Tucker Carlson interviews & ideologies


I watched this though it wasn't easy at times.

Witkoff claims to be faithfully representing what his president wants and has directly requested, and I think he is genuine. Unfortunately he has a low level of awareness about the Middle East in particular and has bought into all the usual propaganda and nonsense about Israel, been led around Israel by Israelis and told about how things are. He never met anyone from Hamas although he's been to Gaza. His understanding of the region is pitiful for someone in his position, but he might be holding back quite a bit. Tucker definitely was, he knows that even he has to tread very carefully in this area. It's hard to believe either of them could be so naive when talking about Israel's goals for the region.

On Iran, it's tiresome at times to listen to all this discourse knowing that Iran almost certainly already has nuclear weapons. Witkoff talks tough but its all just nonsense, nothing Iran has said gives any indication that this whole maximum pressure strategy is going to amount to anything. They have been openly defiant.

On Russia, it is a lot more positive in that Witkoff and Trump seem to have a favourable view of Putin personally and there was a nice anecdote about how Putin commissioned a portrait of Trump by a skilled Russian artist. He had Witkoff deliver it to his president, and told Witkoff that he had prayed for Trump after hearing about the Butler assassination attempt because he sees him as a friend.

Overall impression, Witkoff is a useful idiot and so is Trump, when it comes to the Middle East. But we shall see.
 
Timely interview by Tucker with Sherry Walker.

Sherry Walker has been a commercial airline pilot for almost 35 years. She says DEI has so completely undermined safety standards that pilots are sometimes afraid to leave the cockpit for fear of what their co-pilots will do unattended.

 
Yes! Tucker finally gets Alex Jones on his show. I recently heard that Jones has kicked the booze and he has lost a considerable amount of weight, he looks way healthier. It's just been posted on my feed so I'm only on the first hour, but it's been a good general chat so far. They've dove head first into discussing 9-11 straight off the bat, and Jones is back on bullish form. I'm wondering when Israel will get a mention though....And what of Russia, China, Iran etc?

A lot has been said about Jones over the years, and yes at times I've been so frustrated by him, but he's showing signs of getting his life in order at a good time. He's taken a lot of flak over the years, and has been under considerable pressure from authorities too. I'm hoping Tucker eschews taking Jones in his more eccentric directions and things don't get hysterical, as happened on his mammoth 4hr chat with Joe Rogan many years back. It's a chance here for him to show he's not a carnival barker for conspiracy theorists, there's actually a sound mind at work even if he, much like David Icke (who has fallen out with him of late over Gaza and Trump), go a little fuzzy when, having laid out the problems, grasp about in the dark trying to articulate the solutions. I used to hate him, but these days he doesn't seem so hyped-up in his manners, OSIT.

 
Yes! Tucker finally gets Alex Jones on his show. I recently heard that Jones has kicked the booze and he has lost a considerable amount of weight, he looks way healthier. It's just been posted on my feed so I'm only on the first hour, but it's been a good general chat so far. They've dove head first into discussing 9-11 straight off the bat, and Jones is back on bullish form. I'm wondering when Israel will get a mention though....And what of Russia, China, Iran etc?

I hope everyone gets to see this one. Jones lays out quite a lot of what we can probably expect to see in the coming months in particular. Tucker is also in fine form expressing a calm moral center throughout.

Also hope folks here are doing as much as one reasonably can to not only take good care of themselves, but to prepare/prep in as practical and as realistic a way as possible; the level of Crazy looks like its going to be kicked up a few more notches.
 
I hope everyone gets to see this one. Jones lays out quite a lot of what we can probably expect to see in the coming months in particular.
Here is an AI summary of the covered topics in this interview:

Alex Jones on Predictions, Government Conspiracies, and the Future of Free Speech​

In a revealing discussion, Alex Jones shares his theories on government conspiracies, his predictions about 9/11, and the ongoing battle for free speech in America. He reflects on the historical context of false flag operations, the manipulation of public perception, and the urgent need for awareness in a rapidly changing world.

The 9/11 Prediction​

Jones begins by recounting his prediction of the 9/11 attacks, stating that he warned the public about planes being flown into the World Trade Center as early as the summer of 2001. He emphasizes that he was the only one making such specific claims publicly, which raises questions about why government agencies like the FBI and DOJ did not seek him out for answers after the attacks occurred. Instead, he argues, they mobilized against him, suggesting a connection between his foresight and their subsequent actions.

Historical Context of False Flag Operations​

Jones discusses his extensive research into historical false flag operations, citing examples such as the Gulf of Tonkin incident and the USS Liberty attack. He argues that these events were orchestrated to manipulate public opinion and justify military actions. He believes that the media's portrayal of Osama bin Laden as a looming threat was part of a larger narrative designed to instill fear and facilitate the establishment of a police state in America.

