Trump Elected: The True MAGA Era Begins, Now What?

Jeffery Sachs recently called Elon Musk the US Prime Minister and Trump the US president. C.A. Fitts says the bankers put Trump in office, in order to tear the government down, and complete the control grid for them. And they did a “go around” on Bobby K. (explained below)

Below are a few of my concerns regarding what appears to be a fast-moving train.

The 500 billion for the quantum computers with their own separate electrical grid are already underway in Texas, with no news agency mainstream or alternative challenging it.

Trump on board with new computer making designer mRNA vaxx for each individual. (48 hours after the computer gets a vile of the individual’s blood)

100 billion + already invested in making chips here in Phoenix AZ (Already started). Not far from where Bill Gates plans to build his new smart city, Belmont.

Blaming Zelensky for the Ukrainian war only makes Trump look stupid in the eyes of the world. (purposely?)

The tracks are being laid for those whom we don’t want to be sent to Gulag systems without any representation or chance of returning to society. (Normalizing it.)

Lawlessness from Trump down to the thugs on the UC Davis campus recently (while the cops watched) becoming the new norm. (Mob-rules or dog eat dog becoming the norm.)

C.A.Fits says the US has 500 trillion in land and minerals wealth. The US has 36 trillion in doubt. So… (What the…?) she also said they are preparing to sell it to private interests. (I personally could only verify approx. 200 trillion, but still?)

Yay! we’re sending all those bad brown people to the gulags, but…wait! I thought 10s if not 100’s of thousands of Chinese military age men came in through the Darin Gap and headed straight to California? Crickets….

HHS budget passed with an addition of 300 billion to it’s already double the size of the military budget. The CDC is under the HHS budget and Kennedy’s candidate was rejected for running that department. And…

Meet the OLD BOSS, SAME AS THE OLD BOSS: (?)

"After withdrawing his first nominee to lead the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), President Trump chose Susan Monarez, a longtime federal employee and current acting CDC director, as his new pick."

“Monarez has worked in the federal government for nearly 20 years across multiple offices but had not worked for the CDC prior to Trump tapping her as the agency’s acting head shortly after beginning his second term.”

“The Trump administration withdrew the nomination of former Florida Rep. David Weldon (R) to head the CDC earlier this month, with the former lawmaker saying the reason was the lack of sufficient support among Republicans to secure his confirmation.”

(According to Fitts Monarez is a hard-core mRNA supporter. They did a go around on Bobby.)

The Trump/Musk team could have used a scalpel but it seems that they are choosing to use a chainsaw for its destructive purposes. Which I think was the plan to leave the place in shambles. Then call for help.
 
C.A. Fitts says the bankers put Trump in office, in order to tear the government down, and complete the control grid for them.
Catherine Austin-Fitts is one of the "doom and gloomers". She thinks that Trump is fully on board the technocratic plans, while the C's suggested that he was misled by bad advice and may change course on the "Stargate AI" program, etc.

Remember that she thinks that Trump's team staged the assassination attempt in Butler.

A lot of her criticism is still valid though, eg. Trump using a chainsaw approach to what should be a surgery with a scalpel. Or her analysis of the technocratic plans that Trump is going along with, at least for now.

As to RFK jr, he may still be able to do his work even with a more or less hostile CDC head. According to Grok:

Yes, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) oversees the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). The CDC is an operating division of HHS, and its director reports to the HHS Secretary.
 
Maybe Trump doesn't want to open this can of worm yet... So many irons in his fire !!

From this post on X :

EXCLUSIVE: Israel had planned to strike Iranian nuclear sites as soon as next month but was waved off by President Trump in recent weeks in favor of negotiating a deal with Tehran to limit its nuclear program.

President Trump made his decision after months of internal debate over whether to pursue diplomacy or support Israel in seeking to set back Iran’s ability to build a bomb, at a time when Iran has been weakened militarily and economically.

The debate highlighted fault lines between historically hawkish American cabinet officials and other aides more skeptical that a military assault on Iran could destroy the country’s nuclear ambitions and avoid a larger war. It resulted in a rough consensus, for now, against military action, with Iran signaling a willingness to negotiate.
 
More information on the "innocent father from Maryland" sent to El Salvador prison. In another post it was said his wife has a Go Fund Me account and she's raking in big money at the same time she has a restraining order against him......she hit the jack pot!


More theatrics.

The Democrats also say they want to visit 30-year-old Andry José Hernandez, who they say is a “LGBTQ makeup artist” with a pending asylum application in the U.S.
 
