The end of privacy?

treesparrow

The Living Force
FOTCM Member
Headline -

Forget Street View, there is a far more subtle - and pervasive - invasion of your private life being carried out - this time through your mobile phone

Quote from article

"People are being told that they are signing up for marketing, when they are being opted into a massive surveillance strategy"

http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2009/apr/02/google-privacy-mobile-phone-industry


The toys have been provided and perhaps before you know it the 'playpen' will have been built.
 
Similar article (two years later) from ZDNet about smart phones storing (and transmitting) your geographical location

__http://www.zdnet.com/blog/networking/big-apple-big-google-big-brother/989?tag=nl.e539

In some ways, all the uproar about Apple saving location data on its iOS device users is old news. Guess what? Big Brother, or Big Google, also collects geo-location information from its mobile, Android-powered devices. It’s like anything else in computing: geo-location can provide great services and resources, but it can also be abused.

Take, for example, a woman who was recently robbed in Texas. Using her stolen iPhone, police officers were able to quickly find not only her stolen phone, but her wedding ring as well. Yea!

On the other hand, say another woman is in an abusive relationship and goes to a friend’s house or to a “safe-house” shelter. Her husband tracks her down using her smartphone and literally drags her back “home.”

How about wanting the local cops to know where you’ve been for the last two weeks? Police already have the technology to grab GPS location data from smartphones including latitude, longitude, altitude and time data. They don’t need sophisticated forensics equipment. In Michigan, cops can do it in a roadside traffic stop in a few minutes.

The cops or the jealous ex don’t even need to get their hands on your smartphone or tablet. Both Apple and Google regularly pull down your location data. Apple, it seems, does it twice a day, while Google updates your location several times an hour.


Article also references a commercially available device which law enforcement agencies are using to extract data from phones:

The extractors are called UFEDs—Universal Forensic Extraction Devices—which are made and sold to law enforcement by Cellebrite. The data stealer can swipe everything in under two minutes, including text messages, photos, videos, passwords and even GPS data, from over 3,000 different mobile devices. It can even take encrypted data, and no password can hold it back.

__http://www.businessinsider.com/data-pirates-aka-cops-can-hack-your-cell-phone-2011-4
 
There's an article on SOTT regarding this.

http://www.sott.net/articles/show/227570-How-wide-does-this-go-Now-Google-devices-found-to-transmit-user-locations-back-to-the-company-
 
YUP, there no privacy anymore. I am sure "they" have some big hunking ultra mega supercomputers where our data is stored. And as "they" gather more information their predictive capabilities improve. AND... "they" can most likely zero in a target from outer space orbit. And I'm sure those nasty emfs are being fried tuned to fry our brains to moldable mush. AND.. Who knows if they can really beam into our heads, talk to and persuade us at an unconscious level, or consciously just for "their" needs.?.?.?

ALL IN ALL, Methinks privacy is an illusion that we are allowed to perceive.

Being on a STS controlled planet, I would expect all sorts of :evil: :evil: :evil:

Not so years ago, anyone talking like this would be called crazy.
Darn, where did I put my tin foil hat anyway.?.?.?
 
At the same time their absolutist mindset shows how much they are ignorant of how this universe works. The more you try to control things the more other uncontrollable things become uncontrollable. For them the yin-yang motive is just a funny folkloric drawing.
 
Why is this not surprising. Considering the secret government and their gadgets, aint no telling what means they are using to monitor us. They probably been using those phones as monitors all along. Considering the fact, the phones are wireless and signals go through the air. The government or other forces probably have many ways of monitoring us, and this is just one of many.
 
Agreed, that privacy is an illusion.
Computers/Data Centers are AI, predictive and adaptive.

As the C's say (not direct quotes):
1) We never had free will! (which includes privacy and everything else, perhaps)
2) We are an experiment, not in control of ourselves.
3) Book of Life = supercomputers + Massive data centers + more?
4) Homosapiens, current model is slated to be retired for a new model... (PTB's wishful thinking plan)

There are Google & Facebook massive data centers in Oregon, close
enuf to Intel (research & ramp up), Bonneville Dam (power source),
and not far from my domicile... :/

Devlishly fun place to be in... whoooa aahhh ha ha ha... heh! :evil:
:lol:
 
It does not come as a real surprise but who will really give up his mobile/smart phone because of this ?
It seems to me that most people will rationalize it anyway because "we're not doing anything wrong, only guilty people should be scared...".
I don't know maybe they're testing the waters to see how much noise this will make and the reaction it will cause.

