true crime novel as a tool for educating about psychopathy

  • Thread starter Thread starter Hildegarda
  • Start date Start date
H

Hildegarda

Guest
Somebody said once that literary works based on true stories of psychopaths are as informative as academic research on psychopathy, or may be even more informative. There is something about the stories of real people which are researched in depth, analyzed, and expertly narrated that makes the subject come alive and emphasizes its urgency.

Perhaps we can put together a list of books like that, true crime novels, biographies or psychological thrillers, to give each other an idea of what to add to our reading list?

I am presently reading "And Never Let Her Go" by Ann Rule -- it's a true crime novel based on the murder of Anne-Marie Fahey in Wilmington, DE back in the 90s. It had received a lot of media attention back then.

The perpetrator, Thomas Capano, was a very well-adjusted pathological individual, a pillar of the community, who has wormed his way into the girl's life and was intent on controlling her completely. He obviously could sense the victim-profile women,
too -- Anne-Marie had a vibrant personality, was friendly and successful, yet she did grow up with an alcoholic father, and she had an eating disorder. The other women he pursued, as well as his wife, were similar in this respect too: likely to put the others' needs before their own and not able to say "no" to manipulation.

He wrote her numerous letters in the same rambling, love-bomb style that psychopaths tend to use, almost word for word like the one here: http://cyberpaths.blogspot.com/ He was very manipulative, carefully cultivating an image of yourself as a do-gooder among the people who knew about the relationship between him and Anne-Marie, while portraying her as a troubled and messed-up individual. He would use against her the very things she told him about herself in confidence. E.g., he would constantly mention food in his letters and invite her to restaurants, which in anorexics only increases their anxiety about food and makes it impossible for them to eat. She would get weaker, and he would have grounds for showing more concern. Sick.

The big lesson for me was that, despite everything we learned, I still have a hard time wrapping my mind around the fact that nobody saw it coming. Sure, nobody sees it coming when somebody opens fire in a school or workplace, but after that initial reaction, things always come up that, in retrospect, were the warning signs. Strange or erratic behavior, psychiatric medication skipped, harassing neighbors etc, patterns of animal abuse in childhood etc.

With this guy, there were no signs. Nothing in his upbringing that would explain what happened. Everyone always looked up to him, since he was a kid; he was always the star student, later a successful lawyer, the responsible one, taking care of the family, watching out for his brothers etc. I keep wondering if this is due to the way the book is written, may be the author didn't want to delve into the roots of his behavior too deeply. Regardless, this story really gives you the idea of how well these
types can hide.

Do you have any recommendations for similar type books?
 
Harry Maclean's true crime novel, In Broad Daylight, is on the QFS recommended reading list. I haven't read it yet and haven't seen anything turn up in a forum search other than the reading list references so I don't have much to say about it other than that since it's on one of the top, if not the top reading lists in the galaxy, then it must be worth it.

Hildegarda said:
He would use against her the very things she told him about herself in confidence. E.g., he would constantly mention food in his letters and invite her to restaurants, which in anorexics only increases their anxiety about food and makes it impossible for them to eat. She would get weaker, and he would have grounds for showing more concern. Sick.

Sick indeed. Concern as a means of abuse (and the manipulation behind it) is really lacking in the public knowledge arena. The psychopath can use pity in so many ways whether as a manufactured 'victim' or 'rescuer'.

Hildegarda said:
With this guy, there were no signs. Nothing in his upbringing that would explain what happened. Everyone always looked up to him, since he was a kid; he was always the star student, later a successful lawyer, the responsible one, taking care of the family, watching out for his brothers etc. I keep wondering if this is due to the way the book is written, may be the author didn't want to delve into the roots of his behavior too deeply.

I would bet it's due to the author not finding or seeking such signs since psychopaths can't resist leaving their calling card here and there.
 
Here's some specific links from our site which illustrate what Hildegarde was talking about:

http://cyberpaths.blogspot.com/2009/03/nathan-eb-thomas-jr-emails-love-bombs.html

http://cyberpaths.blogspot.com/2008/12/predator-of-month-robert-darden-blame.html

http://cyberpaths.blogspot.com/2008/03/more-from-db-love-bomber.html

http://cyberpaths.blogspot.com/2008/01/emails-tofrom-john-gash.html

http://cyberpaths.blogspot.com/2007/06/jgridney-yidwithlid-moves-to-next-level.html

http://cyberpaths.blogspot.com/2007/04/one-of-becksteads-targets-shares-more.html

We call it e-bombing or a takeoff on the "love bombing" used by cults on their indoctrinees.
 
