Where is Kate Middleton, Princess of Wales?

gottathink

gottathink

The Living Force
FOTCM Member
Where is Kate Middleton?
She went into hospital on the 17thJanuary for abdominal surgery but hasn’t been seen in public since before Christmas. Recently Kensington Palace released a family photo of her with her children supposedly taken by William at their home. But the photo has been pulled by news outlets as it is evident it is a manipulated photo. Fueling more rumours as to her health and where abouts.
 
gottathink said:
Where is Kate Middleton?
She went into hospital on the 17thJanuary for abdominal surgery but hasn’t been seen in public since before Christmas. Recently Kensington Palace released a family photo of her with her children supposedly taken by William at their home. But the photo has been pulled by news outlets as it is evident it is a manipulated photo. Fueling more rumours as to her health and where abouts.
Click to expand...
Some Spanish video told that she is at Area 51 and that they cloned her. I know because I have a friend that she is obsessed with this story.:rolleyes: But the story goes further: they say Camilla was artificially ovulated with Kate's eggs! To have a child who will be king or queen of the British Empire.:umm:
 
gottathink said:
Where is Kate Middleton?
She went into hospital on the 17thJanuary for abdominal surgery but hasn’t been seen in public since before Christmas. Recently Kensington Palace released a family photo of her with her children supposedly taken by William at their home. But the photo has been pulled by news outlets as it is evident it is a manipulated photo. Fueling more rumours as to her health and where abouts.
Click to expand...

It is a bit strange, image is clearly altered but it is the princess' hand which is the area in question. The fact that the image was retracted in accordance with a "kill order" was always going to draw attention. So it is probably just news outlets' rules about altered images, but if they wanted to provide fuel for more speculation then this would do it!

www.bbc.co.uk

Kate photo withdrawn by five news agencies amid 'manipulation' concerns

The Associated Press said it has noted "an inconsistency in the alignment" of Princess Charlotte’s hand.
www.bbc.co.uk www.bbc.co.uk


View attachment _132884958_royal_photo_01_640-2x-nc.png.webp
 
loreta said:
But the story goes further: they say Camilla was artificially ovulated with Kate's eggs! To have a child who will be king or queen of the British Empire.
Click to expand...
Ha ha ha ha ha ha.... say WHAT???
Camilla is 76 years of age, she has had a history of gynaecological problems.
There is also the tiny, seemingly insignificant detail that she had a HYSTERECTOMY at the age of 59 (2007).

🤪
 
Ben said:
It is a bit strange, image is clearly altered but it is the princess' hand which is the area in question. The fact that the image was retracted in accordance with a "kill order" was always going to draw attention. So it is probably just news outlets' rules about altered images, but if they wanted to provide fuel for more speculation then this would do it!

www.bbc.co.uk

Kate photo withdrawn by five news agencies amid 'manipulation' concerns

The Associated Press said it has noted "an inconsistency in the alignment" of Princess Charlotte’s hand.
www.bbc.co.uk www.bbc.co.uk

View attachment _132884958_royal_photo_01_640-2x-nc.png.webp
Click to expand...
There are definitely some very dodgy alterations to the original photograph but if Kate did them, why? Surely the original would have been much more cohesive instead of having Charlotte's sleeve ending in a different position to her hand and Kate's right hand being out of focus when the rest of Louis's jumper is in focus. They seem rather random and strange alterations for no discernable purpose. I fancy myself as a bit of a "very" amateur photographer and have tried to edit my photos in Photoshop from time to time and it is very easy to alter something realistically only to find that it has had a knock-on effect in another area. I am wondering if Kate's surgery was quite serious and caused her to lose weight from an already very slender frame. Two weeks in hospital is a long time to spend these days when something like a hysterectomy would require usually less than a week. I am not saying that she had a hysterectomy. That was just an example. Perhaps the Buckingham Palace bods don't want to alarm the public (as we are notoriously sensitive little souls) especially as Prince Charles is already going through cancer treatment.
 