My two cents.
 
Mobile phone users are very interesting to watch...
some appear as if talking to themselves and sometimes
as if in an animated tizzy... Some walk back and forth
and sometimes in circles too.

So interesting in fact, the mobile phone users ought to
super-glue these things on their head or ears or at least
implant them into their heads... not that I would advise
it, but sheesh, what would Gurdjeiff say about mechanical
man, if observed today?
 
heh "the end" was long time ago :)

Check out my new find with spying guides by various companies :D

http://cryptome.org/isp-spy/online-spying.htm

also this is good ;)

DEFCON 18: Your ISP and the Government: Best Friends Forever

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t0aQojDGSD4
 
Last week after reading on the Forum about the best methods of being prepared was to read the forces survival manual. So I found the following on the internet which I found very helpful:

US Army Survival Manual: FM 21-76‏

And guess what??? Today I get an email from Amazon! Below:

Are you looking for something in our History books department? If so, you might be interested in these items.
US Army Survival Manual: FM 21-76 US Army Survival Manual: FM 21-76
by Department of Defense

Price: $10.95

OK so how did they know this? Are they downloading my cookies - which I had just deleted as my Hotmail account has mysteriously being playing up for the last 2 months.

Scary - Big Brother is definitely on my case. Even maybe I triggered a few no-go buzz words.

On another note I am still posting out all the controversial stuff on my facebook pages including receiving all the Sott and Cassiopaea posts on my FB. I am not sure whether it is safe for me to continue this although I would like to as Turkey is really getting heated up about these things, as well as targeting reporters etc. I would greatly appreciate some advice on this. I would not have any protection here really should I bring such attention to myself nowadays in the current atmosphere in the countires all around Cyprus.

I am working diligently trying to start a new business here so that I can be able to contribute much much more financially to the team and the work asap. For a bit more security I sometimes think it would be good to know our nearest fellow FOTCM members for mutual support and help, even raising an alarm/assistance in whatever way we can should anything happen to a nearby member. I am not being alarmist here, just thinking out loud, as we are a network of like-minded people. Being prepared can also mean a plan B should someone hit the internet switch, which has already happened on a few occasions near this area.

Please forgive me if this has already been covered and such a contingency plan has already been broadcast somewhere and I have missed it. I know the knowledge protects and that we are more equipped than most to cope now than most when such an eventually occurs. Today it is not if but when OSIT.
 
It's a big deal. Check this from a job posting I saw a few days ago from a start-up tech company wanting to get in on the action, basically building the next generation of systems that will be used by those in the Ministry of Information. Some interesting words and phrases in here.

{company name} powers Big Analytics for Big Data in industries from pharma, energy, and financial trading to web data mining and insurance telematics.

The Big Data we work with is machine-generated, multi-dimensional, multi-sourced data like location data from cars and cell phones, genetic sequences, trading data, data from energy sensor grids, call centers and weblogs. Big Analytics is the complex math that drives better recommendation engines, faster risk models, data-driven genomic discovery, and personalized pricing models.

We're a start-up team of seasoned entrepreneurs and data management experts [...] We're also the sponsors and developers of SciDB the open source scalable scientific database engine.

Our team is all about automation for deep analytics, hypothesis generation and predictive analytics on massive data sets.

So if you are intrigued about building an innovative new data platform to support advances and disruptions in the scientific and commercial worlds, read on and get in touch with us.

Notice that it's all about automation. We've seen this horrid trend of removing human judgment and decision-making from everything possible -- I'm talking about no-tolerance policies, inflexible rules, automatic this and that. Not only does it allow ever more feeble-minded types to be employed as administrators and enforcers, but it eases any guilt they might develop ("just doing my job -- rules are rules"), and strips the victim of any reasonable recourse (can't argue with an automaton). Automation allows for the much quicker identification and one-size-fits-all processing of any identified group. This relates to this post: http://cassiopaea.org/forum/index.php/topic,26888.0.html

Big Intel is certainly interested in hypothesis generation and predictive analytics regarding the masses.

