Thanks Dylan and Mrs. Tigersoap for the links. The globalresearch article is basically what I had in mind and does a good job of picking it apart.
If Academy Award members are boycotting the movie then I suppose the idea that one of them might be willing to lend out their screener copy to aid in negative criticism of the movie would not be outside the realm of possibility. Not that it matters, but I understand the desire not to contribute one penny toward the system that created this atrocity.
I completely understand the visceral negative reactions to the existence of this movie and the desire not to see it at all, and I don't disagree. There was bound to be some discussion of it here anyway, but my point in starting this thread is that sometimes to be in service to Truth, criticism and dissection of lies is necessary. Nothing new here. To people you may come across who may want to see or even saw and say they enjoyed this movie, it's easy enough to say, "The official story of 9/11 and the "death" of Osama bin Laden are lies, and so is that movie." At least if you are willing to say those sorts of things. But it's not likely to go very far with them. The globalresearch piece never comes right out and says those things, although they are likely the positions of its author, but it picks apart ZDT even using assumptions of the official story and mainstream news.
I want Zero Dark Thirty to go away as soon as possible, but while it's here it would be nice to have more armor against it than just saying, "Wake up, sheeple!"
addendum: Thanks Heimdallr! more stuff
