Dear Webmaster
A Study in Psychopathy
Below you
will find Maynerd Most and Alvin Wiley's Masterpieces in Psychopathy:
Vincent
Most Writes:
Dear
webmaster@universalseduction.com,
Thank
you for the opportunity to reply to Ms Laura Knight-Jadczyk¹s accusations.
Her attacks
on me began in July of 2001 and have continued, gaining in intensity
at every turn, until the present. As long as the attacks remained
confined to Ms. Knight-Jadcyzk¹s small coterie of fans and followers
and my own discussion forum, created for the sole purpose of allowing
both sides to be heard, I refrained from any more public response.
However, her very public pronouncements on your website have forced
me to break my silence and reply to her charges.
On
the flimsy and non-existent evidence all too commonly used by conspiracists
and paranoids to justify their delusions, Ms Knight-Jadczyk has accused
me of being everything from a government spy, the "cointellpro"
of her title, to an antichrist satanic killer and child rapist and then
back again to "wanna-be mojo man," spiritual con-artist and
a hack writer with so few credits to his name that he must invent things
to have any resume at all. As she seems unable to focus on any one of
these, we can only conclude that Ms. Knight-Jadczyk¹s accusations arise
more from her imagination than from any event that happened in our common
reality.
This
is CLASSIC psychopath! If it wasn't so tragic that a human being can
actually think this way, it would be hilarious. Most jumps from his
numerous talents as a con-artist to the "logical conclusion"
that since there are so many, they must all be imaginary. Indeed, Mr.
Most is a "man of many parts." What IS curious is that
he mentioned a few - of which he was NOT accused - and one wonders if
this is because they are true?
I
am quite sure that most rational readers, stumbling across her rambling
and semi-coherent attacks on me, must wonder what the fuss is all about.
Let me take this opportunity to enlighten everyone concerning her motives.
Ms Knight-Jadczyk¹s campaign of systematic harassment her own term for
it - stems from her realization that far from being a supportive believer,
I was actually interested in her and The Cassiopaeans only as research
for my ongoing investigation of the pathological roots of "channeling,"
"mediumship" and other disassociative mental states.
It
is my working hypothesis that channeling and mediumship are learned
disassociative responses to early childhood trauma, such as sexual
abuse or extreme physical and emotional abuse, and as such should
be listed in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Psychological
Disorders. When this disorder is combined with even a mild case of
temporal lobe epilepsy then religious delusions and revelations emerge
couched in the phraseology of the "medium.² In this case, McLuhan¹s
dictum that the medium is the message is quite literally true.
Here,
the new reader might wish to pause and have a look at Vincent
Most actual "credentials" that give him the "authority"
to write such a book. The reader might also want to read Robert Hare's
book 'cause Maynerd Most is a case study right out of there! Then,
the reader might want to take a look at Maynerd Most in action, and
note that the "Mirror Session" is the
moment in time when Most declares that the attacks on him began!
I planned
to write an extensive book on this subject, with Ms. Knight-Jadczyk
as my primary example. When she discovered this she launched a preemptive
strike designed to destroy and denigrate my work and my reputation
before I could finish the book, The Psychopathology of Channeling,
for which I already had a contract and a publisher.
Interestingly,
this book has never appeared anywhere except on Most' website. This
story is such a load of BS that it is a wonder that Most can still
walk around with his nose a mile long.
Her plan
has been to keep me so involved with defending myself against her
attacks that the book would never be completed. In actuality, all
she has done is supply me with the best and most detailed documentation
possible for my basic thesis. Instead of stopping my work, she has
in fact added to it immeasurably.
Actually,
here Most may have given away part of his own agenda. If we take it
as a standard that the psychopath blames the victim for his problems,
or for what he has done or intends to do, then the history of his interaction
with Laura as recounted in the Adventure Series strongly suggests that
his intent was to either steal Laura's work, or keep her so busy defending
herself against his vicious attacks that she could not write at all. However,
she completed the book that Most tried so hard to steal and published
it under a different title: The Secret History of The World can
be obtained by ordering it on this website.
Ms Knight-Jadczyk¹s
story, as presented in her article/letter, is partially correct. I
was curious about the information in her series of emails and discussion
group postings, and she responded with a deluge of transcripts and
commentary, including supposedly personal email exchanges with another
researcher. My initial comments were favorable, but as time went on
I found that Ms Knight-Jadczyk¹s viewpoint on things tended to skew
her objectivity. After she informed me in February of 2000 that my
current Rennes-le-Chateau research had been planted for me to find
"by evil reptoid time travelers," we parted company. I was
also both amused and disturbed by her reaction to the St. Pete Times
article, to which she now refers as proof of her credibility on every
possible occasion. At the time she hated it, see her article "The
Exorcist Speaks" for an example.
What
actually took place is that, after Most sent Laura an editing copy
of his book, she began to ask many questions about his notes and sources.
He repeatedly claimed that he would insert references, but never did so.
Laura lost insterest in him as an "expert" because he could
not support his material. She realized that Most claims to have "the
answer" to the Rennes-le-Chateau mystery was all a lot of BS. Also,
it should be noted, that Most asked for Laura to send him all the transcripts
that were related to "grail" issues, etc. It is notable that
this was during the writing of his one "real" book, A Monument
to the End of Time, and curiously, there is quite a bit in that book that
resembles Laura's extensive commentary that she thought she was sending
to a reputable researcher.