I wonder what they mean by supporting "disruptions" in the scientific and commercial worlds.

According to Wikipedia, telematics is:
- The technology of sending, receiving and storing information via telecommunication devices in conjunction with affecting control on remote objects.
- The integrated use of telecommunications and informatics, for application in vehicles and with control of vehicles on the move.
- Telematics includes but is not limited to Global Positioning System technology integrated with computers and mobile communications technology in automotive navigation systems.
- Most narrowly, the term has evolved to refer to the use of such systems within road vehicles, in which case the term vehicle telematics may be used.

IMO, no privacy means required self-censorship and, effectively, eventually, no mind of your own.
 
happyliza said:
Last week after reading on the Forum about the best methods of being prepared was to read the forces survival manual. So I found the following on the internet which I found very helpful:

US Army Survival Manual: FM 21-76‏

And guess what??? Today I get an email from Amazon!

Yep, Amazon is a big monster. All you have to do is shop for something on the internet and soon the ad banners are all for the item you searched for. Amazon will even tell you what you looked at on their site for the last few YEARS and make suggestions.

I was alittle more creeped out the other day. My mom and I were sitting at the table talking about arthritis. That pesky smart phone was sitting on the table. An email came in and the title of it was "arthritis". I swear, I'm going to get a lead box to store that thing in when not in use!! Call me paranoid. :D
 
I have known my best friend for over 35 years and we phone each other regularly. He has recently been wrestling with a lot of the same issues that eventually resulted in my arrival here, and I referred him to Laura's articles on SOTT.

We talked again yesterday and he mentioned that he had found the articles and the one he read interested him greatly. However, he told me, before finding the articles he blundered onto Laura's Facebook page and, thinking that was the required path to the articles, signed up. Incredible to him were the number of people who, apparently, wanted to be his "friend" (however that works. I don't know how Facebook works and neither did he). Even more incredible was the fact that he hadn't been in any sort of contact with many of them for a good number of years and had not been particularly friendly with most of them when they had, for various reasons, interacted.

"How is it," he asked me, "that all these people I didn't know all that well are suddenly there, wanting to be friends?"
I had no answer as the only Facebook doings I've had was to sign up to watch some video quite a while ago. I quickly regretted registering and unsubscribed from their email list. However, I periodically I get another email saying that someone or other that I don't know inexplicably wants to be my "friend", and I again unsubscribe.

I recount this not as any criticism of Laura or her Facebook page, Facebook or social media in general. Social media is a tool and, as such, can be well or poorly used. By registering on such a site, I voluntarily relinquished a fairly large degree of privacy for no good reason, as I have nothing to teach or sell and nothing to learn from a perfect stranger allegedly wanting to befriend me. What is clear to me from the small amount of MSM I watch and the few people with whom I speak is that there are a lot of people not concerned with privacy who spend a great deal of time discussing inanities with people they barely know.

From a November, 2011, Huffington Post article citing Pew Internet and American Life Project data:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/11/19/the-average-facebook-user_n_1102902.html
For example: the average age of a Facebook user rose from 33 in 2008 to 38 in 2010; users have 229 friends each, on average; and the average user has never met 7 percent of his or her friends, according to Pew.
7 percent. The average Facebook user is sharing God-knows-what-all information with 16 friends they've never met. I suspect that if one of those 16 turns out to be a predator of the nature we're all trying to learn about here, Mr. or Ms. Average Facebook User will wish a little more care had been taken on the old privacy front.

There are predators whose designs on us are less ghastly than those who would hit us over the head and chop us up at their leisure, of course. Carelessly flitting about social media invites advertisers happy to waste you time and who can learn how to do it here:
http://searchenginewatch.com/article/2066809/How-to-Target-Affluent-Facebook-Users

Some of the bad actors wanting to follow your computer home from fun-time with friends are described here:
http://anti-virus-software-review.toptenreviews.com/malware-that-targets-facebook-users.html

So anyway, who are all these friendly strangers? I don't want to know. They are not getting their hooks into the small amount of privacy I still possess.
 
