🇺🇸🇾🇪🇮🇷 US President Donald Trump:
— DD Geopolitics (@DD_Geopolitics) March 17, 2025
"Every shot fired by the Houthis will be looked upon, from this point forward, as being a shot fired from the weapons and leadership of Iran, and Iran will be held responsible, and suffer the consequences, and those consequences will be dire". pic.twitter.com/jlYVBi87bi
Every shot fired by the Houthis will be looked upon, from this point forward, as being a shot fired from the weapons and leadership of Iran, and Iran will be held responsible, and suffer the consequences, and those consequences will be dire.
Regarding Iran, Trump just posted this
🇺🇸🇾🇪🇮🇷 US President Donald Trump:
— DD Geopolitics (@DD_Geopolitics) March 17, 2025
"Every shot fired by the Houthis will be looked upon, from this point forward, as being a shot fired from the weapons and leadership of Iran, and Iran will be held responsible, and suffer the consequences, and those consequences will be dire". pic.twitter.com/jlYVBi87bi
Regarding Iran, Trump just posted this
🇺🇸🇾🇪🇮🇷 US President Donald Trump:
— DD Geopolitics (@DD_Geopolitics) March 17, 2025
"Every shot fired by the Houthis will be looked upon, from this point forward, as being a shot fired from the weapons and leadership of Iran, and Iran will be held responsible, and suffer the consequences, and those consequences will be dire". pic.twitter.com/jlYVBi87bi
More bluster, more sanctions? Attacks on Iranian naval intelligence gathering or weapons delivery vessels near Yemen? Or something more serious, that might require an end to hostilities and then the diversion of resources from Ukraine?
I am scrutinizing the possibility of the present Iranian President as being a stooge. If I look closely, there has been an odd chronology:This war with Iran thing that the neocons/Mossad have been dreaming about for decades - I don't see how it's possible. Their weaponry is quiite far advanced from that of Iraq in 2003, including missile defence (they have their own native version of the S-500) and offensive hypersonics.
Plus, they have nukes. I'm not sure, but this is probably known by US/Israeli forces. So an outright war on Iran is off the table, because you literally cannot start a war between nuclear powers. If US/Israeli forces don't know about those nukes, 4D STS sure does, and so will likely prevent their attack dogs from starting a war. Basically, Iran is just too powerful - and the American elites hate it.
So I think their only options are the same tactics that Prouty wrote about in Secret Team, commenting on the changing nature of warfare between nuclear-capable enemies - economic warfare, information warfare, and social warfare, ie. terrorism, psyops, creating internal strife through sanctions, maybe trying to create a West-aligned internal fifth column, something like a domestic ISIS. Or their proxies will continue to fight it out elsewhere. Stuff like that.
But hard times make strong men, and Iran is currently strong because of the imposed hardship, and Iran has strong alliances, too, including military. Increasing the hardship may only strengthen their resolve and those alliances. Even a major false flag directed against the US, blamed on Iran, would run up against the military facts on the ground. I mean, the Pentagon can't even take out the Houthis.
So Trump is making noise, but I don't think it will go anywhere.
Well, I had a quick look at this new President and it's not that good - a random article features:This war with Iran thing that the neocons/Mossad have been dreaming about for decades - I don't see how it's possible. Their weaponry is quiite far advanced from that of Iraq in 2003, including missile defence (they have their own native version of the S-500) and offensive hypersonics.
Plus, they have nukes. I'm not sure, but this is probably known by US/Israeli forces. So an outright war on Iran is off the table, because you literally cannot start a war between nuclear powers. If US/Israeli forces don't know about those nukes, 4D STS sure does, and so will likely prevent their attack dogs from starting a war. Basically, Iran is just too powerful - and the American elites hate it.
So I think their only options are the same tactics that Prouty wrote about in Secret Team, commenting on the changing nature of warfare between nuclear-capable enemies - economic warfare, information warfare, and social warfare, ie. terrorism, psyops, creating internal strife through sanctions, maybe trying to create a West-aligned internal fifth column, something like a domestic ISIS. Or their proxies will continue to fight it out elsewhere. Stuff like that.