The Role of Media and Government​

Throughout the conversation, Jones expresses frustration with the media's failure to investigate his predictions and the government's apparent intent to silence dissenting voices. He highlights the irony that, despite being labeled a conspiracy theorist, he has consistently pointed out truths that have later been validated. He argues that the establishment's efforts to discredit him are indicative of their guilt and fear of exposure.

The Current State of Free Speech​

Jones warns that the ongoing attacks on free speech are a direct threat to democracy. He reflects on how the establishment has used legal and political maneuvers to suppress voices like his, which challenge the mainstream narrative. He emphasizes the importance of standing up for free speech, stating that without it, society risks descending into tyranny.

Predictions for the Future​

Looking ahead, Jones shares his concerns about the potential for increased violence and civil unrest in America. He predicts that the establishment may orchestrate events to justify further crackdowns on free speech and civil liberties. He urges listeners to remain vigilant and aware of the tactics being employed to manipulate public perception and control dissent.
 
Coming up later today, Tucker Carlson will be interviewing Maxime Bernier, the leader the PPC (People's Party of Canada), running to be the next Prime Minister of Canada. As much as I admire Max for his consistent messaging over the years and his courage to act according to his principles, I don't think he or his party has a snowball's chance in hell of winning the general election.

Over the last few elections, Max has failed even to win a seat for himself, let alone a member of his PPC, as most voters in Canada have been manipulated by the media to believe that anyone outside the traditional leftist uniparty (LPC/CPC) system is considered to be a far right extremist. So it will be interesting to see if they can make any headway in this election.

Either way, it's good to see him popping up on popular podcasts lately. This one with Tucker should be an interesting one to watch. Who knows, maybe we'll even see him on Rogan at some point.

 
Tucker's interview with former congressman Curt Weldon, who says elements of the US gov't were complicit in 9-11. He says he has the evidence that the attacks could have been stopped, and that powerful individual made a lot of money from it and the wars that followed. He was a star in the Republican party but the FBI raided his daughter's home (nothing came of it) and the suggestion of scandal caused him to lose re-election. Tucker has been inspired to do a series on 9/11.
 

But thanks for saving the best (Horrors) for for last in your new book beyond disclosure! I'm also interested in any info here about the destruction of some of the the DUMBS in the last five or six years. I'm wondering how much of the alien nutrition and medicine Supply has been cut off?

Am I posting in the right place?
 
I just finished the interview with Catherine Austin Fitts and I recommend it (also the Alex Jones interview).
Both of them point to the spiritual battle that is taking place in the world. (The various topics that they discuss being the effects that we experience : my opinion).
This interviews IMO help other people to look beyond the distractions and make positive changes.
 

But thanks for saving the best (Horrors) for for last in your new book beyond disclosure! I'm also interested in any info here about the destruction of some of the the DUMBS in the last five or six years. I'm wondering how much of the alien nutrition and medicine Supply has been cut off?

Am I posting in the right place?

This interview made news in MSM in Australia. Very unusual for a Tucker interview.

Official: America built a $21 trillion underground city for rich and powerful​

A former Bush official has made an astonishing claim the US government built a secret safe haven to prepare for a “near-instinction event”

A former housing official who worked under President George H. W. Bush has made an astonishing claim the US government spent years funnelling money into the creation of a secret underground “city” where the rich and powerful can shelter in the event of a “near-extinction event”.

Catherine Austin Fitts, who served as the assistant secretary of Housing and Urban Development between 1989 and 1990, made the shocking allegations during an appearance on former Fox News host Tucker Carlson’s podcast, although there is no concrete evidence to support her claims.

Fitts, 74, who is originally from Philadelphia, cited research by Michigan State University economist Mark Skidmore, who released a report in 2017 stating he and a team of scholars had uncovered $21 trillion in “unauthorised spending in the departments of Defense and Housing and Urban Development for the years 1998-2015”.

At the time, Skidmore noted he first began investigating the unreported spending after he heard Fitts “refer to a report which indicated the Army had $6.5 trillion in unsupported adjustments, or spending, in fiscal 2015”.

“Given the Army’s $122 billion budget, that meant unsupported adjustments were 54 times spending authorised by Congress. Typically, such adjustments in public budgets are only a small fraction of authorised spending,” the report noted.

Initially, Skidmore said he thought Fitts had made a mistake, stating that he assumed she had meant to say $6.5 billion, not trillion.

“So I found the report myself and sure enough it was $6.5 trillion,” he said.

According to Fitts, who worked as an investment banker before joining Bush’s administration, that money was used to fund the development of what she described as an “underground base, city infrastructure and transportation system” that has been kept hidden from the public.

“One of the things I’ve looked at in the process of looking at where all this money is going is the underground base, city infrastructure, and transportation system that’s been built,” she said.

“We have built an extraordinary number of underground bases and, supposedly, transportation systems.”

She told Carlson that she spent two years researching where the $21 trillion had gone, alleging that she uncovered evidence that there are 170 secret facilities in the US alone, explaining that she and a team of investigators combed through “all the data and all the allegations on underground bases” in order to make a “guess” as to how many might exist.

