STS & STO: The Choice

Muxel

Dagobah Resident
The Choice is a concept referred to by both Ra and the C's. It is the culmination of third density, and in the grandest scheme of all things, may even be seen to be the purpose of third density.

[quote author=The C's]First awareness of the choice comes. Then making the choice. Then enhancing the energy to graduate. The problem of 3rd density is identifying what to choose, since so much is veiled from you.[/quote]

I have noticed that our world is populated with many adults who are, variously: intelligent, experienced, accomplished, beautiful, even powerful. You would think, with such great people in existence, why then, is our world the way it is, with gross inequality, poverty, pain and suffering? Why do the present systems go unquestioned, as if there were no other alternative? As if the Moon would fall into the seas and the Sun would go supernova if one so much as gave his dollar to the poor, and stopped this present culture of competition and consumption?

As I read the writings of these illustrious people, or listen to them speak, I find that there is something missing. It seems as if all, or most, of them - as different and many-colored as they are - have the same blind spot. I will attempt to describe the missing element in a very general fashion, as: an appreciation of Nature and Existence, as it includes themselves and everyone else.

We have our scientifics, who observe and theorize, but fail to take into account that they are part of the very system that they are observing! As if they thought they stood outside Space and Time, to make observations and measurements of our reality, and assume them to be true -- without any consideration for the Observer.

We have men, possessed of sharpness and brilliance of intellect, who make assessments and conceptualizations of our political and humanistic affairs. They point out the errors of history and society and culture, the errors of individuals and groups of people, and denounce such behaviors as they find to be lacking in merit. However, the author hardly writes a word about himself. The author takes a moral stance, thinks himself the last bastion of goodness and right and in the world, omitting the fact that he himself is part of the very world he finds corrupt! However, this fact does not bother the author, and he never shows any sign of introspection. To take a leaf out of the movie Silence of the Lambs where the protagonist says to Hannibal, "You see a lot, Doctor. But are you strong enough to point that high-powered perception at yourself?"

Then there are the masses of people, who live their lives and follow their heart's desires, never thinking about why they are the way they are, why they do the things they do, and how it all came to be. Joe clocks in, works his shift, clocks out, goes home. Joe already has a full plate, why should he concern himself with the sufferings of his neighbor, or those in a faraway land? Indeed, there is no reason for him to bother. Yet the fact remains that there is suffering, that strange things happen, that greater forces are at work in Joe's world.

Now it is my thought that someone who, even as he is beaten by circumstance and misfortune, is able - even for a moment - to put his ego aside and capitulate to his knowledge and conception of Nature and his place in it, to see things not through his eyes but from a higher perspective of the systemic forces at play, would be of a different "flavor" than another who can see only where and how he has been wronged, and what is available in the world for his taking, and how his desires can best be fulfilled.

All this, more or less, is the meaning I found in the 6th Major Arcanum, The Lovers:
VI-web-bas.jpg

The man in the center is being coaxed in two directions. Which do we love?

And ultimately, what will be our Choice?
 
The question I ask myself: The choice is there a physical action or intellectual action, we do once or several times a day or so is it a permanent (perm, continuous) attitude?
Because I wondered, how much choice, "a man" could do a day?
If a man is faced with choices make 1000 a day, so the choices are permanent (continuous), and it would force to think constantly, and therefore have no time to act and not be in action. More choices are restricted, the more human action appears to be large. If the choices become too numerous in the day, then they become a permanent attitude. And if it's a permanent (continuous) attitude is not intellectual, but a reflex attitude and guided by the heart. As we tend to think that the heart is more KNOWLEDGE compared the intellect, we can, if we had "good heart", no longer be in "the choice" but in attitude. However, as we can not always trust our heart, we are forced to make intellectual choices. These choices intellectuals can be dangerous, because every choice intellectuals, can cause another choice, ie a blockage. It is as if the intellectual choices were exponnentiels and fractals. Thus we see that the heart and the intellect have to work together. As for my original question, whether the choice is an action (physical or mental), or a permanent attitude (heart), I would say most of the time it is permanent, but that doubt, give us the illusion choice. The choice, he would appoint a fear? Perhaps the choice is to trust in our interior attitude. But it is still difficult to recognize our interior attitude, and not to be confused with a program and (STS).
 
