Trump Elected: The True MAGA Era Begins, Now What?

Alma.Innovadora said:
I think seeing all of this just as a "resources" issue is limiting. It's a screen for people who don't see a little beyond it all. If you only see him with the manual of "international treaties" under his arm, you only see that, a war for "natural resources". If they can't see beyond, the meaninglessness of this world would drive us crazy because nothing makes sense. But that "nonsense" is their system, so it is functional for them to generate the results that only benefit them and inherent to a greater purpose as well.

They always had the resources at hand, it was never impossible, unlike them, who when they have them, sanction and block everyone.

There is not a leftist or anyone in Ukraine against their aims of conquering natural resources. Ah! but they started killing people/human resources in those areas to also pull Russia into a conflict. They could have stayed only until the coup, but it was not enough, it was not the only objective.

For example, "Brazil is shaping up to be the world's largest oil producer by 2025." now they have Lula as a pawn... why the hell create a conflict in Venezuela or another country close to them for the same thing? Maduro has never refused to negotiate the purchase and sale of oil with the EE.UU. Oh, they just don't want to pay for it, plus they say it's a worse kind of oil, so what the hell do they want? put another pawn in power and that's it. It's just that they're really annoying, a pineapple on the ass.

Russia has a better way to generate the gas they need in Europe, they have benefited from it, ah! they kicked the table the moment the EE.UU ordered them and now they have the gall to say that Russia wants to keep all the gas.

The worst thing is that wherever they go, from our perspectives, they damage everything. In the event that these psychopaths achieve the conquest of Russia, China, Venezuela, Iran, etc. They will damage everything and make the world worse because it is their nature, they need to generate misery.

Even the issue of money doesn't even make sense anymore. How many more millions do these companies need? by God if everything they earn is enough to maintain the world if only they would change the way they exploit resources and people. That hasn't worked either and it doesn't suit them. They create the necessary misery to then offer a solution with no real intention of doing anything. Because that's their goal, just to create "problems". Every minimal thing that can be useful for humanity, they use only proportionately to destroy and annoy!

Every year I read "such a country will be the largest exporter in this or that"... in other words, there are plenty of resources!, just sit down to negotiate, but no, it's a call to dethrone, kill, cleanse, conquer and fill your belly. Predators at last.

Psychopaths can leave Trump with an America in very bad state, so bad as they want, but if Trump decides to create a strong "publicity relationship" with Putin (and/or China?) with it, that allows him not to continue allocating his resources that contribute to the deterioration of the US, stopping the war in Ukraine, controlling the fighting dogs better in Europe, in addition to the great internal cleaning in your country that is not easy at all, it is very nice to be true that ramification, but the chaos cannot be less, too much disturbance for psychopaths, too much loss of control for them and necessary to create resistance.

Trump can't keep playing everyone's enemy, he has to ally with those who were his enemies before, because the allies of the United States at the moment, they are the worst employees he can have. They will bankrupt your company/country, which is surely the intention. Massive layoff! They will also be crying for unjustified dismissal... the last straw (laughter).
Click to expand...
agree - also major offenders such as the Blackrock mob, bankrupt countries via financed coups and wars then land grab and profit from the debt incurred - as they dictate the foreign policys of many governments.
 
Saki said:
What are the odds of less censorship and more open discussion?
Click to expand...
I'd say good, if you can take the word of the incoming FCC Head, Brendan Carr. This reply to Nicole Shanahan about Newsguard is very encouraging:

https://twitter.com/x/status/1860854182535639111

Yep.NewsGuard positions itself as the Internet’s arbiter of truth. Of course, it is nothing more than an Orwellian outfit that operates for the purpose of censoring viewpoints that fall outside an approved narrative.Its conduct has also led to collusive ad boycotts, which may violate antitrust and competition laws. The FTC and DOJ can examine that. At the FCC, Section 230, as relevant here, only protects “good faith” actions. Given NewsGuard’s concerning track record and the fact that it is under congressional investigation for its impact on protected First Amendment speech, I will say this for now: Any tech company that continues to rely on NewsGuard is putting its Section 230 protections in serious jeopardy. More to come on this…
Click to expand...
 
Here's an excellent pick by Trump: Dr. Jay Bhattacharya for Director of the National Institutes of Health. Very much a critic of the covid policies. You can scroll his X profile and see how based he is on health. One example

https://twitter.com/x/status/1861226586080722963

It seems pretty clear that Trump sees the way covid was managed in the past as a mistake. Between RFK Jr. and Bhattacharya, we should be in good hands should there be another manufactured pandemic.
 
