Queen Elizabeth II Dies - End of an Era

Anyway, the 'king over the water' is all 'water under the bridge' now. King Charles III is finally upon us. And he couldn't be further removed from the 'original' King Charles III.
Regarding "couldn't be further removed" maybe that goes for Liz Truss vs Elizabeth II, although Liz Truss is actually Mary Elizabeth Truss, while Queen Elizabeth II was Elizabeth Alexandra Mary.
 
Except that the Monarch was basically symbolic of a deity. Elizabeth was, in essence, the goddess on the throne, worshiped in one form or another throughout most of known human history.
I think hierarchies in general are a very fundamental part of human (and even animal) existence, but the nature of said hierarchies is often misunderstood and thus the wrong people are at the top for the wrong reasons. Hierarchies and "leaders" are good and important in order to guide their followers in service of an aim. Kinda like the elders of this forum, or the Jedi Order. But the Sith also have a hierarchy and order of their own. The idea is probably very intuitive to all beings because the idea of God as an all-powerful and all-knowing infinite being that creates order out of chaos is also intuitive if we observe the natural world. So people naturally gravitate towards some kind of meaning and order - an organizing principle in their personal lives and in their world. Anarchy or chaos are very uncomfortable and rather destructive if they persist too long. So naturally, leaders spring up in every facet of society, as a symbol of "God" in the sense that they represent order out of chaos and suggest a unity of purpose. But whose purpose, and what purpose?

Even the very idea of Gurdjieff's Work is fundamentally rooted in this - fusing your magnetic center and developing a singular "I" is a way to create order within ourselves, without which not much can be accomplished. But it must be in service to an aim. If you're trying to fuse your magnetic center or join with other collinear people, you must be doing it for a reason. Otherwise what "I" are you even creating, and what does collinearity mean without a commonly recognized direction?

Unfortunately, no organization is undirected. If you're not picking a direction yourself, it will be chosen for you. And unfortunately STO is never the one chosen for you - anyone willing to choose for you is by definition STS. So without knowledge of STS/STO, we are defaulted into STS. And what does a person who IS inclined towards service to others do if they find themselves with a lot of influence in a world dominated by STS and ignorance? They'd probably walk on eggshells and have to be wise as a serpent and gentle as a dove. I think the best the queen could do is just serve as an example of a decent person the best she could. If she went after the existing hierarchy that may be the last thing she does.

Perhaps that's why people loved her - she was a rare person in her position who actually seemed like a decent human being doing her duty, loving God, and being kind and funny, etc. Perhaps she actually did represent a "normal decent person" and not some out of touch twisted creature like most other leaders. And that was enough to give hope to people that the lizards are in fact NOT the only option on the table.
 

Queen Elizabeth II: A legacy like no other​


A very well-done pictorial with commentary of the Queens life. Wonderfully done.

It's actually quite long. Just keep scrolling down.

"Some inherited it upon their father’s final breath. Others conquered armies and murdered rivals to grab it for themselves.

But for one little girl,"


 

Princess reveals why the Romanovs are grateful to late Queen Elizabeth II​


"PARIS, September 9. /TASS/. The Romanov Family will always remain grateful to Queen Elizabeth II of the United Kingdom for the attention she paid to preserving the memory of the last Russian tsar’s children, said Princess Feodora Alekseyevna, who heads the Romanov Fund for Russia, in an interview with TASS on Friday."

"Our family will forever remain grateful to Her Majesty and her spouse Prince Philip for their attention to the identification of the remains of Tsar Nicolas II, Empress Alexandra Feodorovna and their children, including Crown Prince Aleksey and Grand Princess Maria," Princess Feodora noted."

"The Duke of Edinburgh - the spouse of Elizabeth II - was the grand nephew of..."

Article below:

 
The year 1999 seven month,
From the sky will come a great King of terror:
To bring back to life the great King of Angolmois, (the Mongols),
Before after Mars to reign by good luck
(Century X, Quatrain 72)
Just a sidenote regarding the above: I don't really get the link between Angolmois and the Mongols. As a French, it seems to me it rather refers to the Angoumois/Angoulême county since in old texts, one can also find it written Angolmois.


