Reduce pollution: Shift freight from trucks to trains

Laura

Administrator
Administrator
Moderator
FOTCM Member
http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/opinion/278115_transit20.html

Thursday, July 20, 2006

By WENDELL COX
GUEST COLUMNIST

In Seattle and in cities across the U.S., soaring fuel costs and worsening gridlock are like a one-two punch hitting drivers this summer, pinching our wallets and costing us valuable time lost in traffic.

The gridlock situation today is already alarming. The average commuter in the U.S. spends an extra 43 hours each year -- more than a full work week -- caught in traffic.

According to the U.S. Department of Transportation, freight traffic is expected to increase by two-thirds by 2020. One large truck takes up the same amount of highway space as almost four cars and the average truck is becoming longer with the increased use of double- and triple-trailers. With little chance of increasing urban road capacity sufficiently, an increase in truck volume would continue to add to our commuting problems.

Motorists can be forgiven for believing things will continue to worsen, but there are ways to not only reduce gridlock but also save countless gallons of fuel by becoming smarter on how we move freight.

Each year, using data from the Texas Transportation Institute, I study the impact of increased freight traffic in our most congested urban areas and report on how re-directing some of this freight from trucks on the highway to freight trains could affect a typical commuter.

In the Seattle area, by 2025, shifting 25 percent of freight from trucks to freight trains would decrease drivers' commutes by 40 hours. In addition, such a shift would save each commuter $837 in annual congestion costs.

Shifting freight from road to rail also has a positive environmental impact. Freight rail is more fuel-efficient per ton-mile than trucks and reduces fuel consumption of other motorists by decreasing the time drivers spend idling in traffic. For example, by 2025, commuters in the Seattle area could save 83 gallons of fuel with a 25 percent shift of freight from truck to rail.

Air pollution levels also would improve with an increased use of freight rail. For instance, by 2025, shifting 25 percent of freight to rail would decrease air pollutant emissions in the Seattle area by as much as 10,577 tons.

Major road improvement efforts, such as the multiphase project on the state Route 529 corridor, which has already included extensive construction in recent months, are clear signs that highways and bridges cannot withstand the current and projected traffic volumes. Construction and repairs often are expensive and politically contentious. However, freight rail can help stem the tide.

One freight train can carry the equivalent cargo of 500 trucks, and one intermodal train can carry nearly 300 truck trailers. Trucking companies and railroads are already forming intermodal partnerships that combine the best abilities of both modes of transportation. In fact, intermodal is the fastest-growing segment of the rail industry.

To carry more freight, the freight rail industry will need more capacity, which depends on both public and private investments. State government highway officials estimate that railroads will generate only $142 billion to invest on their own over the next 20 years, but rail infrastructure needs are estimated to be more than $200 billion.

Members of Congress concerned about gridlock plan to introduce the Freight Rail Infrastructure Capacity Expansion Act, to stimulate much-needed investment in the freight rail infrastructure. The legislation would provide any organization, including railroads, trucking companies and shipping lines a 25 percent tax credit for their investments. For railroads, the tax incentive would apply to infrastructure such as new track, intermodal facilities and state-of-the-art locomotives -- all essential to helping rail continue to provide on-time, quality service to shippers and boost their share of freight transport. The American Association of Port Authorities and the National Retail Federation support the legislation.

We must prepare now for a surge in freight volume and fight gridlock across our nation. Freight rail provides an excellent strategy.
Wendell Cox is president and CEO of Demographia, a market research and urban policy consultancy.
 
It's funny (or sad) how the main issues of major problems of the western society are not even barely touched when we read or hear about them. Transport, reasons behing wars, terrorism, no-smoking laws... Always pointing at someone-something that is not the the cause, to distract from the real cause behind the problem.

It seems to me that the main problem of the freight and related pollution problems is not the choice of the type of transport or the lack of infrastructure to match the "sacred cow of growth" but the growth of consumerism itself. We buy way too much objects, junk etc, and they come more and more from the other end of the world, which means even more transportation and pollution issues. I don't think the population is directly guilty for this problem, simply guilty of believing the psychopaths that life was a competition of who gets the most beautiful collection of stuff before he dies and agreeing to participate.

Speaking of pointing others, listening to Bush yesterday, it seems one of the main problems of the crisis in Lebanon is Syria...
 
A report from way way down south.

Argentina is in the process of revamping and rebuilding her internal rail network (maybe with Chinese money and help?). And there are definitive plans to build/rebuild three trans-Andean routes between Argentina and Chile (the previous network was dismantled over a territorial dispute back in the days of military dictatorships). The most important one if completed as planned would allow freight rail transport from Buenos Aires to Santiago and would eliminate the need to transport goods between the South American Atlantic and Pacific coasts via the Panama Canal or around the horn.

Rail transport is indeed a very very good idea.
 
We must prepare now for a surge in freight volume and fight gridlock across our nation. Freight rail provides an excellent strategy.
This increase in capacity due to this 'Freight Rail Infrastructure Capacity Expansion Act' could come in handy for rounding up and transporting masses of people as well, if ever the ptb thought there was a need to move them to a 'safe' location.
It would certainly save on having more cattle trucks adding to the gridlock problem.
 
Peam said:
We must prepare now for a surge in freight volume and fight gridlock across our nation. Freight rail provides an excellent strategy.
This increase in capacity due to this 'Freight Rail Infrastructure Capacity Expansion Act' could come in handy for rounding up and transporting masses of people as well, if ever the ptb thought there was a need to move them to a 'safe' location.
It would certainly save on having more cattle trucks adding to the gridlock problem.
Now where have I heard that one before? (Answers on a postcard/e-card to the usual address)
 
Back
Top Bottom