Thierry Meyssan's (Voltairenet) rather optimistic analysis of what Trump is doing:


This part in particular includes some claims about Trump putting Netanyahu in his place and stopping the Israeli expansion plans:

Everyone reacted when he put the unelected Ukrainian President, Volodymyr Zelensky, in his place, but he also put Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu in his place twice [8]. The first time, he responded to his plan to annex Gaza by announcing that he would rather build a new Riviera than see him occupy the territory; the second time, he told him that he could do nothing to divide Syria and that he could not attack Iran either.

Certainly, for the moment, none of these three hotspots is at peace, but things are moving quickly:

- In Ukraine, he has admitted that Crimea, Donbass, and part of Novorossia are indeed Russian. Moreover, it is clear that a presidential election will have to be held. The "integral nationalists" [9] already know they have lost. Regarding the territories to be divided, the only two Ukrainian demands are, on the one hand, the recovery of the Zaporozhye civilian nuclear power plant (which Russia is firmly opposed to [10]) and whether or not Moscow will be allowed to annex Odessa without having to conquer it.

- In Palestine, he has made almost everyone admit that Hamas could not return to power in Gaza, but he has failed to find an alternative to the "revisionist Zionists" (i.e., the disciples of the fascist Vladymyr Jabotinky [11]) in Israel. Donald Trump has failed to stop the massacre of Palestinians, who are still starving in Gaza, nor end the sectarian massacres in Syria, which is still dominated by jihadists, but he has forced Israel to abandon its ambitions in Palestine, Lebanon, and Syria.

- In Iran, he is just getting started and has not yet made the Islamic Republic admit that it cannot safely arm the region's Shiite minorities, but he has not yet offered to guarantee their security by any other means. The situation here is more difficult because he has threatened Iran, as he did with Ukraine and the Palestinians, prompting an immediate hardening of Tehran's stance [12].

In all three cases, President Trump used his military without engaging in combat: he briefly suspended the intelligence the Pentagon was providing to the Ukrainian armed forces [13], causing a military collapse; he also briefly suspended arms deliveries to Israel, although this point was not publicized, but it caused great concern within the Israeli general staff. Conversely, he is building up forces in Diego Garcia to threaten Iran [14]. His only military action was to attack Ansar Allah in Yemen; a deadly and tactically useless action, given that the Yemenis were prepared for it, but useful for getting his message across to Iran.
 
The thing that I find most troubling about Trump is that he'll bring down most of the alternative space with him. Most in this space are truly pinning everything on him and I'm not sure how they'd deal with the cognitive dissonance of betrayal. The shock of it all to not have a champion... desperation, anger, being lost, feelings of powerlessness. Too many emotions to deal with.

I am particularly worried about the RFK betrayal that appears to be taking place. 😭
 
04/18/2025

The Trump administration has proposed a 50% cut to the State Department’s budget, including the elimination of funding for the United Nations and NATO.

The budget proposal also calls for significant reductions in foreign assistance, global health funding and diplomatic staffing.

The cuts come as the administration seeks to increase the Pentagon’s budget to $1 trillion.

Critics argue that these cuts will undermine U.S. diplomatic efforts and global influence, while supporters claim they align with a focus on domestic priorities and reducing unnecessary spending

NATO and UN to lose their main source of funding​

In a move that has sent shockwaves through the diplomatic community, the Trump administration has proposed a drastic 50% cut to the State Department’s budget, which includes the elimination of funding for the United Nations (UN) and the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO). The budget proposal, detailed in an internal memo and reported by The New York Times, also calls for significant reductions in foreign assistance, global health funding, and diplomatic staffing. This comes as the administration simultaneously seeks to increase the Pentagon’s budget to a staggering $1 trillion, raising questions about the priorities of the ruling class and the true intentions behind these fiscal maneuvers.

The proposal, which is still in its preliminary stages, has been met with fierce resistance from both within the State Department and from Capitol Hill. State Department spokeswoman Tammy Bruce defended the administration’s stance, emphasizing that the U.S. remains committed to NATO but views it primarily as a deterrent rather than a tool for waging war. “We want to make sure… that the nations in NATO can actually deliver on the mission of NATO, which is to be a deterrent. It is not to help with wars or to help fight them… NATO was meant to be a collection of entities that would stop the bad actors from doing the bad thing,” she said.