 
Except that the Monarch was basically symbolic of a deity. Elizabeth was, in essence, the goddess on the throne, worshiped in one form or another throughout most of known human history.
It is interesting that you should mention the idea of the goddess on the throne since this accords with the poet and historian Robert Graves' views in his book The White Goddess. Quoting from Graves (with my explanatory additions incorporated in red in parentheses):​

"There is an unconscious hankering in Britain after goddesses, if not for a goddess as dominant as the aboriginal Triple Goddess, at least for a female softening of the all-maleness of the Christian Trinity. .... True the male Trinity antedated the Puritan revolution but it was a theological not an emotional concept: as has been shown, the Queen of Heaven [a Catholic title of the Blessed Virgin Mary] with her retinue of female saints had a far greater hold in the popular imagination between the Crusades and the Civil War than either the Father or the Son. And one of the results of Henry VIII's breach with Rome was that when his daughter Queen Elizabeth I became head of the Anglican Church she was popularly regarded as a sort of deity: poets not only made her their Muse but gave her titles - Phoebe, Virginia, Gloriana - which identified her with the Moon-goddess, and the extraordinary hold that she gained on the affections of her subjects was largely due to this cult.

Elizabeth was the last [British] Queen to play the Muse. Victoria, like Queen Anne, preferred to play the part of War-goddess in inspiring her armies, and proved an effective substitute for the [Male] Thunder-god.

The British love of Queens does not seem to be based merely on the historical commonplace that 'Britain is never so prosperous as when a Queen is on the Throne': it reflects rather, a stubborn conviction that this is a Mother Country not a Father Land - a peculiarity that the Classical Greeks also noted about Crete - and that the King's prime function is to be the Queen's consort*. Such natural apprehensions or convictions or obsessions are the ultimate source of all religion, myth and poetry, and cannot be eradicated either by conquest or education."

*
Elsewhere, Graves notes that this role of the king consort corresponds with the relationship that existed between the Mother-goddess and her consort in antiquity such as that between the Sumerian goddess Inanna (the equivalent of the Akkadian Astarte and the Babylonian Ishtar), who was a fertility figure and a goddess of the storehouse, and her husband the god Dumuzi (equivalent to the Semitic Tammuz - a shepherd king).

In Welsh folklore and mythology, Cerridwen was the Celtic goddess associated with inspiration, fertility, wisdom and can be viewed, therefore, as the Welsh equivalent of Inanna. Since these traits were often linked to the moon and the female intuitive energy, Cerridwen can also be considered as a Moon-goddess. Cerridwen is often portrayed as one aspect of the Celtic Triple Goddess, where she is the Crone or the wise one, Blodeuwedd is the Maiden, and Arianhod is the Mother. However, as is the case with the majority of Celtic female deities, she embodies all of the three aspects of the Triad within herself (Cf. her with the Irish Brigid another triple goddess figure).

Graves argues that the ancient Britons were originally worshippers of the Goddess until what he calls the 'Battle of the Alphabets' occurred, where afterwards the Celts in Britain adopted the male god Bel or Belus as their chief divinity. However, as Graves indicates, the British (particularly those of Celtic descent) still hanker after a more feminised divinity, which would explain the great devotion shown to the Blessed Virgin Mary in England prior to the Reformation. Indeed, as Graves and others argue the word "Merry", as in the "Merry Month of May" and "Merry England", stems from the name "Marie" or "Mary" and therefore betrays what Graves calls Mary-worship, the month of May being the month dedicated by the Catholic Church for special devotion to the Blessed Virgin Mary. However, many of the May festivities or revels in pre-Reformation England stemmed from much earlier forms of worship of the White or Triple Goddess and some of these, such as dancing around the May Pole and the folk dances of Morris (Mary's) Men, still survive in England to this day.

Although Queen Elizabeth II certainly had strong attachments to the British armed forces (as Monarch she was the Commander in Chief - all officers' commissions being bestowed in the Monarch's name), I shall leave it to the reader to decide whether or not as Graves described she fitted the role of War-goddess like her ancestor Queen Victoria.​
 
Here in Canada, the mainstream media is "reassuring" the public that the Queen's portrait will eventually be replaced by Charles' portrait on dollar bills. Looks like the Queen's longevity irritated some folks...

