Terrorist armies of darkness

Hesper

The Living Force
FOTCM Member
I've never posed a question to the C's before but these came up during a recent conversation and, after searching for an answer, I thought I'd share it. I apologize if it's already been covered, but I couldn't remember seeing it in any sessions or topics.

What is the size of the terrorist army (including all ISIS/Daesh/al Qaeda/'moderate rebel' groups)? Where have they come from? Where are the majority at now?

First off, what is the size of this army? Due to a lot of defecting from one group to another, and the fact that we must rely on 'estimates' for each individual group, it's hard to see exactly how many terrorists have been in one country at one point or another. 2011 seemed the year when the terrorist armies really took hold in the Middle East, and the 'Army of Darkness' took down Libya and began its offensive in Syria. So I started there.

The Moriarty's claimed that up to 250,000 head-choppers were participating in the destruction of Libya. When looking at the other conflicts, and assuming that these fighters moved following the Libyan conflict, that number seems relatively reliable - after the Libyan Civil War the number of insurgent groups in Syria exploded. It is also corroborated by a Kurdish leader who stated that ISIS alone had, by 2014, at least 200,000 fighters. This from a group that was estimated to be only a couple thousand strong in in November of 2012. So this shows the problem of trying to figure out the size of this army by relying on estimates. It also brings up the possibility that one reason there's a million and a half different 'rebel groups' is to hide the sheer size of this monster. After all, the size of the contingent the C's have said was sent to Europe is estimated to be around 60,360 strong (6% of an estimated 1,006,000 refugees):

Session 10 October 2015

Q: (L) I would like to know what is the percentage of real refugees to agents?

A: 94

Q: (L) 94 percent?

A: Yes

Q: (L) 94 percent are real refugees, but the rest are agents that are being sent in with them. And so who are the nefarious agents that have cynically utilized this refugee crisis to plant agents within European countries?

http://cassiopaea.org/forum/index.php/topic,39785.msg607185.html#msg607185

In Syria the Free Syrian Army was formed in the beginning of the civil war in 2011, and by 2012 was estimated to be about 40,000 strong. It has recently been estimated to have reached 60,000 strong. So we could probably add the 40,000 to the 250,000 original estimate, since these fighters and the Libyan ISIS fighters can probably be reliably separated. After all, the Libyan 'civil war' started in February of 2011 and the Syrian 'civil war' started not too long after that in March of 2011.

So there is reason to believe that this army is at least a couple hundred thousand in size, to be able to topple Libya and then reinforce Syria with enough strength to send 60,000 onto Europe over the course of the refugee crisis. When you factor in other groups in Russia & China that number seems pretty reliable. But doesn't it seem like it just came out of nowhere?

So now my question is where could they have come from?

It seems plausible to me that, with Western intelligence and their cronies' documented efforts to infiltrate Muslim schools worldwide, many 'actual' terrorists have probably been groomed from an early age, and for quite some time too. After all, the current elite have been working on this since the 1980's, if not longer, and there is evidence that the 'radicalization of Islam' idea stretches back at least a century to the British and German elite. The rise of Wahabbism, the schizoidal idea that obeying any law other than Islamic law makes you a non-Muslim and therefore unworthy of life, fits into this too. The seeds of ponerization have been planted and tended by Western, Turkish, and Saudi elite for quite some time. The allure for psychopaths seeking to live a life of depravity no doubt echoes around the world and contributes to the thousands that leave Europe and America to join the groups.

With the US' torture and brain-washing programs no doubt there's a lot of radicalization going on there, too. A quick glimpse into the numbers of people who were brutally tortured in Iraq around 2003 reveals a startling number of at least 14,000 (Question of Torture). No doubt there were many, many more. Torture itself is a surefire way to create a radical base.

When adding in the numbers of mercenary companies that have exploded since the dawn of the war on terror, those numbers need to be factored in, and no doubt many of them are hard-up Syrians, Iraqis, Yemenis living in hell and who still need a paycheck. And there are regular soldiers who could easily have been caught up in Arab Spring style protests and turned against their governments. This is reported to have happened in Syria.

So those are my tentative answers for where all of the terrorists have come from, and what the size of the group is. It's really just hard to believe that an actual 'Army of Darkness' has been spawned in the Middle East. So in the end I still wonder what the C's would say.
 
I also wonder about the timescale - and about if it is still valid, concerning the dark forces that are presumably meant to be surfacing from the centre of our planet! As well as all the other places they are hiding on the planet. Like when is this likely to happen, and how many are we talking about coming into our midst?

Also not forgetting the 3 huge motherships that have taken generations to be in our vicinity with the millions on board!!

Talk about an invasion/take over if you add these numbers to what I believe must be 10% of psychopaths on our planet now. AND don't forget the organic portals and those that have already been swayed to believe these entities have come to save them so will commit to do their bidding!!

Is the Universe possibly 'timing' things quite nicely to wait until all these nefarious ones are here, then the comets and environment blast them all to kingdom come? That though just occurred to me.

But I think this can all be possibly part of the same question. Yes there can be a lot of mercenaries and jihadists, but once the number multiplies exponentially then that gives an easy smoke screen to incorporate all the other evil critters arriving IMHO.
 
