World’s first 3D printed metal gun unveiled

H-KQGE

Dagobah Resident
I was wondering how long it would take (whoever) to produce this. It's no shock at all. I'm just mindful of the timing, with the police brutality & food costs (& rises in utilities) & rocket launches (to cover up the incoming cosmic debris) & movie propaganda etc, next year's gonna be a HUGE one for turmoil.

http://rt.com/usa/3d-printed-metal-gun-450/

Engineers at the Texas team of a custom manufacturing company want to make 3D printing more than a novelty, and may have accomplished just that with their latest endeavor: a high-powered, fully functioning metal handgun.

The team at Solid Concepts announced this week that that they’ve successfully designed, printed, assembled and (accurately) fired a 1911 pistol created using digital blueprints that were fed through an industrial 3D printer loaded with powdered metals.

“We’re proving this is possible,” Kent Firestone, Sound Concepts' VP of additive manufacturing, said in a statement this week. “[T]he technology is at a place now where we can manufacture a gun with 3D Printing.”

The world’s first open source 3D printed gun, the Liberator, made headlines earlier this year when developers at Texas-based Distributed Defense released their blueprints, in turn allowing anyone with access to the Internet and a mere hobbyist model machine to assemble a plastic firearm without even having to leave their home. With Solid Concepts’ latest effort, however, more advanced 3D printing fans are awarded the opportunity to make something much more in line with traditional firearms akin to what’s sold in stores.

“It functions beautifully,” Solid Concepts claims, adding that the company’s resident gun expert was able to hit a bull’s eye at nearly 100 feet away with the weapon, a feat hard to contest once someone watches a video of the weapon in action that has been uploaded to the web.



Every component of the weapon but its springs were made using a process called “direct metal laser sintering,” or DMLS, a 3D printing technology that can create metal prototypes in only a few hours by blasting those powders with an ultra-precise fiber optic laser beam. The handgun they’ve made with DMLS technology consists of more than 30 separate 3D-printed components that were then hand-assembled to form a firearm that has successfully fired dozens of rounds already, according to the company.

A blog post on the Sound Concepts website suggests the tools, such as the top-of-the-line industrial machine that fires the lasers, make it unlikely that any amateur 3D-printing enthusiasts will be able to replicate the pistol unveiled this week. The printer itself, the company acknowledged, costs tens of thousands of dollars just to acquire on its own. As 3D printing technology continues to climb in popularity and accessibility, however, soon homemade metal handguns could be created at a fraction of the current price.

“When we decided to go ahead and make this gun, we weren't trying to figure out a cheaper, easier, better way to make a gun. That wasn't the point at all," Solid Concepts' Phillip Conner explained in a video. "What we were trying to do was dispel the commonly-held notion that DMLS parts are not strong enough or accurate enough for real world applications."

“So long sad disfigured Yoda heads, no more pretending like that’s going to cut it for this industry,” the company jokes on their site.

And they were naturally drawn to making a firearm?
 
They will have made a good "market research". It seem to search their clientele in terrified and ignorant people, a desperate niche (not to mention the pathological ones).
Thanks for sharing.
 
Yeah, of all the things the could have made for the same purpose (to show that it can be done), they chose to make a firearm....
 
I initially missed this & just in case anyone else did too...

http://www.sott.net/article/286682-For-1200-assault-rifles-can-be-made-without-serial-numbers-or-background-checks

I can't add anything else to this as the SOTT editorial comment says it all.
 
From a purely technical point of view, they chose well. 3D printing right now is mostly for cheaper plastic stuff. To able to print a functioning firearm is no small feat considering that guns must be strong, able to contain and direct an explosion, precisely manufactured, reliable, etc.

From a marketing POV, they also chose well, because of course they knew it would be highly controversial and get everybody talking about them (hence this thread).

From a practical POV, this changes pretty much nothing. It's not like everyone and their dog can now print a gun with their inkjet printer or something. The cheapest quality 3D printing available to the masses is still hundreds of dollars, and for cheap plastic stuff. We're a long ways away from playing Captain Picard and walking over to the replicator and saying, "Computah! Glock 21, 3 full clips!"

As for untraceable weapons, you don't need 3D printing for that either. It's not like intell groups and the various bad guys buy their guns at WalMart... whether they're supplying themselves or somebody else.
 
I think Scotties' take on the story is the most useful to me.

One of the great promises of 3D printing is that it circumvents traditional methods of production and distribution, few things highlight this shift better than the 3D printing of a firearm.
 
Back
Top Bottom