I did a quick search and stumbled on a CBC News article from May 2012.
Is Canada ready for King Charles?
1662738632158.png
Public opinion polls may not favour Prince Charles as the next monarch, but unless fate or some sort of constitutional intervention throws a curve, he will be the next king of Canada. This would affect Canada in a number of ways, such as the inclusion of his image on Canadian currency, as seen in this artistic rendering. (CBC)

What struck me immediately is the fact that the above picture portrays Charles on a "modernized" 25$ note, withdrawn in 1937. Symbolism at play?
The $25 note was issued only in 1935, to commemorate the silver jubilee of King George V. As with other 1935 issues, separate English and French versions were printed. This was a limited release that was never printed in large quantities. The note was coloured an appropriate royal purple; both the King & his consort Queen Mary were featured, with Windsor Castle appearing on the back. The $25 note was withdrawn from circulation in 1937.

Let's see how deep the rabbit hole goes with King Reset.
 
I am trying to understand why there is a need to see her as a kind human being when she was not that at all. She didn't even try to become one ... :cool2:

But to see why I am not appreciating these positive things about her, I went to read this post about her achievements that Adobe posted, but couldn't go to far ... It was too pathetic and long.

So I looked at some shorter and more condensed ones. Like top 5 achievements or similar, and I read this article and couldn't really find any worth mentioning. If she was a neighbor, it would be challenging to remember fast is the one that died at age 96 from 1st or 5th flor ...


Reading and observing the people's comments, I see how she was truly made into the "nice" woman wearing her "cross" with dignity?!?!

Well, she had a golden crown packed with diamonds dug by black children; it wasn't a cross that was put on her against her will, and SHE COULD DO A LOT, but she didn't. WHY? Because it was easiest for her to do nothing, like in every decent established traditional CORPO-RATIOn. She was a silent hunter gatekeeper, and humanity was also for her just prey. She distanced herself from all the evil her empire did just because it was the best way to hypnotize the masses. As many said, she was a "Mother" figure to them, OMG - and that was the biggest crime she did as she accpeted to be that "model" even though she didn't really give a dam shit for any small man on the street.

From my understanding, She sat silently for 70 years enjoying the radiant energy of love from the people she, or the forces she embodied as a queen godess, as she was the one of that kind, obviously needed so desperately. That amount of adoration or hate for an emphatic human being is not easy to take biologically ...

Fame cause a lot of stress on your body just because sooooo many people radiate their energies towards you, projecting on you all sort of things, and you feel them, and they flow through your body so strongly that most of the day, you just can't focus or even think about anything ... you literary feel how they feed on you .... not always negatively, and it is not important, as it is just energy, and you feel it very chaotically ... after some time you can get used to that and learn what part of the day and weeks are less energized, but as long as you are present in media, on TV, magazines etc, what reminds people on you, it is not avoidable. It is partly controllable as you understand it, but when it hits you feel blurry and slightly trembling like when you are excited about something that has to happen, and in that state, you can't make serious work or decisions. That is why those stars and popular people who really do good work are waking up at dawn while their fans are still in sleep mode ... and staying out of everyday media if there is no work by them they need to promote. Well, she was just the opposite - a cover page puppet so that people will be mesmerized by her, not even looking at what is behind that cover page.

Anyhow it is still hell on a way, and you can take it and endure it if there is a better message to bring to the people by your work or exmaple. But for sure if you are human you will not feel pleasant by the enormous amount of power people are ready to give to you. You don't want them to mystify you and to think that their life can be improved not by themself where you can be one piece of that puzzle, but you will not be willing ot radite stornglky like a Queen Goddess - that they will be good mostly because they worship you and want to be you, or near to you.

So she was pure supercharged 4D STS puppet ... the worst kind of puppet, a passive-aggressive one ... this is how I see it, as if she will be compassionate, she will make Africa free again as she was able to make that move. Or if she wass really kind, she was always able to resign and save herself from that kingdom of evil, but she didn't.

Looking at her family, what a mess ... and she was indeed protecting her son's degenerative mind and behaviors... leaving them with Charles and Camila ... and Lizzy Truss(t) - wasn't the name also kind of like form a myth .. a queen died after meeting with Lizzy Trusssst - a serpent, and the queen was a Taurus by astrological sing on her birth, did they maybe performed the ritual? Also, she died at age 96 - mirroring = 69! also, the date of her death looks graphically very snaky = 892022 17222 8222 = 8+9+2+0+2+2 = 5 pentagram ... etc ...
 
The last remnant of a dignified way of life (although I realize the 'age' she was born in had its own unique set of problems). My great-grandmother was much like the late Queen; gentle but firm and one who tried to teach those who came after her a way of life that has all but disappeared off this chaotic planet.
 
Well, in the eighth month of 1999, Putin became prime minister of Russia, and there is something very 'Ghengis Khan-like' about all he has done since.