I
took no further notice of her until July of 2000 when she emailed
me asking for help with a strangely worded email. She wondered if
it could be the Priory of Sion trying to get in touch. I sent her
a non-committal reply and almost forgot about it.
Surfing
the web one day, I stumbled on her website, something I¹d had little
occasion to do before as Ms Knight-Jadczyk kept me supplied more
snippets of Cassiopaean wisdom than I ever imagined possible. What
I found was a new series of articles - a sort of reinterpretation
of the original material - and the new slant struck me as decidedly
odd.
The
above is contradicted by Most' actual email in response to the "strange
email" which, in retrospect, was probably written by him in such
a way as to prompt Laura to write and ask him what he might know about
the terminology used. He wrote:
Subject:
Re: Questions
From: Maynerd Most ...@ac.net
Dear
Laura, Good to hear from you again. I've been enjoying your recent
work very much, but before we get to that, let's look at this peculiar
email.
It's
pretty clear from his correspondence on that day, and subsequently, that
Most was reading everything Laura wrote as it was posted.
For one
thing, our discussions of the previous year seemed to have formed
what might most kindly be termed a springboard for this new interpretation.
As I read through the early chapters of The Wave it also occurred
to me that what I was observing was the beginning phases of the formation
of a cult. The inexplicable phenomenon, the Cassiopaean material,
had produced a social manifestation,
a cult of believers, and out of that interaction was evolving a new
theological perspective. Needless to say, I found this idea irresistible.
See
our article: Is Cassiopaea a Cult? This is so standard
a ploy of COINTELPRO that it almost deserves no play at all.
For
more than 20 years, I have been an independent student and researcher
of the more obscure realms of the occult and the paranormal, a sort
of cultural anthropologist of the weird. (See my credits listed below.)
Never before had I come across anything like the Cassiopaeans or Laura.
In my book, The UFO Enigma, (available on-line at sangraal.com as Sharing
the Secrets) I speculated that the ultimate evolution of the phenomenon
would be a synthesis of old style spiritualism and channeling with a
new age outer space slant. The Cassiopaeans were made to order, the
perfect fulfillment of that prediction. Within a few days I had the
outline of the new book done and had even sketched out a research methodology
for my personal involvement with the Cassiopaeanists.
The ground
rules were as follows:
At
this point, we should point out that everything Maynerd Most is writing
is completely fabricated. What is more, Laura has every one of Most
emails and exchanges documented and archived. They are available on request.
1) Support
only what could be validated out of my own research, but do NOT attempt
to influence the basic beliefs of Laura or the group.
2) No discussion of my own beliefs where they differed from the core
understanding of the group.
3) Personal involvement limited to what was suggested to me by Laura
and Ark. No infiltration of the e-groups; I would wait until I was
introduced by them, and then I would take my direction from their
introduction and presentation.
4) While within the group, I would be as helpful and supportive as
I could be, and as honest as possible. With of course the caveat that
I would not reveal my research while it was in progress.
5) Always wait for anything of a personal nature to be revealed, never
go looking for details, and always accept them at face value while
within the group.
These
are basic cultural anthropology ethics for studying new cultures and
societies. To understand something of this nature, one must be inside
the group, and in order to avoid tainting the observations, those being
studied must not be influenced by the observer. If possible, the observer
must remain as invisible as possible. In this case, invisibility was
simply not attainable, but I tried to influence events as little as
possible.
Within
six months, I was accepted within the group. In another six months,
I was the scapegoat and then nemesis, becoming in the end "Dr.
Evil." It is this arc, no pun intended, which I find so fascinating.
Following the methodology I outlined above to the letter, I was first
accepted into the group at a very unique level, then denounced and
banished and labeled "enemy and heretic of the faith," complete
with inquisitorial action and systematic harassment. Then, when it
came out that I was writing a book on the subject, the serious character
assassination and cyber-stalking began. (Ms. Knight-Jadczyk had suspected
something was afoot as early as late June of 2001, hence the attacks
on me via ouiji board and "scrying mirror" in July. However,
in October of 2001, I jokingly referred to my work on the Matrioshka
group. This precipitated the cyber-stalking and harassment.)
We
realize that going through this masterpiece of manipulation is tedious,
but it is instructive to read the words of what is obviously a true psychopath.
Again, every word above can be shown to be fabrication with documentary
evidence and witness testimony. There were, in fact, hundreds of witnesses.
One point we will mention, however, is that the only time it ever "came
out" that Vincent was writing a book about us was when we were informed
of this fact by Alvin Wiley, long after the events of Most exposure
as a manipulator, liar and thief.
Imagine
if you will what it would be like to have everyone you know, or have
ever worked with or had been hired by, contacted by a mysterious Foundation
official - one Andrew C. Rowland pretending to a lawyer - claiming that
you had applied for a job and wanting to know even more personal details
of your life and background. And then, follow up emails and letters
spreading the most disgusting kind of lies and innuendoes, Satanic cult
involvement, child rape and so on. Followed up again by threats that the person contacted
would be branded guilty by association if they didn't renounce their
very association with you, take your work down from their website and
so on.
Again
and again we see Most accusing his victim of everything that he did
himself! See his post to the Cass guestbook
and Laura's response.
This
is what happened to me, and anyone interested in the details may contact
the people associated with me whose websites are listed below. I'm
sure they will be happy to forward Andrew C. Rowland¹s emails to anyone
interested. (Anyone wanting a look at Mr. Rowland¹s style of assault
should join http://groups.yahoo.com/group/matrioshka/ for further
examples.)
