Trump Elected: The True MAGA Era Begins, Now What?

Funny how the Houthis strike again and again but each time are more self assured . Funny ha ha since the most powerful does the striking, for the only one that matters, but to no effect.
So who is the powerful ?
Funny also how Britain , the original parasite , and Europe , today have no assets , no collateral for new debt and are in great need of something to stop their great slide.
Funny ha ha how they hit upon Defence Industries as their saving grace .
Given that Russia is so far ahead military that they cannot catch up.
Funny also how they hang from the neck of Ukraine to convince all deficients about Russian's non existent threats.
Funny ha ha how we in our rotten West received Zelensky the cocaine user as our coup de grace from the Quorum STS.
 
Regarding Iran, Trump just posted this


Every shot fired by the Houthis will be looked upon, from this point forward, as being a shot fired from the weapons and leadership of Iran, and Iran will be held responsible, and suffer the consequences, and those consequences will be dire.

More bluster, more sanctions? Attacks on Iranian naval intelligence gathering or weapons delivery vessels near Yemen? Or something more serious, that might require an end to hostilities and then the diversion of resources from Ukraine?
 
Regarding Iran, Trump just posted this


Regarding:
1742229632910.png

The above totally refuted in the first five minutes of this vid:

Mohammad Marandi: Why did the US attack Yemen?
In this video, Mohammad Marandi discusses the reasons behind the US attack on Yemen, including the involvement of the Houthis, Israel, and US interests. Tune in for a deep dive into this complex geopolitical issue.
 
Regarding Iran, Trump just posted this




More bluster, more sanctions? Attacks on Iranian naval intelligence gathering or weapons delivery vessels near Yemen? Or something more serious, that might require an end to hostilities and then the diversion of resources from Ukraine?

This war with Iran thing that the neocons/Mossad have been dreaming about for decades - I don't see how it's possible. Their weaponry is quiite far advanced from that of Iraq in 2003, including missile defence (they have their own native version of the S-500) and offensive hypersonics.

Plus, they have nukes. I'm not sure, but this is probably known by US/Israeli forces. So an outright war on Iran is off the table, because you literally cannot start a war between nuclear powers. If US/Israeli forces don't know about those nukes, 4D STS sure does, and so will likely prevent their attack dogs from starting a war. Basically, Iran is just too powerful - and the American elites hate it.

So I think their only options are the same tactics that Prouty wrote about in Secret Team, commenting on the changing nature of warfare between nuclear-capable enemies - economic warfare, information warfare, and social warfare, ie. terrorism, psyops, creating internal strife through sanctions, maybe trying to create a West-aligned internal fifth column, something like a domestic ISIS. Or their proxies will continue to fight it out elsewhere. Stuff like that.

But hard times make strong men, and Iran is currently strong because of the imposed hardship, and Iran has strong alliances, too, including military. Increasing the hardship may only strengthen their resolve and those alliances. Even a major false flag directed against the US, blamed on Iran, would run up against the military facts on the ground. I mean, the Pentagon can't even take out the Houthis.

So Trump is making noise, but I don't think it will go anywhere.
 
This war with Iran thing that the neocons/Mossad have been dreaming about for decades - I don't see how it's possible. Their weaponry is quiite far advanced from that of Iraq in 2003, including missile defence (they have their own native version of the S-500) and offensive hypersonics.

Plus, they have nukes. I'm not sure, but this is probably known by US/Israeli forces. So an outright war on Iran is off the table, because you literally cannot start a war between nuclear powers. If US/Israeli forces don't know about those nukes, 4D STS sure does, and so will likely prevent their attack dogs from starting a war. Basically, Iran is just too powerful - and the American elites hate it.

So I think their only options are the same tactics that Prouty wrote about in Secret Team, commenting on the changing nature of warfare between nuclear-capable enemies - economic warfare, information warfare, and social warfare, ie. terrorism, psyops, creating internal strife through sanctions, maybe trying to create a West-aligned internal fifth column, something like a domestic ISIS. Or their proxies will continue to fight it out elsewhere. Stuff like that.

But hard times make strong men, and Iran is currently strong because of the imposed hardship, and Iran has strong alliances, too, including military. Increasing the hardship may only strengthen their resolve and those alliances. Even a major false flag directed against the US, blamed on Iran, would run up against the military facts on the ground. I mean, the Pentagon can't even take out the Houthis.

So Trump is making noise, but I don't think it will go anywhere.
I am scrutinizing the possibility of the present Iranian President as being a stooge. If I look closely, there has been an odd chronology:

The President is assassinated and a new one pops up.

Well.. the only alternative to your scenario (which makes 100% sense) would be that the current Iranian President suddenly "takes bad decisions", or acts "wrongly". I am scrutinizing this. (So a very hypothetical Israeli President).