The other day, the prime minister of Myanmar all but hailed Putin as today's "Great Khan!"


Anyway, this is side-tracking from the topic at hand, although it does bring into question what it is that makes someone a 'king/monarch', and what ordinary people's expectations of such roles are.
Your comments bring to mind something I discovered on the Forum some while ago linking Putin to the prophecy.

Session 19 June 1999:

Q: Since our lengthy sabbatical, I have accumulated a number of questions, but there has been another matter that has come up in the past few days that I would like to cover first. Apparently there is a newly discovered comet that some people are suggesting fits the prophecies of Nostradamus where he says in quatrain 10.72:

L’an mil neuf cens nonante neuf sept mois,
Du ciel viendra vn grand Roy d’effrayeur:
Resusciter le grand Roy d’Angolmois,
Auant apres Mars regner par bon-heur.

which translates into English:

The year 1999, seventh month,
From the sky will come a great King of Terror:
To bring back to life the great King of the Mongols,
Before and after Mars to reign by good luck.

The reason for the comparison is because it is thought that Nostradamus was referring to September and NOT July, and, in point of fact, this comet will have made its circuit around the [sun] by September, and some folks are theorizing that it could be ‘vacuuming’ and picking up a lot of matter which could slow it down, change its direction, and cause it to interact with the Earth in a detrimental way. Is this, in fact, going to happen?

A: Nostradamus had a specific date tied to a vague prediction.

Q: You are right. Yes, that’s true. Are you suggesting that there is some other event besides a cometary one that he is referring to in this prediction?

A: If he was, let it not be known. The question is: is “1999” a number, or is it more?

Q: You mean that 1999 could imply a code of some sort?

A: Perhaps it is best for you to see events in this subject unfold, then analyze later.
Maybe it is a beginning of a cycle …

{In retrospect, it almost seems like a hint about 9-11.}

[…]

Q: (A) Yes, it can conduct, but it’s not magnetic. Why ‘molten?’

A: What about the “tail” of such an object coming into contact with the ionosphere?

Q: (L) Oh. I think I get it. The Nostradamus thing about a great comet’s tail or something … let me look it up:

After great trouble for humanity, a greater one is prepared
The Great Mover renews the ages:
Rain, blood, milk, famine, steel and plague,
In the heavens fire seen, a long spark running.

This one is supposed to refer to something that occurs at the turn of the Millennium … Is this what we are getting at here? Something that will look like a ‘long spark running’ which then comes in contact with the ionosphere which may exchange potentials with the earth by virtue of this conducting, molten nickel tail? Yes????? Is that good?

A: Ask Arkadiusz.

Q: (L) Well, honey … am I on to something here? (A) The point is that this comet is in space. Space is rather cold, so the question is: what would make nickel molten? (L) Well, it will be close to the sun! That will heat it up! (A) This particular comet is not going to come close enough to the sun to melt it! (L) Well then, how can the nickel be molten???

A: What about flares?


Subsequently, Laura returned to this topic in a later session (apologies but I don't have the name of the Forum member who contributed his comments on this excerpt from the transcripts):​

Session 3 July 1999:

Q: (L) Regarding this prophecy of Nostradamus and Comet Lee, we discovered that a fellow named Peter Lemesurier went back to the original editions of the seer's work and found that a misplaced apostrophe changed the word 'appeaser' to 'terror' so that it is NOT the 'Great King of Terror' but the 'Appeaser King' that is connected to the 'seventh month' of 1999. Of course, the standard interpretations say that whatever it is, it is going to 'bring back' the 'Great King of the Mongols,' which they are identifying as Kublai Khan or Genghis Khan. Could you comment on this?

A: Comment? How so?

Q: What could an 'appeaser king' imply? What could it mean?

A: You have the power to define these terms.

Q: (L) Yeah, but there are only so many hours in the day! But, an 'appeaser' is one who brings peace or 'pacifies' or 'quiets' by giving into demands. It can also mean to 'satisfy' or 'relieve.' The only thing that fits in these terms with 'king' - the only person I can think of who NEEDS to 'satisfy' or 'relieve' is Prince Charles, and he has a sort of 'debt' to pay the British public for the death of Princess Diana, or so it is perceived. But, the only way he could be king would be if Queen Elizabeth dies. So, is this a prediction of the death of Queen Elizabeth and the accession of Charles as king and his repudiation of Camilla? Am I onto something here?

