Trump Elected: The True MAGA Era Begins, Now What?

One thing to consider about the US having a stronger presence in Greenland, for protection and economics, is what could happen in the future when other leaders come into power. Putin wants cooperation with the US which is a beautiful thing but what about the next leader? Who knows about Xi and China, the same thing. The Arctic Circle is an important area.

And it sounds like Putin very much affirms Trump's action regarding Greenland and the Artic. International cooperation would be grand well into the future and most beneficial for the entire planet, but as we know, our STS basic orientation is always going to be a factor. Plus, despite any friendly vibes from China, I feel they will always be best kept at arms' length. Nonetheless, I don't see Greenland really in any danger at the moment, plus we already have a military presence there.
 
One thing to consider about the US having a stronger presence in Greenland, for protection and economics, is what could happen in the future when other leaders come into power. Putin wants cooperation with the US which is a beautiful thing but what about the next leader? Who knows about Xi and China, the same thing. The Arctic Circle is an important area.
Another thought is a strong position around the Artic could also help the Canadian people. The US has been providing/paying for protection for them already. Of course their present WEF government wants no cooperation with a populist US.
 
It is very smart by Putin and his team to point out to Trump and his team that the US national security issues with Greenland are similar to the Russian national security issues with Ukraine, only magnitudes higher in the case of Ukraine.

It is almost like Russia is indirectly offering to support the US annexation of Greenland (maybe at the UN) in return for a normalization of relations and the US agreeing to Russia's demands regarding Ukraine.
 
What is said here is actually correct. All judges must agree to allow something to move forward, it only takes one to hold things up.
The tyranny part is misleading I'd say. Miller can be flamboyant which causes a reaction, he wants a reaction here.
I think it is not just the "tyranny" part in his tweet that is misleading:

- "Unelected judges" implies he is unhappy with the constitutional separation of powers. In light of this, what kind of reaction do you think he wants?

- District judges can only take action when someone files a lawsuit. They cannot act on their own. He makes it sound like any of them can, which is misleading.

- "The action is frozen" leaves out that judicial injunctions are temporary. Those reading his tweet could equate "frozen" with "permanent".

- Miller also supports what is close to a tyranny of Zionist/Mossad control in the US, yet he claims the real tyranny are the judges? Misleading is a mild term for that.

Having said that, there is also some truth in-between his misleading statements:

The judicial system is certainly not free from corruption (eg. activist judges with no prior experience) and it may be better to return to letting only the Supreme Court judge the actions of the Federal Government.

If Trump, Miller and other Republicans are in favor of that, it would make a lot more sense.

Instead, they claim the president should basically act without any oversight, completely ignoring that the separation of powers is a central part of the constitution.
 
And it sounds like Putin very much affirms Trump's action regarding Greenland and the Artic. International cooperation would be grand well into the future and most beneficial for the entire planet, but as we know, our STS basic orientation is always going to be a factor. Plus, despite any friendly vibes from China, I feel they will always be best kept at arms' length. Nonetheless, I don't see Greenland really in any danger at the moment, plus we already have a military presence there.
It doesn't seem like Greenland is under threat right now unless there's some hidden thing happening. My impression is the US is in a very weakened state right now because of all the years the DS has been working to destroy its sovereignty. The last 4 years added a lot to that plan. There's now a rush to strengthen things up quickly.
 
Interesting take. So I suppose from this 'law and constitutionality aside' perspective, all the Palestinians maybe shouldn't have decided to live in such a dangerous place? Seems like a logical fallacy to me.
Life is better without tattooes and hand signs. That is aside from law and constitution, and Palestinians too.
 
New AI launched by Rubio and crew to scan foreign students' social media accounts for antisemitism/terrorism, leading to deportation if caught. Originally saw this on WikiLeaks. The new technocratic turn here is that AI is doing the policing. This is only one short step away from antisemitism (or any other thought-crime) being criminalized amongst the actual citizenry.

Washington:

Hundreds of international students studying in the US have received emails from the US Department of State (DOS), telling them to self-deport as their F-1 visas (student visas) have been revoked owing to campus activism. The crackdown is not limited to students who physically participated in campus activism, but people who shared or even liked 'anti-national' posts have reportedly also been targeted in these emails.

Some Indian students may also be at the receiving end of such emails, for something as innocuous as sharing a social media post, The Times Of India reported, quoting Immigration attorneys who confirmed the development.

According to the latest Open Doors report, of the 1.1 million international students studying in the US in 2023-24, 3.31 lakh are Indian students.

