Umberto Eco's Foucault's Pendulum

  • Thread starter Thread starter Guest
  • Start date Start date
G

Guest

Guest
Recently read this and just wondering of opinions regarding it. Regarded as a good gateway towards esoterica- Saint Germain, Templars etc? Thought Name of the Rose actually a better book for what its worth.
 
I've actually just started reading this and it is proving to be a cracker. Fiction and non-fiction seem to overlap from what I've read so far, thus it really needs an index!
 
I'm reading Foucault's Pendulum as well. I find it really fascinating the way in which Umberto Eco is able to mix actual history with fiction.

I have to say, he is very knowledgeable on the Templars and not just regarding the known history of the order.
 
I just finished This is Not the End of the Book by Umberto Eco and Jean-Claude Carrière. London: Vintage Books, 2012. (originally published in French in 2009.)

This is a book of conversations between these two authors, with a third person interviewer, Jean-Philippe de Tonnac. Both authors share a common passion for tracking down historical books and authors that they see as idiotic or foolishness, as a kind of celebration of human folly. Eco does collect books on things like occultism and other unorthodox theories outside the scientific mainstream, but not because he thinks they have much real sense in them. He describes what he collects as:
[. . .] books on wrong, zany and occult science, as well as on imaginary languages.
-p. 131.
The subject of my collection is so eccentric that I’m not sure whom exactly it would interest. I wouldn’t like my books to end up in the hands of an occultist; they would of course value them, but for different reasons. Perhaps the Chinese would buy my collection? I once received an issue of Semiotica, a journal produced in the United States. It was dedicated to semiotics in China, and it cited my works more often than our specialist publications do. Perhaps one day the real interest in my collection will come from Chinese researchers seeking to understand all the follies of the West.
- Eco, p. 336.

In his novel Foucault’s Pendulum, I would say Eco’s purpose is not to persuade people of the possible existence of hidden undercurrents of influence in history coming from various secret fraternities, but rather to ridicule such ideas by showing that when you start looking for them, you can discover all kinds of correlations and coincidences ad infinitum. Hence Foucault’s Pendulum is I think supposed to be a reduction ad absurdum of “secret history” kind of thinking.

Both authors came across as having some measure of contempt for what they saw as idiotic thinking from throughout history, as recorded in books which have come down to us, which I found unendearing and a little intellectually arrogant.

[U. E.] The idiot is different [to the fool] – it’s not that he’s socially inept, but that his logic is faulty. Initially he seems to reason well enough, and you can’t quite work out what’s wrong. And that’s why he’s dangerous. [. . .]
[J. C. C.] For me, the idiot isn’t content with just being wrong. He has to broadcast his error for all to hear. Idiocy is unbelievably strident. ‘We now know for sure that. . .’ followed by some utter rubbish.
[U. E.] You’re quite right. Any banal, commonplace truth becomes an idiocy when it’s shouted all over the place.
[. . .]
[U. E.] We had better refine our definition, then. Stupidity is a way of acting out one’s idiocy with persistence and pride.
[J.C.C.] Not bad. We could also enrich this discussion with quotations from those – and they are many – who have sought to destroy what we today consider our greatest authors and artists.
- pp. 208-211.

[U. E.] As I’ve said, I once wrote about the madmen published by vanity presses, summarizing their ideas with what I thought was obvious irony. But some of them didn’t notice the irony and wrote to thank me for taking their ideas seriously. The same goes for Foucault’s Pendulum, which lays into the ‘bearers of truth’, and yet resulted in unexpected praise and enthusiasm from them. I (or rather my wife and secretary, who screen them) still receive calls from a certain Grand Master Templar.
- p. 215.

Eco gets so absorbed by the subject of stupidity that he thinks it is the best explanation for some 20th century military events:

George W. Bush hadn’t read about how the English fought wars in Afghanistan, so he couldn’t learn from their experiences, and sent his troops off to the slaughter. If Hitler had studied Napoleon’s Russian campaign, he wouldn’t have been so stupid as to throw his troops into battle there. He would have known that the summer is never long enough to arrive in Moscow before winter.
-p. 312.

