Tunguska - An overhead explosion

Opinion

During the Tunguska event, over 8 million trees covering an area of 830 square miles were flattened when an asteroid entered Earth's atmosphere.
On June 30, 1908, an asteroid flattened an estimated 80 million trees in Siberia over 830 square miles (2,150 square kilometers). Dubbed the Tunguska event, it is considered the biggest asteroid impact in recorded history. Yet no one has ever found the asteroid fragments or an impact site.

The asteroid lit up the skies in a remote, sparsely inhabited region near the Podkamennaya Tunguska River. It unleashed a 10 to 15 megaton explosion — similar in size to the 1954 Castle Bravo nuclear bomb test, the fifth-largest nuclear detonation in history. "The sky was split in two, and high above the forest the whole northern part of the sky appeared covered with fire," an eyewitness reported.

One popular theory is that the asteroid formed Lake Cheko, a freshwater lake about 5 miles (8 kilometers) from the explosion epicenter. The lake is about 1,640 feet (500 meters) wide and 177 feet (54 m) deep. Luca Gasperini, research director at the National Research Council of Italy, and colleagues said the lake's cone-like shape and depth resembled an impact crater. In a study published 2012 in the journal Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems, they estimated that the sediments at the bottom of the lake had been building for 100 years, while evidence of trees at the bottom of the lake indicate the waterhole covers an old forest.


Screenshot 2023-05-31 at 10-44-47 The Tunguska event was the biggest asteroid impact in record...png


But some experts were not convinced. In 2017, researchers led by Denis Rogozin, from the Institute of Biophysics at the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, carried out their own analysis and concluded that lake sediments were at least 280 to 390 years old, "significantly older than the 1908 Tunguska Event."

And in a new study published May 2 in the journal Doklady Earth Sciences, Rogozin and colleagues presented more evidence to refute the idea Lake Cheko is the Tunguska asteroid’s impact site.

Related: Extinction-level asteroid impacts could be far more common than we thought, controversial study suggests

Previously, many researchers believed Lake Cheko’s unusual cone shape was unique in the region, giving weight to the idea that an asteroid formed it. But Rogozin and colleagues analyzed two nearby lakes — Zapovednoye and Peyungda — that sit 31 miles (50 km) and 37 miles (60 km) from the suspected impact site. Both are also cone shaped, they found.

"The difference in the age of the lake sediments puts into question the impact origin of these lakes — this would require the arrival of three almost identical space bodies at different times, which is highly improbable given that the lakes are located in almost the same place on Earth," the researchers wrote.

Daniel Vondrák, who studies lake ecosystems at Charles University in Prague, told Live Science in an email that he is convinced by Rogozin's evidence.

However, the conical shape of the lakes isn't the only evidence that Cheko was formed by the Tunguska event, Gasperini said.

In a paper posted to the preprint server arxiv in 2018 (which still has not been peer reviewed), Gasperini and his team hypothesized that Tunguska was caused by a "rubble-pile" asteroid — a structurally weak mashup of fragments from a monolithic asteroid.. As a result, the asteroid split into two pieces — one around 197 feet (60 m) wide, the other around 20 to 33 feet (6 to 10 m) wide. The smaller of these two smashed into Earth, forming Lake Cheko, they wrote.

The team detected a 33-foot-wide (10 m) anomaly at the bottom of the lake that may be a leftover fragment of the asteroid. By drilling to the lake center, someone could test the composition of the anomaly to confirm that hypothesis. However, Gasperini's team can no longer access the site due to the war in Ukraine.

"The Russian scientists could easily do this test, instead of continuing to publish articles showing data similar to ours with very questionable interpretations," Gasperini told Live Science in an email.

What could have happened to the asteroid?

If Cheko wasn't formed by the Tunguska impact crater, then what happened to the asteroid that set fire to the skies more than a century ago? A paper published in 2020 in the journal Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society suggested a large iron asteroid passed through Earth's atmosphere, then curved away from Earth without breaking up. This, the team said, would explain why no trace of the asteroid has ever been found.

