Spontaneous Fires

[Leo40]

A search for "spontaneous fires" at sott.net returned 436 results!
My following investigation led me to the website of Alexander Putney:

http://www.humanresonance.org/index.html

His central theory deals with the ability of biological organisms to
transmute basic elements via resonance.
There is a wealth of information available free of charge and everything
is profusely referenced to scientific researches and published papers.

I first came across this idea in Prof. C. Louis Kervran's book:

"Biological Transmutations".

These older and now recent researches are of great importance for human
health and diet especially regarding supplementation because of the
interactions of the various elements and the transmutational regulatory
mechanism of the human organism.

Regarding the "spontaneous fires", he correlates theses events to coordinates
on the globe and provides maps so one can evaluate the predictive value of
his theory.

 

[Niall]

Try a search for Alex Putney on the forum. He brought his ideas here some time ago and apparently believes himself to be the reincarnation of Nicola Tesla:

http://cassiopaea.org/forum/index.php/topic,6930.60.html

 

[Leo40]

Hi, Kniall:

I am not interested in the person but the subjects mentioned:

Spontaneous Fires

Biological Transmutation

This is a research forum. Ergo, where is the research?

Am I to assume that you are not interested in the above topics?

 

[truth seeker]

According to the link below at the general site you posted, Putney seems to have experienced a 'joyful lightness' upon coming across 'higher-dimensional beings' at 'energetic sacred sites'.

_http://www.humanresonance.org/water.html

My question would then be, if he seems to be so easily pulled in by such phenomena, wouldn't this lack of discernment then carry over into all areas of his life, including his 'theories'?

Hi, Kniall:

I am not interested in the person but the subjects mentioned:

Spontaneous Fires

Biological Transmutation

This is a research forum. Ergo, where is the research?

Am I to assume that you are not interested in the above topics?

While the topics themselves may well be of interest, as always, the source must be carefully considered, yes? In addition, there are many newbies on this forum who may be inclined to think that any link posted and unquestioned is 'safe'.

Try to keep in mind, Leo, that a source being questioned doesn't reflect upon you personally. That said, is everything okay with you?

edit: clarity

 

[Mikey]

Hi, Kniall:

I am not interested in the person but the subjects mentioned:

Well, messenger and message seem to be intertwined with each other. It is always worthwhile to ask: "Sez who?"

This is a research forum. Ergo, where is the research?

If the research is not there yet, you are welcome to do it and share it here. To say that person A believes this and person B believes that is not very productive without any supporting data.

Am I to assume that you are not interested in the above topics?

Better not to assume anything. Kniall shared a piece of data, relevant to the subject you posted. You come across as being emotionally invested in whatever theory you found.

 

[Leo40]

Re. Biological Transmutation:

Experimental observation and study of controlled transmutation of intermediate mass isotopes in growing biological cultures
Vysotskii, Vladimir | Kornilova, Alla A | Samoylenko, Igor I | Zykov, German A
Journal of New Energy. Vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 123-128. 2000

For the first time the experimental study of cold nuclear transmutation of intermediate mass isotopes was carried out in growing microbiological culture with controlled conditions of growth. With the help of time-of-flight mass-spectroscopy the formation of rare Fe super(54) isotope from Na super(23) and P super(31) isotopes in sugar-salt nutrient medium was observed. Combined and independent Mossbauer and mass-spectroscopy investigations of nuclear transmutation of Mossbauer isotope Fe super(57) in growing biological cultures were also carried out.

 

[Niall]

I am not interested in the person but the subjects mentioned.

This is a research forum.

Yes, it is. And if you have learned anything from the research on this forum, it is that the researcher also provides important data points alongside the material that is researched.

Regarding the "spontaneous fires", he correlates theses events to coordinates on the globe and provides maps so one can evaluate the predictive value of his theory.

Does that mean he was able to predict any of these 436 'spontaneous fires'? You could test his theory and report your results.

Ergo, where is the research?

There is no need to be a smartalec, Leo40. Why don't YOU provide some research? I'm telling you that Putney has been covered here before in order to help you.

Am I to assume that you are not interested in the above topics?

With that kind of attitude, you're welcome to assume all you want.

 

[anart]

Ergo, where is the research?

There is no need to be a smartalec, Leo40. Why don't YOU provide some research? I'm telling you that Putney has been covered here before in order to help you.

Leo has yet to grow out of his tendency to be a smart alec. In fact, Leo tends to feed that part of himself to the detriment of everything else.

 

[Alexander Putney]

Re: Spontaneous Fires and Biological Transmutation

Leo has yet to grow out of his tendency to be a smart alec. In fact, Leo tends to feed that part of himself to the detriment of everything else.

Anart, congratulations on topping yourself once again. We can see that you've graduated from the previous name-calling (referring to me as a "nutjob") to even more insulting tactics like insinuating that Leo40 has a mental illness and psychological imbalances for even mentioning my research! That makes it quite obvious that you are trained to lash out at ANYONE bringing this hidden physics to the fore.

It is quite unfortunate that Leo40 has to put up with your insults, and I'm jumping in here to invite readers to reconsider the fascinating articles that have driven Leo40 to post this thread:

_http://www.human-resonance.org/quantum_trapping.html
_http://www.human-resonance.org/quantum_trapping 2.html
_http://www.human-resonance.org/pelagic_alchemists.html
_http://www.human-resonance.org/bacteria.html
_http://www.human-resonance.org/bone.html
_http://www.human-resonance.org/sweat.html
_http://www.human-resonance.org/chlorophyll.html

I look forward to hearing from anyone who wants to discuss the phonon resonance transmutation principles or any of the facts presented in those articles.

I'm sure these forum agents will continue to insult and distract, yet now they will do so at the risk of proving my point further.

Thanks again Leo40, it is for people like you who I continue to work so hard --to give important information to conscious minds.

mod: deactivate links

 

[anart]

Re: Spontaneous Fires and Biological Transmutation

Leo has yet to grow out of his tendency to be a smart alec. In fact, Leo tends to feed that part of himself to the detriment of everything else.

Anart, congratulations on topping yourself once again. We can see that you've graduated from the previous name-calling (referring to me as a "nutjob") to even more insulting tactics like insinuating that Leo40 has a mental illness and psychological imbalances for even mentioning my research! That makes it quite obvious that you are trained to lash out at ANYONE bringing this hidden physics to the fore.

It is quite unfortunate that Leo40 has to put up with your insults, and I'm jumping in here to invite readers to reconsider the fascinating articles that have driven Leo40 to post this thread:

Alex, you're embarrassing yourself. You know not of which you speak. Unfortunately, that's not unusual based on your past and current behavior on this forum.

Please re-read the forum guidelines in their entirety and abide by the rules and spirit of this forum or you will be removed - again. You were given another opportunity to interact here and this and this is the (rather predictable) result, which is unfortunate to say the least.

 

[Nienna]

Alexander, I'd like to point something out to you that you really seem to be missing. THIS IS NOT YOUR FORUM. You don't make the rules. The moderators do what they are supposed to be doing and that is "moderating".

Everything that anart said about Leo40 is what all of the rest of us mods also see. Anart is just quicker on the draw. The only reason you are standing up for Leo40 is because he supports something you also agree with. You do NOT know his history on this forum and it seems to me that if he were to have said something you didn't like, you would be attacking him as well.

As I said to you in this post, your self-importance is astounding.

Since this is NOT your forum, if you cannot follow the rules and learn how to play nicely you will be banned.

And just so you know, when the mods ban someone it is in mutual agreement. These things are not taken lightly and are discussed rather extensively. Again, just so you know.