Schoolgirls must have compulsory sex disease jabs, say doctors

[the rabbit]

More news to shock me as i aim towards some sleep.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/news/news.html?in_article_id=408823&in_page_id=1770

Despite claims that it encourages under-age sex, medical journal The Lancet has called for compulsory cancer jabs for schoolgirls.

The magazine has published an editorial which says all schoolgirls aged 11 and 12 should be vaccinated against the sexually transmitted virus that causes cervical cancer.

The jab, against what is effectively a sexually transmitted infection, is controversal because it is argued that they encourage under-age sex.

But The Lancet states that Europe should follow the lead of the US state of Michigan, which passed a bill on September 21 ruling that all 11 to 12-year-old sixth grade girls must be immunised.

"This is the first legislation of its kind in the USA, and a decision from which the EU members states should take heed," said the editorial.

There is also growing support for the vaccination of boys. They too can carry human papillomavirus (HPV), the virus spread by sexual intercourse that can trigger cervical cancer.

Studies have shown that a female-only vaccination would be only 60-75% as effective as strategies targeting both sexes.

Previous gender-specific programmes had not always succeeded, said the journal. In 1995, Britain's rubella immunisation programme was modified after 25 years to include boys as well as girls after a rise in the number of pregnant women contracting the disease.

"For effective and long-term eradication of HPV, all adolescents must be immunised," said The Lancet.

 

[CarpeDiem]

Indeed more shocking news.

Despite claims that it encourages under-age sex, medical journal The Lancet has called for compulsory cancer jabs for schoolgirls. The magazine has published an editorial which says all schoolgirls aged 11 and 12 should be vaccinated against the sexually transmitted virus that causes cervical cancer.

Yep! That scare tactics was always used to promote mandatory vaccination. PTB ceaselessly turns on to girls of pubertant age to secretly sterilize them with coercive vaccination. And they do succed until we become aware what's going on with our kids.

http://www.lacruzdecal.com/ed/breves/0400brev.htm
La vacuna antitetanica provoca esterilidad: dioceses de Culiacan.

http://www.elmilitante.org/desde240702/esterilizacion.htm (El Militante)
Esterilizacion forzosa en Peru: La punta del iceberg - a must read for parents imo! Another must read for parents imo is Alfredo Embid's "Del control de natalidad al genocidio". That's my favourite on immunization scam.
http://www.free-news.org/aembid10.htm

and http://www.solidaridad.net/imprimirnoticia.asp?noticia=706
EL CONTROL DE LA POBLACI

 

[Ruth]

Oh dear, things are getting 'ugly'. Strangely enough, its all about money.
http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story/0,20867,20538962-30417,00.html

'Fear bid' on cancer vaccine
Natasha Robinson
October 07, 2006
AN allegedly illegal marketing campaign designed to strike "fear, uncertainty and doubt" into the minds of doctors prescribing the world's first cancer vaccine - developed by Australian of the Year Ian Frazer - has been revealed in an explosive court battle.
Desperate to gain a slice of the potential billion-dollar industry spawned by Professor Frazer's discovery of a vaccine to prevent cervical cancer, the Australian arm of multinational GlaxoSmithKline has been accused of marketing its rival vaccine to doctors before being given federal government approval.

Doctors were paid to participate in telephone interviews as part of a project conducted by contracted marketing firms, it was alleged by CSL Ltd in the Federal Court in Melbourne.

The marketing firms allegedly approached at least 300 doctors and sent them an "information sheet" comparing the vaccine developed by Professor Frazer and CSL to a rival vaccine also based on his work. This was despite the fact that the Therapeutic Goods Administration has yet to review the rival vaccine, Cervarix, for registration.

In an affidavit, CSL's pharmaceutical division sales and marketing director, John Anderson, said the tactics used by GlaxoSmithKline to promote Cervarix were based on striking "fear, uncertainty, and doubt" in doctors' minds about the rival vaccine.

According to Dr Anderson's evidence, Gardasil, which has TGA approval and was launched to the market in late August, had a potential market of $1.2billion open to it if every eligible person received the full three-course dose of Gardasil.