This is interesting. Trump's team is going to attempt to avoid the Deep State's surveillance of their communications including office bugs and phone taps. Another move based on his experiences during his first term. From ZeroHedge:

President Trump’s Chief of Staff, Susie Wiles, announced the Trump transition team has refused to sign an MOU with the Government Services Administration (GSA), and will not be using cell phones, computers, offices or “any technology” provided by the GSA. This is a smart move to avoid the Deep State surveillance situation that was faced in the first term.

In the first Trump administration, the GSA had wiretaps, office bugs, and gave all the electronic communication information from the Trump transition to the FBI, IC and later Robert Mueller. In essence, the GSA spied on the Trump team, then gave all the data to the operatives who were in place to target them. The Trump team is not making this mistake again.

The Trump transition team is also not going to use the office space provided by the GSA and will instead have their own offices and security systems in place to coordinate the transition to power.
Click to expand...
 
gottathink said:
Just listening to a Fox News report about multiple threats being made against the lives of the Trump administration nominees and their families. The deep state is going after them now. Better include them in our prayers.
Click to expand...
Does that mean that it is a revolution from the top? Or is it to become more of a revelation of who was in power all along?

Anyway, Russia does not expect all that many changes in its foreign policy. Below are excerpts from a couple of articles:

Trump may be Oreshniked on Ukraine even before he gets to China
Andrey Sushentsov is a program director of the Valdai Club and dean of MGIMO's school of International Relations. He's one of Russia's top analysts. Sushentsov released this pearl to TASS, among other things:

"Trump is considering ending the Ukrainian crisis, not out of any sympathy for Russia, but because he acknowledges that Ukraine has no realistic chance of winning. His goal is to preserve Ukraine as a tool for U.S. interests, focusing on freezing the conflict rather than resolving it. Consequently, under Trump, the long-term strategy of countering Russia will persist. The U.S. continues to benefit from the Ukrainian crisis, regardless of which administration is in power."

Sushentsov fully recognizes how "the U.S. state system is an inertial structure that resists decisions it deems contrary to American interests, so not all of Trump's ideas will come to fruition."

That's just one graphic illustration, among many, that Moscow harbors no illusions whatsoever about Trump 2.0.
Click to expand...
And in FSB chief warns of escalation over US-backed strikes on Russia
Washington's authorization for Kiev to carry out attacks on internationally recognized Russian territory using Western-supplied long-range weapons will inevitably lead to an escalation of the conflict, the head of Russia's Federal Security Service (FSB), Aleksandr Bortnikov, has warned.

Moscow must be prepared for any provocations from Washington, London, and their allies, the FSB chief said, specifically noting that US President Joe Biden and his team were likely to aggravate the situation in the key global regions as much as possible before leaving office in January.

"The main goal is to hinder the new administration's potential opportunities for a political solution to the accumulated problems," Bortnikov claimed.

He also expressed doubt that the incoming Trump administration would take a drastically different course, stating that "it is unlikely that the election of a new US president will lead to a fundamental change in Washington's foreign policy."

Bortnikov accused the US and its partners of using the most "unsightly methods" to create chaos in the post-Soviet space, and turn it into a cheap resource base.
Click to expand...
Even if changes will not be radically different in the foreign policy of the US, more people have become aware of what has, and what is going on, That is a positive development.
 
Jay has his own podcast though he hasn't been active recently - probs cause he was getting lined up for a big job.

S

Thread 'Illusion of consensus podcast'

I haven't seen this podcast mentioned on the forum. It's jay bhattacharya's podcast and I'd recommend it highly. Some of the interviews are worth a listen and do present relevant perspectives and information.

Below are a few I'd recommend:

About mRNA - this will contain new information for a lot of people


On sleep:


On regenerative medicine (seems like an obscure area that almost sounds too good to be true)


And more. I'd say don't listen them on YouTube - get a podcast app so you can listen whilst doing other stuff.
  • Like
 
1732803784821.png

Some exaggeration, no doubt, as this is from CNN. Personal targets? I strongly doubt it. Change their lives forever? Yes, of course, why not? Learn something. Fear of being threatened? No, that should not happen. Drive them from their jobs? Unless their jobs are unnecessary, no, not if they work in the true interests of the public. Afraid to speak up? Isn't that part of the problem, though, non-transparency and not speaking up if they suspect that what they're doing is not approved by the public majority? Whether or not Musk should have made names public, I don't know.

 
Although many cabinet picks are business as usual for US politics, I've been feeling that I'm witnessing an incredible change in the story of our world.

