the REAL reason why they haven't been back to the Moon (video)

[Cosmos]

I just want to share one of "my" youtube videos and would like to know what you are thinking about it :

the REAL reason why they haven't been back to the Moon : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iIW2cLOgMl8&feature=channel_video_title

 

[Mikey]

I think they're not back to the moon because all that money goes into wars all over the globe. They are not really interested in real research and having a true pioneering spirit.

 

[T.C.]

I think this vid is handy disinfo for NASA, to divert people away from the fact that we've never even been to the moon.

 

[Cosmos]

I think this vid is handy disinfo for NASA, to divert people away from the fact that we've never even been to the moon.

really do you think we never were on the moon ?

in the video they present data from NASA about unnatural events on the moon. I suggest this data they present exist really.
but we know that NASA (highly likely) hide things or/and manipulate data and pictures.

did you read Ingo Swanns book Penetration ? there is also a thread about it here: http://cassiopaea.org/forum/index.php?topic=7618.0

Edit: you say that it is a fact that we never even been to the moon?
is that the case ? do you have data to support this ?

 

[dannybananny]

I think that it is half true because there are bases on the other side of the Moon that isn't visible, if I remember correctly Swan saw towers and cities there, and green fog and some people doing work there which means there is also some kind of atmosphere. C's said that Apollo landed on Moon and that there are Gray bases there and on Mars there are Gray and reptilian bases, but this video is a clip from movie secret space that is cointelpro. And they could be going there but with the secret space program and their advanced crafts, but in other hand there's no need to go there(if they already know they are on the Moon) if they can get all they need in the underground bases because it's only waste of money!

 

[Cosmos]

I think that it is half true because there are bases on the other side of the Moon that isn't visible, if I remember correctly Swan saw towers and cities there, and green fog and some people doing work there which means there is also some kind of atmosphere. C's said that Apollo landed on Moon and that there are Gray bases there and on Mars there are Gray and reptilian bases, but this video is a clip from movie secret space that is cointelpro. And they could be going there but with the secret space program and their advanced crafts, but in other hand there's no need to go there(if they already know they are on the Moon) if they can get all they need in the underground bases because it's only waste of money!

Year Swann saw there humanlike people (all male) and naked down below !?

 

[Renaissance]

Is there something going on in the news or something that is making this topic suddenly a little popular? I ask because there are also new and current threads on the same topic at the David Icke forum and GLP. Not that I spend time at either of those places. I was doing some searching today and came across them.

Started March 5th
Why so hard to return to the moon...?
_http://www.godlikeproductions.com/forum1/message1381004/pg1

Started Feb 18th
Why we've never been back to the moon
_http://forum.davidicke.com/showthread.php?t=158402

 

[T.C.]

you say that it is a fact that we never even been to the moon?
is that the case ? do you have data to support this ?

I was first made aware of the conspiracy theory, and the data the theorists were providing back in 1995 after I watched this t.v show. I was convinced from then on.

A google search gives plenty of hits, but Dave McGowan's "Wagging the Moondoggie" is an entertaining analysis. There's a thread on it, here.

 

[Slow Motion Mary]

Nice video. I had a question at sott.net which remained unanswered: The asteroid that made a close flyby to Earth on 3/4/11: Was this the reason why the moon (as seen from the U.S.) on 3/5/11 was hanging low on the Northern horizon with a crescent to the bottom of the moon? I've been watching the sun/moon rise and sun/moon set in odd places for years, but this was a new position. I thought, severe wobble? But then the sun came up the next day where it should, I thought maybe the moon had propelled itself (or was propelled) into that odd position to escape the asteroid? Also, why is it we only see one face of the moon no matter where on Earth we are? Gives me a new meaning for "food for the moon"!

 

[Cosmos]

Nice video. I had a question at sott.net which remained unanswered: The asteroid that made a close flyby to Earth on 3/4/11: Was this the reason why the moon (as seen from the U.S.) on 3/5/11 was hanging low on the Northern horizon with a crescent to the bottom of the moon? I've been watching the sun/moon rise and sun/moon set in odd places for years, but this was a new position. I thought, severe wobble? But then the sun came up the next day where it should, I thought maybe the moon had propelled itself (or was propelled) into that odd position to escape the asteroid?

you watch the moon without knowing the moon cycle ? lack of knowledge about what's going on in the sky from your side ?

Also, why is it we only see one face of the moon no matter where on Earth we are? Gives me a new meaning for "food for the moon"!