I will recommend "Doc: The Rape of the Town of Lovell" by Jack Olsen, which won the 1990 Edgar Award for Best Fact Crime. The author knows about psychopathy, quoting Hervey Cleckley's Mask of Sanity a few times.

Olsen describes how Dr. John Story, the psychopath doctor, raped numerous women in the town of Lovell in Wyoming for over 25 years without anybody doing anything about it. And even when some people knew about it (including hundreds or even thousands of victims), they only helped to conceal his behavior with their religious programming. The religious component in this story is huge, the crimes could not had happened otherwise, IMO. Lovell is a small town in Wyoming whose population is about 50% Mormon. The victims were very religious and most of them consider themselves property of men, or the Church. Dr. John Story established his medical practice in Lovell in 1958 and he rapes his victims while doing pelvic exams. The doctor, who was a pillar of the Baptist Church, enjoyed enormous prestige and support.

A quote from the book:

“A guilty defendant who trumpeted his innocence could sway jurors by the eloquence of his denial -it happened all the time. A guilty defendant who lacked conscience or a sense of shame could pass lie-detector tests. One of the prosecutors was even fascinated to learn that Story was so impressed by Dr. Hervey Cleckley’s Mask of Sanity, the classical study of psychopathy, that he’d insisted that his wife Marilyn and his two daughters read it!!"

Even though Dr. Story was a psychopath, the MMPI (Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory) and other tests had shown “no evidence of psychopathology”.

A doctor’s evaluation of Dr. Story concludes that he is a “private person who has spent an adult lifetime serving people as a physician” and that he is a deep believer in religion and ethics. His sexual fantasies, according to the psychological tests, were “normal and unimaginative,” and he lived a normal, “provincial” sex life with neither sadistic nor aggressive fantasies. Above all, he was emotionally stable and mentally healthy, and the charges against him were “inconsistent with the results of this diagnostic examination”.

At some point a pre-sentence investigator with a vast knowledge of criminals comes into the scene. He scans the psychiatrist’s report, Breck Lebegue, M.D. who found Dr. Story “alert, oriented and cooperative… shows a mild tendency for his thinking to jump from one subject to another, over-inclusiveness in an attempt to be accurate, and a great deal of projected blaming of others…”. The convicted man had insisted that he was the victim of a “vendetta against him by one woman whose request for a disability statement was denied.” As the PSI read, he says that certain offenders flatly refused to take responsibility for their actions, always had glib explanations, and, when one story didn’t impress, blithely switched to another. Familiar, eh? His says they are conscienceless robots, incapable of feeling guilt or taking blame. Dr. Story's I.Q. was 135, there was no indication of major psychopathology or cerebral dysfunction, he wasn’t mentally ill, and he “wouldn’t respond to treatment”. The PSI adds that "psychopaths stubbornly refused to admit they needed treatment and were impervious to it when it was forced into them." As the doctor talks about his family background, the PSI notices that the word “love” popped out several times, but with a curious lack of feeling. He even mumbled once, “I should adjust my speech to what I think you are.” As he continues talking and talking the message seems obvious for the PSI, the doctor hints that “everything about me is normal. How could I possibly be a criminal?”. The PSI realizes that Story’s criminal behavior went back almost 28 years and despite his medical degree and mild appearance, Dr. Story was shaping up as a textbook example of hardened criminal.

The PSI’s conclusions are so instructive that I’m going to include them here:

“Mr. John Story appears to have established a very definite pattern of criminal behavior which includes humiliation, victimization, and sexual assaults on select female patients. It appears that this behavior has progressed from its initial stages of simply humiliating women in the examining room as early as 1958 in Crawford, Nebraska, to actual sexual assaults on female patients in Lovell as recently as 1983. He appears to have been quite selective concerning his victims in that, for the most part, he selected only those women who were particularly vulnerable at the time. It appears that Mr. Story used a wide variety of methods to select his victims and to increase their vulnerability.

First, it appears that he used his position of authority as a doctor to intimidate patients. It appears that he then based further actions on individuals’ responses to his position of authority as a doctor and if they seemed particularly easily led or influenced, he continued with his victimization. Throughout the police department investigation and this investigation are references to Mr. Story’s view of himself as a doctor. He did not like to be questioned about his medical decisions or, for that matter, any decisions, and he made that quite clear with people he worked with. Additionally, he did not volunteer information to his patients or other individuals concerning medical decisions.

Second, Mr. Story has a good command of the English language. He has a substantial vocabulary and a good understanding of semantics. It appears that he has developed a pattern of using the language to help intimidate, confuse and humiliate other people. Again, during the investigation it was learned that it was widely known that Mr. Story could talk all around a subject or talk over people’s heads and did so regularly. It appears that when he combined his command of the language with his knowledge of medicine and medical terminology, he easily confused and intimidated a good number of people.