The diktat followed US Secretary of State Marco Rubio's announcement about the revocation of several international students' visas for so-called anti-national activities.

"It might be more than 300 at this point. We do it every day. Every time I find one of these lunatics, I take away their visas...Every country in the world has a right to decide who comes in as a visitor and who doesn't," Rubio said at a press conference in Guyana on Thursday, without elaborating on whose visas had been revoked.

Speaking to reporters on the plane back to Washington, Rubio said the 300 revoked visas were a combination of student and visitor visas. He said he signed every single action.

"At some point, I hope we run out because we've gotten rid of all of them, but we're looking every day for these lunatics that are tearing things up."

Rubio's office recently also launched an AI-powered app, "Catch and Revoke", to detect and cancel the visas of students found supporting Hamas or other designated terrorist organisations. As part of the crackdown, the DOS (which includes Consulate officials) is also scrutinising even new student applications, be it for an F (academic study visa), M (vocational study visa), or J (exchange visa). If found guilty, applicants will be denied the opportunity to study in the US.

What did the email say?

The email received by students from the authorities asked them to self-deport themselves using the CBP Home App that the US President Donald Trump administration launched on March 10.

"On behalf of the United States Department of State, the Bureau of Consular Affairs Visa Office hereby informs you that additional information became available after your visa was issued. As a result, your F-1 visa with expiration date XXXXX was revoked in accordance with Section 221(i) of the United States Immigration and Nationality Act, as amended," the TOI reported, citing the email.

"The Bureau of Consular Affairs Visa Office has alerted the Department of Homeland Security's Immigration and Customs Enforcement, which manages the Student Exchange Visitor Program and is responsible for removal proceedings. They may notify your designated school official about the revocation of your F-1 visa," it added.

The document warned the student that if they stay in the United States without lawful immigration status, it could lead to fines, detention, and/or deportation.

"It may also make you ineligible for a future US visa. Please note that deportation can take place at a time that does not allow the person being deported to secure possessions or conclude affairs in the United States. Persons being deported may be sent to countries other than their countries of origin," it further read.

It further said that if the deported students want to return to America in the future, they would need to apply for a fresh visa, and then their eligibility will be reassessed.

"As soon as you depart the United States, you must personally present your passport to the US embassy or consulate which issued your visa so your visa can be physically cancelled. You must not attempt to use your visa, as it has been revoked. If you intend to travel to the United States in the future, you must apply for another US visa, and a determination on your eligibility for a visa will be made at that time," the mail added.

'Visa Not A Birthright'

Rubio, earlier this week, stressed that the US visa was "not a birthright" and people who were found violating the terms of visitation would have to leave.

"I don't know when we've got it in our head that a visa is some sort of birthright. It is not," US Secretary of State Marco Rubio said on CBS News's Face The Nation show.

"It is a visitor into our country, and if you violate the terms of your visitation, you are going to leave," he added.
 
Last edited:
New AI launched by Rubio and crew to scan foreign students' social media accounts for antisemitism/terrorism, leading to deportation if caught. Originally saw this on WikiLeaks. The new technocratic turn here is that AI is doing the policing. This is only one short step away from antisemitism (or any other thought-crime) being criminalized amongst the actual citizenry.
Heading there
 
I think it is not just the "tyranny" part in his tweet that is misleading:

- "Unelected judges" implies he is unhappy with the constitutional separation of powers. In light of this, what kind of reaction do you think he wants?

- District judges can only take action when someone files a lawsuit. They cannot act on their own. He makes it sound like any of them can, which is misleading.

- "The action is frozen" leaves out that judicial injunctions are temporary. Those reading his tweet could equate "frozen" with "permanent".

- Miller also supports what is close to a tyranny of Zionist/Mossad control in the US, yet he claims the real tyranny are the judges? Misleading is a mild term for that.

Having said that, there is also some truth in-between his misleading statements:

The judicial system is certainly not free from corruption (eg. activist judges with no prior experience) and it may be better to return to letting only the Supreme Court judge the actions of the Federal Government.

If Trump, Miller and other Republicans are in favor of that, it would make a lot more sense.