A: Maybe.

Q: (F) But how would he bring back the 'king of the Mongols?' (L) I don't know. The 'king of the Mongols' could be related to having a harem or something... give us a clue here on this!

A: No.


"Nostradamus’s Century 10 Quatrain 72 prediction in French:
L'an mil neuf cens nonante neuf sept mois
Du ciel viendra un grand Roy deffraieur
Resusciter le grand Roy d'Angolmois.
Avant apres Mars regner par bon heur

And in English:
The year thousand nine hundred ninety nine seven months
Of heaven shall come a great King defrayer (redeemer)
To bring to life again the great King of Angolmois.
Before after Mars reigns by good luck.


I understand that we should not always take such predictions in a literal sense, but this particular one strikes me with its precision to dates and their relevance to the current state of affairs.

Among world politicians and leaders of our times Vladimir Putin is among the very few who fits the description of the ‘Appeaser’ King.
March could mean Mars. Presidential elections were held in Russia on 26 March 2000.Incumbent Prime Minister and acting President Vladimir Putin, who had succeeded Boris Yeltsin on his resignation on 31 December 1999, won the elections in the first round. Prior to that on Aug. 9, 1999, President Boris Yeltsin stunned Russia with his televised announcement of Vladimir Putin's appointment as prime minister, as well as his characterization of the new appointee as his successor.

However Nostradamus mentions 7 months, meaning the event he was talking about was supposed to take place in July, not August. So there is a difference in the prediction and Putin's appointment as prime minister in at least 10 days. But the difference can be explained by the fact that the Gregorian calendar we use today was introduced in February 1582 after Nostradamus death on July 2 1566. The Gregorian calendar began by skipping 10 calendar days, to restore 21 March as the date of the vernal equinox.

The ‘Appeaser King’ will bring back the King of Angolmois. Most commentators say Angolmois is an anagram for Mongoulois, or Mongolian, even though there is not an “a” in Mongoulois, which is needed to create Mongoulois from Angolmois. It may be a very big assumption, but if Nostradamus did mean “King of Mongols” then this quatrain could be telling us that the ‘Appeaser King’ will bring back to life the King of the Mongols.

Who is the most famous Mongol? Genghis Khan.

I think Sergey Shoygu, Putin’s long-time ally, might be a descendant of Genghis Khan. Sergey Shoigu is Defense Minister of the Russian Federation as of November 6, 2012. Previously, Shoigu was Minister of the Russian Federation for Affairs of Civil Defense, Emergencies and Disaster Relief for 18 years.¬ Sergey Kozhugetovich (patronymic) Shoigu was born in the town of Chadan in the Republic of Tuva (Tyva) into a family with deep historical roots dating back to Genghis Khan times. Sergey’s father’s first name was Shoygu and his last name was Kozhuget. Under the law Shoygu’s name should have been Sergey Shoyguvich Kozhuget, which unveils the secret of Sergey’s ancestry. But allegedly due to the oversight of the passport officer in 1971 Sergey’s name became Sergey Kozhugetovich Shoigu.

Kuzhuget/Kozhuget is a last name of people from the Baryn-Hemchiksky area of the Republic of Tuva, Russia. The tribe of Kuzhuget belongs to a group called Uryankhayets, who lived in the area historically called Uryankhay/ Uriangqai/Uriankhai/Uriangqad. The Republic of Tuva between 1914 and 1921 was called Uryankhaisky Kray. Today by the people of Tuva Chinghiz Khan is recognized … as the Tuvinian.