I think your numbers are likely close to the mark in terms of the jihadi mercenaries recruited from Iraq and elsewhere to wage the proxy war on Syria, but I'm not sure this is an "army" per se, at least not one that is designed to wage any kind of direct war in Western Europe. More than likely many of these "agents" are simply mercenary fighters who left Syria and Iraq and headed for Europe because they had nothing better to do, and saw the opportunity to get in with the refugees. Having said that, a good number of them are likely available to, and will be used to, carry out 'terror attacks' in Europe similar to the Paris attacks.

Given the focus on Germany, I suspect that Germany may be next.
 
Hesper said:
But doesn't it seem like it just came out of nowhere?

It's not cohesive, as Joe pointed out, and remember that it's decades in the making. Think back to Brzezinski's "stirred-up Moslems" in the late 1970s.

Regarding the scale of it all, consider that London is the world capital of mercenary corporations/private armies:
https://www.rt.com/uk/331158-britain-global-mercenary-industry/

There's probably a 'data pool' of tens or even hundreds of thousands of ex-soldiers that these corporations can draw from.

Now consider what former British Foreign Secretary Robin Cook said back in 2002:

Throughout the 80s Osama bin Laden was armed by the CIA and funded by the Saudis to wage jihad against the Russian occupation of Afghanistan. Al-Qaida, literally "the database", was originally the computer file of the thousands of mujahideen who were recruited and trained with help from the CIA to defeat the Russians.

Whether they're on the 'terrorist' database, or the 'soldier' database (or both - see Libyan and Syrian 'rebels'), there are a lot of people out there who will kill for money, and Western governments/corporations are happy to pay top dollar for their 'services'. As I see it, they keep tabs on pretty much all of them, and either maneuver or pay them to be where they want them to be.
 
Niall said:
Hesper said:
But doesn't it seem like it just came out of nowhere?

It's not cohesive, as Joe pointed out, and remember that it's decades in the making. Think back to Brzezinski's "stirred-up Moslems" in the late 1970s.

Regarding the scale of it all, consider that London is the world capital of mercenary corporations/private armies:
https://www.rt.com/uk/331158-britain-global-mercenary-industry/

There's probably a 'data pool' of tens or even hundreds of thousands of ex-soldiers that these corporations can draw from.

Now consider what former British Foreign Secretary Robin Cook said back in 2002:

Throughout the 80s Osama bin Laden was armed by the CIA and funded by the Saudis to wage jihad against the Russian occupation of Afghanistan. Al-Qaida, literally "the database", was originally the computer file of the thousands of mujahideen who were recruited and trained with help from the CIA to defeat the Russians.

Whether they're on the 'terrorist' database, or the 'soldier' database (or both - see Libyan and Syrian 'rebels'), there are a lot of people out there who will kill for money, and Western governments/corporations are happy to pay top dollar for their 'services'. As I see it, they keep tabs on pretty much all of them, and either maneuver or pay them to be where they want them to be.

Thank you both for your insights. I see now that conceptualizing all of these groups as being a traditional 'army' or even 'armies' is way off - it's organized differently. What you two wrote reminded me of something called 'chaoplexic warfare':

At the turn of the century, the Pentagon adopted the doctrine of network-centric warfare and set out its vision of autonomous 'swarming' and 'self-synchronized' war fighting units connected to one another by high-speed data links and superior battle field awareness. Of course, the actors that have truly excelled at adopting loose, decentralized organizational structures are the jihadist networks and insurgent movements that have tied down the net-enabled US army in Afghanistan and Iraq. The recently retired head of US Central Command responsible for operations in the Gulf and Central Asia, General John Abizaid, is in no doubt that 'the enemy is in fact more networked, more decentralized, and operates within a broader commander's intent than any twentieth century foe we've ever met. In fact, this enemy is better networked than we are.' The lesson is clear, however: 'It takes a network to beat a network, and our network must be better.'

--Antoine Bousquet, Chaoplexic Warfare

So essentially the people who have access to these databases can simply make phone calls and voila, 'rebels' or 'violent protesters' or 'terrorists' materialize wherever they need them to, and begin to 'swarm'. Really creepy stuff there.
 
happyliza said:
Also not forgetting the 3 huge motherships that have taken generations to be in our vicinity with the millions on board!!

Talk about an invasion/take over if you add these numbers to what I believe must be 10% of psychopaths on our planet now. AND don't forget the organic portals and those that have already been swayed to believe these entities have come to save them so will commit to do their bidding!!

It's probably not set in stone i.e 'the future is open'. Those 'minions of evil' may not even turn up!

For example, they could get lost, have an accident, or turn up... and not find what they are looking for! They could even MH370 it, collide with MH370, in whatever reality it went to, or get attacked by a bunch or really angry lost airline passengers, pilots and crew whilst attempting to 'rescue' them and turn them into minions of evil. I am in fact having a bit of fun here.

How do we know they haven't already been and gone? (Thanks guys for dumping me here! I WILL get you back for that!)

Or, it could be a metaphor for something else completely different. I don't think any of it is set in stone and as someone once said 'there's many a slip twixt lip and cup'.
 

Trending content

Back
Top Bottom