However, critics argue that the proposed cuts will severely undermine U.S. diplomatic efforts and global influence. Senator Jeanne Shaheen of New Hampshire, the top Democrat on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, expressed deep concern over the proposal. “When America First becomes America Alone, our economy, security, and prosperity will suffer as adversaries fill the void the Trump Administration leaves behind,” Shaheen stated. “Investments in diplomatic programs that promote peace and stability, and advance American national security interests are commonsense priorities that should be reflected in the State Department’s budget request.” The budget proposal, if implemented, would have far-reaching consequences for U.S. foreign policy and international relations, but it would also decouple the U.S. from predatory global bodies that are involved in provocations and corrupt multinational agendas.

Key points include:

Halving foreign assistance:
The proposal calls for a 50% reduction in foreign assistance funding managed by the State Department and the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID), which stood at $52 billion in 2024.

Eliminating global health funding: Funding for global health initiatives, except for small amounts dedicated to HIV, tuberculosis, and malaria, would be eliminated. The proposal also requires global health partners to contribute a larger share of funding.

Cutting diplomatic staff: The budget would freeze pay for U.S. foreign service staffers and cut travel and benefits, potentially leading to a significant reduction in diplomatic presence abroad.

Eliminating UN and NATO funding: The proposal calls for the complete elimination of funding to the UN and other major nongovernmental organizations, including NATO, which has been a cornerstone of U.S. foreign policy since its inception in 1949.

Reducing refugee and immigration programs: Several refugee and immigration programs would be cut, and the government’s independent watchdog office looking for waste and inefficiency in U.S. programs in Afghanistan would be eliminated.

As the proposal moves through the review process, it is likely to face significant opposition from both Democrats and Republicans in Congress. The final budget, which will be voted on in the coming months, may look very different from the current proposal. However, the mere suggestion of such drastic cuts sends a clear message about the administration’s priorities and its vision for America’s role in the world
 
However, critics argue that the proposed cuts will severely undermine U.S. diplomatic efforts and global influence. Senator Jeanne Shaheen of New Hampshire, the top Democrat on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, expressed deep concern over the proposal. “When America First becomes America Alone, our economy, security, and prosperity will suffer as adversaries fill the void the Trump Administration leaves behind,” Shaheen stated. “Investments in diplomatic programs that promote peace and stability, and advance American national security interests are commonsense priorities that should be reflected in the State Department’s budget request.” The budget proposal, if implemented, would have far-reaching consequences for U.S. foreign policy and international relations, but it would also decouple the U.S. from predatory global bodies that are involved in provocations and corrupt multinational agendas.
Ha! What a joke. DOGE and others have shown whats really going on with all this funding. It has to go! It's a huge operation globally and dismantling it won't be easy and lots of opposition comes along with it.
 
Tulsi Gabbard, Pete Hegseth, JD Vance and Susie Wiles helped shut down Israel/USA joint attack on Iran. For now it looks like DNI Gabbard as the nation's top intelligence chief is having a positive effect, as the usual neocons and interventionists can't so easily get their way anymore.
VERY good to see! Here's the small group thats actually helping Trump see straight. There is huge opposition in Israel that don't want these wars that their current government is dumping on them, they know that it means their destruction. It's possible the current bunch will be removed which is the best case scenario.

But it looks like they (the hawks and the Israeli lobby/AIPAC) are currently trying to get everyone opposed to war with Iran fired. On Wednesday a third official was escorted out of the Pentagon, with security credentials removed:

A third high-level Pentagon staffer has been placed on administrative leave in two days as part of a probe into media leaks.

Colin Carroll, chief of staff to Deputy Secretary of Defense Stephen Feinberg, was escorted out of the building on Wednesday, following Dan Caldwell, senior advisor to Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, and Darin Selnick, deputy chief of staff to Hegseth.
"We can confirm that Mr. Carroll has been placed on administrative leave pending investigation. We have nothing additional to provide at this time," a defense official told Fox News.
54,670449

 
Last edited:
The thing that I find most troubling about Trump is that he'll bring down most of the alternative space with him. Most in this space are truly pinning everything on him and I'm not sure how they'd deal with the cognitive dissonance of betrayal.
Many of the most well-known people in the alternative space see Trump very negatively:

Whitney Webb
Catherine Austin-Fitts
Corbett
David Icke

Whether they will be proven correct is open. It does seem that their reading of Trump is incorrect, because they tend to think that he staged the assassination attempt and didn't mind one of his supporters getting shot and killed.
 
Back
Top Bottom