the CIA infiltratation into Silicon Valley. 1999

seek10

The Living Force
FOTCM Member
CIA seems to have invested in 90 silican valley startup technology companies for spying technologies , it thought it needed in future ( do they know about 911 also ? ) through its front company called In-Q-Tel. Q seems to stand for James Bond and all the Google Earth and all similar technologies are from offshoot of these investments. What else more they know . I dont see any thing more left to hide.

see this article from star ledger
http://www.nj.com/starledger/stories/index.ssf?/base/news-12/1185683257242790.xml&coll=1
------
In tech field CIA spied a chance for growth
It funds start-ups and reaps progress
Sunday, July 29, 2007
BY J. SCOTT ORR
Star-Ledger Staff

WASHINGTON -- In 1999, the CIA decided to infiltrate Silicon Valley.

Hopelessly lagging the freewheeling high-tech entrepreneurs of the day, the nation's spy agency recognized it needed better access to cutting-edge technologies to carry out its mission of collecting, analyzing and communicating intelligence data.
Advertisement





But rather than sending covert agents, the agency took a more direct approach: It began knocking on doors with money. And for once, the CIA made no secret of its plan.

That September, the CIA announced the formation of In-Q-Tel, a nonprofit corporation it funded to provide venture capital to high-tech start-ups. Its mission was twofold -- to encourage the development of technologies and to build bridges to entrepreneurs outside the government-contracting food chain.

Eight years later, In-Q-Tel is hailed as an unqualified success, having invested millions in start-ups, leveraged the investment of others and, perhaps most important, established solid ties in Silicon Valley and elsewhere that have helped the CIA and the larger U.S. intelligence community catch up in the race for the latest spy gear.

Donald Tighe, In-Q-Tel's vice president for external affairs, called the company a "technology accelerator" that has succeeded in bringing countless developments to the attention of the intelligence community.

"Our job is to serve as eyes and ears looking outward to the start-ups, entrepreneurs and innovators in the early commercial technology fields to find capabilities that match current and future intelligence community needs," he said.

Even though In-Q-Tel is a private, nonprofit company, its finances are secret because of the ties to the CIA. Tighe said, however, that most investments are in the range of $1 million to $3 million. It has invested with more than 90 companies for a total of between $90 million and $270 million, he said.

A NEW MODEL
Bernard Golden, who had a hand in setting up In-Q-Tel and is now the CEO of San Carlos, a Calif.-based open source management consulting firm Navica, said In-Q-Tel has helped start-ups develop technologies much faster than the CIA could have on its own.

"The models they had in place just weren't successful. There were shortcomings in the way the intelligence community was traditionally getting access to technology," he said. Only after a technology is developed, he said, does the CIA acquire it and adapt it to its more secretive purposes.

"They decide that they think this technology might have some application to their mission, then they acquire it through traditional channels. ... This (In-Q-Tel) is the public face of it, then it gets into the CIA," he said.

While it consults with the CIA on "the strategic fit and mission value" of particular ventures, decisions on investments are made independently by In-Q-Tel's board of trustees and CEO.
Advertisement





Board members come from the high-tech industry and academia and include James Barksdale, the founder of Netscape; Jeong Kim, president of Lucent's Bell Labs; and Charles Vest, president emeritus of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. The board is chaired by Michael Crow, president of Arizona State University, and the company's CEO is Chris Darby, former vice president of Intel.

LAGGING BEHIND
The CIA readily admits it was ill-equipped to gain access to the latest technologies in the years leading up to the creation of In-Q-Tel: "In contrast to the remarkable transformations taking place in Silicon Valley and elsewhere, the Agency, like many large Cold War-era private-sector corporations, felt itself being left behind," reported an article from the Defense Intelligence Journal published in 2000 on the CIA's Web site.

In-Q-Tel's success has not gone unnoticed in other federal agencies and several -- including the Pentagon and NASA -- have set up similar operations to get close to sources of new technology.

Over the years, In-Q-Tel has invested in companies developing hardware and software for surveillance, communication, data management, imaging, mapping, foreign language translation and many other purposes. The companies are listed on In-Q-Tel's Web page (www.inqtel.org) and generally offer their products for use by the private sector as well as the federal government.

While In-Q-Tel and the CIA don't like to discuss the uses of specific technologies developed through the company's investments, former CIA Director George Tenet mentioned in a recent book two cases in which seemingly unrelated technologies yielded benefits for the intelligence community.

"This highly unusual collaboration between government and the private sector enabled CIA to take advantage of the technology that Las Vegas uses to identify corrupt card players and apply it to link analysis for terrorists, and to adapt the technology that online booksellers use and convert it to scour millions of pages of documents looking for unexpected results," Tenet wrote.

INNOVATING AND IMPLEMENTING
One of the best-known companies funded in part through In-Q-Tel is Keyhole, the Mountain View, Calif., company that pioneered rich-mapping software combining satellite images, aerial photography and other data to produce detailed, searchable maps. Keyhole was acquired by Google in 2004 and provided the technology for the wildly popular Google Earth.