The two authors seem to think the coming of the internet is a mixed blessing, with the potential it has to make available screeds of nonsense

J. C. C. himself asks a not overly smart question:

[J.C.C.] In the case of Shakespeare, it’s important to remember that very few of his plays were published during his lifetime, that they were collected together and published in what is now called the Folio and considered the first edition. The holy of holies, naturally. Do any copies of that edition still exist, I wonder?
[U. E.] I have seen three at the Folger Library in Washington. There are others in existence, but no longer on the antiquarian market.
-pp. 166-167

An internet search will show that 230 copies of the First Folio are known, of which the Folger Library has 82 copies, and that a copy of the First Folio was sold by Sotheby’s in 2006 (for 2.8 million UK pounds). (This copy came onto the market from an institutional collection.)

Eco also seemed out-of-touch with the average person’s relation to buying new motor vehicles, not that this invalidates anything in particular.

We feel the need to buy a new car every year, because the new model is always better in terms of security features, gadgets, etc.
- p. 39.

In conclusion I think anyone who wanted to dismiss "conspiracy theories" as being nonsense would find a useful ally in Umberto Eco and his writings.
 
Just wanted to report the sad news that Umberto Eco passed away today. RIP Mr. Eco, you were one of the 20th Century's great writers.

http://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-35620368

640.jpg


ADDED: And Harper Lee also passed away. Literature has lost two great writers: http://www.al.com/news/index.ssf/2016/02/harper_lee_dead_at_age_of_89_t.html
 
Thanks Beau for the update, sad day indeed for literature. Two of my favourite authors as well and interesting that they both passed away on the same day - may they rest in peace.

To me the best fictional work that i have ever read is to "Kill a Mockingbird". I remember being so moved and feeling strong emotions when reading the book, and vicariously imagining the moral courage of Atticus Finch. If only we had more Atticus Finch's in this world...sigh!
 
Very sad. One of the few minds I really admired.

In addition to his fiction, he wrote "The Search for the Perfect Language" which is brilliant and highly recommended. It will make you think about things in all-new ways.
 
RIP Umberto Eco .I suggest you read the book "Zero Code" :)
The famous sentence from his last interview:
"Big lies make history"
 
Very sad. RIP Umberto Eco.

I only read the Name of the Rose years ago, but I remember how I was totally moved and absorbed by it. Perhaps it's time to check out his other works.

casper said:
RIP Umberto Eco .I suggest you read the book "Zero Code" :)
The famous sentence from his last interview:
"Big lies make history"

Do you have a source for this casper? I would like to share this quote on social media, but want to check the source first - couldn't find any with a quick search... Thanks!
 
luc said:
casper said:
RIP Umberto Eco .I suggest you read the book "Zero Code" :)
The famous sentence from his last interview:
"Big lies make history"

Do you have a source for this casper? I would like to share this quote on social media, but want to check the source first - couldn't find any with a quick search... Thanks!
https://translate.google.hr/translate?sl=hr&tl=en&js=y&prev=_t&hl=hr&ie=UTF-8&u=http%3A%2F%2Flupiga.com%2Fintervjui%2Fjedan-od-posljednjih-intervjua-umberta-eca-velike-lazi-stvaraju-povijest&edit-text=
 
casper said:
luc said:
casper said:
RIP Umberto Eco .I suggest you read the book "Zero Code" :)
The famous sentence from his last interview:
"Big lies make history"

Do you have a source for this casper? I would like to share this quote on social media, but want to check the source first - couldn't find any with a quick search... Thanks!
https://translate.google.hr/translate?sl=hr&tl=en&js=y&prev=_t&hl=hr&ie=UTF-8&u=http%3A%2F%2Flupiga.com%2Fintervjui%2Fjedan-od-posljednjih-intervjua-umberta-eca-velike-lazi-stvaraju-povijest&edit-text=

Thanks casper! I read the translation (unfortunately the original interview is behind a paywall on Le Monde's website), and it turns out that with his comment "big lies make history", Eco was actually talking about "conspiracy theories" such as the protocols of the elders of zion, and not about the big lies spread by the governments and media! So while I think he has a point about these conspiracy theories (witness the 'Muslims invade us and want to turn us into a caliphate' nonsense), it's unfourtunate that he doesn't speak about the big lies in the mainstream. So it's kind of difficult to use this quote to "wake people up", osit. But maybe some of the meaning of Eco's words was also "lost in translation"... Thanks again for the link!
 
A great mind and very good writer. Oh, my, I had so fun reading "In the name of the Rose", entering the labyrinth. Today I read that his library have 30,000 books. I saw also an interview with him where he talks with another lover of books, you know, both having the "gentle madness" about books. Now he is not here anymore. I have the impression he was very simple, very humble.


 
Back
Top Bottom