I saw yesterday about a third of this documentary (which is about five hours long). I was also intrigued about what could be the truth of it all (so I checked here).
The maker (She) is not mentioned: in the introductory frame a statement is made about the reasons and driving force behind making this movie and that is that her father wore a ring (with all the markings of the masonic order). In this ´why I made this movie´ a famous quote of Woodrow Wilson is used (power 1913).
Quality of the documentary is OK but not of the professional level as such contemporaries as Zeitgeist. It does use the same techniques though: narrative voice over either entertaining related material such as movies and comics or pictures, graphs, etc to clarify the spoken explanation. A lot of use is made of excerpts of older movies (eg The ten commandments with C Heston). The graphics and drawings are homemade, not on a computer but on paper and looked to me as working material used in the research for making this movie. This all suggests that this documentary was made with little money and by one or a few persons on a homecomputer.
the documentary is divided in different chapters such as one on 911 (where she point towards the Zionists as the perpetrators), the bible.
I was also especially intrigued by the comparison between Egyptian history and the Bible and the discussion about Jesus.
This indeed was also a part that struck a nerve in me. The producer claims that the reason why Egyptian records hardly mention the people living in know Israel and Palestine is simply because they were the ´undercover´rulers of Egypt. The bible is a written history of that ruling class, pretending not to be in power in Egypt. This concurs at least with the masonic tradition that claims that its society dates back to Egypt and needed to hide itself because the truth about their identity would immediately get them killed... if the Egyptian people would know they were still ruled by Hebrews (in the movie it is told they kicked them out after a brutal one hundred years of oppression) they would of course revolt.
This story of secret control of Egypt by the Hebrew people finds it culmination in who is Jesus Christ. The producer claims he is the son of Cleopatra and Julius Cesar. After the Romans conquered Egypt, Cleopatra carrying the original Hebrew genes, mixed them with the man that could guarantee continuation of the control of the power in the world. After the murder of Cesar before the defeat of Marcus Antonius (with whom Cleopatra had another three children) Cleopatra sended away her son (Jesus then called Cearasian) to India accompanied by two (or more) or her most trusted servants (Mary and Joseph). There the 13 y old Cesarean changed his name into Jesus (Isaiah, son of Isis) and was introduced to the buddist teachings high in hiding in the Himalayans. Thirty years old he returned to his homeland, met his halfbrothers and halfsister (the three otherchildren of Cleopatra fathered by Marcus Antonius) and married the last one (she would be Mary Magdalene... and the inspiration for the statue of liberty). Jesus, his wife, his halfbrothers and a few trusted disciples then set on quest to reclaim his heritage (the roman empire of his father)... not through violent means but through a beliefsystem based on what he learned in the Himalayans.
In short the producer makes the link, all the way from ancient Egypt and its god Am-on (amen) (the only one) to the current day people in charge of the world (the bloodline). It all culminates in London, with the queen and the financial controlsystem of a few families and the black nobility controlling the trade, in Rome, with the pope and the control of the spiritual, and in Washington DC, with the control of the military might. All of this people would still carry the blood (genes) of the Hebrew elite that once ruled over Egypt, mixed with the most powerful roman emperor and explains in her view why the Zionists rule the world.
This theory seems to justify the masonic tradition that claims that a bloodline is indeed going back all the way to the times of Egypt and (for some) all the way to Atlantean times. Is this documentary therefor a masonic production promoting this whole bloodline idea? Or is it indeed a piece of the puzzle that uncovers a truth about the Zionist conspiracy for world domination? I have not enough background on many of the topics to answer this clearly. What I know from the masonic tradition it is sure that some people in those circles believe this to be the truth. What also is truth is that there are Zionist creating a lot of problems in the world.
Another thought that I had watching a part of this documentory was about a ´psycopathic´ bloodline. Would those bloodlines be the same or be intertwined? Would you intermarry (between the royals and the elite) not only for the protection of the power and the resources but also for the pool containing the psychopatic genes (or absent of certains genes). Would you not try to exclude any psychopath in your society as those are the ones that can threaten your claim to power and therefor maintain the genetic information in a very closed and very well monitored system? Or maybe the bloodline idea is symbolic for some people owing this gene and naturally climbing up the ladder to join the select clubs and secret socities?