When In-Q-Tel invested, Keyhole's technology was being developed as an aid to real estate companies, Tighe said. "In-Q-Tel's engagement with the company significantly accelerated the intelligence community's exposure to the innovation and implementation of the capabilities," he said.

Page 3 of 3

Sean Varah, CEO of MotionDSP in San Mateo, Calif., has been working with In-Q-Tel since around 2000. He helped link In-Q-Tel up with Keyhole and recently received funding for his current venture through In-Q-Tel.

"They really encourage companies to develop the commercial application. The whole purpose is to encourage commercial development of technologies. They understand that government can't develop all of the technology that it needs," he said.
Advertisement





Though he said the CIA maintains its own research and development operations, Varah believes In-Q-Tel is a worthy supplement to the kind of secret government lab that was run by James Bond's fictional gadgetmeister "Q." The "Q" in In-Q-Tel is said to be a reference to Bond's technology wizard.

"The burn on Q's lab would probably be, say, $80 million a year, and eight of 10 things Q comes up with in his lab probably don't work. Now, take that same money and invest in 80 or 100 companies and the return is going to be better," he said.

Varah said companies need not fear that In-Q-Tel's association with the CIA could lead it to try to control young start-ups.

"There is some paranoia or worry that they're going to direct where you're going, but that hasn't been the case. They let the companies develop their technologies just like any other venture capitalist," he said.

While In-Q-Tel is unique in that it targets start-up companies it might not otherwise encounter, the CIA has a long history of contracting with established companies to develop secret spying equipment.

Perhaps the most successful is the so-called "skunk works" at Lockheed Martin, which worked with the CIA and, under a contract to the federal government, secretly designed and built a series of spy planes and other aircraft beginning in the 1930s.

J. Scott Orr may be reached at sorr@starledger.com.
 
Hopelessly lagging the freewheeling high-tech entrepreneurs of the day, the nation's spy agency recognized it needed better access to cutting-edge technologies to carry out its mission of collecting, analyzing and communicating intelligence data.
The above is a pretty piece of disinfo. The CIA and other military intelligence agencies would like the public to believe that they are behind-the-times, inept, and have only recently seen the need (because of those big, bad Muslim terrorists) to get with the times spyware wise. Yeah, right.

Check out the history of companies like Oracle and Goggle for instance. The Stanford Research Institute purportedly has ties to US and British (Tavistock) intelligence operations. Some of the sites I once perused claimed that there is a large government underground complex that runs lengthwise from San Francisco to San Jose; and that a certain Silicon Valley school is supposedly attended by 'children of the Illuminati' for programming purposes.

The C's have said that the One World Government is already here. Makes sense, though it's not official, so as to fool and distract the public who are even remotely interested in such things. It's a distinct possibility (and a probability in some cases) that Silicon Valley brain power was siphoned off and 'nurtured' in some major companies decades prior to 1999 by the Military/Industrial complex and the PTB.

Regarding Goggle, I still use a gmail account my husband set me up with a few years ago to the consternation of some of my accociates who warn that everything one writes and/or searches for on Goggle is monitored by the FBI, CIA, etc. Well, frankly, if the gooberment wants to know more about my radical ideas, and hall me off to a Haliburton-built concentration camp in the future, they have the means to access my Yahoo and other accounts. (I contemplated getting rid of Goggle just to send a message to the company...as if they care.)
 
Also check out the Meet the Feds at DEFCON. Spooks have been in regular attendence at Defcon conferences since it's inception with the game "Spot the Fed" being one of the conferences highlights.

http://www.defcon.org/html/defcon-15/dc-15-speakers.html
 
More "US Intel is technologically backward" propaganda here: http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/20010712/site/newsweek

I had to laugh out loud (later I'll cry cause I know where this is heading) at the lines in the above linked article that read:

"The National Security Agency is falling so far behind in upgrading its infrastructure to cope with the digital age that the agency has had problems with its electricity supply, forcing some offices to temporarily shut down. The gap is also partly a result of administration fumbling over legal authorization for eavesdropping by U.S. agencies."

Gasp! Maybe Congress will come to their rescue with more funding, more laws (or a repeal of certain privacy laws) to help these Bozos get with the program. Wouldn't want those terrorists hanging out in the caves to show us up, now would we? Sheesh.
 
earth said:
The CIA readily admits it was ill-equipped to gain access to the latest technologies
here is the biggest red herring in the story - whenever the CIA 'readily admits' something, you can be quite certain that it is a LIE!
 
In the movie Live Free or Die Hard, the NSA supposedly had this backup system of the financial institutions that was under threat and was so easily hacked. LOL, sounds like "they" are pushing out the idea that all of our systems are easily hackable.

What really bugged me was how they had all the east coast power grid centrally controlled from a small office in West Virginia. Honestly, they can mess up the grid with physical circumstances in the parts that are bottlenecks to the system. However, it is NOT centrally controlled, as every company that does electric transmission and distribution keeps it to themselves.

The CIA, NSA, whatever, plays dumb... maybe they will get a false hack operation and start locking down the internet?
 
Back
Top Bottom