the clampdown continues. UK Music & Licensing Laws

vinny

The Living Force
http://www.level-1.org.uk/showthread.php?t=502

www.level-1.org.uk said:
This is a call to anyone who loves any type of music. Please read

The Government have recently passed laws in the UK to try and suppress live
music and dance. Pubs which could previously offer work to solo singers or
duos now have to pay for a special licence and can only have 12 of these per
year. Even school Xmas concerts need to be licensed.

If you don't know there is a UK government web site where anyone can now
start a petition and that's what is being done. we've just received the
following email which explains things more clearly and gives the site
address . If you care about keeping music live please take the time to sign
the petition.

Subject: Music/Licensing Laws - Official Downing Street petition

Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2007 12:36:37

Please circulate

The live music/licensing e-petition now has nearly 4550 signatures.
It currently stands at no.17 in the list of 1,702 petitions on the
Number 10 website: http://petitions.pm.gov.uk/licensing/

This is good, especially in just under a month - and there are five
more months in which people can sign. (CLOSING DATE: 11 June 2007).
But the petition needs to do much better to make an impression on ministers,
and to encourage DCMS to implement music-friendly amendments.

The petition is for everyone, not just musicians. Please consider
signing if you haven't already done so. If you have signed, encourage
friends to sign.

Points to remember about the new legislation:

a.. The unlicensed provision of even one musician is a potential
criminal offence (although some places are exempt, including places of
public religious worship, royal palaces and moving vehicles). Max penalty:
£20,000 fine and six months in prison.

b.. The rationale is to prevent noise, crime and disorder, to ensure public
safety, and the protection of children from harm.

c.. But broadcast entertainment, including sport and music, is exempt - no
matter where, and no matter how powerfully amplified.

d.. In the transition to the new regime, bars with jukeboxes, CD
players etc were automatically granted a license to play recorded
music; but their automatic entitlement to one or two musicians was
abolished.

e.. For the first time, private performances raising money for charity are
licensable.

f.. School performances open to friends and family are licensable -
they count as public performances.

g.. Under the old regime all premises licensed to sell alcohol for
consumption on the premises were automatically allowed up to two live
musicians (the 'two in a bar rule').

h.. In December, DCMS published research confirming that about 40% of these
have lost any automatic entitlement to live music as a result of the new
Act:

'Very few establishments that wanted a new license were denied it, and many
who were previously limited to 2-in-a-bar now have the ability to stage
music with 2 or more musicians... This contrasts, of course, with the fact
that 40% of establishments now have no automatic means of putting on live
music (i.e. they would have to give a TEN).'

['Licensing Act 2003: The experience of smaller establishments in
applying for live music authorization'; December 2006', paragraphs
6.1.1 and 6.1.2 'Conclusions', p54; Caroline Callahan, Andy Martin,
Anna Pierce, Ipsos-MORI]

'TEN' stands for Temporary Event Notice - in effect a temporary
entertainment licence. Only 12 are allowed per premises per year.
They cost £21 each. See the full MORI reports on this site:

http://www.culture.gov.uk/Reference_...ec_summary.htm

link to sign petition is here.. http://petitions.pm.gov.uk/licensing/

I know this if for England and Wales at the moment but how long before we
get hit with something like this too in Scotland. This applies to everyone.

Thanks everyone. Please email this to everyone you know, post it on other
forums, myspce it, whatever you can do.
a note: the hyperlink to the petition doesn't always seem to work unless you copy/paste it. (weird)

anyway it is just another indication, I thought I'd share with you all, of the creeping police-state clampdown on liberty in general, but especially on creative acts.
 
Wow. I guess the psyhcopaths are coming out of the woodwork and are now trying to flex their muscles. News coming at 6:66.66 :(

As Benjamin Franklin says: http://www(dot)ushistory.org/franklin/quotable/quote04.htm

In 1755 (Pennsylvania Assembly: Reply to the Governor, Tue, Nov 11, 1755), Franklin wrote: "Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety."
 
It seems to me that it is hard to control what someone can say or sing when they are performing live. Therefore, keeping track of who is performing where and when, and what is being said, it is easier to keep track of who's doing what. (Reminds me of The Dixie Chicks). One can then weed out the performers who are speaking out against the ponerization precess that is going on.

How long until people have had enough? Or are all those asleep willing to give up all of their freedoms to be kept under the thumb of the pathocracy? :(

All of this, on thinking about it, has me wondering if some of the PTB are maybe beginning to think that things might not go as they have planned. Things that are occurring lately have the feeling of desperation to them. Or maybe it's just "wishful thinking" on my part.
 
I made a friend in Hawaii that worked on a rescue team under FEMA after the last big earthquake in Los Angeles. When I complained about the enactment of martial law on Kauai after hurricane Iniki, he told me that he had seen FEMA's new world order plans, and that they intended to decrease public access to musical instruments and performing venues. That was over 10 years ago, and it seemed unlikely to me at the time. Unfortunately, that's no longer the case. I don't know how they've managed to restrict live music in Rome (probably through the mafia), but there are pitifully few venues for a city of it's size, and the ones that do exist are struggling so hard that they rarely pay musicians decent wages, and frequently try to avoid paying on slow nights.
 
Seems like another scam to suck money back into the treasury as well as extending the controlling influence of government. Lately the whole system is looking more and more like one big hoover to suck as much revenue as possible out of the population and divert it into making war.

...and call me paranoid, but maybe those online petition thingies are just too good a data capture device for some to resist? 8|
 
Back
Top Bottom