I understand this may look fantasical, but honestly they set up an LGBT leader in Syria - so why not. And if I remember well, Israel has already taken over Lebanon in 2005 - it really seems they may have been holdin gthis up to this day. When the Hezbollah Nasrallah leader died, people had the feeling that Lebanon was on the verge of falling into bad hands. But this already happened in 2005 already.

And so, this modus operandi... Well... We have spectated a sudden change of leadership in Iran. I of course hope that the current President is a good one, but who knows. Honestly if they managed to kill a President, it means that they have some access. Setting a new guy, waiting patiently behind the curtains, would make it...

Given how Russia and China did not intervene in regard of Syria, lately, I suppose that if hostilities start against Iran, and if the President is a stooge, they wouldn't intervene. We shall see!

EDIT: indeed, a way to dodge Iran's "nuclear's threat"
 
This war with Iran thing that the neocons/Mossad have been dreaming about for decades - I don't see how it's possible. Their weaponry is quiite far advanced from that of Iraq in 2003, including missile defence (they have their own native version of the S-500) and offensive hypersonics.

Plus, they have nukes. I'm not sure, but this is probably known by US/Israeli forces. So an outright war on Iran is off the table, because you literally cannot start a war between nuclear powers. If US/Israeli forces don't know about those nukes, 4D STS sure does, and so will likely prevent their attack dogs from starting a war. Basically, Iran is just too powerful - and the American elites hate it.

So I think their only options are the same tactics that Prouty wrote about in Secret Team, commenting on the changing nature of warfare between nuclear-capable enemies - economic warfare, information warfare, and social warfare, ie. terrorism, psyops, creating internal strife through sanctions, maybe trying to create a West-aligned internal fifth column, something like a domestic ISIS. Or their proxies will continue to fight it out elsewhere. Stuff like that.

But hard times make strong men, and Iran is currently strong because of the imposed hardship, and Iran has strong alliances, too, including military. Increasing the hardship may only strengthen their resolve and those alliances. Even a major false flag directed against the US, blamed on Iran, would run up against the military facts on the ground. I mean, the Pentagon can't even take out the Houthis.

So Trump is making noise, but I don't think it will go anywhere.
Well, I had a quick look at this new President and it's not that good - a random article features:

The Pezeshkian Paradox: Iran’s New President and the IRGC

In his efforts to flirt with Western media, the new president has even raised the idea of de-escalating tensions with Israel, suggesting that the regime in Iran could disarm if Israel did the same. But while Pezeshkian’s comments captured his target audience in the West, less reported was the fact that the new president received a huge domestic backlash from some elements of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) and its hardline constituency.

What we see is a potentially dismantling of the Iranian resistance. Odd. This reminds me of Arafat, the PLO, the Fatah (cf Palestine).

Those "guards" are expressing a schism between this new President and are objecting his views, somehow:
The IRGC’s demand of Pezeshkian is simple: do not challenge or abandon any of the regime’s key ideological pillars

And, well - This President is "Hamas-friendly":
Remarkably – or perhaps not – Pezeshkian’s administration has already gone out of its way to demonstrate its commitment to the above, from the new president’s over-the-top embrace of ‘Axis of Resistance’ leaders – including hugs and kisses for the late Hamas leader Esmail Haniyeh

I wouldn't make myself illusions, with such state of affairs. But who knows, I don't have the Truth and I keep room for things to be "else" - that's for sure. But I see this and it clearly does not go in the right direction. I would be happy to know your thoughts (and other's) about this, if you please!

☺️ 🤔
 
Well, I had a quick look at this new President and it's not that good - a random article features:

The Pezeshkian Paradox: Iran’s New President and the IRGC



What we see is a potentially dismantling of the Iranian resistance. Odd. This reminds me of Arafat, the PLO, the Fatah (cf Palestine).

Those "guards" are expressing a schism between this new President and are objecting his views, somehow:


And, well - This President is "Hamas-friendly":


I wouldn't make myself illusions, with such state of affairs. But who knows, I don't have the Truth and I keep room for things to be "else" - that's for sure. But I see this and it clearly does not go in the right direction. I would be happy to know your thoughts (and other's) about this, if you please!

☺️ 🤔

There are many sites of power in any nation, and the head of state is a negotiator between these groups all trying to carry out their own plans. The president also tries to carry out his own plans. In Iran it's probably similar to other states - there's public opinion, business interests, political elite and bureaucrats, the legal system, the military, etc. In Iran, there is also the clerical grouping. And then within each of these groups, there are different factions fighting for control.

Anyways, what that means is Pezeshkian, just like Trump, can't deviate too far from the negotiated course. Any head of state has to walk a fine line between smart and stupid (or good and evil) in order to appease the power centres in their country, while also carrying out their own personal plans. That includes Putin, who has done much better than any other.
 
