Remarkable similarity with another person's work..

[Lamp of Orion]

Hello,

Sorry if this is inappropriate to this forum. However, I've wanted to get this off my chest for a while, keeping in mind we are all striving towards Objectivity.

There's a YouTube channel _http://www.youtube.com/user/tsaklar , which I have stumbled into some 6 months ago, but I have found some correlation between what he says and what the C's say. He also has an alternate domain: _http://www.anunnakiagenda.com]www.anunnakiagenda.com

Please understand, I do not mean to 'advertise' or 'divert', I'm just trying to share a gem with you guys.

Yours truly,
Lamp of Orion

[links deactivated by moderator]

 

[paralleloscope]

Hi Lamp of Orion,
To be considerate of your audience would perhaps be describing what the relevance or thing you find striking is, other than 'some correlation', which it seems you have to dig for (only YT channel worked for me). As you perhaps know all disinfo has some percentage of truth in it, otherwise it would be inedible. Having a a quick glance at the playlists I spotted the 'Chemtrail' and 'Archon' memes which usually are wrapped in misunderstanding, though admittedly I had no patience to sit through a text-to-cpu-voice driven video, to sift through what seems like common diversions.

Searching for example the forum for 'Archons' will present some of the shortcoming of that angle, when trying to understand the forces of 4d STS. Reading the wave series would be even better as for coming to terms with the other density forces. If you want you can also read about the research done by Laura and crew, on the issue of Chemtrails, which differs a bit from the conventional view on the issue:
http://www.sott.net/article/249499-Chemtrails-Disinformation-and-the-Sixth-Extinction

 

[Lamp of Orion]

Thanks for the reply! I've held into account the possibility of a response such as that, and I'll have to say, the moment that person started speaking of 'Gnostic Archons' was the moment I started losing my faith in his 'material'. Nonetheless, much of what he wrote was more credible than most to all the other things I had come by at the time I had actually reached his YT channel for the first time.

Hi Lamp of Orion,
To be considerate of your audience would perhaps be describing what the relevance or thing you find striking is, other than 'some correlation', which it seems you have to dig for (only YT channel worked for me). As you perhaps know all disinfo has some percentage of truth in it, otherwise it would be inedible. Having a a quick glance at the playlists I spotted the 'Chemtrail' and 'Archon' memes which usually are wrapped in misunderstanding, though admittedly I had no patience to sit through a text-to-cpu-voice driven video, to sift through what seems like common diversions.

Searching for example the forum for 'Archons' will present some of the shortcoming of that angle, when trying to understand the forces of 4d STS. Reading the wave series would be even better as for coming to terms with the other density forces. If you want you can also read about the research done by Laura and crew, on the issue of Chemtrails, which differs a bit from the conventional view on the issue:
http://www.sott.net/article/249499-Chemtrails-Disinformation-and-the-Sixth-Extinction

Now that hit it home for me. Thank you! Thanks for the link too!

 

[Atreides]

There's a YouTube channel _http://www.youtube.com/user/tsaklar , which I have stumbled into some 6 months ago, but I have found some correlation between what he says and what the C's say. He also has an alternate domain: _http://www.anunnakiagenda.com]www.anunnakiagenda.com

Please understand, I do not mean to 'advertise' or 'divert', I'm just trying to share a gem with you guys.

Much appreciated.

I did take a moment to listen what the videos said. There's a rather low threshold of information content. It sounds for the most part like the product of a schizophrenic mind. I don't think that the "mutation" core thesis, liquid crystals and Chemtrails in the videos is really in line with what the C's say. Nor do I think that Occult/Astro Theology really sound like the C's bent. That's just my opinion though.

If that's the kind of material that resonates with you, more power to you bro, but I have to say that from my perspective, it seems to me to be yet another instance of someone either disintegrating due to an inability to cope with the real situation, or just someone tapping into general current of disinfo and not really knowing how to filter it out. Or maybe he's/she's an enlightened channel and I am just too esoterically backwards to appreciate it. Who knows. I certainly don't have an answer for you, but nothing clicked with me and I gave it a chance.

 

[Lamp of Orion]

There's a YouTube channel _http://www.youtube.com/user/tsaklar , which I have stumbled into some 6 months ago, but I have found some correlation between what he says and what the C's say. He also has an alternate domain: _http://www.anunnakiagenda.com]www.anunnakiagenda.com

Please understand, I do not mean to 'advertise' or 'divert', I'm just trying to share a gem with you guys.

Much appreciated.

I did take a moment to listen what the videos said. There's a rather low threshold of information content. It sounds for the most part like the product of a schizophrenic mind. I don't think that the "mutation" core thesis, liquid crystals and Chemtrails in the videos is really in line with what the C's say. Nor do I think that Occult/Astro Theology really sound like the C's bent. That's just my opinion though.

If that's the kind of material that resonates with you, more power to you bro, but I have to say that from my perspective, it seems to me to be yet another instance of someone either disintegrating due to an inability to cope with the real situation, or just someone tapping into general current of disinfo and not really knowing how to filter it out. Or maybe he's/she's an enlightened channel and I am just too esoterically backwards to appreciate it. Who knows. I certainly don't have an answer for you, but nothing clicked with me and I gave it a chance.

Thanks for the reply! I'd say that in retrospect, the C's material makes much more sense to me than what the videos said. Much of it is limiting in domains the C's have explained in much more detail, other things which simply divert. I really didn't mean to waste time, but rather, I wanted to see replies to this in which I could further my learning. Feedback accelerates learning, am I right? I suppose I was in a wad of delusion when I made this thread.