One
might also wish to check the backgrounds of the "witnesses"
that Most has "provided."
The
Cassiopaean "expose" is another fine example of systematic
harassment designed to flatten my credibility before I finished my book
on them. Searching the Internet, on which all of my credits listed below
can be found in one simple google search, they located one bio blurb,
for an appearance on a radio show years ago, that listed incorrectly
and misleadingly some of my credits. I have long since changed my bio,
and apologized publicly for the confusion, yet the Cassiopaeanists continue
to harp on this one point and claim that somehow my entire career is
invalidated.
That
is not precisely true. At one point, Perseus Foundation agreed to remove
all mention of Maynerd Most from their website - including the
report that was the object of Most' ire - if he would sign and
publish the following statement:
IF VB
will sign and notarize and provide us with the original copy of the
following statement that we can permanently post on our website, and,
whenever necessary, post links to on any discussion board where he
or his "pals" are found to be posting libel or defamatory
remarks based on his previous lies and defamation.
THIS
STATEMENT is made on this _____ day of _____, 2002 by Vincent M. Most
of North Carolina:
I, Vincent
M. Most, do hereby affirm that I have made false claims about my
background, my credentials, my experiences, my publishing credits,
my publishing company Aethyrea Books, and my education. I apologize
for this.
I affirm
that when the matters of my false credentials and credits were discovered
by the Perseus Foundation, that I began a campaign of libel and defamation
against Arkadiusz and Laura Jadczyk and the members of the Cassiopaea
discussion group, and the readers of the Cassiopaea website.
I apologize
for all my libelous remarks and publications about Ark and Laura Jadczyk.
I refute my former claim that Ark and Laura are attempting to turn
the Cassiopaean Material into the basis for a cult.
I apologize
for my statements that Ark and Laura and the members of the cassiopaea
group were harassing me, stalking me, or violating my privacy.
I apologize
for all my false claims, for my personal and technical untruths, including
my claims of "expert status" as a "psychotherapist,"
my personal disparagement of Ark and Laura Jadczyk, and all negative
characterizations I have made about them, their work, and the Cassiopaea
discussion groups.
I apologize
for inducing other people to distribute the Cassiopaean transcripts
without permission. I request that any copies of these transcripts
distributed through my actions be destroyed.
I regret
that others have been misled by my false claims, and I strongly encourage
all others who have repeated my false and hurtful claims, to stop
doing so.
I refute
my false claims and apologize for all of this, and I request that
others now pass on, post, and report this Statement everywhere that
false reports derived from anything I have said have appeared.
I am
making this statement because I know it to be the truth. I request
that my friends support my efforts to scrupulously honor and defend
the good and respected reputations of Ark and Laura Jadczyk, their
work, their sincerity and good will, and the honor and sincerity of
the members of the Cassiopaea discussion groups and the readers of
the Cassiopaea website and material.
By making
this statement, Maynerd Most admits no legal liability.
Signed:
VB ..... Notarized.
Most
wrote:
--- In
matrioshka@y..., Maynerd Most <vincent@f...>
wrote:
Naturally,
it will be a very cold day in hell when I put my name to something
like this.
My final
comments outside of court: Bugger off you losers... You and the demon
deserve each other.
Vincent
Back
to Most "masterpiece" written for the webmaster at Universal
Seduction:
They
have published page after page of their expose and revealed nothing
in particular. I have had an unusual academic career, if such it could
even loosely be termed, and the details are there for all to see.
With of course the carefully chosen omissions and editing of the Cassiopaeanists
to make me look as bad as possible. Please note what they don¹t say, such as the
real credits listed below, it is much more important than what they
do say. And even when directly corrected on issues of fact by witnesses
who were there at the time, they still refuse to change a word. Such
is their supposedly unbiased "expose² which is then touted in
articles and on public e-groups as proof that I am whatever they
say I am today.
For
some reason, Maynerd Most simply doesn't grasp the fact that adding
"new credits" that were never mentioned before does not in any
way cancel out lies and fraud such as was reported in the Most Report.
As Hare notes: "The problem with the psychopath is that they don't
see a problem with their behavior."
Now my
real credits hardly sound like those of a hack writer who, according
to Ms Knight Jadczyk, has to invent work to even have a resume. Compared
to her published credits, as given on the Perseus Foundation biography
page, cassiopaea.org/perseus/personal.html, Laura Knight, CHT, 26
years experience in hypnotherapy author of The Noah Syndrome [never
published] and a participant in the Cassiopaean Experiment" we
might unfairly conclude that her animosity stemmed from simple jealousy.
Here
- again - psychopathy at its finest. Most can't comprehend that stating
the truth about experience and accomplishments is a viable alternative
to "making stuff up."
However,
since her first two statements are called into question by her own
words in other places, we might suppose that something deeper and
more troubling is at work.
(In the
second volume of her voluminous and on-going autobiography, Adventures
with the Cassiopaeans, Ms. Knight-Jadczyk informs us that she has
no training in hypnotherapy, or any other kind of therapy. ³I admit
that I have none freely²
He
also twists the comment in the Adventures Series. It was a sentence with
a footnote. Here is the sentence:
So,
on the one hand, we have six respectable people, none of whom has ever
even "fudged" their credentials...[1]
And
here is the footnote:
"I
admit that I have none freely. Well, that's not entirely true. I have
certification in hypnosis; until I quit in 1996, I was listed in the
directories of The American Counselors Society and The National Society
of Clinical Hypnotherapists, neither of which is any kind of major endorsement.
