Unpublished 'Wrinkle in Time' excerpt clarifies L'Engle's political philosophy

kalibex

Dagobah Resident
though some of her books had political themes, she wasn’t known to write overtly about politics. That is, until her granddaughter, Charlotte Jones Voiklis, came across an unknown three-page passage that was cut before publication.

The passage, which Ms. Voiklis shared with The Wall Street Journal so it could be published for the first time, sheds new light on one of the most beloved and best-selling young-adult books in American literature.

[...]

In it, Meg has just made a narrow escape from Camazotz. As Meg’s father massages her limbs, which are frozen from a jarring trip through space and time, she asks: “But Father, how did the Black Thing—how did it capture Camazotz?” Her father proceeds to lay out the political philosophy behind the book in much starker terms than are apparent in the final version.

He says that yes, totalitarianism can lead to this kind of evil. (The author calls out examples by name, including Hitler, Mussolini and Khrushchev.) But it can also happen in a democracy that places too much value on security, Mr. Murry says. “Security is a most seductive thing,” he tells his daughter. “I’ve come to the conclusion that it’s the greatest evil there is.”

_http://www.wsj.com/articles/a-new-wrinkle-in-time-1429219305?KEYWORDS=wrinkle+in+time
 
Thanks for the link, Kalibex.

Makes one wonder why this segment was cut out of publication. Or maybe not.

Love L'Engle's writing. It was a book my son and I especially enjoyed together.
 
Back
Top Bottom