Dr Anderson also said he was concerned that alleged misinformation spread by GlaxoSmithKline could influence members of the Pharmaceutical Benefits Advisory Committee, which is deciding whether to approve a national plan to vaccinate 12-year-old girls at school.

GlaxoSmithKline disputed the claims, which judge Mark Weinberg ruled were overstated.

The company told the court that by bringing the legal action, CSL was "seeking to secure a monopoly" for the supply and sale of Gardasil.

Professor Frazer refused to buy into the stoush yesterday. "Any issue which relates to the relative merits of the two vaccines I have decided it would be inappropriate for me to comment on," he told The Weekend Australian.

In the Federal Court this week, CSL lost its bid to force GlaxoSmithKline to abandon its Cervarix marketing campaign. In rejecting the company's bid for immediate relief, Judge Weinberg ruled there were serious issues to be decided at trial.

Such issues include CSL's claims that GlaxoSmithKline misled doctors by implying that Cervarix gave protection against two additional strains of the HPV virus, thereby giving 10 per cent more protection against all cervical cancers than Gardasil.

Justice Weinberg did not have to decide at this week's interlocutory hearing whether the company had breached laws including the Trade Practices Act and the Therapeutic Goods Act by giving the impression Cervarix was already approved by the TGA. The matter was set down for a four-day trial beginning on November 13.

 

[CarpeDiem]

Strangely enough, its all about money

I think it's also about control of population. From article on cancer vaccine: "Dr Anderson also said he was concerned that alleged misinformation spread by GlaxoSmithKline could influence members of the Pharmaceutical Benefits Advisory Committee, which is deciding whether to approve a national plan to vaccinate 12-year-old girls at school."
Why ptb focus on vaccinating girls of pubertant (most vulnerable) age? We know that cancer hits almost equally both sexes, so why that exclusivity with vaccination? Covert sterilization with vaccines on grand scale already happened in Latin America. Sharp increase of miscarriages and sterility shortly after introduction of tetanus vaccine.
I think the same could happen with cancer vaccine, AIDS vaccine (for newborns!!). Read that big pharma had developed an anticonceptive vaccine for men and anti-smokers vaccine (claims smokers would abandon their habit). Wonder if big pharma has any vaccine against dumbness? :)

 

[Ruth]

Strangely enough, its all about money

I think it's also about control of population.

Most things in this world today are about controling the population, especially if you are one of the ones in control, you can't ever let the population know how bad you are or they'd lynch you! There are also other things that vaccinatins do.
1. Mostly they provide immunity from diseases caused by viruses. Antibiotics are of no use against these unless they subsequently get infected with bacteria.
2. Accidentally harm a population in some way (there are risk factors to everything and accidents DO happen).
3. Deliberately harm a population in some way (for the purposes of experimentation or population control).

Mostly it is option number 1 which is done in good faith. However there seems to be a significant lack of research into option number 2. As far as option number 3 goes, if the PTB want to hurt you and they're backed up by 4th D STS, there's not a damn thing anyone can do apart from reveal the crime. But that doesn't always work as we can see by what is happening in the US today. Plenly of crimes are being committed by people in powerful positions, but they all seem to be 'protected' in some way.

From article on cancer vaccine: "Dr Anderson also said he was concerned that alleged misinformation spread by GlaxoSmithKline could influence members of the Pharmaceutical Benefits Advisory Committee, which is deciding whether to approve a national plan to vaccinate 12-year-old girls at school."
Why ptb focus on vaccinating girls of pubertant (most vulnerable) age?

Because the vaccination has no effect when the virus is already caught. The virus is an STD (therefore spead by sexual activity) and they want to vaccinate the girls before they become sexually active. Same reason for re-vaccinating girls between ages 10-16 for German measles. This is because:

Rubella is a serious disease during pregnancy because of its effects on the developing fetus. Congenital rubella syndrome (CRS) may occur in up to 90 per cent of infants born to women who contract rubella during the first trimester of pregnancy. Early infection may also cause intrauterine death and spontaneous abortion. The incidence of congenital defects is rare if the disease is contracted after the 20th week of pregnancy.