Instead, they claim the president should basically act without any oversight, completely ignoring that the separation of powers is a central part of the constitution.
I think it comes down to what is a persons basic ideas or assumptions about this topic and those will determine how they interpret what is said. I'll put this in very simple terms. If one thinks Trump and his team are bad guys the interpretation will be derogatory. If one considers Trump and team are good etc. Surely there are gray areas but I'll keep it black and white to make a point. What you write here, appears to me, to be seen threw the lens of "bad guys". The objective is to perceive reality as clearly as possible. If one is to much on either side of this duality things won't be seen clearly.
"Unelected judges" implies he is unhappy with the constitutional separation of powers. In light of this, what kind of reaction do you think he wants?
No, he's unhappy with the judges using the law unlawfully to impede Trump from taking legitimate actions and this is the tyranny he speaks of. He wants the Constitution followed and they aren't. Its a tactic.
- Miller also supports what is close to a tyranny of Zionist/Mossad control in the US, yet he claims the real tyranny are the judges? Misleading is a mild term for that.
What! Where does that come from? Proof. This idea that Trump and team are merely puppets of Netanyahu/Jews has taken up significant brainspace, taken root and proliferates constant examples, accusations and assumptions. Hey, there's a lot more going on then that. Yes, this is a factor and how it fits into the bigger picture isn't clear yet. But considering how this is hyped up so much by many, it could be exaggerated as is the case with psy-ops. A perfect opportunity to twists peoples minds. And it does get annoying to hear this constantly repeated here.

Instead, they claim the president should basically act without any oversight, completely ignoring that the separation of powers is a central part of the constitution.
No! Seen through a glass darkly!

The judicial system is certainly not free from corruption (eg. activist judges with no prior experience) and it may be better to return to letting only the Supreme Court judge the actions of the Federal Government.
If you've been paying attention you'd see the Supreme Court is also compromised.
 
What! Where does that come from? Proof. This idea that Trump and team are merely puppets of Netanyahu/Jews has taken up significant brainspace, taken root and proliferates constant examples, accusations and assumptions. Hey, there's a lot more going on then that. Yes, this is a factor and how it fits into the bigger picture isn't clear yet. But considering how this is hyped up so much by many, it could be exaggerated as is the case with psy-ops. A perfect opportunity to twists peoples minds. And it does get annoying to hear this constantly repeated here.

Super weird, are you really downplaying the relationship between the USA and Israel? That's pretty bizarre to me. As you say, there's more going on than just US-Israel, but US-Israel is definitely not a psyop and it's definitely not an exaggerated problem. For proof, read Reed's book Controversy of Zion, MacDonald's book Culture of Critique (and his other two in the series), Joe and Laura's book on 9/11, or even just listen to mainstream analysts like Jeffrey Sachs. There's evidence in the C's sessions, too.
 
What you write here, appears to me, to be seen threw the lens of "bad guys". The objective is to perceive reality as clearly as possible. If one is to much on either side of this duality things won't be seen clearly.
Yes, I also keep pointing out that Trump does both good and bad. However there seems to be an increasing number of "bad precedents" being set by the Trump team in the last couple of weeks:

- Bombing Yemen on behalf of Israel (despite promises of "being a peacemaker")
- Apparently sending some innocent people to a supermax prison in El Salvador (along with actual violent gang members)
- Rubio using a new AI to scan social media posts of students for "anti-semitism" and cancelling student visas based on that

Now I am bit more skeptical of what "bad precedent" the Trump team may have in mind to solve the judicial crisis. There are indeed activist judges who obstruct the federal government, but a lot depends on what kind of a solution Trump chooses for this.
 
Federalist No. 78 is now making some headlines:

The Avalon Project : Federalist No 78

The Hamiltonian perspective, though it may be unsurprising, is that the judiciary has no power to execute the will of congress, and can only "judge" matters.

However, if something is against the constitution (and due process is part of the constitution) then an action is rendered invalid. But then what happens?

Some relevant quotes from Hamilton:

'This simple view of the matter suggests several important consequences. It proves incontestably, that the judiciary is beyond comparison the weakest of the three departments of power1; that it can never attack with success either of the other two; and that all possible care is requisite to enable it to defend itself against their attacks. It equally proves, that though individual oppression may now and then proceed from the courts of justice, the general liberty of the people can never be endangered from that quarter; I mean so long as the judiciary remains truly distinct from both the legislature and the Executive. For I agree, that "there is no liberty, if the power of judging be not separated from the legislative and executive powers.'''

"This independence of the judges is equally requisite to guard the Constitution and the rights of individuals from the effects of those ill humors, which the arts of designing men, or the influence of particular conjunctures, sometimes disseminate among the people themselves..."
 

Trending content

Back
Top Bottom