Synthesis

  • Thread starter Thread starter msg
  • Start date Start date
M

msg

Guest
Hi all,
There are so much materials on the forum and the website that may be it could be useful to sum up and link the different parts. The aim is to have some sort of big picture of where we come from and where we are heading to.
May be as a conclusion : how to prepare for...

Thx.
 
Hi msg,

You are certainly correct in your assesment. There is a link, showing the volumes of concepts and various information here http://www.cassiopaea.org/cass/site_map_qfg.htm then of course if you were looking to define some particular concepts as your taking in said volumes of data you might also try here http://glossary.cassiopaea.com/glossary.php . Your certainly correctly in implying that the data is a doosie. :)

May be as a conclusion : how to prepare for... I can see prepare, but I'm not to keen to think the future is a closed and locked concept. The C's said that the future is open. How does one grasp the concepts if we're looping along and this "may" end with another cycle of civilization whereas "perhaps" those able to even become STO 'candidates' will be the only ones who may see the chance possibility of moving to 4D (right or left-sts/sto). Which for me (if even at all factual) is only a concept, likely complete mumblry to an extent.. haha :) haha I think a good amount of what can be known and learned is emassed :) in those volumes. I mean complete mumblry in terms of how I see it.. with only my limited imagination and "SCARCE" awareness. It should NOT be taken that I think the info itself is mumblry, I certainly do NOT believe that.

For myself I'm kind of frustrated. I cannot even keep up with the existing data output even while trying to take in the main works of past persons be they Gurdjieff, Boris M., Laura Knight-Jadczyk, Ospensky or any of the intelligent writers of SOTT's.. heh, it is certainly alot.

I doubt that was at all helpful. One thing you might want to watch for in self-observation (at least I believe) is not to think that the "Work" is something that can be handed to a person in a few sentences.. cause it seems to me that it is a long process, a forging so to speak, the metal has to be worked and reworked kind of like the japanese and how they would fold and fold blades to get the hardness and strength desired.

Maybe my analogy sucks.. it's pretty common. :)

Salutes!
 
Actually, noise, I think you're pretty close to the target with that one, especially this part...

noise said:
One thing you might want to watch for in self-observation (at least I believe) is not to think that the "Work" is something that can be handed to a person in a few sentences.. cause it seems to me that it is a long process, a forging so to speak, the metal has to be worked and reworked kind of like the japanese and how they would fold and fold blades to get the hardness and strength desired.
I'm sure that others can elaborate more on this subject, msg, but, from my understanding, it would be rather difficult for us to say 'where we come from and where we are headed' - mostly because what we are dealing with here is very much a working hypothesis. We gather data and try to figure out these things, but at this point, the information we present on these, and the affiliated, pages is the 'picture' that has emerged so far - foggy in some places and much more clear in others. Yet, even for the more clear areas, we are always aware that one piece of data can change the entire idea.

One of the other aspects to consider is that each person who encounters this material and begins the real work of reading, exploring and eventually grasping it, will bring, in some small or even large way, their own understanding of it to the group - perhaps adding another facet to the working hypothesis.

I think, perhaps, this is one of the reasons that every true seeker has to take the considerable time and make the considerable effort to digest all the material available, without being handed a 'this is what's going on' guideline - that simple process of learning and exposure can often trigger a perspective that, once added to the working hypothesis, becomes much more than the sum of that adding.

With that said, however, there is an enormous amount of support available here from like minded individuals - nothing - and I mean nothing - matters more here than the truth, so if one is really willing to dive into figuring these things out, they will find more support and minds to engage in discussion here than they most probably could have imagined before they started out.

At any rate, just some thoughts on the subject you brought up - as I said, I'm sure others will have more to add.
 
I'm finding it more and more that it is organic to me as the truth seems to be - evolving, growth, change (which some say is love..) There are so many concepts.. here is one I've gained but may very well be more fully explored by others.

There is talk here and elsewhere including the glossary, which I previously referenced/linked, though I don't know much about the subject of frequency's I consider truth to be at one. Then this brings up the concept of "tuning the instrument" and of truth being a something, wave length or channel (so to speak). Strangely I still don't have a true clue as to what I just said but then again conceptually.. Kind of like how a faithful person went to christ and touched him - and so gained insight, was healed or something of that nature.

For me and my own array of conceptions toward truth it's hard, I suppose, just as it is for anyone else. But I have gained alot of insights in growing my own perspective on reality by I dunno.. 3 years of study of this material now. Another thing that comes to mind going further on the above concept is the thought that people who are "actually" born again live that beam, as that spark, in that truth, at that frequency.

I can't say they do or do not have anything special powers wise or not, maybe this far down the time tunnel we don't know all what this christ guy did. He did seem to have healed some folks, and/or made some certain analogies I believe were of or symbolic toward the esoteric by far. Laura's online works have certainly touched on several aspects or works factual or supposed of him (the jesus guy). I don't know where I stand on alot of issues about particular subjects (virgin birth and the like) but there is certainly a wealth of things I think the average person just tosses out with the sunday bathwater as well as others easily accepted. I wonder if so few are (seemingly) called by the quest for truth. Thus far I have no answer, enough discipline and/or awareness, and I should add truth.

The progress is slow but ya know (finally) I'm pretty elated. I feel very content and immensely thankful for the online works that are being shared throughout the various sites. I bet I'd being gaming it up right now and on my 10th of 12th hour if I hadn't been so moved by the Pentagon Strike video.
 
Back
Top Bottom