dant
The Living Force
I guess I am confused.
Recalling from memory, the C's quoted that Mt. Rainer was going
to blow (it's a caldera), there was going to be a 10.5 earthquake in
Puget Sound, WA, and then a 115m tnusami? The proceeded to state
that it could occur within XX years from the date of the announcment?
Sometimes they would give a probability factor. What was not clear
to me until now, that perhaps it would not even occur at all?
I had assumed that something big might go down between now and
2012 or thereabouts, but I was not sure that we could still continue
past 2012 and onwards?
From Session: 000122
were but for nought?
Hmmm.... seems consfusing.
Recalling from memory, the C's quoted that Mt. Rainer was going
to blow (it's a caldera), there was going to be a 10.5 earthquake in
Puget Sound, WA, and then a 115m tnusami? The proceeded to state
that it could occur within XX years from the date of the announcment?
Sometimes they would give a probability factor. What was not clear
to me until now, that perhaps it would not even occur at all?
I had assumed that something big might go down between now and
2012 or thereabouts, but I was not sure that we could still continue
past 2012 and onwards?
From Session: 000122
So, what is it? What can we say at this point? Nothing is certain and all of these "warnings"Q: I am curious. Now we have the big 05-05-2000 coming up. I was reading something about this today. Apparently on this date,
the planets line up in conjunction with the peak of the solar cycle and there is supposed to be the "Big Kahuna" of earthquakes or
whatever. What is the likelihood of the majority of people experiencing THAT timeline?
A: 0.1
Q: (A) Many people are saying that the most probably date of earth change is 2012. That falls in what you previously you gave as
an outside limit of the arrival of the comet cluster, twin sun business; in the middle, in fact. Of course, it may never happen, but is
this still the case?
A: Maybe...
Q: (A) Is this a better probability than 0.1?
A: Between 0.1 and 100.
were but for nought?
Hmmm.... seems consfusing.