UFO over Vatican city?

[treesparrow]

BBC Catches UFO Over Vatican City

UFO was caught on tape by the BBC as the world awaited the naming of the new Pope.

The object, caught as the camera showed a view of the Sistine Chapel at night, is circular and glowing a strange red color. The UFO doesn't move at all, which seems to rule out the possibility it's a balloon. Even a drone usually makes more movement. Why would there be a drone over the Vatican?

The video uploader processed the image, reversing it into a negative. The object is perfectly round and maintains its position throughout.

Some would say this is a sign that the naming of the new Pope would be of interest to extraterrestrials visiting Earth in secret. Others are much more skeptical, but still offer no other reasonable explanation.

What do you think?

Check it out:
youtu.be/T8URC9hNR50

_http://www.bubblews.com/news/317168-bbc-catches-ufo-over-vatican-city

See here -
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S5vl0BAPDYo

 

[lucasraffablog]

A light moving from right to left, in a straight line and at the same speed, can be a simple airplane or helicopter.

 

[Michael B-C]

BBC Catches UFO Over Vatican City

UFO was caught on tape by the BBC as the world awaited the naming of the new Pope.

The object, caught as the camera showed a view of the Sistine Chapel at night, is circular and glowing a strange red color. The UFO doesn't move at all, which seems to rule out the possibility it's a balloon. Even a drone usually makes more movement. Why would there be a drone over the Vatican?

The video uploader processed the image, reversing it into a negative. The object is perfectly round and maintains its position throughout.

Some would say this is a sign that the naming of the new Pope would be of interest to extraterrestrials visiting Earth in secret. Others are much more skeptical, but still offer no other reasonable explanation.

What do you think?

Check it out:
youtu.be/T8URC9hNR50

_http://www.bubblews.com/news/317168-bbc-catches-ufo-over-vatican-city

See here -
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S5vl0BAPDYo

Sorry Treesparrow, but I am confused by the above posting. You have pasted a quote re the proposed UFO in which it is stated (by you?) that the object ‘doesn't move at all, which seems to rule out the possibility it's a balloon. Even a drone usually makes more movement...' But when one goes to the YouTube link you have included, the light/object clearly travels a significant distance from right screen to rest centre over the dome of St. Peter’s (before the shot returns to the broadcast anchor). Am I missing something?

 

[treesparrow]

BBC Catches UFO Over Vatican City

UFO was caught on tape by the BBC as the world awaited the naming of the new Pope.

The object, caught as the camera showed a view of the Sistine Chapel at night, is circular and glowing a strange red color. The UFO doesn't move at all, which seems to rule out the possibility it's a balloon. Even a drone usually makes more movement. Why would there be a drone over the Vatican?

The video uploader processed the image, reversing it into a negative. The object is perfectly round and maintains its position throughout.

Some would say this is a sign that the naming of the new Pope would be of interest to extraterrestrials visiting Earth in secret. Others are much more skeptical, but still offer no other reasonable explanation.

What do you think?

Check it out:
youtu.be/T8URC9hNR50

_http://www.bubblews.com/news/317168-bbc-catches-ufo-over-vatican-city

See here -
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S5vl0BAPDYo

Sorry Treesparrow, but I am confused by the above posting. You have pasted a quote re the proposed UFO in which it is stated (by you?) that the object ‘doesn't move at all, which seems to rule out the possibility it's a balloon. Even a drone usually makes more movement...' But when one goes to the YouTube link you have included, the light/object clearly travels a significant distance from right screen to rest centre over the dome of St. Peter’s (before the shot returns to the broadcast anchor). Am I missing something?

Yes, looks like it's a contradiction. No quotes by me, btw.