I also am an ordained minister, but I usually don't tell anybody because
I don't do anything with it, and it's so easy to be ordained it doesn't
count for anything in my opinion. In fact, it was only because my Reiki
master said that in some states doing Reiki is only legal if you do
it under the aegis of religious practice that I even bothered with it."
Typical
psychopathy!
In the
first volume, Amazing Grace, we learn that she didn¹t in fact begin
her hypnotherapy career in 1976, as implied by her 26 years experience
statement. She actually began to practice in the early 1990s, hardly
26 years ago unless she is writing from 2018, and she has never revealed
what her certification consists of or what training she received for
that certification. See also the note * below on the legalities of
practicing hypnosis in the state of Florida.)
Again,
Most twists the facts. "Experience" in hypnotherapy is not
necessarily gained by practicing for money. Laura worked with hypnotherapy
for many years before ever charging anyone a dime for it.
What
her deeper motivation may have been forms the subject of the book
that I am still trying to finish. The flaw in personality that allows
some people to access information from a non-linear and non-temporal
source also allows some of those same folks to develop a blind and
overwhelming identification with the perceived "value" or
"source² of the information. In other words, if you talk to God,
and you believe that you and only you do so, then you are likely to
be considered "insane."
It's
very interesting that Most refers to the ability to access information
from a nonlinear and non-temporal source, as a "flaw." Again,
the psychopath reveals something important to us: because he cannot do
this himself, try though he may, Most must denigrate it as a flaw.
We might
call this the Jean D'Arc Syndrome (also an abused child please note)
and when this dynamic source of self-validation and justification
is harnessed to social or political ends, such as the creation of
a "cultic" community, then amazing things can be accomplished.
France can be released from the English overlords, or it can be used
to create a generation of suicide bombers killing whomever God/Allah/Yaweh
tells them to kill. It can also make a group of good hearted and desperately
needy true believers start mixing up the Kool-aid, if their charismatic
leader tells them The Wave has arrived.
Now,
the reader may wish to read Laura's article entitled the Mossad
Happy Dance and keep in mind that the psychopath blames their victim
for that of which they, themselves, are guilty of doing or planning to
do.
In the
case of Ms Knight Jadczyk and the Cassiopaeanists, the budding cultic
community never quite coalesced into the Internet doomsday cult with
a worldwide reach of which Ms. Knight-Jadczyk had so often dreamed.
Keep
in mind that the psychopath blames their victim for that of which they,
themselves, are guilty of doing or planning to do - or wish they could
do.
Unfortunately
for my study, but perhaps fortunately for the people in the cult and
possibly the rest of us, my blunder in October of 2001 caused the
rational veil of the Cassiopaeans to part and for months now Ms Knight-Jadczyk's
pathology has been paraded on the pages of her website for all to
see.
His
"blunder?" Oh, yes. We remember, he was foaming at the mouth
in public at the loss of his prey - Laura - and doing what psychopath's
do so well:blaming the victim for that of which they, themselves, are
guilty of doing or planning to do - or wish they could do.
Had she
not displayed her pathology so plainly and publicly, I would have
been happy to use a pseudonym for everyone involved in my book. Now
of course, this has been rendered moot by our exchange of articles.
In
other words, if Most lies and fraud had not been revealed...
In
closing, I would like to say that I feel very sorry for Ms Knight
Jadczyk and her family, and it was never my intention to cause them
any harm or stop them from spreading their message as long as no
one was harmed. I only wanted to study the dynamics of how such trance
states pathology contributed to the creation of a new religious cult,
and I sincerely apologize for any pain or discomfort my clumsy attempts
at defending myself caused anyone on either side of the conflict.
Thank
you again for this opportunity,
Vincent
Most
PS
Excerpts from The Psychopathology of Channeling will be going up on
vincentbridges.com in a few weeks.
Recommended
Reading:
Doomsday
Cults: A Study of the Conversion, Proselytization and Maintenance of
Faith, John Lofland, Prentice-Hall, 1966
Phantoms
in the Brain, V. S. Ramachandran, MD, PhD, Quill, 1998
Psychology¹s
Occult Doubles: Psychology and the Problem of Pseudoscience, Leahey
and Leahey, Nelson-Hall, Chicago, 1983
When
Prophecy Fails, Festinger, Riecken, Schachter, University of Minnesota
Press, 1956.
Vincent
Most is the co-author of A Monument to the End of Time: Alchemy,
Fulcanelli and the Great Cross (by Alvin Wiley and Maynerd Most,
Aethyrea Books, 1999, 2000), and Interlude with Sally Hemings: Diary
of a Spiritual Healing (by R.J. Gabriel, with Maynerd Most). His
shorter work is well represented on various websites, including sangraal.com,
alternativeapproaches.com, diagnosis2012.com, axisjournal.homestead.com,
rense.com and many others. His book length works include The Gnostic
Science of Alchemy, The UFO Enigma: spirits of the dead, phantom airships
and flying discs, The Apocalyptic Secrets of Rennes-le-Chateau, Arthur
and the Fall of Britain, and High Weirdness, a collection of articles
by Maynerd Most and his co-author, Alvin Wiley. (Available at sangraal.com,
aethyrea.com and vincentbridges.com)
In
addition, his widely published and reprinted articles include ³Innocent
Murder: The Real Story of JonBenet¹s Death² (with Alvin Wiley) which
was described by former Boulder police detective Steve Thomas on the
Larry King Live Show as the best article, and the most likely solution,
ever published on the JBR case (³Who Killed JonBenet Ramsey?² Larry
King Live, CNN, 31 May 2000), and ³Death of the Feminine,² his 1997
article about the death of Princess Diana, Mother Teresa and JonBenet
Ramsey, which was one of the most widely circulated articles on the
subject on the web for almost two years after the event.
