Six Months to Go Until The Largest Tax Hikes in History?

_http://www.atr.org/sixmonths.html?content=5171
Six Months to Go Until
The Largest Tax Hikes in History


In just six months, the largest tax hikes in the history of America will take effect. They will hit families and small businesses in three great waves on January 1, 2011:

First Wave: Expiration of 2001 and 2003 Tax Relief

In 2001 and 2003, the GOP Congress enacted several tax cuts for investors, small business owners, and families. These will all expire on January 1, 2011:

Personal income tax rates will rise. The top income tax rate will rise from 35 to 39.6 percent (this is also the rate at which two-thirds of small business profits are taxed). The lowest rate will rise from 10 to 15 percent. All the rates in between will also rise. Itemized deductions and personal exemptions will again phase out, which has the same mathematical effect as higher marginal tax rates. The full list of marginal rate hikes is below:

- The 10% bracket rises to an expanded 15%
- The 25% bracket rises to 28%
- The 28% bracket rises to 31%
- The 33% bracket rises to 36%
- The 35% bracket rises to 39.6%

Higher taxes on marriage and family. The “marriage penalty” (narrower tax brackets for married couples) will return from the first dollar of income. The child tax credit will be cut in half from $1000 to $500 per child. The standard deduction will no longer be doubled for married couples relative to the single level. The dependent care and adoption tax credits will be cut.

The return of the Death Tax. This year, there is no death tax. For those dying on or after January 1 2011, there is a 55 percent top death tax rate on estates over $1 million. A person leaving behind two homes and a retirement account could easily pass along a death tax bill to their loved ones.

Higher tax rates on savers and investors. The capital gains tax will rise from 15 percent this year to 20 percent in 2011. The dividends tax will rise from 15 percent this year to 39.6 percent in 2011. These rates will rise another 3.8 percent in 2013.

Second Wave: Obamacare

There are over twenty new or higher taxes in Obamacare. Several will first go into effect on January 1, 2011. They include:

The “Medicine Cabinet Tax” Thanks to Obamacare, Americans will no longer be able to use health savings account (HSA), flexible spending account (FSA), or health reimbursement (HRA) pre-tax dollars to purchase non-prescription, over-the-counter medicines (except insulin).

The “Special Needs Kids Tax” This provision of Obamacare imposes a cap on flexible spending accounts (FSAs) of $2500 (Currently, there is no federal government limit). There is one group of FSA owners for whom this new cap will be particularly cruel and onerous: parents of special needs children. There are thousands of families with special needs children in the United States, and many of them use FSAs to pay for special needs education. Tuition rates at one leading school that teaches special needs children in Washington, D.C. (National Child Research Center) can easily exceed $14,000 per year. Under tax rules, FSA dollars can be used to pay for this type of special needs education.

The HSA Withdrawal Tax Hike. This provision of Obamacare increases the additional tax on non-medical early withdrawals from an HSA from 10 to 20 percent, disadvantaging them relative to IRAs and other tax-advantaged accounts, which remain at 10 percent.

Third Wave: The Alternative Minimum Tax and Employer Tax Hikes

When Americans prepare to file their tax returns in January of 2011, they’ll be in for a nasty surprise—the AMT won’t be held harmless, and many tax relief provisions will have expired. The major items include:

The AMT will ensnare over 28 million families, up from 4 million last year. According to the left-leaning Tax Policy Center, Congress’ failure to index the AMT will lead to an explosion of AMT taxpaying families—rising from 4 million last year to 28.5 million. These families will have to calculate their tax burdens twice, and pay taxes at the higher level. The AMT was created in 1969 to ensnare a handful of taxpayers.

Small business expensing will be slashed and 50% expensing will disappear. Small businesses can normally expense (rather than slowly-deduct, or “depreciate”) equipment purchases up to $250,000. This will be cut all the way down to $25,000. Larger businesses can expense half of their purchases of equipment. In January of 2011, all of it will have to be “depreciated.”

Taxes will be raised on all types of businesses. There are literally scores of tax hikes on business that will take place. The biggest is the loss of the “research and experimentation tax credit,” but there are many, many others. Combining high marginal tax rates with the loss of this tax relief will cost jobs.

Tax Benefits for Education and Teaching Reduced. The deduction for tuition and fees will not be available. Tax credits for education will be limited. Teachers will no longer be able to deduct classroom expenses. Coverdell Education Savings Accounts will be cut. Employer-provided educational assistance is curtailed. The student loan interest deduction will be disallowed for hundreds of thousands of families.

