Trump Elected: The True MAGA Era Begins, Now What?

According to CAF, doing it all legally could have been done quickly too, but wasn't.
It's not hard to think that speed was of the essence in enacting DOGE, a seemingly Shock and Awe type maneuver! It caught the targets so off-guard that their only response was to have their Dem mouthpieces make complete fools of themselves with their hue and cry! Legal backlash may indeed be the ultimate consequence, but the public's broad acceptance and stunned realization of the breath and width of the exposed fraud may override any attempts to reverse outcomes.

I watched the entire White House video of RFK Jr's swearing in, with an introduction by Trump and a speech by RFK. RFK wants vaccines to be tested and to be safe.
For sure, unbrainwashing the public's perception of vaccines is going to be the ultimate challenge particularly with the full force of the pharmaceutical industry in attack mode. It's been predicted that the life expectancy of the Covid vaxxed will be severely shortened - three years the number that was put forth (April Drop Dead comes to mind). Should large numbers of the public start to expire, the truth about the dangers of vaccines will be self-evident. Otherwise, the horrific rise of autism and its correlation to the child vax schedule is another area of contention that finally needs to have a reckoning. But even more, the other causes of autism need to be addressed - glyphosate and heavy metals in our food, particularly that aimed at babies and children:

Toxic Metals, Glyphosate Found in Girl Scout Cookies

A recent laboratory investigation of Girl Scout cookies revealed widespread contamination with glyphosate and toxic metals across multiple product lines. The study, conducted by MIT researchers and published on GMOScience.org, analyzed 25 cookie samples from three states, documenting consistent presence of herbicide residue and heavy metals, with several samples exceeding EPA safety thresholds.
  • All tested samples (100%, n=25) contained detectable levels of glyphosate, with concentrations ranging from 13.57 ppb in Peanut Butter Patties to 111.07 ppb in Thin Mints – levels reportedly 334 times higher than recommended safety thresholds according to Purdue University research.
  • Heavy metal contamination was present in 88% of samples (n=22/25), with testing revealing presence of aluminum, arsenic, cadmium, lead, and mercury. Notably, 76% of samples exceeded EPA water safety limits for cadmium (>5 ppb).
  • Lead contamination was detected in 96% of samples, with Peanut Butter Patties showing the highest concentrations at 42.5 ppb for lead and 27.5 ppm (27,500 ppb) for aluminum.
  • The study examined products from both major manufacturers (ABC Bakers and Little Brownie Bakers) across three states: California, Iowa, and Louisiana, suggesting widespread distribution of contaminated products.
Stephanie Seneff, PhD, led the researchers of this study and as we here know, she has been on an endless quest to find and expose the causes of autism with glyphosate being a predominate focus.

Parents can soon use QR codes to reveal heavy metal content in baby food
Parents across the U.S. should soon be able to determine how much lead, arsenic, cadmium and mercury are in the food they feed their babies, thanks to a California law, the first of its kind, that took effect this year.

As of Jan. 1, 2025, every company that sells baby food products in California is required to test for these four heavy metals every month. That comes five years after a congressional report warned about the presence of dangerously high levels of lead and other heavy metals in baby food.

Every baby food product packaged in jars, pouches, tubs and boxes sold in California must carry a QR code on its label that consumers can scan to check the most recent heavy metal readings, although many are not yet complying.

Because companies seldom package products for a single state, parents and caregivers across the country will be able to scan these QR codes or go online to the companies’ websites and see the results.

I am a pharmacist researcher who has studied heavy metals in mineral supplements, dietary supplements and baby food for several years. My research highlights how prevalent these toxic agents are in everyday products such as baby food. I believe the new California law offers a solid first step in giving people the ability to limit the intake of these substances.
Certainly, basic food safety - and supply - is something RFK Jr will need to take on. We are so under attack by greedy, psychopathic corporations (remember, they have been legally recognized as persons!).
 
I’m really curious what DOGE and Tulsi will do in regards to the military and/or the Pentagon/CIA. Tulsi made some rather interesting remarks on how she plans to make those things “better“:

Her plan seems to be to stop those departments/agencies from doing illegal things and thereby eliminating the urge of whistleblowers to come forward in the first place, because well, if those agencies don’t engage in those kind of illegal behaviors, whistleblowers can’t whistleblow on anything!

Kind of a smart and common sense approach, although it will probably be SUPER hard to implement!
 
Certainly, basic food safety - and supply - is something RFK Jr will need to take on. We are so under attack by greedy, psychopathic corporations (remember, they have been legally recognized as persons!).

A good first step for RFK Jr., would be to apply a little DOGE to get at the corruptive roots, and then as the science is already pregnant with its toxic harm, would simply be to outlaw Glyphosate on American soil - and that would affect the tagalong genetic functions of modified plants that were made to adapt to it. This might help to remove farmers from that mafia of GMO-seeds and chemicals required (for which they are sold on the idea of increased yields to the point where they feel there is no alternative - it is likely that PR work against RFK Jr. will be aimed at farmers to reject).

It is such a humongous list of where to start, yet perhaps also start by striping out toxic adjuncts from vaccines and retest, and go from there.

May he be able to accomplish even a little and try to make it permanent change for the betterment of society.
 

