Trump Elected: The True MAGA Era Begins, Now What?

During the January 6th Capitol Riots, according to Sara Gonzales, psychotronic weapons were used on the demonstrators, which started out tame and then turned 50/51.

1736220876487.webp
1736220926631.jpeg


10-05-94
Q: (L) Did the United States government deliberately murder the Branch Davidians at Waco?

A: Close. Led them to destroy themselves.

Q: (L) How?

A: Psychological warfare tactics.

Q: (L) Did the US government set their compound on fire?

A: No.

Q: (L) Who set the compound on fire?

A: Branch Davidians. Drove them crazy.

Q: (L) Were ELF or subliminals used?

A: Yes. As well as other means.



Three years after the January 6 attack, propaganda about the insurrection is poisoning the American public
New York CNN
The U.S. will mark the anniversary of the January 6 insurrection on Saturday, a milestone that will confer upon the reality-dwelling citizenry a grim reminder of the potency of propaganda and how quickly it can warp perception when introduced into the public square.

Just three years ago, most of the country watched with dismay and horror as a violent MAGA mob beat back authorities and stormed the country’s citadel of democracy. The Donald Trump-incited crush of disillusioned rioters, fueled by a stream of fantastical lies, believed that the 2020 election had been stolen by sinister forces working to undermine the democratic election.

Of course, not only was their belief flatly incorrect, but evidence later emerged indicating that it was Trump who, in fact, had tried to subvert democracy.

Facts, however, have little bearing on the sentiment inside the Republican Party, which has been fed a steady diet of lies and half-truths by Fox News and the rest of the sprawling right-wing media machine. To wit, the false notion that Joe Biden nefariously stole the 2020 election is now widely shared inside the GOP. A CNN poll conducted over the summer found that nearly 70% of Republicans believe Biden’s win was not legitimate, a number that has continued to tick up.

In other words, the Big Lie that led to the 2020 insurrection is now the dominant thinking among Republicans.

At the same time, right-wing media forces have worked overtime to wash Trump’s hands clean of the role he played in inciting the mob to storm the U.S. Capitol. MAGA extremists such as Tucker Carlson have repeatedly promoted the false and reprehensible fantasy that the attack the country witnessed live on national television was a so-called “false flag” event perpetrated by the “deep state.”

And while that rightfully comes across as absurd to the share of the public that relies on credible news organizations for an understanding of current events, it has become commonplace in the Republican Party. A poll released on Thursday by The Washington Post and University of Maryland found that a staggering 39% of Americans who identified Fox News as their primary news source believed the FBI organized and encouraged the January 6 attack. The same poll found that 44% of Trump voters believed that falsehood.

It goes without saying that those are astonishing numbers, given the attack on the U.S. Capitol only occurred three years ago. What will those numbers look like on the 10-year anniversary of the violent assault?

Such data provides further evidence of how formidable an opponent propaganda is for the news media and those who care about living in an honest society and passing down an accurate historical record to future generations.

The sad truth is that while these lies have fomented, the mainstream press has probably failed to match the energy necessary to effectively counter the poison, which promises to be at the center of this year’s presidential election. That’s not to say the news media has not done essential work fact-checking the lies that have circulated. But it is a case not dissimilar to how anti-vaccine activists overwhelm authoritative sources by flooding the zone with misinformation, a tactic that has proved successful in infecting countless minds with junk science.

The New York Times’ Alan Feuer and Molly Cook Escobar published a story Wednesday about the sprawling DOJ investigation into the insurrection that began with a simple fact: “Every week, a few more people are arrested.” How much of the public is aware of that alarming truth? As the duo later noted, “While some of the cases have attracted nationwide attention, particularly those involving far-right groups like the Proud Boys and the Oath Keepers militia, most of the prosecutions have flown beneath the radar, unfolding in quiet hearings often attended only by the defendants and their families.”

Perhaps, that’s part of the problem. Perhaps this moment requires the press to do even more to shine a light on the ugly events that transpired at the very heart of U.S. democracy three years ago. The stakes, after all, could not be higher. And given the polls indicating how twisted reality has become for significant swaths of the American populace, it is hard to say it’s not warranted.

(L) So, clearly Trump didn't have the courage to do anything big and bold. Now the Deep State is in power via Biden and... Camel Harris. So, what does that mean for the world at large?

A: Chaos.

Q: (L) What is the reason for the chaos?

A: Fear of losing control.

Q: (L) Well, I don't understand. Exactly what do you mean?

(Joe) I was going to say that their fear of losing control has increased in recent years, obviously. But it's been as a result of their own actions, not as a result of anything the people are doing. The people are getting agitated and thrown into chaos because of what's being done to them.

(Artemis) They're shooting themselves in the foot over and over and over again.

A: Greed is a sickness.

Q: (L) And I guess you mean not just greed for money, but greed for power?

A: Yes

Q: (L) Can you tell us any particular way that this chaos is going to manifest?

A: Increased military intervention at all levels.

Q: (L) So despite the fact that Trump was so friendly and always playing up to the military, they really still didn't want or like him because he wasn't a war monger. Is that correct?