But hard times make strong men, and Iran is currently strong because of the imposed hardship, and Iran has strong alliances, too, including military. Increasing the hardship may only strengthen their resolve and those alliances. Even a major false flag directed against the US, blamed on Iran, would run up against the military facts on the ground. I mean, the Pentagon can't even take out the Houthis.
So Trump is making noise, but I don't think it will go anywhere.
In his efforts to flirt with Western media, the new president has even raised the idea of de-escalating tensions with Israel, suggesting that the regime in Iran could disarm if Israel did the same. But while Pezeshkian’s comments captured his target audience in the West, less reported was the fact that the new president received a huge domestic backlash from some elements of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) and its hardline constituency.
The IRGC’s demand of Pezeshkian is simple: do not challenge or abandon any of the regime’s key ideological pillars
Remarkably – or perhaps not – Pezeshkian’s administration has already gone out of its way to demonstrate its commitment to the above, from the new president’s over-the-top embrace of ‘Axis of Resistance’ leaders – including hugs and kisses for the late Hamas leader Esmail Haniyeh
Well, I had a quick look at this new President and it's not that good - a random article features:
The Pezeshkian Paradox: Iran’s New President and the IRGC
What we see is a potentially dismantling of the Iranian resistance. Odd. This reminds me of Arafat, the PLO, the Fatah (cf Palestine).
Those "guards" are expressing a schism between this new President and are objecting his views, somehow:
And, well - This President is "Hamas-friendly":
I wouldn't make myself illusions, with such state of affairs. But who knows, I don't have the Truth and I keep room for things to be "else" - that's for sure. But I see this and it clearly does not go in the right direction. I would be happy to know your thoughts (and other's) about this, if you please!
![]()
![]()
Is it possible that you remember this video, posted on YT in 2020 with Corbett bringing back his documentary of 2008 after 1 min long intro?I definitely have a mental picture of the documentary title in capital letters in my head, in brownish tones!
Thank you for your post - it makes great sense, especially for Trump.There are many sites of power in any nation, and the head of state is a negotiator between these groups all trying to carry out their own plans. The president also tries to carry out his own plans. In Iran it's probably similar to other states - there's public opinion, business interests, political elite and bureaucrats, the legal system, the military, etc. In Iran, there is also the clerical grouping. And then within each of these groups, there are different factions fighting for control.
Anyways, what that means is Pezeshkian, just like Trump, can't deviate too far from the negotiated course. Any head of state has to walk a fine line between smart and stupid (or good and evil) in order to appease the power centres in their country, while also carrying out their own personal plans. That includes Putin, who has done much better than any other.
Plus, they have nukes. I'm not sure, but this is probably known by US/Israeli forces. So an outright war on Iran is off the table, because you literally cannot start a war between nuclear powers. If US/Israeli forces don't know about those nukes, 4D STS sure does, and so will likely prevent their attack dogs from starting a war. Basically, Iran is just too powerful - and the American elites hate it.
Is it possible that you remember this video, posted on YT in 2020 with Corbett bringing back his documentary of 2008 after 1 min long intro?
@JEEP, no special effort was necessary, it was just sitting in one of my tabs "to be watched/read". It was Corbett and it was brown, and both things are closely connected. Since I'm in the same club with you when it comes to memory, I know that this kind of little 'glitch' sometimes happens, at least for me. Glad you've found the right one. Only that now, I have one more tab in the stack...@Possibility of Being , thank you for making the effort to locate my vague TECHNOCRACY memory.
In responce to this quoteMy prediction is that the voiding of the pardons ends up in the Supreme Court and they will not side with Trump. Prepare to be let down by conservative justices (again).
That would be interesting to see if he manages to do that. And then to see all those psychos on trial. Not holding my breath but one can hope…![]()