying that you and all 150 million Russians are worthless and are to blame for what happened? Every child, every old man. After all, they all had to think the same way at one moment and go out to the square in order to take everything into their own hands? You seem to live in a fairy-tale world. Do I even need to tell you about our mentality? If all this had happened in Russia, or in Belarus, or anywhere else, I would not consider those people my enemies, I would not wish them death and suffering, I would not laugh at their stupidity and grief. That is what distinguishes you from me. You bring up all these examples from the news as if I did THIS, as if I established absolute tyranny, dictatorship, lawlessness and horrors here, as if I tortured all these unfortunate people, executed them, unleashed this inhuman war. I am infinitely angry about all this, even more than you are, I have more rights and reasons for this. I mourn this great tragedy, I am infinitely hurt for everyone who suffered from this darkness and evil. I myself am surviving here as best I can, I am literally in prison, without water, stable electricity, with daily shells and drone attacks, in endless despair. You have not seen a real war to have the right to say so. To judge ME. Equating me with all the bastards.

From the very beginning, I wanted to say this: I myself call all such Ukrainians as khokhols and bastards, I despise them and I will never have anything in common with them. But I do it AT MY HOME. And you do it here, on the forum. Do you feel the difference? Let's have everyone here call all Jews kikes, all Central Asians khachs, all Americans pindos or striped mattresses (like their flag), all Asians slant-eyed monkeys. Do you get my point, an Internet Field Marshal? Go ahead, it's normal, right?

Oh yeah, and make sure that Central Asian labor migrants don't throw you out of your own home while you're heroically fighting the khokhols on the Internet front. Just in case. Maybe you're looking in the wrong place and one day you'll find yourself in my situation. Like millions of others. Will you then remember about collective responsibility, that every German = Hitler?

And if you preach and fight evil so hard, why don't you join the Russian armed forces and liberate Donbass, Kyiv, Odessa, Kharkov, Dnepr, Zaporozhye and other cities from their bad inhabitants? Maybe then I'll even be able to see you in my city, because you'll come to protect me, right? If I'm still alive in this war by then. Which doesn't depend on me at all.
If tomorrow I'm captured and sent to fight against you, you'll call me an enemy, a khokhol, a bastard and whatever else you want. But do you know that neither I nor hundreds of thousands of other men here want that? No, you don't. But I do. But you don't need that, you're satisfied with TV, with what they show you. If tomorrow you're sent to war as a conscript, will you keep your zeal, how many khokhols will you destroy, bringing liberation and protection?
Or will you come and lead the resistance against the tyrant? Come on. After all, you know better how to do it. Because if I go out on the street or write what I think on the Internet, the Gestapo will come for me and I will also "die of a heart attack" in the basement. You see, I can't organize the resistance without you here. Come and help me. If you really support your president, this military "operation" and want protection for all Russian people.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Trending content

Back
Top Bottom