Additionally, Fitts alleged that several of these bases are located beneath oceans — not just underground.

“We systematically went through and tried to estimate our guess — this is totally a guess — of how many underground bases [there are], both underground in the United States, but also underground under the ocean around the United States. And our estimate was 170 with a transportation network connecting them,” she said.

When Carlson asked what the “purpose” of these underground bases is, Fitts responded that they would be used if a “near-extinction event” was believed to be on the horizon.

However, she added that she believes these so-called bases could also be used by the government to carry out “secret” projects, such as a “secret space program”.

Carlson responded by claiming that he actually knew “a contractor who worked on one in Washington, DC,” stating: “I remember him telling me about a power box, like a transformer box, on Constitution Ave. … He told me [that] was actually the exit, the egress from the White House.

“And I thought, that’s kind of crazy in the middle of this big city where I live … you could build something like that without me knowing it.”

Carlson said he had always assumed that those kinds of bases were only located in D.C.—and that they were meant specifically for some kind of “nuclear war”, to which Fitts responded: “Some of it is. It’s preparation for catastrophe.”

As for how these alleged cities and facilities are powered, Fitts said she believes the government has found a way to generate breakthrough energy that she believes is being used to keep them going.

“I’m convinced that this energy exists. If you look at a lot of the really fast ships, flying around the planet, they’re not using classical electricity,” she claimed.

Fitts’ controversial claims come just a few months after a Virginia-based company called SAFE (Strategically Armored & Fortified Environments), unveiled plans for a $300 million luxury, members-only doomsday bunker called “Aerie”.

The company says the facility will offer “AI-powered” medical care, “wellness programs” and the ability to “blend protection and luxury” in a way that has never been done before.

SAFE says it planned to build the bunkers — which will cost each entrant a $20 million membership fee — in all 50 states, but was going to construct the first in Virginia because of its proximity to D.C.

“It’s the wealthiest state per capita,” a company spokesperson previously told Realtor.com. “It’s ground zero for the finest demographic for something like this in the world.”

This article was originally published by the New York Post and reproduced with permission.


I listened to the CAF interview on YouTube version last week. She doesn't seem totally convinced about underground bases because the info she's looking at to come to that conclusion is part of black ops budgets, or maybe she knows more but doesn't want to sound too definite about it.

Some developing impressions after listening to the interview that may or may not be correct:

CAF estimates that there are 170 underground bases under the US and the surrounding waters that have been constructed in anticipation of a near-extinction event. Other countries are probably doing something similar.

The elite want to reduce the population and they're also in favour of transhumanism. I get the feeling that they don't want pure robots because they can't extract suffering from them, they need their subjects to have enough human in the mix to accomplish that. Robots don't feel guilt, embarrassment, humiliation or pain for them to extract their loosh. The reason for depopulation is that they want to take a percentage of the population underground with them, but they also don't want too many left on the surface in case they survive and thrive and pose a problem for them when they decide to return to the surface.

The reason that renewables on the surface suit them is because they are unreliable and have a restricted life span on the infrastructure. They don't want the surviving surface dwellers having a reliable energy source that could help them survive, thrive and multiply - and maybe become powerful.

CAF when talking about the underground bases and their energy supply says:

CAF: We know that there are quite a number of large underground bases in the United States, we can't state that as fact right, and then the question becomes of course like if they're connected to the power grid you know if they're pulling off. Just a conventional natural gas electricity generation station you could like know that and measure it.

Tucker: But you think they have independent energy sources?

CAF: Of course they do. So one of the one of the questions I have that I think is really important is when you look at breakthrough energy if you were running the planet. So I have this nickname for the committee at the top, Mr Global. If you were Mr Global you would not want to implement breakthrough energy on a widespread basis for a variety of reasons one of which is everybody got a hold of it and weaponized it it could be very dangerous. [....] If you're the risk manager and you're in charge of managing the planet you know this has more disruption capability both weaponization economic, you know, suddenly everybody's free to do whatever they want so they're much harder to control. So if you're Mr Global and you have the capacity to dramatically lower the energy cost the other danger is then population skyrockets and you're concerned about that. So if you're Mr Global and you're worried about what will happen if you bring this technology out."

Then there is some discussion about reports coming back from different construction workers - electricians, concreters etc - that have apparently actually worked on portions of these bases and seen breakthrough energy in action, they couldn't really understand it but recognised that it didn't operate according to known laws or physics.

The breakthrough energy company that she mentions is Brilliant Light Power. That is basically working with hydrogen energy production. I doubt that this is the energy that the underground bases would be operating on though.
 
Tucker's just had a good sit-down with the always interesting Bret Weinstein. I'm just viewing it now, and clearly there will be divergences within their worldviews on this one. Apparently this talk goes into the thorny Israel issue, I'll be very interested to hear Bret's views on God's chosen lunatics.

 
Back
Top Bottom