We know that cancer hits almost equally both sexes, so why that exclusivity with vaccination?

Its certain tpes of HPV which gets picked up and transmitted by both sexes. There seems to be a high degree of correlation between certain types of this virus and cervical cancer. Men won't get cervical cancer, same reason women don't get prostate or testicular cancer, but they can still carry and pass on the HPV virus just like any other STD.

Covert sterilization with vaccines on grand scale already happened in Latin America. Sharp increase of miscarriages and sterility shortly after introduction of tetanus vaccine.

Doesn't suprise me in the least. This is the type of world we live in. They certainly couldn't do this to everyone though, especially to people who were an empowered majority. Trouble is, the disempowered 'minority' don't really seem to realise that they are the majority to a psychopath.

think the same could happen with cancer vaccine, AIDS vaccine (for newborns!!). Read that big pharma had developed an anticonceptive vaccine for men and anti-smokers vaccine (claims smokers would abandon their habit). Wonder if big pharma has any vaccine against dumbness? :)

A vaccination against psychopaths would be nice. Talk about changing the world... The fact is, with drugs, there are simply people who are at risk because they don't know that whatever they are taking is harmful to them. That's just 'as good as it gets' at the moment. The sum total of all our 3rd density medical knowledge still tends to treat all humans as if they were biologically and genetically the same when they're not.

 

[mamadrama]

Leave it to Texas. And darn it, now there's no Molly Ivins to object.

Texas Requires Anti-Cancer Vaccine for Girls
By LIZ AUSTIN PETERSON
AP
AUSTIN, Texas (Feb. 2) - Bypassing the Legislature altogether, Republican Gov. Rick Perry issued an order Friday making Texas the first state to require that schoolgirls get vaccinated against the sexually transmitted virus that causes cervical cancer.

By employing an executive order, Perry sidestepped opposition in the Legislature from conservatives and parents' rights groups who fear such a requirement would condone premarital sex and interfere with the way Texans raise their children.

Beginning in September 2008, girls entering the sixth grade - meaning, generally, girls ages 11 and 12 - will have to receive Gardasil, Merck & Co.'s new vaccine against strains of the human papillomavirus, or HPV.

Perry also directed state health authorities to make the vaccine available free to girls 9 to 18 who are uninsured or whose insurance does not cover vaccines. In addition, he ordered that Medicaid offer Gardasil to women ages 19 to 21.

Perry, a conservative Christian who opposes abortion and stem-cell research using embryonic cells, counts on the religious right for his political base. But he has said the cervical cancer vaccine is no different from the one that protects children against polio.

"The HPV vaccine provides us with an incredible opportunity to effectively target and prevent cervical cancer," Perry said.

Merck is bankrolling efforts to pass state laws across the country mandating Gardasil for girls as young as 11 or 12. It doubled its lobbying budget in Texas and has funneled money through Women in Government, an advocacy group made up of female state legislators around the country.

Perry has ties to Merck and Women in Government. One of the drug company's three lobbyists in Texas is Mike Toomey, Perry's former chief of staff. His current chief of staff's mother-in-law, Texas Republican state Rep. Dianne White Delisi, is a state director for Women in Government.

The governor also received $6,000 from Merck's political action committee during his re-election campaign.

The order is effective until Perry or a successor changes it, and the Legislature has no authority to repeal it, said Perry spokeswoman Krista Moody. Moody said the Texas Constitution permits the governor, as head of the executive branch, to order other members of the executive branch to adopt rules like this one.

Legislative aides said they are looking for ways around the order for parents who oppose it.

"He's circumventing the will of the people," said Dawn Richardson, president of Parents Requesting Open Vaccine Education, a citizens group that fought for the right to opt out of other vaccine requirements. "There are bills filed. There's no emergency except in the boardrooms of Merck, where this is failing to gain the support that they had expected."

Texas allows parents to opt out of inoculations by filing an affidavit objecting to the vaccine on religious or philosophical reasons. Even with such provisions, however, conservative groups say such requirements interfere with parents' rights to make medical decisions for their children.