It is possible that there is a spiritual and perhaps even a genetic connection between the people of Uryankhay and Genghis Khan. The Uriangqai tribe plays an important role in the history of the sacred mountain Burkhan Khaldun /Burqan Khaldun /Burkhan Qaldun, /Bourhan Qaldun. The Burkhan Khaldun (48°45′14″N 108°39′49.5″E) is a mountain of the Khentii Mountains in the Khentii Province of current Mongolia. The mountain and/or its proximity are rumored to be the birthplace of Genghis Khan, as well as the place of his shamanic initiation and a purported location of his tomb. The most ancient Mongolian historical opus The Secret History of the Mongols in the paragraph 9 it says that the members of the tribe Uriangqai (Uriankhai, Uriangqad) , “Burgan Bosqaysan and Sinci Bayan, Lords of [Mount] Burqan Qaldun.“ Thus we can assume that the Burkhan Khaldun was the land where the people of Uriangqai resided even before Genghis Khan was born. And this is how Urgunge Onon translated the same sentence: “Shinchi-bayan established [shamanistic] deities as the spirit-lords Burqan-Khaldun while he was travelling in the direction of Uri[y]angqai.” Based on this translation we can assume that the member of the Uriangqai tribe Shinchi-bayan (Shinchi the Rich) had some spiritual connection to Burkhan Khaldun. He could have prayed there, or established a sacred place, or performed some rituals there. The only way to find out is to read and understand the original Mongolian text of The Secret History of the Mongols. Most translators for some reason say that the men of Urianqai Burgan Bosqaysan and Sinci Bayan were the land lords of Burkhan Khaldun, meaning that the land on which Genghis Khan presumably was born and later buried belonged to the Uryankhayets. In Genghis Khan's army the warriors of Uryankhay were something like an elite guard, and the famous general of Genghis Khan’s army, Subutai was Uryankhayets (Tuvinian).

After Genghis Khan’s death the area around Burkhan Khaldun was named Ikh Khorig, meaning the “Great Taboo”, or the “Forbidden Zone.” Russian historian Hara-Davan Erendzhen in his research about Genghis Khan writes that his grave is “overgrown by dense woods. The keepers of this large forbidden place were the Uryankhayets.” The ban remained in force until 1989, when the Mongolian government allowed in the first visitors and archaeological expeditions.

Based on the connection presented above we can assume that Nostradamus was trying to say that the ‘Appeaser King’ Putin will bring back to life the King of Mongols, Shoygu. I will not be surprised if Shoygu is going to become a president of Russia after Putin."


Well the above comments may be controversial in the present circumstances but it would be interesting to obtain the views of Russian Forum members on the above.

Oddly enough, King Charles III claims descent from Genghis Kahn and, as King of England, he can be considered to be the king of the Angles.

See:Ancestry charts of the current British royal family

A descent from Genghis Khan was proposed by Iain Moncreiffe in Royal Highness that requires descent of Thocomerius, Voivode of Wallachia, from Jöchi (presuming parentage from Mengu-Timur, possibly identifying Thocomerius with Toqta, Khan of the Blue Horde or one of his brothers), which is controversial. However, further on, this connection leads to Francis, Duke of Teck (shown in the first chart) through the half-brother of Dracula as proposed by Moncreiffe and Gerald Paget.

That being said, King Charles also claims descent or blood ties to Dracula, i.e., Vlad III, commonly known as Vlad the Impaler or Vlad Dracula, the ruler of Wallachia three times between 1448 and his death in 1476/77.
However, as one Forum member has already pointed out, Angolmois may relate to Angoulême in south-west France.
Angoulême (Poitevin-Saintongeais: Engoulaeme; Occitan: Engoleime) is a commune, in the prefecture of the Charente department, in the Nouvelle-Aquitaine region of southwestern France.
The inhabitants of the commune are known as Angoumoisins or Angoumoisines.


You should note in this connection that Angoulême was formerly the capital of Angoumoise in the Ancien Regime.

To me "Angolmois" does seem very close to "Angoumoise". Thus, the other possibility is that Nostradamus may have been predicting a resurrection of the French monarchy, perhaps in the person of the mythical 'Great Henri'.​
 
For myself, I'm inclined to hope that Queen Elizabeth rests in peace.
Hers was a life that was not really her own, ever. Whatever feelings we may have about the Monarchy, and whatever conspiracies some like to entertain their minds with, she was a sister, mother and grandmother to people who no doubt loved her.

Elizabeth, like the rest of us, was programmed to do and be exactly what she was. And just like any family, some of them might be psychopaths, and others normal and empathic
Exactly. She was a fellow human being (sorry Icke, it's not a 'Big Secret', she was), and she was likely limited, just like so many of us.

So now us lucky Brits have another King Charlie to look forward to. Wonderful.

Chuckie is clearly a libtard/Leftist/Greenie and full supporter of WEF and all that nefariousness.
Again, exactly. I wonder what Charlie as Head of State and Liz Truss as Prime Minister will bring us? Enjoy the show folks!
 

JORDAN PETERSON COMMENTS ON THE QUEEN'S PASSING​


If you watch this, there is JP critiquing that could be done, but I’m just going to post it, and leave it at that. (14 minutes long)


 
Last edited:

Trending content

Back
Top Bottom