Trump just mentioned that tomorrow afternoon usa time all the kennedy files will be released .

2h ago / 9:02 PM GMT

Trump teases release of all remaining JFK files​


Katherine Doyle

During a tour of the Kennedy Center for the Performing Arts, Trump said that his administration will release “all of the Kennedy files” tomorrow, about 80,000 pages of records related to President John F. Kennedy's assassination. The Kennedy Center was named after JFK in 1964.

"We have a tremendous amount of paper. You've got a lot of reading," Trump told reporters. "I don't believe we're going to redact anything. I said, just don't redact. You can't redact."

Trump, who had made the release a campaign promise, added, “I’m a man of my word.”
 
There are many sites of power in any nation, and the head of state is a negotiator between these groups all trying to carry out their own plans. The president also tries to carry out his own plans. In Iran it's probably similar to other states - there's public opinion, business interests, political elite and bureaucrats, the legal system, the military, etc. In Iran, there is also the clerical grouping. And then within each of these groups, there are different factions fighting for control.

Anyways, what that means is Pezeshkian, just like Trump, can't deviate too far from the negotiated course. Any head of state has to walk a fine line between smart and stupid (or good and evil) in order to appease the power centres in their country, while also carrying out their own personal plans. That includes Putin, who has done much better than any other.
Thank you for your post - it makes great sense, especially for Trump.

I could not prevent myself from looking as Pezeshkian as himself a new power center, and opposing himself to a rather welded structure. But I will keep room for your sayings, thank you. 🤔 And thank you for having taken the time to developp :thup:
 
Plus, they have nukes. I'm not sure, but this is probably known by US/Israeli forces. So an outright war on Iran is off the table, because you literally cannot start a war between nuclear powers. If US/Israeli forces don't know about those nukes, 4D STS sure does, and so will likely prevent their attack dogs from starting a war. Basically, Iran is just too powerful - and the American elites hate it.

Personally, I think Trump is way out of his depth when it comes to Israel which means nothing is off the table. And he has no one to advise him. He doesn't understand psychopathy and he certainly does not understand 4D STS. My understanding is that 4D STS wants to get rid of Semites--people with souls--and there could be a concentration in that area though not in Israel. If 4D STS can bring Russia into the fray by Israel attacking Iran, they (4D STS) can destroy even more Semites potentially. As the Cs said, things are about to get chaotic. However, I do feel the American people have no appetite for war. And if Trump is seen as starting World War III that will certainly be bad for his ego and maybe he'll back off.
 
Is it possible that you remember this video, posted on YT in 2020 with Corbett bringing back his documentary of 2008 after 1 min long intro?

@Possibility of Being , thank you for making the effort to locate my vague TECHNOCRACY memory. What you found isn't it, but this has to be it albeit not brownish - from October 2017:

1742270310589.png

I was sort of right about this being a Corbett documentary, but not a stand alone one. It's actually a segment in Corbett's HOW BIG OIL CONQUERED THE WORLD, but specifically in PART TWO: WHY BIG OIL CONQUERED THE WORLD starting around 1:12:00 in. Interestingly enough, the provided full transcript has this - PART THREE: AGENDA: TECHNOCRACY - but that title doesn't appear in the vid. I guess those giant letters in the vid really stuck in my mind if not entirely as they actually appeared. And perhaps this shot was where the brownish came from although it's still not what I saw in my mind's eye - well, it was seven+ years ago and my memory is not at all what it used to be:

1742272279638.png


Both vids and full transcript:
 
@Possibility of Being , thank you for making the effort to locate my vague TECHNOCRACY memory.
@JEEP, no special effort was necessary, it was just sitting in one of my tabs "to be watched/read". It was Corbett and it was brown, and both things are closely connected. Since I'm in the same club with you when it comes to memory, I know that this kind of little 'glitch' sometimes happens, at least for me. Glad you've found the right one. Only that now, I have one more tab in the stack...
 
My prediction is that the voiding of the pardons ends up in the Supreme Court and they will not side with Trump. Prepare to be let down by conservative justices (again).
In responce to this quote
That would be interesting to see if he manages to do that. And then to see all those psychos on trial. Not holding my breath but one can hope… 😅

While I agree with Beau, simply because if they start prosecuting ALL the psychos, there would be mass suicides like Jeffery Epstien. The elites just can't leave a chance that those charged and unable to get out of it wouldn't turn over a lot of info that would be even more damaging. Then that would call even more attention to them as well. But it would be a nice show, that's for sure!

It does seem like Trump has many of them on the defensive this time around instead of being on the defense as he was during his first term. Maybe it is part of his strategy to keep them on the defense, not necessary believing he will win at everything, so they will be focused on that particular fight, allowing him to other things he wants to try or do?

Edit: I can't spell!!!
 

Trending content

Back
Top Bottom