The Amazing Kreskin

henry

The Cosmic Force
Just got back from seeing the Amazing Kreskin do his show tonight. For those of you who do not know who he is, he is a 'mentalist'. The first half of the show involved several examples of his ability to pick up on people's thoughts. The second part was about suggestibility. Kreskin says there is no such thing as hypnotism, it is only suggestibility. He then went on to demonstrate it by calling up a large number of people to the stage after performing a pre-selction for suggestibility by having the entire audience stand up, close their eyes, and have their arms move up or down as he placed either a balloon or a heavy object onto them (via suggestion). Those who 'successfully' reacted were called on stage. Those whose arms stayed immobile sat down. I sat down. :)

He then told the group to close their eyes, raise one arm with the hand open and flexed open as far as they could, and that when he counted to three they would be unable to close their hands. He led them through several other bits like this. Fall asleep, wake up and make the happiest face you have ever made, the saddest face, etc. As the routine went on, individuals on stage would snap out of it and walk back to their seats. But there were still eight or so people at the end.

The highlight of the evening was when he finished the show by doing the 'invisible man in the room' that Laura talks about in The Wave. It didn't work on everyone on stage, but it worked on some of the people. For example, they thought they saw the microphone stand floating in the air because it was being held by the 'invisible man'.

As I was watching it, I had two thoughts racing through my head: first, that this was so cool to see the 'third man' trick that Laura references acted out; the second, it is really scary how easily some people are open to suggestion. I was thinking to myself about how it plays out in society with the media. And Kreskin was constantly talking about the media, name-dropping all the TV shows he has been on, all the celebrities he knows. And that patter was part of his suggestibility speel. The people who buy into Fox News,Regis, Huck-what-ever-his name-is, then open themselves to his suggestions.

What was frightening was how easily he could take control over these people. Once he got them, which didn't take long at all, he could take them in and out of the state of suggestibility in an instant -- which just means they were never really out of it, which is the even scarier part. They would appear to be 'normal', but then he would say a word and, 'boom', they would go under again.

The woman seated next to me went up with the large crowd, but returned to her seat before the end because she snapped out of it at one point. But even after she sat down, when Kreskin told the people on stage to raise their arms, she would raise her arm. Really creepy!

After the show, I was talking with some of the other people who were there. I mentioned the social implications of the show, the way the media do this day in and day out. I got blank stares. They couldn't understand the link... and these are not stupid people. They were all 'amazed'. I was thinking to myself, 'This stuff goes on every day."

Interesting evening....
 
Hi Galahad --

Galahad said:
As I was watching it, I had two thoughts racing through my head: first, that this was so cool to see the 'third man' trick that Laura references acted out; the second, it is really scary how easily some people are open to suggestion.

Is this related in any way to the 'Third Man Theme' that comes up in the transcripts, or is it just a coincidence of terminology?

Its really cool that you got a chance to see this -- I have wondered about that very trick before and what it would be like if I really got to see it (the closest I have ever been is the standard hypnosis trick at the county fair where people are told to cluck like chickens and that sort of thing). I'm glad you got to sit down in the first round (!)

He didn't use strobe lights at any point, did he? ;)
 
Here's the extract in question:

There is a little known fact about hypnosis that is illustrated by the following story:

A subject was told under hypnosis that when he was awakened he would be unable to see a third man in the room who, it was suggested to him, would have become invisible. All the "proper" suggestions to make this "true" were given, such as "you will NOT see so- and-so" etc... When the subject was awakened, lo and behold! the suggestions did NOT work.

Why? Because they went against his belief system. He did NOT believe that a person could become invisible.

So, another trial was made. The subject was hypnotized again and was told that the third man was leaving the room... that he had been called away on urgent business, and the scene of him getting on his coat and hat was described... the door was opened and shut to provide "sound effects," and then the subject was brought out of the trance.

Guess what happened?

He was UNABLE TO SEE the Third Man.

Why? Because his perceptions were modified according to his beliefs. Certain "censors" in his brain were activated in a manner that was acceptable to his ego survival instincts.

The ways and means that we ensure survival of the ego are established pretty early in life by our parental and societal programming. This conditioning determines what IS or is NOT possible; what we are "allowed" to believe in order to be accepted. We learn this first by learning what pleases our parents and then later we modify our belief based on what pleases our society - our peers - to believe.

Anyway, to return to our story, the Third Man went about the room picking things up and setting them down and doing all sorts of things to test the subject's awareness of his presence, and the subject became utterly hysterical at this "anomalous" activity! He could see objects moving through the air, doors opening and closing, but he could NOT see the SOURCE because he did not believe that there was another man in the room.

So, what are the implications of this factor of human consciousness? (By the way, this is also the reason why most therapy to stop bad habits does not work - they attempt to operate against a "belief system" that is imprinted in the subconscious that this or that habit is essential to survival.)

One of the first things we might observe is that everyone has a different set of beliefs based upon their social and familial conditioning, and that these beliefs determine how much of the OBJECTIVE reality anyone is able to access.

In the above story, the objective reality IS WHAT IT IS, whether it is truly objective, or only a consensus reality. In this story, there is clearly a big part of that reality that is inaccessable to the subject due to a perception censor which was activated by the suggestions of the hypnotist. That is to say, the subject has a strong belief, based upon his CHOICE as to who or what to believe - the hypnotist or his own, unfettered observations of reality. In this case, he has chosen to believe the hypnotist and not what he might be able to observe if he dispensed with the perception censor put in place by the hypnotist who activated his "belief center" - even if that activation was fraudulent.

And so it is with nearly all human beings: we believe the hypnotist - the "official culture" - and we are able, with preternatural cunning, to deny what is often right in front of our faces. And in the case of the hypnosis subject, he is entirely at the mercy of the "Invisible Man" because he chooses not to see him.

The rest here
 
Here is Derren Brown pulling off the invisible man trick on a film student: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ws54lrylm7c
 
No, he didn't use any strobe lights. There was stage lighting, and the house lights in the theatre were on the entire show because the entire show depends upon his interactions with the audience.

Many members of the audience really wanted to be up on stage. It seems that they were the most receptive -- although not in every case. A friend went up at one point, and she didn't last long, even though before the show she told me she was looking forward to trying it.
 
We also had a hypnotist artist performing at a local pub 14 years ago, using very similar techniques you've described above. His name was Max Khan. I never went up on stage, but always kind of knew that I wont be very 'suggestible'.

I got confirmation on that in December 2007 when I went to a past life regressionist and she was unable to hypnotise me. I wanted to see if there's anything to this reincarnation thing...something more concrete maybe, than just reading other people's testimonies... I really tried very hard to go under, without success, and then she still charged me! :rolleyes:

I wonder what is it that causes some people to be suggestible and some not.
 
Just to let you know that U tube now has the following message instead of the video of the invisible man - interesting.


This video has been removed as a violation of YouTube's policy against spam, scams and commercially deceptive content.
Sorry about that.
 
Back
Top Bottom