Trump Elected: The True MAGA Era Begins, Now What?

In what way would you say is the will of the people who elected Trump in contradiction to doing what is best for the whole world? That for some Trump voters MAGA means making America great again at the expense of others around the world?
Perhaps, or perhaps many of those voters aren't aware of that fact, or if they were faced with it, a more equitable world or MAGA, they'd choose MAGA.
 
The gold at Fort Knox hasn't been revalued since its $45 an oz. price and is of different qualities, some from the mid 1800's is less pure, if its still there. The gold was still present during this 1974 filming but hasn't been seen since is my understanding,

Might one find Tungsten Gold in its place?


Whoever is making the fake gold bars seems to be running a complex operation.

A search on SOTT.net on Tungsten Gold is very revealing.
 
Might one find Tungsten Gold in its place?

Good article. I didn't know that was a thing. I did a quick search and found a page that lists the differences between the two metals. It's more extensive then this but I thought these points might be interesting.


Is tungsten a cheap metal?​

Yes, tungsten is generally considered an inexpensive metal, especially when compared to precious metals like gold. The current price for tungsten is around $35 USD per kilogram.

By comparison, gold sells for over $50,000 per kilogram - over 1,400 times more expensive!

How can you tell the difference between gold and tungsten?​

There are a few tests that experts use to tell real gold apart from tungsten fakes:
Magnet Test - Gold is not magnetic, but tungsten will be weakly attracted to a magnet due to impurities in the metal.
Density Test - Professional scales can measure the density of small gold and tungsten pieces. Tungsten is 1.7 times denser than gold.
Ultrasound Test - Under ultrasound, flaws and impurities in tungsten alloys will show up, while pure gold is flawless.
Hardness Test - Gold is soft and scratches easily, while tungsten is very hard. A tungsten object will scratch glass but gold won't.
Acid Test - A small amount of acid dropped onto gold will not cause discoloration, while tungsten may oxidize and darken.
Chip or Drill Test - Drilling into a tungsten bar will reveal base metals and alloys underneath, while gold is uniform all the way through.

Tungsten vs Gold Weight​

One of the biggest differences between tungsten and gold is their weight. Tungsten is an extremely dense metal with a density of 19.3 g/cm3. This makes tungsten over 1.7 times denser than gold, which has a density of only 10.21 g/cm3.

What this means in practical terms is that tungsten is much heavier than gold. For example, a standard gold wedding band weighs around 5-15 grams. A tungsten carbide wedding band of the same size would weigh 25-35 grams.

Is tungsten stronger than a diamond?​

For reference, here are the hardness ratings of tungsten, diamonds, and gold on the Mohs scale:
Diamond: 10/10
Tungsten carbide: 9/10
Gold: 2.5-3/10
 
From what is being said in the following two interviews, it seems that at least to some (rather significant?) degree the deepstate is trying again to derail, slow down and prevent what Trump/Team (the elected representatives of most people in America) are trying to do at every turn:


 
As of now, how Trump handles the ongoing negotiations about Ukraine (namely to mostly exclude the Ukrainian and European clowns from the talks) could indicate that Trump knew or knows quite a bit more about the real situation there than he pretended publicly.
 
What would be great to see, as well:

Should Russia agree to "peacekeepers" (which isn't a given and justifiably so!) to see countries of Eastern Europe such as Hungary and Serbia for example fulfilling that mandate instead of the current clown nations such as Great Britain and Germany (while also excluding eastern countries such as Poland).
 
Apparently some excellent news, if the Daily Mail can be trusted:

Covid vaccine faces ban for all Americans in radical U-turn by Trump team​

Covid vaccines could be suspended for all age groups in America under radical new plans backed by key health figures in the Trump Administration.

Several experts poised for top jobs in US health agencies subscribe to the disputed idea the shots are causing widespread side effects and deaths.

Dr Jay Bhattacharya, who has been nominated to lead the National Institutes of Health (NIH), has backed a petition calling for the mRNA vaccines to be paused and retested, DailyMail.com can reveal.

He is one of the signatories of the Hope Accord, which claims there is a 'causal link' between the mRNA shots and an alarming rise in excess deaths worldwide.

DailyMail.com also understands Robert F Kennedy Jr has privately expressed concerns about the vaccines and signaled he is open to axing them if the data supports it.

Other key advisors to Kennedy have promoted conspiratorial views on social media about the Covid vaccines, including that the shots killed more people than they saved.

Dr Aseem Malhotra, a British cardiologist being considered for a health advisory role in Kennedy's new health departments, has called for the jabs to be suspended and and reassessed.

Outside the health agencies, Kash Patel — who has been nominated as FBI director — previously promoted bogus supplements that 'reversed' the supposed damage caused by Covid vaccines.

How a ban would be implemented is still not clear. A total ban would require the FDA withdrawing its approval status for safety or effectiveness reasons.
 

Trump just straight up called Zelensky a dictator who was scamming the previous administration 🤭

Just great and the truth! Further increases my suspicion that Trump knew more about what is really going on in Ukraine than he publically pretended. If so, would be nice to hear more of such openness of Trump now in other areas as well.
 
What would be great to see, as well:

Should Russia agree to "peacekeepers" (which isn't a given and justifiably so!) to see countries of Eastern Europe such as Hungary and Serbia for example fulfilling that mandate instead of the current clown nations such as Great Britain and Germany (while also excluding eastern countries such as Poland).

What Lavrov said seems to point to not accepting Western/NATO and/or EU "peacekeepers" in Ukraine:

 
What would be great to see, as well:

Should Russia agree to "peacekeepers" (which isn't a given and justifiably so!) to see countries of Eastern Europe such as Hungary and Serbia for example fulfilling that mandate instead of the current clown nations such as Great Britain and Germany (while also excluding eastern countries such as Poland).
Ukraine's special services, under the supervision of Britain, are sure to attack peacekeepers under false flags in order to disrupt the mission.
Peacekeepers are dangerous, expensive and politically unprofitable for Serbia and Hungary. Poland refuses because it knows Polish soldiers will be destroyed along with Ukrainian provocateurs.
Britain wants to introduce troops? Let them, all will be destroyed.
 
Back
Top Bottom