Tunguska.

[Wandering Star]

My question is that there is a clear discrepancy in the Tunguska explosion, between Ra's material (Law of One) and the C's sessions.

In Ra's material it is a kind of ship or satellite and in the C's sessions it is a meteorite exploding in the atmosphere.

The most coherent answer seems to me to be that of the C's, so:

Did Carla and her team have a strong prior belief about this that biased the response?

 

[Wandering Star]

Sesión 17

3 de febrero de 1981

Questioner: In meditation a few nights ago I had the impression of a question about a crater in Russia. I believe it was in Tunguska. Can you tell me what caused the crater?

Ra: I am Ra. The destruction of a fission reactor caused this crater.

17.4 Questioner: Whose reactor?

Ra: I am Ra. This was what you may call a “drone” sent by Confederation which malfunctioned. It was moved to an area where its destruction would not cause infringement upon the will of mind/body/spirit complexes. It was then detonated.

17.5 Questioner: What was its purpose in coming here?

Ra: It was a drone designed to listen to the various signals of your peoples. You were, at that time, beginning work in a more technical sphere. We were interested in determining the extent and the rapidity of your advances. This drone was powered by a simple fission motor or engine as you would call it. It was not that type which you now know, but was very small. However, it has the same destructive effect upon third-density molecular structures. Thus as it malfunctioned we felt it was best to pick a place for its destruction rather than attempt to retrieve it, for the possibility/probability modes of this maneuver looked very, very minute.

 

[Wandering Star]

Sometimes the C's complement and expand Ra's material and vice versa.

So I thought maybe this is the case too.

A combination of the two sources.

 

[Wandering Star]

August 22, 1998

Q: (L) Okay, we would like to know what was this famous explosion in Tunguska?

A: Comet fragment.

Q: (L) Did that have anything to do with this laboratory or this magnetic meridian business?

A: No.