I think the reason you see only on face of the moon is pure physics ! nothing odd

 

[ScioAgapeOmnis]

Also, why is it we only see one face of the moon no matter where on Earth we are? Gives me a new meaning for "food for the moon"!

I think the reason you see only on face of the moon is pure physics ! nothing odd

I found an explanation:

_http://www.moonconnection.com/moon-same-side.phtml

You may have heard references made to the "dark side" of the Moon. This popular, although somewhat inaccurate term refers to the fact that only one face of the Moon, the "near side", is visible to us. The dark side or far side is permanently rotated away from our planet.

Why is this the case? We all know that the Earth rotates on its own axis, so theoretically, the Moon should also do the same, allowing us to get a full picture of the planetoid. Why are we limited to seeing only 50 percent? It turns out that the speed at which the Moon rotates has lead to this particular phenomenon. Millions of years ago, the Moon spun at a much faster pace than it does now. However, the gravitational influence of the Earth has gradually acted upon the Moon to slow its rotation down, in the same way that the much smaller gravitational influence of the Moon acts upon the Earth to create tides. This influence slowed the rotational period of the Moon to match that of its orbit – about 29.5 days – and it is now "locked in" to this period.

Here is the wiki entry on the phenomenon:
_http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tidal_locking

And an explanation of why the Earth is not tidally locked to the Sun the way the Moon is locked to the Earth:
_http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20091118200840AAYQwb0

Pretty fascinating. I wonder if electrical forces are involved in this phenomenon as well?

 

[Slow Motion Mary]

SAO, thanks for the info on the face of the moon. I had looked and never found this explanation. Probably putting the wrong keywords into the search engine. I'm not a higher math/physics type person, so I don't always know the terminology. Pashalis, the fact that I saw the moon on the NORTHERN horizon indicates I know the phases of the moon and where the moon rises and sets in my locale. It rises generally EASTWARD and sets generally WESTWARD. IT DOESN'T RIDE THE NORTHERN HORIZON, which raised the question: Why is it there? If it was the effect of a wobble, then why did the sun the next morning rise where it should? Did the Earth whip one way to place the moon in the North, then whip back by the next morning to allow the sun to rise in a "normal", i.e. Eastern position? Is there an explanation for this phenomenon other than Pashalis's inference that I am an idiot?

 

[Cosmos]

Is there an explanation for this phenomenon other than Pashalis's inference that I am an idiot?

can you please explain where I inference that you are an idiot ?

SAO, thanks for the info on the face of the moon. I had looked and never found this explanation. Probably putting the wrong keywords into the search engine. I'm not a higher math/physics type person, so I don't always know the terminology. Pashalis, the fact that I saw the moon on the NORTHERN horizon indicates I know the phases of the moon and where the moon rises and sets in my locale. It rises generally EASTWARD and sets generally WESTWARD. IT DOESN'T RIDE THE NORTHERN HORIZON, which raised the question: Why is it there? If it was the effect of a wobble, then why did the sun the next morning rise where it should? Did the Earth whip one way to place the moon in the North, then whip back by the next morning to allow the sun to rise in a "normal", i.e. Eastern position?

don't you think that this thoughts are a bit far out ?
is there no possibility for you to suggest that your thoughts could be wrong ?
so I ask you again do you know where the moon on that exact date had to rise and sink, and did you compared it with your sighting ?

 

[Slow Motion Mary]

Nice video. I had a question at sott.net which remained unanswered: The asteroid that made a close flyby to Earth on 3/4/11: Was this the reason why the moon (as seen from the U.S.) on 3/5/11 was hanging low on the Northern horizon with a crescent to the bottom of the moon? I've been watching the sun/moon rise and sun/moon set in odd places for years, but this was a new position. I thought, severe wobble? But then the sun came up the next day where it should, I thought maybe the moon had propelled itself (or was propelled) into that odd position to escape the asteroid?

you watch the moon without knowing the moon cycle ? lack of knowledge about what's going on in the sky from your side ?

I think I've given enough info for you to know that I am aware or it wouldn't have appeared to me to be an anomaly. Do you have any questions about the anomaly itself that I can answer? Do you need normal latitude/longitude vs. anomalous latitude/longitude or something like that? If you have a clue, let me know. I think so much my brain hurts and from time-to-time I get tired of the Socratic method, forever asking questions. But if you need more info, let me know. I'm stumped.

 

[cubbex]

The moon always remembers to me the ying yang thing always.

I think this kind of videos are for those who truly believe on the government, and then by seeing this they say "I have been busted!"

Thanks anyway.