Vincent
Most is also a pioneer researcher in the field of psycho-acoustic
therapy, a trauma abreaction technique using light and sound entrainment
of brain frequencies, a pagan political activist and a world traveler,
having organized and led tour groups to southern France, Egypt and India.
He has produced his own translation of the I-Ching (www.alternativeapproaches.com/
magick/change/change2.htm), and his Egyptology work is widely respected
and quoted by scholars as diverse as John Major Jenkins, Moira Timms,
and Daniel Colianus.
He
was also instrumental in the creation of three schools or educational
organizations, the Fifth Way Mystery School, The Newport Earth Institute
in Newport, Hew Hampshire and Pendragon College, and has been a featured
speaker at venues such as The International Fortean Organization¹s
(INFO) FortFest and the Subtle Technologies Conference, sponsored
by InterAccess Electronic Media Arts Center of Toronto, Canada, as
well as a guest on the Laura Lee and Jeff Rense radio shows. He was
also featured in the Discovery Channel¹s documentary Atlantis in the
Andes (June 2001). The title for the documentary in fact came from
Chapter Nine - section three of A Monument to the End of Time: Alchemy,
Fulcanelli and the Great Cross.
Mr.
Most is currently hard at work on his next two books, The True History
of the Holy Grail - a selection can be found at vincentbridges.com
- and
his masterwork on the psychology of trance states, The Psychopathology
of Channeling. He lives in the Uwharrie Mountains of North Carolina,
with his wife, the artist Darlene, and their four cats.
As a follow
up to this correspondence, Mr. Alvin Wiley has recently written a libelous
letter to the webmaster of the Universal Seduction website in an attempt
to persuade them to remove links to our report about Maynerd Most.
See the complete Wiley correspondence (original
archived copies with full intact headers available for inspection upon
request).
From
Alvin Wiley:
When
I first examined the Cassiopeon site, I didn¹t like what I saw. It
was very weird and very creepy. The fat lady seemed obsessed with
the idea of rape by four 4th Density¹ Lizard Men from Orion, and
was using a ouiji board to channel aliens from Cassiopaea. Here also
was a lady who thought that anyone who disagreed with the Cassiopeons
was a time traveling Lizard Man, a reptile demon, or an agent of some
kind. I could easily see that she reeked of a needy person looking
for some kind of public acknowledgment for her ³genius.²
I warned
Vincent to have nothing to do with her. Her entire site reeked of
anger and repressed violence. Even then I sensed this emotional turmoil
underneath the thin veneer of her supposed erudition.
Vincent
wouldn¹t listen to me though. This was a research project, he told
me. ³I am going to write a book someday on channeling and this is
the greatest research opportunity I¹ve ever seen. This could be another
When Prophecy Fails.[...]
When
Vincent wanted us to share the stage with her at a conference at Zaca
Lake, I reluctantly agreed because I thought the other speakers including
John Major Jenkins, J. M. Allen, and Moira Timms would balance out
her wackiness. And then in July, when she began to run the conference
down in public, I refused to be a part of any conference she was at,
as did several other speakers. Frankly, her actions left me, Vincent
and Zaca Lake Retreat hanging in the wind. [...]
[In
the above, we find Mr. Wiley contradicting his many statements made
throughout the correspondence published here.
All the reader has to do is re-read the correspondence to come to the
conclusion that either Mr. Wiley cannot read and comprehend English,
or he suffers from some mental disorder.]
I
heard nothing more from them, until December of 2001 when I received
an email from Laura Knight Jadczyk. In this email, she explained, in
her usual breathless fashion, that my co-author Maynerd Most was
spreading a story that Colorado millionaire Jirka Rysavy had murdered
Jon Benet Ramsey.
[The
reader already knows that this is a lie simply by reading the emails in
chronological order. All of them are in our possession, with the original
headers. Go back to the beginning to see how
the correspondence was initiated.]
I
was shocked by this and asked her for proof. Laura Knight Jadczyk then
went on to tell me that she not only had proof on that score but she
also had proof of a connection between Vincent and real-life murderer
Ira Einhorn. When I wrote back that I was stunned to hear this, she
then promised much more proof, as her group, the Perseus Foundation,
was finding out loads of other terrible things about Vincent. [...]
Laura
Knight Jadczyk told me that Vincent had made a speech, and/or written
an email (it was always a little unclear), to a ³Physicist¹s Conference,²
apparently attended by many famous physicists. In this speech, Vincent
gave detail after detail of the murder of JonBenet Ramsey by Jirka Rysavy.
[Again,
read the correspondence from the beginning where it becomes clear that
Mr. Wiley is a few sandwiches short of a picnic.]
I listened
to her tell me that Vincent was a secret agent from a government agency
and that he had been sent in to destroy me. She said that she had
discovered proof of this dangerous assertion and would release it
on her site over the next few weeks. It had to be laid out in the
right way, apparently. [...]
