Comments on Cassiopaea on the Web

[PopHistorian]

There's a Ra thread on Reddit,

https://www.reddit.com/r/lawofone/comments/z21ld9/thoughts_on_the_cassiopaea_transcripts

and someone posted a few years ago asking for opinion about the Cs, which I just saw. I searched, but did not see this mentioned on the forum. The original poster wrote:

...they appear to have shifted to forum-based sessions brimming with Q-Anon adjacent ideas: anti-vax, pro-Russian invasion, anti-trans, pro-Trump stolen election hubris, and so on.

Notice the language dripping with political bias.

I wrote a nice explanation about how what appears to be a shift of political views (if viewed in that light) is really because public attitudes have changed, not so much the core principles of the source. Upon submission, immediately, I received email from Reddit stating that my post had been removed "due to an influx of spammers" and that my account was too new (subjective).

There are other responders giving the Cs the thumbs up, though. If interested, others might wish to try posting on the thread and see if you get through, but best, in my opinion, not to engage anyone in particular.

If there is no other such thread, this one may serve as a place to post external comments, if worth noting, about the Cs material. Bound to be some COINTELPRO.

 

[Jones]

The mods are even (perhaps jokingly) requesting money for poorly formulated questions in one thread.

 

[rognaill]

Bound to be some COINTELPRO.

Greetings Pop,

My observations over the past few years is when the moniker "Q-Anon" is thrown out there it is nearly always a form of COINTELPRO. What I have also noticed regarding the use of the moniker is that it may make the poster sound well informed, while others are using the moniker with malicious intent knowing the phrase has become somewhat of an On/Off button in the public's ability to critically think.

 

[Ina]

There were some good comments after the one mentioned. There is no point in listing them here, though as there is no point in starting a debate.

 

[whitecoast]

A lot of what they wrote is ticking me off. There is so much “not even wrong” that I agree there’s no point in replying to anyone. Might as well just share from a general space of openness and see if there’s discernment present or not. Either way you would do your duty of sharing knowledge when asked for.

 

[Steph_rivers]

My favorite reply:

Its really very simple. ANY channel pushing anything on you other than love is likely corrupt. If they are trying to direct your views or beliefs on any subject. They are not service to others.

If a channel tells you to vote one way or another. Or anything remotely like that, then they are trying to control you. Thats not love and not the way to serve others. - Some Reddit guy

Don't forget to send the Lizzies some love and light guys...
Don't forget your coffin too

 

[Wandering Star]

My favorite reply:

Don't forget to send the Lizzies some love and light guys...
Don't forget your coffin too

I was just at work, and I was request from a drug addict woman who has been living for months in an old man's house, from whom she has been stealing his retirement pension money for several months.

Now another drug addict has stolen from her and she wanted me to solve her problem.

So yes, I solved the problem but not the way she wanted.

Don't you have your heart? - she told me.

A demon wanted my love and light, but you see, she didn't like what I gave her.

 

[PopHistorian]

Don't forget to send the Lizzies some love and light guys...
Don't forget your coffin too

That "pushing anything on you other than love" response stood out for me, too. But expected, given that this is seemingly the main message of the entire New Age movement. I had to get along with a close associate for years who believed, from listening to her favorite channeler, that the only reason we incarnate on Earth is to "have fun." I guess the billions of suffering victims of psychopaths are just failing miserably at this aim. I must admit that Love Pusher would make a great '70s soul song title, though.