[quote author=Felipe4]
Well, take into account, that the weather has not stayed the same in any place, For example, where Im from Bogota Colombia, it is said it used to be a huge lake a long time ago. And the gravity as well as other atmospheric and terrestrial conditions have also changed in the history of the planet, creating different weather in different places at different times.[/quote]
If you look at the picture in the article I linked, this is a round circle about 10 feet across. It is on a flat area not much bigger than the circle. This area is near the peak of the Grand Teton; all of the Teton mountains near the summits are large pointed rocks, as can be seen in the picture. So this structure had to be placed on this small flat area after the present geological formation was formed.
[quote author=Felipe4]
So it is possible that maybe a civilization that survived a long time ago in a particular place were there because conditions were favorable and now they are not. Also the interesting thing about Coral Castle is not the size or the shape, but that the same type of technology was used to move them in place.[/quote]
It is very possible the same technology was used to move these smaller (yet too heavy to carry by hand) stones. I have not been able to locate any references to an ancient civilization inhabiting the area. The only thing I can find is that more recently (before European settlers) the native Americans traveled through and hunted the area at the base of the Tetons, but there was no reason for them to go to their peaks, and there were no permanent settlements.
[quote author=Felipe4]
There are other threads here that discuss related topics, if you use the search function you will find lots on this alleged kind of technology that was used to move gigantic rocks into place.
Machupichu in Peru is another example, as the altitude of the city is above 3,000 meters i believe and it also coincides with moving gigantic rocks without any of our architecture means to do so. [/quote]
Again, I agree that it is possible some ancient technology may have been used, but I can find nothing to compare this stone circle to. It is only 10 feet across and does not equate with the megastones used at Machu Pichu. Machu Pichu was obviously a city with inhabitants which raised their own food on terraced landscapes. There stones the builders used weighed up to several tons. The stone circle in the Tetons is on a flat area maybe 20 feet wide alongside a pointed rock peak. There is no water, no place to grow food, and no animals in the area. It is impossible to build a road to this area. There is no way more than 2 people could stay on that ledge, and no way for them to feed themselves. Based on the location of the circle which is located centrally on the small flat ledge, it had to be placed there after the present landscape was formed. So no civilization could actually live in these mountain peaks. Or if they could, it is beyond my comprehension.
[quote author=Felipe4]
It could be an abandoned site, or brought down by cataclysm , or sudden weather change could be a reason. Could be some possibilities to look at too.[/quote]
Agreed it appears to be an abandoned site, and there are many possibilities as you say. I have run into a dead end because there are no records or even any myths of ancient peoples in the area that I have been able to locate. So I have hit a wall, which led to my question.