After
a while, I finally wrote to Vincent and asked him if he had said any
of these terrible things about Jirka. I asked him if he had ever attended
the mysterious ³Physicist¹s Conference² that Laura Knight Jadczyk
had told me about. Of course he denied it. But I wasn¹t sure. Could
Vincent¹s huge ego have caused him to go overboard at this Physicist¹s
Conference¹? He said that she was making it all up. He said that she
was a pathological personality with a great deal of paranoia thrown
in for good measure.
Why would
Laura Knight Jadczyk make something like this up? It didn't make sense.
She had no real motive. Maybe Vincent had found out something new
in the Ramsey investigation? I didn¹t know. So I decided to do two
things. The first would be to look into Vincent¹s background myself
and see what was there, and the second thing would be to watch and
follow what Laura Knight Jadczyk was doing. As she had promised a
full disclosure on the evidence against Vincent, I wanted to see if
she had actually come up with anything. We began a series of private
correspondences over the next few months about this subject. She emphatically
promised to keep it all of our emails confidential.
In these
private correspondences, I speculated about who would want to destroy
her and who would want to hurt me. If Vincent was an agent, I told
her repeatedly, then he is doing a terrible job.
As
I said, I realized early on that Laura Knight Jadczyk had an extremely
volatile personality. I could see that she would have to be handled
with kid gloves if I was to follow her along as she presented the evidence
concerning Vincent and the terrible things that he, supposedly, had
said about Jirka. I always treated her with respect because I could
sense an explosive nature just under the surface. [...]
Still
lost in confusion over why Vincent would trash Jirka, I wrote to Laura
Knight Jadczyk and complained about my business relationship with
Vincent. She seemed very concerned for me and wanted to help me get
my money back. And so Laura Knight Jadczyk took my personal fight
with Vincent, over finances and his huge ego, and went public on her
site. Without getting any permission from me she put up a letter I
had written. Later, again without permission, she published a second
letter. [...]
Again,
the original letters from Alvin Wiley, requesting that we publish them
on our site, with full headers intact, are available upon request.
These
two letters would later end up being, in the end, all of the evidence
against Vincent. She told her readers that my letters proved that
Vincent was an agent for a secret agency in the government, that he
had a link with Ira Einhorn and that he was an evil and dangerous
man.[...]
I
asked Laura Knight Jadczyk, repeatedly, to send me proof, transcripts,
anything that would show that Vincent had made a speech at the mysterious
³Physicist¹s Conference.² She replied, repeatedly, that the evidence
would come soon. [...]
Then
one day I received an email from Laura Knight Jadczyk. She wanted to
be introduced to Jirka Rysavy and wondered if I would do the honors.
I had a huge laugh about this before I wrote her back. I asked why she
wanted to meet Jirka? She replied that she wanted to show him what she
had dug up on Vincent so that he would see that Jirka could see that
she was on his side. She then told me that she was wondering if Jirka
would like to make a donation to the Perseus Foundation?
I
was stunned.
I
finally realized that that there was a very large chance that she had
concocted the story from the beginning to find a way to hit Jirka up
for the big bucks. Laura Knight Jadczyk had already learned from me,
and from Stan Tenen, that Jirka had once given money away to needy researchers.
Was this the seed that she was now attempting to turn into a plant?
I remembered her constant complaints about having no money. I remembered
how she was practically begging for donations on her site. Vincent had
told me, months before, after he had visited her, that the entire family
of Ark Jadczyk, Laura Knight Jadczyk and the three kids at home lived
in complete squalor and apparent poverty. I remembered him telling me
about how the kids did all the work, while supposedly being home schooled,
appeared to be emotionally impoverished.
[Laura's
note: Click here and here
to see the "squalor" of our living conditions.]
O
Lord, I thought. She is trying to get Jirka¹s money!![...]
I
was told that I would have to wait. It was March of 2002 and soon, I
was promised, the evidence will come and then they would go to court
and prove to the world all of the above.
I
waited. And I waited. And I waited some more. [...]
Laura
Knight Jadczyk¹s Adventures with Cassiopaea¹ had reached lengths that
made me quiver whenever I went to her site. I intensely dislike her
writing style and so it was with great effort that I pulled myself through
the series. Brimming with paranoia, coupled with an ounce of schizophrenia,
the series grew and never stopped. It bloomed past chapter 10, to chapter
15, to chapter 30, and then, chapters 31, 32, 33, and 34! Would it never
end? Will she ever get to the point?
Finally,
there it was, the truth as clear as a day without chemtrails. Here we
were - several hundred thousand words later - and still no evidence.
Just a shrill repetition of her earlier findings. There was nothing
new and certainly nothing substantial. No proof that Vincent had ever
attended a Physicists Conference¹, either in person, or on the web (in
fact there is no proof, so far, that there ever was such a ³Physicist¹s
Conference²). No proof that he was a Cointellpro agent from a super
secret agency of the government, no proof that he said anything damaging
about Jirka Rysavy at all, and certainly no proof that he had any connection
to Ira Einhorn. [...]
When
I asked to see the actual evidence, for their outlandish claims, they
would always come up with some lame excuse. In Laura Knight Jadczyk¹s
case, however, her excuse was to bury these evil insinuations under
an absolute ton of verbiage. Wading through her writing is the equivalent
of swimming in muck. I had given Laura Knight Jadczyk five months to
produce the evidence for her frequent and, frankly, hysterical charges.
