The danger of infiltration by radicals who discourage people

[neonix]

I don't want to say that Sott was infiltrated, but I want to say there's always possibility. And you have to be aware.

I don't have paranoia about cointelpro and controlled opposition, but I see signs that there is potential thread.

Alongside this is the threat of being infiltrated. Scores of declassified documents, along with accounts from veteran activists, will reveal many stories of members who were actually undercover police, FBI or M15. In the worst cases of infiltration, undercover agents have acted as provocateurs. Such incidents normally serve to radicalise a movement, thus demonising it in the eyes of society and effectively lessening its wider political appeal.
http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2011/nov/15/occupy-global-elite

Cognitive infiltration is a term coined by Cass Sunstein and Adrian Vermeule to refer to the use of government and third party "cognitive" provocateurs and front groups to "infiltrate" social networks, other online groups, and "real life" groups built around conspiracy theories.
http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Cognitive_infiltration
http://rationalwiki.org/w/index.php?title=Cognitive_infiltration&action=history

There's also radicals who post radical comments below articles and they discourage normal people to read comments because radical language. I don't want to say that this people are agents, but they can be manipulated from astral realm. And this is a big thing because such group of disturbed people can destroy pleasure of visiting Sott. The good solution could be comments rate system.