Kate Middleton: Princess of Wales apologizes after altered photo circulatedPublished on 03/11/2024 at 12:35 | Updated on 03/11/2024 at 12:35
1710186256567.png



www.parismatch.com

Photo retouchée de Kate : décryptage dâun fiasco

Ultra-retouchée, la première photo de la princesse de Galles depuis son opération, diffusée le jour de la Fêteâ¨des mères, devait rassurer. Elle a, au contraire, ravivé lâinquiétude. On vous explique.
www.parismatch.com www.parismatch.com
Edited photo of Kate: deciphering a fiasco
Ultra-retouched, the first photo of the Princess of Wales since her operation, released on Mother's Day, should have been reassuring. On the contrary, it has revived concern. We'll explain it to you.Four smiles that should give hope. Apart from a stolen photo published by American media in early March, the Princess of Wales had not appeared officially since December 25. In other words, an eternity.
 
Kate has claimed responsibility for making the alterations to the photos. The originals will not be released and nothing is known about when they were taken.

www.bbc.co.uk

Kate photo: Princess of Wales seen after saying she edited Mother's Day picture

The Princess of Wales apologises "for confusion" after agencies recall the image over editing concerns.
www.bbc.co.uk

The Princess of Wales has apologised "for any confusion" after she said she edited a Mother's Day photograph of her and her children.
Her statement was posted on Kensington Palace social media after five agencies retracted it over editing concerns.
"Like many amateur photographers, I do occasionally experiment with editing," Catherine said.
The image, taken by the Prince of Wales, was the first of Catherine to be released since her surgery in January.
Click to expand...

The implication is that this was not a piece of professional manipulation, but some tidying up of a picture capturing a family moment.
Except that this was not just a personal picture, it was going to be shared with the world, against a background in which it would inevitably be seen as an attempt to stop the speculation and conspiracy theories about Catherine, as she recovers from an operation.
Click to expand...

Well if so then it has backfired! There are multiple fairly poor edits throughout the photograph but no obvious reasons for them. I normally have absolutely ZERO interest in anything related to the royal family but this is just strange.

This also comes at a time when speculation is rife about how ill Charles actually is.
 
I have a friend who is conspiracy mad...she spends her time down every rabbit hole going...anyway, she thinks Kate refused to be impregnated with the sperm of the recently deceased Rothschild and wants to blow the whistle...whilst she was also having an affair with the now dead Tom Kingston, who managed to shoot himself with the family shotgun! All in all, its very odd.
I didn't notice anything odd about the photo initially as I wasn't looking for it, but what did seem strange to me was...who an earth would wear skinny jeans after recovering from abdominal surgery?? Surely loose fitting clothes would be more comfortable?
 
Here is a article on rumors of Prince Williams extra marital affair that might be causing the current articles on Kate . Looks to me like another distraction for the masses.

www.indiatoday.in

Rose Hanbury opens up about Prince William 'affair'

A conspiracy theory emerged linking Kate's absence to rumours of Prince William having an affair with Sarah Rose Hanbury, the Marchioness of Cholmondeley, a close friend of the couple. Now, Rose Hanbury broke silence on rumour of affiars.
www.indiatoday.in www.indiatoday.in
 
Ellipse said:
Apparently new suspicious photo of Kate was published but someone was not convinced
Click to expand...
It was a video. Many thousands? Ain't convinced, including me. For many reasons, height, face, walking, as many had pointed out at X.
I find it curious that they're letting the whole thing get blown up. And there hasn't been a convincing enough picture where Kate is alive, fine, resting. By several days ago, shouldn't they - whomever that is taking decisions, had already realized that people are beyond suspicious.

https://twitter.com/x/status/1769819450990322114

seek10 said:
Looks to me like another distraction for the masses.
Click to expand...
One of many, I guess.
 
Houseinhabit, instagram independent journalist who is covering the elections in the state (she is very popular because she is fair to Trump and RFK jr) said the other day that she had heard from a trusted source that Kate really is just recovering from surgery🤷
 
Ellipse said:
Apparently new suspicious photo of Kate was published but someone was not convinced.

View attachment 93169
Click to expand...

Interesting, the BBC didn't mention their own reporter in this damage control article - including a roundup of who's spreading conspiracy theories on X.

www.bbc.co.uk

How Kate body-double conspiracy theory spread on social media

Footage of the Princess of Wales out shopping has stoked false theories already circulating online.
www.bbc.co.uk www.bbc.co.uk
This social media frenzy, which the media also contributes to and which fills a vacuum of information, mirrors others that I've investigated - and that have caused serious harm to the real people at their centre.
It can cause hurt to family and friends, and more widely, it erodes public trust.
Click to expand...

Sonja McLaughlan's account on X is now locked and the post is not visible, oops!

x.com

x.com x.com
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Trending content

Back
Top Bottom