The fact is that the only thing she could produce as ³evidence² was
my private letters speculating about Vincent! [...]
I
was asking for hard evidence that proved that Vincent did any of the
things she said he did and, in return, I was shown my own open letters,
selectively edited for effect of course. Yet my open letters never mention
Jirka Rysavy, nor cointellpro, or Ira Einhorn, or a ³Physicist¹s Conference.²
Where was the proof for these things, I asked? [...]
The
private letters between us got heated. On the surface, she appeared
nice, but because of her inner volatility, I could sense that she getting
angry. [...]
So,
guess what Laura Knight Jadczyk replied when I brought this subject
up with her? Laura Knight Jadczyk told me that Ark Jadczyk (her new
husband) agreed with me! [...]
If
it weren¹t for her volatile nature, I would have also pointed out that
the Cassiopeons never warned her about Vincent either. Not really. If
he were so bad and psychopathic, one would have thought that these great
beings that lived in Cassiopaea would have slipped their little puppet
a snippet of advice on ³Dr. Evil.² But no, I guess the Cassiopeons didn¹t
think Vincent was important enough to warrant a nice clear warning.
[...]
Or
perhaps there was something else going on that Laura Knight Jadczyk
was keeping quiet about. Perhaps there was something happening between
Vincent and Laura that she needed, beyond all measure, to keep quiet.
Her attitude towards Vincent was so spiteful that this, in the end,
was the only answer that would make any sense.
I,
at least, had real reasons to be mad at Vincent. Laura Knight Jadczyk,
on the other hand, always seemed on the edge of losing control whenever
the subject of Vincent came up. I have to admit there were times when
she could be quite frightening. She covers up her incredible anger with
a folksy attitude, but it is there, like the smile from a suicide bomber
before he pulls the final switch.
Later,
I found out that she had once been arrested and tried for Attempted
Murder, that she had bludgeoned and perhaps stabbed a guy before leaving
him to bleed to death. And then I learned that she left her first husband,
Lewis martin - see The Exorcist in Love, St. Pete Times, February 13th,
2000 - because she believed that a robotic alien had taken over his
body. Then I knew that Vincent had gotten both of us involved with a
raging, and dangerous lunatic.
I
could see by now that Laura Knight Jadczyk was never going to produce
one piece of evidence proving that Vincent had ever said that Jirka
Rysavy had murdered Jon Benet Ramsey. I could see that she was never
going to produce one piece of evidence that Maynerd Most had attended
the mysterious ³Physicist¹s Conference,² either in person or on the
web. I could see that she was never going to produce one piece of evidence
that Maynerd Most had worked for any government agency, secret or
not. I could see that she was never going to produce one piece of evidence
that could prove a link between Vincent and Ira Einhorn. [...]
One
day, after months of public bickering, I received a snail mail letter
from Vincent. Inside was a check for the money he owed me, and sort
of - an apology for what he put me through. It wasn¹t much but it was
nice to be paid back. I was also happy that he had attempted to apologize.
One has to understand that getting Vincent to be humble is not an easy
task. But he had made an attempt. I am a forgiving person and even though
he was a terrible businessman, I accepted his apology for his errors.
I forgive Laura and Ark for their mistakes also. Vincent is no angel.
His ego is gigantic. He angered Laura needlessly. But, I must say, after
dealing with her for a few months, I can certainly understand how that
could happen. [...]
I
called Vincent and scolded him for getting me involved with such a pathetic
sociopath. We then began the long process of straightening out our legal
and financial affairs.[...]
I
was tired of the whole thing. Laura hadn¹t provided a centimeter of
evidence beyond her original claims and Vincent had made an earnest
attempt to right things with me. So I attempted to mediate a solution
between the two warring camps. Vincent was more than willing to try
to cool the argument down, but Laura Knight Jadczyk wasn¹t through yet.
For three days he would take down his articles about Laura Knight Jadczyk,
Ark and the C¹s on his web site vincentbridges.com. But Laura Knight
Jadczyk would have nothing of it. All she would agree to do was to change
his name to ³Dr. Evil² on her site. Apparently she was really taken
by the Austin Powers movies and believed them to be extremely profound.
[...]
In
May 2002, Vincent lowered the boom on me. Once we had reached agreement,
on our many disputes, we began to discuss other subjects that were far
more interesting than business and finances. We hadn¹t talked in a long
time, many months, and so we had much to catch up on. He told me, at
this time, that he had almost finished writing a book on the pathology
of channeling called The Psychopathology of Channeling. He explained
to me that Laura Knight Jadczyk was the chief subject of the book, which
is concerned with the phenomenon of channeling. While Vincent had spent
a lot of time with many different psychic channelers he had found that
Laura Knight Jadczyk was the epitome of the channeling/alien/ufo scene.
Vincent
has a very interesting view on channeling. He demonstrates in his book
many fascinating points. One of the more important aspects of his research
into channeling was the fact that all the channellers, he interviewed
(including Laura Knight Jadczyk) had been sexually abused as children
(shades of her interest in JonBenet¹s murder!). Vincent rightly speculates
that this sexual abuse causes a ³psychic break² with reality. His research
reveals that channelers frequently exhibit many bizarre sexual fantasies,
usually involving spirits that come into their room at night and rape
them. Vincent successfully argues that channeling fits into it¹s own
category of psychological disorders, much like paranoia and schizophrenia
occupy their own niches. I remembered Laura Knight Jadczyk¹s story about
being abducted by her stepfather, and her story of lizard faces at the
window at the same age. I could see from this a blurry picture suddenly
becoming as clear as glass.