Lavrov and Rubio hold phone call​


"Lavrov and Rubio reaffirmed their readiness to work together on restoring mutually respectful dialogue. The top diplomats agreed to stay in regular contact, "including on preparing a Russian-American meeting at the top level.”

"Senior US officials, including Rubio, National Security Adviser Mike Waltz, and Middle East Envoy Steve Witkoff, will reportedly head to Saudi Arabia in the coming days to kick off peace talks involving Russian and Ukrainian negotiators. Major European powers are not expected to participate"

"The Russian side reported that Lavrov and Rubio discussed the Ukraine conflict and the situation in Gaza."

 
What Trump is suggesting is that fighting lawlessness with more lawlessness works, which is doubtful.

Especially since the courts will continue to stop him and there is not much he can do about it, short of an actual dictatorial coup and dismantling of the checks and balances.
 
I don't think that's what he's suggesting, and I don't think he plans on doing anything illegal.
What Trump and Musk are doing with DOGE is already breaking several laws (conflict of interest for Musk, privacy laws, secrecy laws).

At least according to Catherine Austin-Fitts, speed is not really an argument since everything could have been done legally and quckly too.

The court injunctions will keep coming and not all of them are from Democrat-appointed judges either. If Trump plans to fight the judges instead of avoiding needless illegal actions, then you have to wonder whether that is just narcissism and possibly ignorance or the implementation of some plan.
 
Me thinking through this new Trumpism wave to partially drain the swam and it appears he is been allowed room to work. Theil and Ellison are oligarch supporting Trump. Larry is also a part owner in X.
The shadow govt is still in place and not moving anytime soon.
 
What Trump and Musk are doing with DOGE is already breaking several laws (conflict of interest for Musk, privacy laws, secrecy laws).

At least according to Catherine Austin-Fitts, speed is not really an argument since everything could have been done legally and quckly too.

The court injunctions will keep coming and not all of them are from Democrat-appointed judges either. If Trump plans to fight the judges instead of avoiding needless illegal actions, then you have to wonder whether that is just narcissism and possibly ignorance or the implementation of some plan.

Maybe Catherine Austin-Fitts is right, maybe not. She has an informed opinion, but IIRC she hasn't been close to the actual levers of power in years. Things may have changed drastically. So while her warning is good, her claims are a bit over the top in my eyes. Is Trump really 'shredding the Constitution?'

The question for me is this - should the law be upheld, even if it protects entrenched pathocrats? That's the central existential question asked during all revolutionary periods. Even Thomas Hobbes, known as the original theorist of modern authoritarianism allowed for popular revolt of the masses in cases of entrenched elite corruption.

Bypassing the law in the interests of normality does seem like a contradiction. It could definitely lead to a slippery slope. But life is full of contradictions. There is right, and wrong, and the specific situation. If Trump and team followed the law to the letter, as CAF suggests, their political blitzkrieg may have been rendered ineffective. That's my sense at least.

What did Paul say about the law? It is a child-minder. There are those without the law, who live a purely Flesh-based existence. There are those with the law, whose baser instincts are kept at bay by adherence to it. Then there are those who have Seen, and are above the law - even while abiding by it - and live a life of the Spirit. I don't think Trump and team are acting according to the Pauline ideal, but there is evidence of higher inspiration in many of his actions against the pathocrats, who wield the law itself as a lever of their power.
 
What Trump and Musk are doing with DOGE is already breaking several laws (conflict of interest for Musk, privacy laws, secrecy laws). At least according to Catherine Austin-Fitts, speed is not really an argument since everything could have been done legally and quckly too.
Catherin Austin-Fitts thinks Trump staged the assassination attempt. She's not a reliable source. I can't believe there are forum members who aren't happy seeing what DOGE is doing. It is a monumental reorganization of the US federal government intended to wrestle control of the country away from the psychopaths who have been in control for over a 100 years.
 
Me thinking through this new Trumpism wave to partially drain the swam and it appears he is been allowed room to work. Theil and Ellison are oligarch supporting Trump. Larry is also a part owner in X.
The shadow govt is still in place and not moving anytime soon.
Rich people are always going to cozy up to the people in power in the White House. That doesn't mean the shadow gov't is still in control.
 
Maybe Catherine Austin-Fitts is right, maybe not. She has an informed opinion, but IIRC she hasn't been close to the actual levers of power in years. Things may have changed drastically.
If there is someone who knows what actually happens in US politics and openly talks about it, that would be her. She has a lot of contacts in the US among politicians, agencies, etc. including high-profile people like RFK jr.

So I don't think that "she may not know what she is talking about" is a good argument. A much better argument is that her view of Trump seems to be too negative - she still believes that the assassination attempt was staged by his handlers.

But she also says that she has some hope for what the Trump presidency can do for the US

Is Trump really 'shredding the Constitution?'
She did not say that, only that Trump's and Musk's needlessly illegal actions are leading to a more overt constitutional crisis - in addition to all the previous more hidden ones (JFK, 9/11, etc.)

The question for me is this - should the law be upheld, even if it protects entrenched pathocrats?
That is not really the issue, I think. Rather it is that laws are not enforced when it comes to the pathocrats. And that it is not even necessary to break any laws to do what Trump and Musk are doing with DOGE at the same speed, yet for some reason they apparently did break several laws.

The question is whether they did it out of ignorance or whether it is a part of some plan.
 

Trending content

Back
Top Bottom