Today I am still thinking about it. And he seemed to understand that the choice was inérant our incarnation.
I'm assuming that the incarnations are experiences that give us knowledge.
But many people question the usefulness of knowledge, and they prefer to take the blue pill of illusion, which can be conforrtable. It is true that some of us are wondering why suffering exists. And the answer is often knowledge. I have often wondered if the price of knowledge was not too high?
Today, I think I understand that the price is not primarily knowledge, but choice. Not only the choice of our personal road, but the choice of the universe. This means judgment.
If a king knows only that the experience of being a torturer, then judgment will be that of a torturer. If another king knows that the experience of the victim, then judgment will have victimhood. But if a king knows all the human facets, so his judgment will be fair.
So, God (the beings in general) want a more just world, it should experience it. That was his choice, and therefore our choice, to understand, to experience the world, but above all to cut the wheat from the chaff. The choice seems to be always the will of a more just world. It would not be fair to me, to say that "God" accepted evil. Because even if "God" creates evil, experimentation comes after creation. Also, we think that it may take time, because for thousands of years, we have experienced suffering, and "God", could therefore eradicate it, since he knows that this is bad. But if "God", the first eradicate suffering, and if we were still following the road of pleasure, then we omit to try the creations, or be mixed good and evil. And if we allow a mixed world of good and evil, then God would not do justice. What I understand is that "God" did not intentionally create evil. Also, another question that comes to mind is, why do some experiments, are they experienced as suffering? My only answer is that evil (suffering), is a deconstruction. This deconstruction, I see it as an involution, or chaos. Also, I have to think that creation is the evolution and involution. So paradoxically, in every creation there would be a deconstruction. Why create it would always be with deconstruction? I might also wonder, why expiration, it is always accompanied by inspiration? Would this be the breath of the universe?
We may think that if the creation was continually evolving, exponentially, it could never stop. If this is the case, what are the dangers? Probably the fear of distortion. Thus, the laws of evolution would create sails. The involution is the process of the Apocalypse "(remove the veils of distortion).
Also, in this principle, we can consider two systems suffering.
1. The involution: Destruction, which slows the process of evolution.
2. Evolution: Ignorance, or the distortions veils of illusion.
That said, if evil or suffering, are found in the two processes, we can consider that pleasure and good, also found there.
1. When involution and destruction, some systems of false beliefs are revealed. This is the junction between our source, our past and our experiences.
2. The evolution we discover new facets of the world and new pleasures.

So another question, if "God" knew the possibility that his creations can generate evil, then why create ? Perhaps here is this choice that precedes judgment. The choice of creation, is the choice of "to be or not to be, that is the question."
 
It would be inspired to read or re-read this very informative definitions:
https://thecasswiki.net/index.php?title=Law_of_Three
https://thecasswiki.net/index.php?title=Positive_vs._negative_feedback
This is one of the core precepts presented by Laura Knight-Jadczyk in the Wave series. We could say that this is the fulcrum on which free will and the duality of service to others and service to self balance.
https://thecasswiki.net/index.php?title=Unweighted_choice
 
Kisito,

I think what we perceive as "good" and "bad" is subjective. As Ra said:

The Law of One blinks neither at the light or the darkness

Even our suffering can be said to be subjective. In the end, I think it comes down to the choice between staying objective (with the bigger picture), or becoming completely a slave to whatever drives you.
 
Muxel said:
Kisito,

I think what we perceive as "good" and "bad" is subjective. As Ra said:

The Law of One blinks neither at the light or the darkness

Even our suffering can be said to be subjective. In the end, I think it comes down to the choice between staying objective (with the bigger picture), or becoming completely a slave to whatever drives you.

I think the best attitude toward difference between STO and STS is approach: whether this or that support other person or on the contrary. Next, important is to answer what is for better for other person, the knowledge is need here. The next thing is the energy we use and what is the ultimate goal of this. If energy is used with full expression and nothing is coming back, then it is ultimate STO.
 
What came to mind immediately when reading through this thread are the words from the Cs and I will paraphrase and I may be misquoting here "The battle is always there, it is when we choose that counts". My own everlasting question related to this statement is the word "when".

If our perception of 'time' is inaccurate, then how does the word "when" work into the big picture of it all? The only word I seem to come up with related to this, is the word 'location'.

What I am trying to express (and perhaps failing to do) is that my understanding at the present time is that STO and STS are 'natural' and infinite factors within all that is. The "battle" or the availability of STO and STS is always there.

Always . . .
Always there . . .
Always available . . .

Thus, the word "when" in the Cs quote above could possibly be viewed as 'where' ?

If . . . there is only 'NOW', then each and every NOW is generated by innumerable factors that are infinitely generating innumerable probable other NOWS.

WE (the big WE ) are entitled to think and feel and choose within the innumerable opportunities that arise in what we perceive as earthly life in a 'material' world. Therefore, each and every thought and feeling and action and failure to act that we generate will generate an outcome that is a dynamic and ever-changing process.

I determined that my obsessive attempting to be 'good' all of the time was a goal that was limiting my ability to learn.

My work, my focus, my intention . . . consists of attempting to stay awake and remain very consciously available to learn and evolve. I will share that the majority of my gemstones (my most valuable lessons) has been forthcoming from STS choices with very questionable outcomes.

This is the path I have chosen for this journey and I think that the possibilities for learning and evolving transform into probabilities towards STO.
 
STS is the easy path, the low energy path, the path of darkness. It leads to the creation of more separation, it leads one deeper into the illusion of separation. STO is the high energy path, the choices require energy, this path leads upwards, towards our ascension. This path creates unity and leads us to unity consciousness. The path of light is paved with meritous acts, acts which bring about good karma. The path of darkness is paved with demeritous acts. These acts appear along the way of both paths, so they act like a rope. With a rope we have the choice to use it to climb, or to use it to hang ourselves. To climb takes energy. To hang oneself takes no energy. STO is about ascending. If a rope is given to someone on the STO path, the obvious right thing to do is to climb. Afterall, climbing is what one on the STO path does:
jacobs-ladder-meditation1.jpg
 
Back
Top Bottom