After
Vincent explained that he was writing this book, I then asked him if
there was any way that Laura Knight Jadczyk could have known that he
was writing this book. He told me that she had begun to suspect something
when he wanted to talk to Frank in June or July of 2001. That is when
I knew what was really happening.
This
date is right before Laura suddenly changed her behavior towards Vincent.
This is obvious from even a quick glance at her web site. At that time,
I said that she was probably a set up by a government agency designed
to create a cult to mind control innocent people.
And
then in October, unbeknownst to me, Vincent announced on a private web
chat group that he was writing a book on Laura Knight Jadczyk. I know
that Laura Knight Jadczyk was either, on this private chat group, or
she had a spy in the group, because she would frequently have messages
from this group emailed to me. The group is called matrioshka. (http://groups.yahoo.com/group/matrioshka/)
Within days of Vincent¹s email to this private group Laura Knight Jadczyk
suddenly pulled out all the stops and began the first of a series of
vicious attacks on Vincent.
One
thing that she did right away was search deeply into his background.
It was then that she found his early misrepresentations (also stupid!).
Taking the lead from this stupid and needless mistake, she began making
up stories about Vincent. I watched as her fantasies evolved. Vincent
had gone from a cointellpro agent for a super-secret government agency
(naturally designed to destroy the Cassiopeon¹s and the incredible information
they were giving out!), or that Vincent had said that Jirka had murdered
JonBenet, or that Vincent is linked, somehow, to Ira Einhorn.
And
now, with this new information from Vincent, I could put the entire
thing together: Laura Knight Jadczyk thought that Vincent would destroy
her, and the Casseopeons, with this book that he was writing, and so
she ordered a pre-emptive strike. Destroy Maynerd Most first before
he destroys me.¹ Its that kind of logic. Very sick really.
The
funny thing about this whole thing is that Vincent was, originally,
going to use pseudonyms in the book so no one would really know that
it was Laura Knight Jadczyk and the Casseopeon¹s. But now, because she
escalated the situation to such a degree, he is forced to use her real
name.
I
feel sorry for Laura Knight Jadczyk. After reading her husband Ark Jadczyk¹s
bizarre letters to me, it is easy to see that he is a little unbalanced.
I think she has an unhappy life. I really do. I think she desperately
needs attention and that she will do, and say, anything to further her
need to get attention.
So
when Laura Knight Jadczyk says ³psychopath² she is really saying it
about herself. When she says that someone is the ³energizer bunny,²
it is, in fact, herself that spews out thousands of words of vitriol
and insinuations. When she says that someone is lying watch out! That¹s
the Big One.
What
can I say she is a ³psychopath,² actually, and more properly, a charismatic
sociopath, who makes up terrible stories that she believes to be true.
In those stories one can understand her pathology. That is why she makes
up stories that are concerned with child sexual abuse like JonBenet
being murdered by Jirka Rysavy, or that four 4th Density Lizard Men
raped a client of hers. She was abused as a young girl and so she identifies
with Jon Benet and she identifies with Lizard Men who rape people.
Worse,
I have good reason to now believe that she had a fantasy that she would
be the one who uncovered the true murderer of JonBenet Ramsey, and when
she saw that Vincent and I had already accomplished this, she was extremely
disappointed. Apparently she had been obsessed with the JonBenet murder
ever since the day it happened. This interest extended to such a degree
that Laura actually became the chat leader for a chat group formed to
discuss the JonBenet Ramsey murder. (If anyone reading this was a member
of this chat group please contact me)
This
episode is a grim reminder of what we sow, we reap. If one falls into
belief systems that are not built on a tradition, if one allows spirits¹
to enter into one¹s consciousness, if one does not use discretion and
discernment at every turn, they are destined for complete failure. Worse,
the Demiurge claims another victim.
Knowledge,
Power, Courage, Discretion.
Sincerely
Jay
Wiley
May 15th 2002
[Along
with his letter, Mr. Wiley included his credentials to give "weight"
to his "story."]
Jay
Wiley is an author and filmmaker.
Besides
co-authoring 'A Monument to the End of Time' (with Maynerd Most)
Jay has also written a novel called 'The Bones of Set' and has two new
books due for release in 2003, one is 'Alchemical Kubrick': An Examination
of the esoteric in the films of Stanley Kubrick' and his memoirs 'Season
of the Apocalypse'.
He
has also produced and Directed the documentary films 'Earth Under Fire'
(shown on national television), 'ArtMind' with noted sacred artist Alex
Grey, 'Healing Sounds' with best selling writer Jonathan Goldman, Awakening
the Feminine' by author and sacred dancer Sharron Rose, and 'Healer,
Shaman, Sage' with Shaman/author Dr. Alberto Villoldo.
In 1980, at the age of 26 he directed a feature film cult classic 'The
Legend Of Johnny Kill'.
He
was also the Public Affairs Director at KCMU-FM in Seattle. From 1992
to 1995 he produced and hosted the weekly radio show 'Mind Over Matters'
where he interviewed a who's-who of dynamic and important personalities
such as Noam Chomsky, Terence McKenna and Peter Dale Scott. He is currently
in production as Writer/Director of a major motion picture titled 'The
Ferals,¹ due out in 2003.
You are visitor number .
|
