Pollution, DU contamination and precipitous global warming have all been drastically, and intentionally, worsened by the obscene wars and anti-environmental actions of the Bush Regime from day one of its reign. It was about to become a very hot topic for BushCo, but now there is suddenly a "new" anti-smoking "study" and a terrifying Surgeon General's report to deflect the public's attention, as well as their justified fears and anger, directly onto smokers and smoking and a full 180 degrees away from the Real problem, toxic levels of global environmental destruction and pollution, all of it caused by the global Pathocracy of the wealthiest individuals and corporations.
The U.S.leads the world in producing lethal substances which poison all the world, but people pretty much worldwide have been brainwashed to believe it's the smokers who are causing their lung and other cancers, their heart disease, and all else that is ailing them more and more by the day. It's from secondhand tobacco smoke, not the foul water they drink, the poisoned air they breathe and the radioactive DU particulates raining down upon them.
The several truly independent studies done on "secondhand cigarette smoke" exposure have all concluded that it is harmless. Period. There is simply NO evidence of any adverse effects from exposure to it, either immediately, (except for those with severe allergies or respiratory diseases from other causes) short term or long term. None such have ever shown up in those few truly scientific, and truly independent, private studies and honest research done on the subject.
The most recent, new and unbiased study was done in Britain and the results were published in Britain's most prestigious medical journal, (the name of which escapes me at the moment). It came out just days after SotT ran an article "Environmental 911", by Mathew K. Kiel, evidently based on more than a year's worth of research on the whole subject of the health risks of smoking.
In that article, (recommended reading for anyone wanting the full "low-down" on the subject) there was a good bit of detail as to how all of the "many" studies "proving" the dangers of both smoking itself, and most of all the alleged ills from exposure to "secondhand" smoke, were bogus. The article said they all were reiterations of basically the same, three, government-designed, government-conducted and government-published "studies." It concluded that the whole anti-smoking myth is propaganda, with the same pieces being recycled over and over for psy-ops purposes. Looks like the article nailed it right on the head, doesn't it?
And here it is, confirmation, months later, of what the SotT folks were already on top of and covering in depth quite a while ago. I am NOT surprised at either firm confirmation that SotT had the facts right or that they came in way ahead of the "pack" with putting it together to reveal the Pathocratic agenda behind the anti-smoking Programme.
Way to go, SotT. Good "shooting" yet again. Do you folks polish your "crystal ball" regularly, or is it done with tea leaves and entrails at the dark of the moon?
Seriously, your prescience speaks well of both your efforts and your sincerity. It is not easy for you, I am sure, to be the ones who keep pointing out that the emperor is not only naked but also exceedingly ugly, extraordinarily stupid, a pathological Liar and a psychopath to boot.
M
