Hi, happyliza
happyliza said:
I just love books and learning. I just wonder how people have the time to read fiction! I haven't done so for decades. Apart from the psychological relationship angle of learning I cannot see the point in fiction.
I used to feel exactly the same way. The only fiction I ever read were the books of Roald Dahl when I was a child. For the last ten years, most of the reading I've done has been only non-fiction. But this year my attitude changed towards fiction, and I started reading it again.
My idea was that it would be super if fiction books were written in order to teach all the psychology subjects that we study - after all it is what we are here to learn - reality. It is not taught in schools yet is the major hurdle we all have to learn about and overcome once understood. Utilizing fictional characters to teach people about the basic theories as well as the archetypes would be far more productive!
What seems to be the case is that there is a wide variety of fiction, from junk right the way through to masterpieces. What makes great fiction is exactly what you describe above; even though the story 'didn't really happen', the author gets the characters and the archetypes and the story right.
The first story I really fell in love with for the above reasons was
Pride and Prejudice. It spans the range of feelings, of types of people, of love and hate, friendship, strength and weakness.
The only 'fiction' type books I felt that could be useful are biographies and auto biographies of STO type people.
But isn't there value in learning about both sides of the coin? Don't we study psychopaths in order to learn about them, to defend ourselves from them and recognise their traits in ourselves?
When fiction is great, it is archetypal and mythological and myth always has the good and the bad.
I have not read science fiction though do realize there is fact to be found, preferring to use the internet. There is so much to learn from our threads and recommended reading list anyway to even bother to digress to sifting out truth from fiction imo.
I believe there is fact to be found in anything. I also believe that we live in a world of lies. Someone might consider a newspaper to be non-fiction, but we know so many stories in newspapers couldn't be further from the truth. We know that science is corrupt, and so many people believe anything that they're told was said or written by a scientist; but so much science is junk, and really just harmful. I could easily rewrite your above sentence to read, "There is so much to learn from our threads and recommended reading list anyway to even bother to digress to sifting out truth from
non-fiction imo."
I'd say the level of discernment required for sifting out the truth from either fiction or non-fiction is pretty even, and that what counts is that we learn how to think about things in the right way.