POST 9
A DEEP DIVE INTO ENCLOSURE ‘D’
So with all that in mind… let us take a deep dive into the world of Enclosure D.
I am focusing in on Enclosure ‘D’ alone because as of today it is the earliest dated thus far excavated. Yes there are many other fascinating carvings and devices that appear in the later enclosures but I want to take a very close look at the source code so to speak – and that is found in Enclosure ‘D’, the one enclosure that the archaeologists are confident remains as it was constructed and with no adaptations later on in its life.
A necessary caveat; after 20 years of excavation, only possibly as little as 20% of the total site has been excavated. Geological surveys reveal numerous other extremely large circular read outs suggesting there are multiple other structures waiting to be unearthed.
GT geological survey results
Whether earlier or later we cannot say. Looking at the above they seem to me so vast in size compared to the known enclosures bottom right (in green), I simply cannot see how they would be comparable purpose finds or that they could come from the earliest level, but only time will tell. Therefore, for now my argument rests on the limitations of the known evidence to date.
The issue of dating is really messy and there are plenty of detractors on the accepted carbon dating because so few samples have been taken and all that have were based on materials that do not conclusively prove a construction date merely the date these materials were placed in proximity to the stones (not mentioning the highly likely contamination issues when you consider the site was ritually and deliberately buried)
That being said we have to go with something, so according to the following…
… we have a benchmark date of circa 9,600BC for Enclosure D.
Here are the main T-pillar enclosures packed in tight together (Enclosures A-F).
I still find it very interesting that Enclosure ‘D’ is very marginally off of a true North South orientation whilst the subsequent enclosure ‘A’ goes wildly off course, ‘B’ and ‘C’ start to wander back and ‘F’ follows an entirely different orientation. Was north at a different spot than it is today when ‘D’ went up? Did it then move about over the centuries after? Had the builders lost the source code of why north mattered so much by the time of ‘F’ (which is thought to track the rising of the sun/moon?)
Enclosure ‘E’ by the way appears to be a dry run for the technique of successfully constructing the floor and central pillar orientation (minus the pillars themselves) as no evidence has been found for holes where other pillars would have been. Its orientation is also almost precisely that of ‘D’ again suggesting that come what may in terms of what is discovered elsewhere, for these builders ‘D’ was their first go for real.
Enclosure ‘D’
The enclosure comprises 11 exterior T-pillars embedded into walls, with stonework benches between each pillar. There are then two larger pillars in the centre. Holes and groves in the tops of many of the pillars are further suggestive of their double use as roof supports. It may have originally looked something like this…
An artist’s impression of Karahan Tepe which I think is actually wrong because (a) its too large in diameter to sustain a roof with just 2 central pillars and (b) I do not think it had a full roof anyway as witnessed by the weathering/erosion, but still it provides a useful impression of what Enclosure D at Göbekli Tepe might have originally looked like.
To date, and following a great deal of searching, I have to conclude that no one it seems has thought fit to provide us with a full photographic record or set of complete line drawings of the 13 T-pillars of Enclosure ‘D’ as a single body of work so as to be considered in its entirety. No archaeologist, academic, or alternative researcher. Yes, individual or randomly associated pillars are discussed and theorised about and often represented, but no one seems to have considered that the pillars may represent a totality and should therefore be considered as such. And I have to ask why?
Anyway, I have painstakingly hunted through hundreds of photos to ascertain as best I can what lies on every pillar; for what is not often considered is that the pillars have two sides and a front and images appear on all these faces in different combinations. Regrettably there are still a few gaps in my record and I just have to assume that no photographic record anywhere suggests that the few sides of pillars I could not account for means they are therefore blank. But I cannot 100% confirm this.
As I explored the designs in total I began to think about the possibility that they might represent individual stages in a single overarching narrative – rather akin to the way that the stations of the cross are laid out in separate arches around a church and around which pilgrims would travel, hearing certain elements of the Jesus story told aloud and then pay their specific ritual obedience’s at each step of the way.
The 13 T-pillars of Enclosure ‘D’, numbered in sequence as they were excavated.
So as a thought experiment I’m going to take you around Enclosure D to see what crown of thorns we can perhaps uncover.
We will start at the point the enclosure suggests is close to due north.