A:
Yes

Q: (L) And high mucky-muck military guys are basically war mongers.

A: Yes

Q: (Joe) When they increase military intervention at all levels, is that a reference to it being not just foreign, but domestic?

A: Yes

Skipping Down

Q: (L) So in other words, the fact that the majority voted FOR Trump and he was not allowed to become the president and they took over means that they took over against the will of the people. I think that has some kind of energetic implication. There was some stuff about that in the Ra material.

(Pierre) You once asked what is the main universal rule. The C's said Free Will. At some level, energetic or informational, respect of free will of life forms is a rule. If you infringe on the rule, you expose yourself to some consequences even if you are high up 4D STS.

(L) In other words, cosmically speaking, they just painted targets on their own heads!

A: Yes

Q: (Joe) Or is it going to manifest as earthquakes and tornadoes and kill a bunch of people?

(L) People will be objecting to this takeover inside themselves, so it'll manifest in some way externally, we just don’t yet know how. Well, that's interesting.
 



I am hearing that the people of Greenland are “MAGA.” My son, Don Jr, and various representatives, will be traveling there to visit some of the most magnificent areas and sights. Greenland is an incredible place, and the people will benefit tremendously if, and when, it becomes part of our Nation. We will protect it, and cherish it, from a very vicious outside World. MAKE GREENLAND GREAT AGAIN!

A nice video of a man in Greenland who really likes the idea!

 
Last edited:
This idiot wants to change the name of the Gulf of Mexico. Did you actually vote for this? MAGA is a golden era or the effort to maintain hegemony? How does changing the name of a geographic location or use of military force make America great again?

Gulf of America? Trump says he'll change name of 'Gulf of Mexico'​


WASHINGTON — President-elect Donald Trump said Tuesday that he plans to rename the Gulf of Mexico the Gulf of America.

"We're going to be changing the name of the Gulf of Mexico to the Gulf of America. Gulf of America -- what a beautiful name," he said at a news conference at his Mar-a-Lago club in Florida. "And it's appropriate."

"We're going to change, because we do most of the work there, and it's ours," he said.


Trump refuses to rule out use of military force to take control of Greenland and the Panama Canal​


PALM BEACH, Fla. (AP) — President-elect Donald Trump on Tuesday said he would not rule out the use of military force to seize control of the Panama Canal and Greenland, as he declared U.S. control of both to be vital to American national security.

Speaking to reporters less than two weeks before he takes office on Jan. 20 and as a delegation of aides and advisers that includes Donald Trump Jr. is in Greenland, Trump left open the use of the American military to secure both territories. Trump’s intention marks a rejection of decades of U.S. policy that has prioritized self-determination over territorial expansion.

“I’m not going to commit to that,” Trump said, when asked if he would rule out the use of the military. “It might be that you’ll have to do something. The Panama Canal is vital to our country.” He added, “We need Greenland for national security purposes.”


Screenshot_20250107-134637_X.jpg
Screenshot_20250107-134728_X.jpg
Screenshot_20250107-134807_X.jpg

 
How does changing the name of a geographic location or use of military force make America great again?
To raise the... imperialistic feeling that is so ingrained in millions, I guess.

He will change next New Mexico to be New America. Although, the rest of the states might be jealous because they won't sound so nice in comparison. Following New England? Name already taken, so to what? New East America?

Beyond the anecdotal, I do not forget that there is a North American Treaty where little by little we have been paired, who knows what else is behind it that they are not saying.

Edit, grammar.
 
How does changing the name of a geographic location or use of military force make America great again?

You may as well ask: "how does exporting Coca cola and McDonalds around the world help to entrench and consolidate American global influence?"

Personally, I think it's hilarious, and waaay better than the usual way American has gone about getting what it wants, i.e. covertly and through subterfuge, dirty tricks, assassinations, coups, economic warfare, and invasions. Trump's upfront, in your face style is so much more edifying. I mean, if you're gonna be an evil empire, then be open about it!
 
Last edited:
I still think it is more likely that Trump is simply following one of the negotiation tactics outlined in his book: make the most outrageous demand first and when you meet "in the middle" after that, you get exactly what you wanted in the first place.

In the case of the Panama canal, it may be lower fees for US ships he is after (and he already talked about it). In the case of Canada, it may be something like a better trade deal.

Greenland he might actually be serious about and I think that aside from the pride issue of "not wanting to be sold", many in Greenland may not be against it. The main issue for them seems to be that Denmark sends a lot of monetary support and Trump did not promise anything like that to Greenland's 50,000 people, which I think is a mistake.
 
You may as well ask: "how does exporting Coca cola and McDonalds around the world help to entrench and consolidate American global influence?"

Personally, I think it's hilarious, and waaay better than the usual way American has gone about getting what it wants, i.e. covertly and through subterfuge, dirty tricks, assassinations, coups, economic warfare, and invasions. Trump's upfront, in your face style is so much more edifying. I mean, if you're gonna be an evil empire, then be open about it!
It just sound so much like a certain Adolf who last century decided to make Germany great and annexed some neighbours for a start. Hope I am wrong but here in my province Trump is so hated and often compared to the previous named individual.