The stolen election gave way to four years under Biden, which included the plandemic and millions murdered by gov't bioweapons and lockdowns, kids mutilated by the gender cult, the mass flooding in of illegals, Satanism becoming more confident in mass culture, the genocide in Gaza, and the march towards WWIII - everything started to look very bleak, to be quite honest. It was everything one could expect when a Dark King usurps the rightful throne of the true leader of the people.

And then there was the assassination attempt, the miracle, and the program change. If anything, it seems that the future is open again, where it didn't look like that for a long time.

A better way forwards in many respects is not guaranteed, in no small part because there are so many looming wild cards for the end of civilization, or the world, which is the background setting to the many cabinet picks who are beholden to the same forces that have always ruled US politics. So although hope at this point is somewhat of a Fool's dream, I'm at least feeling that the potential of this moment is palpable, even if difficult to understand - who knows what will happen with RFK's plans for health and food, or Bhattacharya at the head of the NIH, Musk's DOGE? Add to that the Oreshnik de-escalation strikes and the success of BRICS+ this sure has been one crazy ride.

We're not in for a new Golden Age, but I'm almost embarrassed at how much I'm enjoying the turn towards common sense, to plain old American normalcy (with all its flaws). I guess it's perhaps the greatest blessing one could ask for after four years in hell.
 
An Interview with Tucker Carlson where he express is sentiment about a war with Iran is the real thread Trump administration is facing.
I am very concerned that the people who have hated Trump for eight years and run out of
ways to destroy him, indicting him, first calling him a racist, spying on him with the federal
intel agencies, sickening the FBI on him, trying to put him in prison, then trying to
kill him at least twice, probably more actually, but at least twice.

And that those people out of options have decided the only way to stop Trump and the
disclosure that a Trump administration will bring, once again, disclosure is what they
fear, having their crimes revealed, that the only way to stop Trump is with a world war.

And so I've been pretty fixated on that for months, probably more than a year.
I've just thought a lot about it and I know a lot of the people involved and they're
very, very, very focused on war.

Permanent Washington doesn't care about domestic policy in case, in case your viewers, I'm
sure know this, but just want to restate it.
They don't care about domestic policy.
They don't care about fixing the country, closing the borders, ending the drug crisis,
getting the cartels out of, you know, the entire Southwest.
They don't care about that.
What they care about is exercising power abroad, killing people because it makes them feel
like God and making money.
And that's where the money is, trillions of dollars.
So they care about foreign policy.

And I've been concerned and remain concerned that that group of people, which is basically
everyone in DC in both parties, wants Trump to take the country to war either against
Russia or comma, far more likely comma, Iran.
And I think what people outside, I don't know how to the degree to which this is understood,
but I just will say it.
A war with Iran is a world war.

This is not 2002.
Iran is now part of a coalition that includes the biggest economies in the world and the
largest militaries in the world.
So a war with Iran means a war in effect or by proxy, but still a war with Russia, China,
Turkey and a lot of the rest of the world.
So that's a world war.

It's not just as simple as we're going to take out their nuclear facilities.
OK, how are you going to do that?
And how are you going to ensure that that doesn't destroy the United States in the process?
And of course, they don't care whether it destroys the United States.
That's the actual answer.
They don't care.

And if they cared, they would pause and think about it.
But anyway, I don't want to be bitter about it.
But to me, it's really simple.
Anybody who would even consider having a war with Russia or Iran should not be in any position
of power at all in this administration or any other administration.
It's super simple.

And I think especially Ukraine is so obvious.
Now, there is some debate on Iran and I'm not of course, I'm not endorsing Iran.
I'm not a Shiite.
But there's really no debate at this point about the debacle that has been Ukraine.
Ukraine's not going to win.
It's just completely destroyed Ukraine.
It hasn't crushed Russia.
It's really hurt the United States.

So anyone who can't say that out loud, should not have a job in the federal bureaucracy.
So that's my litmus test.
It's not about people or personality.
Of course, I know them all as I know you do too.
And I like a lot of them.
I even like some of the guys I disagree with.
One in particular I like very much.
Nice guy, good guy.
But it's just a simple practical test for whether or not you should wield power.
Do you have the requisite wisdom to lead my country?
And if you're still defending the war in Ukraine, you do not have the requisite wisdom to lead
my country.

That's my opinion.
Thank you.
Click to expand...

odysee.com

Ciel Voilé

Informations sur la géo-ingénierie et les atteintes au vivant.
odysee.com odysee.com
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Trending content

Back
Top Bottom