What's in the beef?

DJM

Padawan Learner
Does anyone know if a study has been done to see what kind of chemicals or substances are in beef? The reason I ask. Several months ago my wife and I became vegetarians after noticing a strange smell while cooking meat. It didn't matter how the meat was cooked, the smell and strange taste could still be detected. Now I'm wondering if this indeed why the population is overweight and our children maturing at younger ages. It doesn't seem normal for a female child to develop breast or periods at 10 years old. If factory farms are pumping hormones and steroids into our food chain, those substances must be going somewhere. I would like to take some meat to a lab for testing and make the results public if this hasn't been done.

Blessings
 
Michael said:
Does anyone know if a study has been done to see what kind of chemicals or substances are in beef?

Just a few ideas, but not exhaustive by any means:

Foods “treated” with sufficient
amounts of radiation can kill nearly all E. coli, Salmonella,
Listeria and other pathogens found in food while leaving it
edible, though perhaps with a scorched taste, unpleasant
smell or discoloration.

In recent years, however, attention has turned toward
questions of whether irradiated foods are toxic or could
cause cancer, genetic damage or other health problems.
_http://www.citizen.org/documents/beeftesting.pdf (November, 2003 Report)


Did you know that animals that collapse at the slaughterhouse door or during transportation are called “downers,” and their corpses are routinely processed for human consumption? The diseased ones are “rendered” into “meat meal” and fed back to the pigs and chickens we eat and added to pet food. This according to the USDA.
_http://www.dfsgardenclub.org/articles/What'sInTheBeef.htm


"A hundred thousand cows per year in the U.S. are fine at night, dead in the morning. The majority of those cows are rounded up, ground up, fed back to other cows. If only one of them has mad cow disease, it has the potential to affect thousands."
_http://www.encyclopedia.com/doc/1G1-20099771.html


Pesticides:
Nearly all the meat in America is contaminated with toxic chemicals applied directly to livestock and to animal feed. Unlike crops grown for human consumption, crops grown for cattle feed have no limits on the amount of pesticides that can be applied. About 80% of the pesticides used in the US is applied to four major feed crops -- corn, soybean, cotton, and wheat. Banned pesticides such as the notorious DDT, are persistent in the environment and continue to contaminate food crops. Because the toxins bioaccumulate, the consumer is exposed to greater concentrations of pesticides when eating meat than from eating plant food.
_http://www.accessmylibrary.com/coms2/summary_0286-6780234_ITM


Genetically engineered growth hormones are commonly used in beef production. The hormones have been Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved since the 1950s, but are now produced using genetic engineering techniques. The United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) says the use of the hormones creates a more flavorful and more tender product at lower costs to cattle producers, the environment, and consumers.

There are six approved growth hormones that are produced using genetic engineering: estradiol, progesterone, testosterone, zeranol, melengestrol acetate, and trenbolone acetate. The first three hormones occur in both humans and animals. The other three substances are artificial hormones designed to act like the natural hormones.

There is concern by some researchers and consumers that these hormones may cause cancer, hormonal imbalance, developmental and immune risks in humans who eat these growth hormones.
_http://www.iptv.org/exploremore/ge/features/issue2_feature5.cfm
 
Buddy said:
Michael said:
Does anyone know if a study has been done to see what kind of chemicals or substances are in beef?

Did you know that animals that collapse at the slaughterhouse door or during transportation are called “downers,” and their corpses are routinely processed for human consumption? The diseased ones are “rendered” into “meat meal” and fed back to the pigs and chickens we eat and added to pet food. This according to the USDA.
_http://www.dfsgardenclub.org/articles/What'sInTheBeef.htm

GREAT INFORMATION here Buddy!!!! Thanks for doing the research for all of us.

This one quote really made me think, as I try to buy organic beef and generally organic everything if possible. Now I am wondering if organic beef is processed in the same plants as all other beef. I will have to do my own work on this as I just can't let it go now. I am thinking that some may be processed in with all the other beef and some may not.

It seems the more one looks into what one eats, the more scary it gets!! Where does it all end? Well, at least we all have the forum to help us out on a daily basis.

Thanks again Buddy,

gwb
 
Hi Micheal,

Since it's been 6 months since the question was asked, I don't if you are still interested in knowing about chemicals/substances in beef but I thought I would provide some information for anyone who comes across this thread.

Both the US and Canadian governments study and report on chemical residues in various food products, including beef. The respective government website addresses are:
US - http://origin-www.fsis.usda.gov/Science/Chemistry/index.asp
Canada - http://www.inspection.gc.ca/english/fssa/microchem/chemchime.shtml

To set the record straight, downer cattle are not permitted in the human food chain and haven't been since Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy, BSE (mad cow disease), was detected in an imported cow in December 2003. All cattle must be able to walk in unaided for pre-slaughter inspection for human grade beef. The same rules also apply in Canada

Recent hidden camera footage of certain slaughter facilities revealed, however, that some facilities are not following the rules and have forced downed or injured cattle into the slaughter facility. I don't think this is very common though, as few facilities would want to risk losing the federal registration which is necessary to operate on anything more than a local or regional level. As well, since the hidden camera footage surfaced, facilities are probably concerned that they could be being watched at any time.

With respect to animal feed, it is worthy to note that in Canada, the Specific Risk Material, SRM, cannot enter the animal feed food chain. Specified risk material include the skull, brain, trigeminal ganglia (nerves attached to the brain), eyes, tonsils, spinal cord, and dorsal root ganglia (nerves attached to the spinal cord) of cattle aged 30 months or older, and the distal ileum (portion of the small intestine) of cattle of all ages. Generally, a permit is required for the transport and disposal of SRM, so they can be tracked and guaranteed to not enter the food chain. I believe the US are on par with these regulations as well.

Some might be interested to know that beef isn't directly fed to cattle or other animals. When I first heard that they were feeding cows to cows, I envisioned them serving cows raw meat. I was surprised to learn that in reality, what ends up in livestock feed is more like a proteins extract, which would be mixed with a grain formula.

There is a lot of misinformation and disinformation out there, and I can only imagine the purpose behind such is to manipulate people into removing animal meat from their diet and the purveyors of such information are operating on the misguided notion that eating animal meat is cruel, inhumane and unnecessary.

If anyone is interested in knowing more about cattle slaughter, the websites of both the US Food Safety and Inspection Service and the Canadian Food Inspection Agency are full of interesting information, including lists of all of the applicable laws, regulations and guidelines.

FSIS: http://www.fsis.usda.gov
CFIA: http://www.inspection.gc.ca

Gonzo
 
Back
Top Bottom