The federal government approved Gardasil in June, and a government advisory panel has recommended that all girls get the shots at 11 and 12, before they are likely to be sexually active.

The New Jersey-based drug company could generate billions in sales if Gardasil - at $360 for the three-shot regimen - were made mandatory across the country. Most insurance companies now cover the vaccine, which has been shown to have no serious side effects.

Merck spokeswoman Janet Skidmore would not say how much the company is spending on lobbyists or how much it has donated to Women in Government. Susan Crosby, the group's president, also declined to specify how much the drug company gave.

A top official from Merck's vaccine division sits on Women in Government's business council, and many of the bills around the country have been introduced by members of Women in Government.

 

[Nienna]

I, for some reason, am rather skeptic on the potential for these vaccines being the cures that they are being advertised as being. I am only copying a couple of important, I think, paragraphs form this article. If you would like to read the whole thing I have included the url. (The bold face and color are mine.)

From FDA News: http:(dlb slash)www(dot)fda(dot)gov/bbs/topics/NEWS/2006/NEW01385.html

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) today announced the approval of Gardasil, the first vaccine developed to prevent cervical cancer, precancerous genital lesions and genital warts due to human papillomavirus (HPV) types 6, 11, 16 and 18. The vaccine is approved for use in females 9-26 years of age. Gardasil was evaluated and approved in six months under FDA's priority review process--a process for products with potential to provide significant health benefits.

Gardasil is a recombinant vaccine (contains no live virus) that is given as three injections over a six-month period. Immunization with Gardasil is expected to prevent most cases of cervical cancer due to HPV types included in the vaccine. However, females are not protected if they have been infected with that HPV type(s) prior to vaccination, indicating the importance of immunization before potential exposure to the virus. Also, Gardasil does not protect against less common HPV types not included in the vaccine, thus routine and regular pap screening remain critically important to detect precancerous changes in the cervix to allow treatment before cervical cancer develops.

Four studies, one in the United States and three multinational, were conducted in 21,000 women to show how well Gardasil worked in women between the ages of 16 and 26 by giving them either the vaccine or placebo. The results showed that in women who had not already been infected, Gardasil was nearly 100 percent effective in preventing precancerous cervical lesions, precancerous vaginal and vulvar lesions, and genital warts caused by infection with the HPV types against which the vaccine is directed. While the study period was not long enough for cervical cancer to develop, the prevention of these cervical precancerous lesions is believed highly likely to result in the prevention of those cancers.

The manufacturer has agreed to conduct several studies following licensure, including additional studies to further evaluate general safety and long-term effectiveness. The manufacturer will also monitor the pregnancy outcomes of women who receive Gardasil while unknowingly pregnant. Also, the manufacturer has an ongoing study to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of Gardasil in males.

Okay. As we can see in the first paragraph, this vaccine was only evaluated for six months. And, the process of the testing did not proceed long enough to tell if it really would prevent the cancer. And, it doesn't prevent all cervical cancers either. So if you do develop cervical cancer then it probably wasn't the one that the vaccine was for. Nice little loopholes. Yep. So what really is the reason for the big push for these vaccines?

I smell a big rat in here somewhere. I just can't spot it. Other than the obvious, that it makes more money for the pharmaceutical companies. But I can't help feeling that there is something more here that I am missing. At least, that's the way I see it right now.

 

[stardust]

On the last January 11, the french deputies approved the following text :

" The refusal to subject or subject those on who one exerts the parental authority or whom one assures the tutelage, to the vaccination obligations provided for the articles L.3111-2 , L-3111-3 and L-3112-1 or to hinder their execution, is punished to six months of imprisonment and 3 750 euros of penalty"

We were already considered as belonging to a sect when we refused to be vaccinated, now it is vaccination or prison!

If the vaccine for the cervical cancer ( let me laugh !) the big hoax from SANOFI PASTEUR whom its mainly source of money is the vaccines , is imposed lawfully , I can't imagine the consequences ... LIBERTE -EGALITE -FRATERNITE ???? The Liberty to be manipulated , the equality in being all vaccinated and the fraternity of the laboratories, maybe....