PopHistorian said:
It's a big deal. Check this from a job posting I saw a few days ago from a start-up tech company wanting to get in on the action, basically building the next generation of systems that will be used by those in the Ministry of Information. Some interesting words and phrases in here.

{company name} powers Big Analytics for Big Data in industries from pharma, energy, and financial trading to web data mining and insurance telematics.

The Big Data we work with is machine-generated, multi-dimensional, multi-sourced data like location data from cars and cell phones, genetic sequences, trading data, data from energy sensor grids, call centers and weblogs. Big Analytics is the complex math that drives better recommendation engines, faster risk models, data-driven genomic discovery, and personalized pricing models.

We're a start-up team of seasoned entrepreneurs and data management experts [...] We're also the sponsors and developers of SciDB the open source scalable scientific database engine.

Our team is all about automation for deep analytics, hypothesis generation and predictive analytics on massive data sets.

So if you are intrigued about building an innovative new data platform to support advances and disruptions in the scientific and commercial worlds, read on and get in touch with us.

Notice that it's all about automation. We've seen this horrid trend of removing human judgment and decision-making from everything possible -- I'm talking about no-tolerance policies, inflexible rules, automatic this and that. Not only does it allow ever more feeble-minded types to be employed as administrators and enforcers, but it eases any guilt they might develop ("just doing my job -- rules are rules"), and strips the victim of any reasonable recourse (can't argue with an automaton). Automation allows for the much quicker identification and one-size-fits-all processing of any identified group. This relates to this post: http://cassiopaea.org/forum/index.php/topic,26888.0.html

Big Intel is certainly interested in hypothesis generation and predictive analytics regarding the masses.

I wonder what they mean by supporting "disruptions" in the scientific and commercial worlds.

According to Wikipedia, telematics is:
- The technology of sending, receiving and storing information via telecommunication devices in conjunction with affecting control on remote objects.
- The integrated use of telecommunications and informatics, for application in vehicles and with control of vehicles on the move.
- Telematics includes but is not limited to Global Positioning System technology integrated with computers and mobile communications technology in automotive navigation systems.
- Most narrowly, the term has evolved to refer to the use of such systems within road vehicles, in which case the term vehicle telematics may be used.

IMO, no privacy means required self-censorship and, effectively, eventually, no mind of your own.

Disruptive/Disruptions is described below. It also means not being in a competitive environment as most businesses are. I think the term originates from Blue Ocean Strategy:
Blue Ocean Strategy is a business strategy book first published in 2005 and written by W. Chan Kim and Renée Mauborgne of The Blue Ocean Strategy Institute at INSEAD. The book illustrates what the authors believe is the high growth and profits an organization can generate by creating new demand in an uncontested market space, or a "Blue Ocean", rather than by competing head-to-head with other suppliers for known customers in an existing industry


A disruptive innovation is an innovation that helps create a new market and value network, and eventually goes on to disrupt an existing market and value network (over a few years or decades), displacing an earlier technology. The term is used in business and technology literature to describe innovations that improve a product or service in ways that the market does not expect, typically first by designing for a different set of consumers in the new market and later by lowering prices in the existing market.

In contrast to disruptive innovation, a sustaining innovation does not create new markets or value networks but rather only evolves existing ones with better value, allowing the firms within to compete against each other's sustaining improvements. Sustaining innovations may be either "discontinuous"[1] (i.e. "transformational" or "revolutionary") or "continuous" (i.e. "evolutionary").

The term "disruptive technology" has been widely used as a synonym of "disruptive innovation", but the latter is now preferred, because market disruption has been found to be a function usually not of technology itself but rather of its changing application. Sustaining innovations are typically innovations in technology, whereas disruptive innovations change entire markets. For example, the automobile was a revolutionary technological innovation, but it was not a disruptive innovation, because early automobiles were expensive luxury items that did not disrupt the market for horse-drawn vehicles. The market for transportation essentially remained intact until the debut of the lower priced Ford Model T in 1908.[2] The mass-produced automobile was a disruptive innovation, because it changed the transportation market. The automobile, by itself, was not.
 
Back
Top Bottom