To understand the motivations for the attacks on NATO countries a good starting point I think would be to look at who the victims are, here it's the general population who are usually innocent bystanders. When these attacks happen it creates mass fear and anger within the population, it's close to home and it generates thoughts like 'it could be me next'. This raw emotion can then be used to make the average joe support wars in foreign lands to 'destroy the terror threat' so they can feel safe again. After all if the armed forces and populations didn't back their leaders, then who would fight in these wars that fulfill the ambitions of the elites.
You might find these articles interesting:
Inside the FBI's 'Terror factory': Manufacturing the 'War on Terror' ,
The Politics of Terror as the Business of Terror ,
Who is Bombing European Civilians?. Particularly this one:
Limbic Warfare and Martha Stout's "Paranoia Switch"-
[quote author=Limbic Warfare and Martha Stout's "Paranoia Switch"]Traumatic events overload our limbic system. The heightened response of our amygdala, which registers the emotional significance of the event, leads to a decreased response in the hippocampus, which usually prioritizes information and allows the higher brain centers to create coherent memories, based on their emotional importance.
So, traumatic events do not get integrated by the higher brain centers as true memories, but instead leave us with non-integrated fragments of memory: isolated images and sensations. These memories can then be "triggered" by similar images. In this way, a backfiring car can trigger a war vet into a state of paranoia. His "paranoia switch" has been flicked.
...
As Stout explains later in her book, fear brokers maintain their power through the exploitation of human weaknesses. Ironically, it is often the very people we are genetically "programmed" to fear (i.e. psychopathic individuals), that exploit this fear by focusing it on an arbitrary and convenient group. Hitler used anarchists, communists, and Jews.
Our leaders are using "terrorists", Muslims, and critics of their policies.
Stout defines terrorism as
"violence committed with the primary goal of manipulating the minds of the surviving population" (27). It creates a paranoia switch in our minds, or turns on an already existing one. Its "most cherished ambition is to affect us psychologically,
to instill a sense of helplessness in the minds of individual citizens, and to steal, in wholesale grabs, from our collective store of hopefulness" (24).
It is in this way that terrorists (whether they be Western intelligence agency puppet masters or foreign "terrorist" patsies)
are able to steer a battered public in the direction of their choice. However, we can make sure that terrorism does not work on our minds by being aware of its effects and its purpose, and the tactics of those who exploit it. [/quote]
The first video speaks about failed terror threats in the US and draws conclusions about the agenda behind the attacks, I'm not sure what your native language is but the video has some subtitles available, the second video talks more directly about the agenda behind European terror attacks:
to our forum VITRIOL it would be nice if you could post a small intro about yourself in the 