A DEEP DIVE INTO ENCLOSURE ‘D’
So with all that in mind… let us take a deep dive into the world of Enclosure D.
I am focusing in on Enclosure ‘D’ alone because as of today it is the earliest dated thus far excavated. Yes there are many other fascinating carvings and devices that appear in the later enclosures but I want to take a very close look at the source code so to speak – and that is found in Enclosure ‘D’, the one enclosure that the archaeologists are confident remains as it was constructed and with no adaptations later on in its life.
A necessary caveat; after 20 years of excavation, only possibly as little as 20% of the total site has been excavated. Geological surveys reveal numerous other extremely large circular read outs suggesting there are multiple other structures waiting to be unearthed.
GT geological survey results
Whether earlier or later we cannot say. Looking at the above they seem to me so vast in size compared to the known enclosures bottom right (in green), I simply cannot see how they would be comparable purpose finds or that they could come from the earliest level, but only time will tell. Therefore, for now my argument rests on the limitations of the known evidence to date.
The issue of dating is really messy and there are plenty of detractors on the accepted carbon dating because so few samples have been taken and all that have were based on materials that do not conclusively prove a construction date merely the date these materials were placed in proximity to the stones (not mentioning the highly likely contamination issues when you consider the site was ritually and deliberately buried)
That being said we have to go with something, so according to the following…
… we have a benchmark date of circa 9,600BC for Enclosure D.
Here are the main T-pillar enclosures packed in tight together (Enclosures A-F).
I still find it very interesting that Enclosure ‘D’ is very marginally off of a true North South orientation whilst the subsequent enclosure ‘A’ goes wildly off course, ‘B’ and ‘C’ start to wander back and ‘F’ follows an entirely different orientation. Was north at a different spot than it is today when ‘D’ went up? Did it then move about over the centuries after? Had the builders lost the source code of why north mattered so much by the time of ‘F’ (which is thought to track the rising of the sun/moon?)
Enclosure ‘E’ by the way appears to be a dry run for the technique of successfully constructing the floor and central pillar orientation (minus the pillars themselves) as no evidence has been found for holes where other pillars would have been. Its orientation is also almost precisely that of ‘D’ again suggesting that come what may in terms of what is discovered elsewhere, for these builders ‘D’ was their first go for real.
Enclosure ‘D’
The enclosure comprises 11 exterior T-pillars embedded into walls, with stonework benches between each pillar. There are then two larger pillars in the centre. Holes and groves in the tops of many of the pillars are further suggestive of their double use as roof supports. It may have originally looked something like this…
An artist’s impression of Karahan Tepe which I think is actually wrong because (a) its too large in diameter to sustain a roof with just 2 central pillars and (b) I do not think it had a full roof anyway as witnessed by the weathering/erosion, but still it provides a useful impression of what Enclosure D at Göbekli Tepe might have originally looked like.
To date, and following a great deal of searching, I have to conclude that no one it seems has thought fit to provide us with a full photographic record or set of complete line drawings of the 13 T-pillars of Enclosure ‘D’ as a single body of work so as to be considered in its entirety. No archaeologist, academic, or alternative researcher. Yes, individual or randomly associated pillars are discussed and theorised about and often represented, but no one seems to have considered that the pillars may represent a totality and should therefore be considered as such. And I have to ask why?
Anyway, I have painstakingly hunted through hundreds of photos to ascertain as best I can what lies on every pillar; for what is not often considered is that the pillars have two sides and a front and images appear on all these faces in different combinations. Regrettably there are still a few gaps in my record and I just have to assume that no photographic record anywhere suggests that the few sides of pillars I could not account for means they are therefore blank. But I cannot 100% confirm this.
As I explored the designs in total I began to think about the possibility that they might represent individual stages in a single overarching narrative – rather akin to the way that the stations of the cross are laid out in separate arches around a church and around which pilgrims would travel, hearing certain elements of the Jesus story told aloud and then pay their specific ritual obedience’s at each step of the way.
The 13 T-pillars of Enclosure ‘D’, numbered in sequence as they were excavated.
So as a thought experiment I’m going to take you around Enclosure D to see what crown of thorns we can perhaps uncover.
We will start at the point the enclosure suggests is close to due north.