I sure will make reserve of popcorn in the coming week.
 
Personally, I think it's hilarious,
:lol: Me Too! Never a dull moment with this guy! I'm considering this may be a smack at Mexico's new president. They had a deal about the illegals and she backed out. It's a psych move isn't it. It's not like a declaration of war or something serious. What it does is stir things up emotionally on the Mexico side. I'll say it again (how many times?) it's often a mistake to take what Trump says at face value, there's usually more coming that changes the initial statement. It's always wait and see with him. He certainly brings surprises to the same old, stale rot of business as usual. I seriously doubt he's serious about this.
 
Last edited:
It just sound so much like a certain Adolf who last century decided to make Germany great and annexed some neighbours for a start. Hope I am wrong but here in my province Trump is so hated and often compared to the previous named individual.

I sure will make reserve of popcorn in the coming week.

Yup, It's the so-called Lebensraum (living space) of the Nazis but politically correct and conservative called "national security" or "security purposes." but come on, Trump said it (as openly as Adolf), let's celebrate because he is being upfront.

Although Trump's idea of annexing and threatening is new to many, it has been around for decades. Trump is only following the script dictated by the Deep State, which some still hold out hope of seeing it ended by the orange messiah.

This was written by geopolitologist Alfredo Jalife on December 2013, for example.

From Stratfor's Balkanization of Mexico to Spykman's Mediterranean Sea of the US


It would seem that Mexico finds itself trapped with no way out in the geostrategic game waged by the United States to control the Gulf of Mexico and the Caribbean Sea, as part of its new military/energy and security redesign, when it has retreated to its first line of defense after the failed war against Syria and the advent of the new tripolar order it now shares with Russia and China.

We thus find ourselves before a global/regional/local chessboard where the once unipolar superpower, the United States, moves its pieces to achieve its primary objectives: the energy security of North America, in unison with the security of the North American home, as requisites for the insertion of "neoliberal Mexico" into the Northern Command/Norad.

In the crosshairs would be the bountiful hydrocarbon deposits in the Gulf of Mexico, which it is desired to rename the Gulf of the United States, which seems to revive the concept of the US/Dutch geostrategist Nicholas John Spykman in reference to the US Mediterranean Sea, a mare nostrum similar to that of the Roman Empire, which integrates the surface of the Gulf of Mexico/Gulf of the United States (1.55 million square kilometers) and the Caribbean Sea (2.754 million square kilometers) which together yield an area of 4.304 million square kilometers.

In the face of the US unipolar retreat and the rise of the new tripolar world order (United States/Russia/China) -which was sealed with the agreement of a new co-dominance between Washington and Moscow in the Middle East, replacing the outdated Sykes-Picot of Franco-British colonialism-, the Obama administration is withdrawing its flags and reinforcing its first vital line of defense in the resuscitated US Mediterranean Sea, where the future of Mexico's bountiful hydrocarbons in the United States is at stake, not to mention the thunderous declaration by Secretary of State John Kerry on the demise of the Monroe Doctrine.

[In order to achieve its energy security] it is in the interests of the United States to balkanize Mexico, via the cartels, who obscenely stock up on weapons in cross-border kiosks.


Yes, there is nothing new under the sun. The Monroe Doctrine is now called MAGA and MAGA is the instrument of the NWO.​

Screenshot_20250107-153612_X.jpg
 

I am hearing that the people of Greenland are “MAGA.” My son, Don Jr, and various representatives, will be traveling there to visit some of the most magnificent areas and sights. Greenland is an incredible place, and the people will benefit tremendously if, and when, it becomes part of our Nation. We will protect it, and cherish it, from a very vicious outside World. MAKE GREENLAND GREAT AGAIN!

A nice video of a man in Greenland who really likes the idea!

What I would love to know is where does he get his information? Greenland belongs to Denmark, right? So how do the people (Greenlanders or Groenlanders) want him to be their representative? Did they write to him? Did they send off videos wearing his caps to get him to come over to visit them and take them away from Denmark?. Was his son actually "asked" to visit and report back?
Just like our fiasco leader, he certainly has an extremely "large" ego to even suggest they want him. Did they vote for a new referendum that includes him in their lives? Do we have to postulate in front of him and declare him a god?????
I'm terribly confused with all these narratives. Obviously, he wants chaos and forcing issues that should be done in a diplomatic way. But at what cost?
 
It just sound so much like a certain Adolf who last century decided to make Germany great and annexed some neighbours for a start. Hope I am wrong but here in my province Trump is so hated and often compared to the previous named individual.

I sure will make reserve of popcorn in the coming week.
Yep, sounds like that isn't it? What sounded like hope for the Americans is now alarmingly chaos and devastation for other countries that he should respect instead of insisting and imposing his views and threats. Wow, the next few years promise to be extremely entertaining, expensive, stressful, demeaning, devastating, demoralizing and downright violating! Eiriu- Eolas anyone????
 
Back
Top Bottom