Finally, it appears that Mr. Story believes that he is superior to most other individuals in society. This seems evidenced first by his criminal behavior in the present offense and additionally by his attitude toward various social programs, rules and controls suggested by the state of Wyoming. It appears that he has the attitude that the laws and rules apply to all other individuals, but not to himself.

With such an attitude, it seems quite understandable how he could continue to humiliate, intimidate and victimize his patients with probably a relatively clear conscience. Throughout the trial on the present offense and his incarceration pending sentencing, he has steadfastly maintained his innocence and proclaimed he was convicted as the result of some grand conspiracy against him. It would appear to this Writer that the idea of a conspiracy would be the only way he could allow himself to view his situation, as he is far superior to other individuals and only a conspiracy could have resulted in his conviction.

In this writer’s opinion, Dr. John Story does not appear greatly different from other rapists this writer has dealt with, except that he has a better education and has committed a larger number of offenses. His attitude toward the present offenses appears to be that he is above the law, the laws are for other people and that his only mistake was in getting caught. He appears to have somehow made the determination that it is okay to sexually assault his patients in the examining room, but it is probably not okay to have an affair with his neighbor’s wife or to murder someone. It is not clear, however, how he has made that distinction and what would stop him from going even further in his victimization of people."

It is worth reading for all its connotations, not only on as a psychopathy case study, but also as example of the religious role in the whole mess. The book is written in a novel format making it a very interesting reading.
 
As per all the links we gave above - this is VERY familiar.
Sounds like every single one of the exposed Cyberpaths on our site.
Every Single One.

psyche said:
shows a mild tendency for his thinking to jump from one subject to another, over-inclusiveness in an attempt to be accurate, and a great deal of projected blaming of others…”. The convicted man had insisted that he was the victim of a “vendetta against him ...

As the PSI read, he says that certain offenders flatly refused to take responsibility for their actions, always had glib explanations, and, when one story didn’t impress, blithely switched to another. Familiar, eh? His says they are conscienceless robots, incapable of feeling guilt or taking blame.

The PSI adds that "psychopaths stubbornly refused to admit they needed treatment and were impervious to it when it was forced into them." As the doctor talks about his family background, the PSI notices that the word “love” popped out several times, but with a curious lack of feeling. He even mumbled once, “I should adjust my speech to what I think you are.” As he continues talking and talking the message seems obvious for the PSI, the doctor hints that “everything about me is normal. How could I possibly be a criminal?”.

Our only problem with true crime novels is that many people will continue to connect psychopathy to overt criminal behavior & persons and not pick up on the more frequent - subcriminal behavior and exploitativeness of the majority of psychopaths.
 
I really like reading John LeCarre. He wrote The Constant Gardener whose main character reminded me of myself when I first began to realize for the first the true horror of the situation in which we find ourselves It's also quite a good movie.

He's written quite a number of books and the ones I've read are quite good. The plots are not about individual psychopaths per se, but rather about the ruthlessness of governments, or corporations in their exploiotation of individuals for espionage in most of his books and other purposes. In The Constant Gardener unwitting subjects in Africa are used for clinical trials by pharmacutical companies.

I'm totally amazed and impressed by leCarre's depth and breadth of knowledge, and his literary style.
 
Los said:
Harry Maclean's true crime novel, In Broad Daylight, is on the QFS recommended reading list.


I have read In Broad Daylight, and it's great. It is just as much about a psychopath as it is about a kind of a community that allows the psychopath to go unpunished. The author describe a conservative community that is tight-knit yet highly private, individually and collectively. People are distrustful of strangers and reluctant to look into the lives of their own, too. They think that if they sit tight and look the other way, everything would blow over. Yes, but it doesn't work with a psychopath.

Instead of buying this book, I put in a purchase request in a local library. There was a waiting list on this book when I brought it back to return it. May be someone else out there will find it useful, too.
 
i too have read Anne Rule's Books and find they are excellent as studies on various types of psychopath. My grown up child has a personality disorder and i lived day to day with her game playing and much of what I learn stikes a chord. The fact that they take what you tell them. In confidence or emotion and use it to twist the knife. If you tell people or try to explain they for the most part fail to understand and see you as the psycho. And yet they see these true life crime documentaries on telly or read books and believe the plots every time. So it seems that it is easier to explain by fiction. i often thought of writing a book. i have had terrible trouble trying to piece together what happened in my family and I think especially with females people find it hard to believe they are capable of such calculated evil. To associate psychopathy with violence is something which the media is guilty of doing. Actually the icy cold ones who are able to act the victim are much more dangerous because you cannot spot them easily.
 

Trending content

Back
Top Bottom