Charitable Contributions from IRAs no longer allowed. Under current law, a retired person with an IRA can contribute up to $100,000 per year directly to a charity from their IRA. This contribution also counts toward an annual “required minimum distribution.” This ability will no longer be there.

Read more: _http://www.atr.org/sixmonths.html?content=5171#ixzz0sxznDuke
 
Re: Six Months to Go Until The Largest Tax Hikes in History

Just ridiculous....another brick in the wall poised to fall atop of the U.S.A

Get out while you can, brothers and sisters.... :/
 
Re: Six Months to Go Until The Largest Tax Hikes in History

I remember in "Bringers of the Dawn," the Pleiadians mentioned that high taxes would be the thing that would unite people's anger against the PTB. Should be interesting.
 
Re: Six Months to Go Until The Largest Tax Hikes in History

I think this whole "biggest tax increase" thing is nonsense. Bush gave away the farm to the rich and put an expiration date on the tax cuts in order to get enough support. It was these ridiculous giveaways to the rich added to two expensive wars that gave us the massive deficit which is making it difficult to pull out of the recession. It seems to me that calling letting reckless tax cuts expire the way they were intended a tax increase is to repeat Republican propaganda without thinking.

These so-called largest tax increases would take the United States back to the tax rates that were in effect in the 1990s a time of high economic growth and that's only if they all expire. The Democrats are proposing to only let some of them (the ones on people who earn a taxable income of more than $250,000 a year).

All this at a time when roads and bridges are falling apart. Public schools are having core programs eliminated, class sizes increasing and Republicans are telling us that we can't afford universal health care. All this also at a time when the gap between rich and poor in the United States is as great as it has been since the 1920s.

There was even a Republican presidential candidate, Mike Huckabee saying last week that making it so insurance companies cannot deny health insurance coverage for preexisting conditions is like a person going to get insurance for their house after their house has already burned down.

Yet there's always money to bomb other countries...
 
Re: Six Months to Go Until The Largest Tax Hikes in History

Mr. Premise said:
I think this whole "biggest tax increase" thing is nonsense.

I certainly hope this article is nonsense! The proposed tax increases would certainly put our family in financial straits! And likely put my husband out of business.

[quote author=Mr. Premise]
Yet there's always money to bomb other countries...
[/quote]

Ain't that the truth!
 
Considering the proximity to an election that will determine if the Democrats or Republicans have control of the House, the inclusion of knee-jerk reactionary words like "Obamacare", and the source (ATR.org)...I'm extremely skeptical of the "facts" in this report.

Wikipedia: Americans for Tax Reform said:
Shortly after Bill Clinton's 1992 election, ATR headquarters became the site of a weekly, off-the-record get-together of conservatives to coordinate activities and strategy. The "Wednesday Meeting" of the Leave Us Alone Coalition soon became an important hub of conservative political organizing. Participants each week include Republican congressional leaders, right-leaning think tanks, conservative advocacy groups and K Street lobbyists. George W. Bush began sending a representative to the Wednesday Meeting even before he formally announced his candidacy for president in 1999, and continued to send representatives after his election in 2000.

ATR has helped to establish regular meetings for conservatives nationwide, modeled after the Wednesday meetings in Washington, with the goal of creating a nationwide network of conservative activists to help support initiatives such as tax cuts and deregulation. There are now meetings in 48 states and more internationally, with meetings in Canada, Austria, Belgium, Croatia, France, Italy, Japan, Spain, and the United Kingdom.
 
What I think it most telling are the tax increases on dividends and investments that aren't mentioned in this article. It seems like the article itself is skewed to pointing out how the tax increases affect only ordinary working Americans. A bit of a propaganda piece perhaps?

Dividends are currently taxed at 15% and they are set to go up to 36%. Is it possible that these individual tax rates are mere peanuts compared to the tax reaped from dividends? I haven't looked at the numbers, so I'm not sure. Also, dividends paid to foreigners are not taxed at all from what I've read. How much money could be generated from taxing this bracket of wealth?

As much as I hate to see my taxes go up, I'm not sure if raising income tax is really necessary with a higher tax on dividends. It's probably just a ploy to get people behind the slogan of "no more tax", when in reality - despite the bemoaning of our corporate overlords - they could afford to raise the dividend taxes without hiking the individual tax rates and all those other tax incentives. Dividends and other sources of static wealth is, IMO, where most of the tax money should come from.

Of course, like Mr. Premise said, there will always be money for more war despite the complaint that we can't adequately fund social programs. :mad:

No amount of tax money will ever satisfy the addiction to war that our government is stuck in.
 
Back
Top Bottom