H-KQGE
Dagobah Resident
I thought this story was interesting because of the way it was presented, and the likely (non) response from primarily the American public :www.youtube.com/watch?v=QgwP9RjygFc
"Known supporters of Al Qaeda and the Taliban" says the piece, the US is there to clean out the terrorists they say and yet they give money in the form of large government contracts? As if that wasn't bad enough the government reckon that the contracts can't simply be suspended because of an official report claiming evidence of terrorist affiliates. Known terrorist affiliates. Why? Well look at the title of this thread, or the video. The justification given is the"surface reality."
Check the quote within the box (still photo) at approximately 2:30 minutes. That's a dot. Now connect with this : www.youtube.com/watch?v=_WDXcZB1j7I
Yes. The UN are outsourcing to private defense contractors for wait for it, "peacekeeping duties." This obvious ploy is for those extremely non-perceptive people that are easily fooled. They throw it out there that they are discussing the option of using such companies, as if they haven't been doing so since god knows when.
Mercenaries (you heard right) for "peace and humanitarian missions." Another "testing of the waters" on the mainstream of consciousness on the planet, in other words deaf ears (until later of course they can say that they did discuss the situation publicly) and the juggernaut continues.
I hope that you will have noted the part about the "laws" being different for military personnel (the attention on military scandal is too much) as opposed to mercenaries (random faces from any and everywhere) which just means dot 2 is the lack of accountability for their pathological guns for hire.
No it's certainly not new news, but the "due process" part is (although writing this gives a bad case of deja vu) and mercenaries (code for violent psychopaths in this context) standing for peace? Well, it sounds like conversive thinking to me..
"Known supporters of Al Qaeda and the Taliban" says the piece, the US is there to clean out the terrorists they say and yet they give money in the form of large government contracts? As if that wasn't bad enough the government reckon that the contracts can't simply be suspended because of an official report claiming evidence of terrorist affiliates. Known terrorist affiliates. Why? Well look at the title of this thread, or the video. The justification given is the"surface reality."
Check the quote within the box (still photo) at approximately 2:30 minutes. That's a dot. Now connect with this : www.youtube.com/watch?v=_WDXcZB1j7I
Yes. The UN are outsourcing to private defense contractors for wait for it, "peacekeeping duties." This obvious ploy is for those extremely non-perceptive people that are easily fooled. They throw it out there that they are discussing the option of using such companies, as if they haven't been doing so since god knows when.
Mercenaries (you heard right) for "peace and humanitarian missions." Another "testing of the waters" on the mainstream of consciousness on the planet, in other words deaf ears (until later of course they can say that they did discuss the situation publicly) and the juggernaut continues.
I hope that you will have noted the part about the "laws" being different for military personnel (the attention on military scandal is too much) as opposed to mercenaries (random faces from any and everywhere) which just means dot 2 is the lack of accountability for their pathological guns for hire.
No it's certainly not new news, but the "due process" part is (although writing this gives a bad case of deja vu) and mercenaries (code for violent psychopaths in this context) standing for peace? Well, it sounds like conversive thinking to me..