Another paper posted to arxiv last month put forward yet another hypothesis — that the asteroid broke apart and scattered across the landscape. While many fragments would have burnt up in the atmosphere, the team said smaller chunks could have survived and hit Earth over a "strewn field.". This paper suggests rocks from the asteroid could be about 10 to 12 miles (16 to 19 km) northwest of the epicenter, "even if the mud and vegetation could have made any trace disappear."

 
A comprehensive examination of the many anomalies surrounding the Tunguska event and integrating them within the electric comet theory. Precursor anomalies ahead of the actual arrival of the fragment worth storing in one's memory bank for future awareness. Knowledge protects, ignorance endangers!


On the morning of June 30, 1908 in remote Siberia near the Stony Tunguska River, a blue-white fireball exploded with the force of a 10-to-15 megaton H-bomb. The explosion flattened 60 million trees and devastated 2,000 square kilometers.

The shockwave knocked people off their feet and broke windows hundred's of kilometers away. Interestingly, a ring of burnt trees were left standing near the epicenter, and even stranger, several unburnt trees remained in the heart of the center.

Seismic stations across Europe and Asia felt the explosion, a pulse of air-pressure circled the Earth twice, and astronomers observed a red glowing haze in the upper atmosphere for several nights. The Smithsonian and Mount Wilson Observatories reported a decrease in atmospheric transparency that would persist for months.

For well over one-hundred years, the appointed experts continue to debate Tunguska—comet or asteroid?!? In the EU Model a comet is just an asteroid large enough to hold its own charge as it moves through the Sun's electric field. For example, asteroid Chiron's chaotic orbit between Saturn and Uranus unexpectedly sprouted a tail in 1989. Now it's classified as proto-comet 95P/Chiron.

To accurately solve the Tunguska mystery, a theory needs to explain all the observations and data collected. The EU Model does this. The Standard Model does not. As Wal Thornhill would say, the answers to these questions become obvious. It's electric.
 
FWIW, new paper on Tunguska airburst event. The conclusion shown below;

Conclusions​

The physical evidence documented at Tunguska and Tall el-Hammam presents a significant challenge to conventional airburst models that do not account for extreme temperature and pressure conditions. While Boslough and Bruno [1] raise minor concerns about historical interpretations and terminology, their critique does not address the fundamental mineralogical and geochemical evidence that indicates conditions far exceeding those predicted by simplified blast models.

Our findings—including shocked quartz with PDFs, partially melted minerals requiring temperatures >1700°C, evidence of electrical discharge effects, and magnetic anomalies—cannot be dismissed through semantic arguments or historical reinterpretations. This evidence requires an explanation either through substantial refinement of existing airburst models or recognition of additional physical processes operating during such events. These findings are compatible with Gladysheva’s [71, 72] and our [9] model of complex fragmentation dynamics and atmospheric discharge mechanisms during the Tunguska event.

The inclusion of plasma physics offers a coherent framework for understanding these observations. Well-established plasma mechanisms—including non-equilibrium heating, electromagnetic energy coupling, and electrical discharge effects—can produce the localized extreme conditions documented in our samples from Tunguska and Tall el-Hammam without requiring the entire blast region to reach such temperatures or pressures. These mechanisms have been experimentally verified in laboratory settings but remain largely absent from conventional airburst models.

This matter has significant real-world implications. Current impact hazard assessments may systematically underestimate the destructive potential of airburst events if they fail to account for mechanisms that can produce localized regions of extreme conditions. The evidence from Tunguska and Tall el-Hammam suggests that even moderate-sized airbursts can generate temperatures and pressures sufficient for mineral melting and shock metamorphism in discrete zones, potentially creating more severe hazards than current models predict.

We propose that comprehensive airburst models incorporate plasma physics and associated electromagnetic effects, realistic treatments of heterogeneous pressure distributions, mechanisms for localized energy concentration, non-equilibrium energy transfer processes, and the effects of fragmental impacts and their secondary processes.

The scientific method requires that theoretical models evolve to accommodate empirical evidence, not the inverse that evidence be dismissed when it contradicts existing models. The physical records preserved at the Tunguska and Tall el-Hammam sites offer a valuable opportunity to refine our understanding of cosmic impact processes and their effects on Earth’s surface, with significant implications for impact hazard assessment and the interpretation of other potential impact sites throughout the archaeological and geological records.

 
Back
Top Bottom