Taylor Swift shilling for the PTB?

Musicinventor

Musicinventor

Jedi Master
A friend sent me the following two articles about Taylor Swift. The first discusses a recent poll showing that one fifth of voters would back a candidate endorsed by her, :scared: the second addresses the possibility of a Taylor Swift psy-op. I found this of interest when tied with the linked thread Search.

www.thegatewaypundit.com

What the Heck? New Poll Finds NEARLY A FIFTH of Voters 'Likely' to Back Candidate Endorsed by Taylor Swift | The Gateway Pundit | by Cassandra MacDonald

A shocking new poll has revealed that nearly a fifth of voters are “likely” to support a candidate endorsed by pop star Taylor Swift.
www.thegatewaypundit.com www.thegatewaypundit.com

Is There A Taylor Swift Psyop? | ZeroHedge

ZeroHedge - On a long enough timeline, the survival rate for everyone drops to zero
www.zerohedge.com www.zerohedge.com

cassiopaea.org

Search

cassiopaea.org cassiopaea.org
 
The short answer is: pretty much yeah. PJ Watson has a piece on it too. Her tearful crocodile tears over the gender thing back in the day was the start and first tip-off she is not organic. She’s a GMO manufactured star.

Her hookup with Travis Kelce reeks of BS. And he is now on every street corner pushing the vaccines.

 
Same as in relationship attraction: the quality to psychically engage and hypnotize. (That’s the biggie)

Add the vicarious imagining of that kind of power: wealth, fame, domination, “intelligence“ beauty, creativity, emotional expression of the all powerful divine bimbo who has no bounds. If that isn’t a seductive focal point of projection for an STS planet, I don’t know what is.

(Her faux “romantic” connection to a pseudo-masculine facsimile of a sub-moronic archetypal footballer icon is also in play now, too)

She has what everyone wants and lacks. (In the terms of this world).
 
Last edited:
Joe said:
Yeah, but her appeal in that respect seems to go far beyond any others who shared similar attributes. She seems to provoke adoration in many that goes beyond the average stuff that surrounds pop stars.
Click to expand...
Maybe she is a "deep punctuator"? It might be a stretch but:

Session 17 August 2003:
Laura said:
Q: (Perceval) What's the relationship between the Mossad and the Rothschilds?

A: Mossad is a "brainchild."

{Laughter at the joke - "Rothschild" "Brainchild" - Discussion mainly Perceval) wondering whether the Rothschilds are part of the apex or if they are just useful idiots that are going to be double-crossed also. C's break in as Laura is not understanding Perceval's question.}

A: The lines blur. Rothchilds are similar in a smaller way to Sargon. Deep level punctuator.

Q: (L) What is a deep level punctuator?

A: One who emerges from seeming obscurity to "make a mark" on history. Don't you wonder where they come from. Think "deep."

Q: As in underground bases?

A: Well, what a concept!
Click to expand...
 
Look at the swooning over the Beatles in the early 60’s. I never “got” that. But it’s rooted in deep psychic stuff. Now the media machine/programmers are even more refined and advanced far beyond that era. Who knows how much subliminal encoding goes into each recording. She’s a witch, esoteric sell-out of the highest order. She’s got the Lizzie’s and major dark entities behind her. She’s Bathsheba, the girl in the red dress and Mata Hari rolled into one.

I think it would be great if some of the women on the forum chimed in.

(Oh yeah, she’s every temptation of the devil also. A living archetype. An advertisement for every conceivable sin. One stop shop. )
 
Watched Metropolis lately? Fritz Lang nailed it.
1719077442609.jpeg
IMG_1298.jpeg
IMG_1300.jpeg
 
Joe said:
Yeah, but her appeal in that respect seems to go far beyond any others who shared similar attributes. She seems to provoke adoration in many that goes beyond the average stuff that surrounds pop stars.
Click to expand...
At the beginning of her carreer, a large part of her fans were teens and she was everything a girl wanted to be: "talented", beautiful, famous, fearless... Many of her songs were about her bad experiences with men (manipulator, liar, cheater or just being left on the shelf, you name it.) and this is something most of girls can relate to. Were things get concerning is that gradually her songs' topic became a lot about how she got even with these men, and basically anyone who annoyed her, how she rose from her ashes and became this famous, dazzling superstar, how she wasn't afraid to use her beauty and wealth, and could just have her pick ... Add the context where women are told they are perpetual victims, where real men are "toxic" and all the Woke thing... You got a generation of young women for whom Taylor Swift is a model, a real woman, a woman who made it.
 
goyacobol said:
Probably, looks, talent and usability.
Click to expand...
I'm betting her looks have been surgically enhanced, her "talent" isn't that great, she's run through auto-tune, she has a host of people who take her "ideas" and turn them into the product that is sold to the masses. She has the one thing that a majority of truly talented individuals don't have, money from financial investors. Due to that factor, she is heavily controlled, as the end result of her product is return on their investment.

I think a lot of young females may relate to her because of the songs she writes about ex-boyfriends. :rolleyes:
 
I was exposed to quite a bit of her music growing up, and while she appealed primarily to girls, I thought some of her songs were cute and she seemed more authentic and innocent than most pop stars. Her downhome side appealed to the cultural milieu I was raised in, and I envisioned her as a country girl next door with a lot of heart but not much brains, chronicling her coming of age struggles while looking for love in a world where none was to be found. Particular favorites of mine were Love Story, You Belong With Me, Mine, Our Song, and Hey Stephen. Wildest Dreams came out later and gave me an endearing image of the futility of romantic relationships, if that makes any sense. For awhile, she seemed to be fighting back against the big record labels and trying to go independent, as they were taking a lot of money that was rightfully hers, which made her good in my book. I did start noticing a change in the late 2010s in the way she presented herself and the direction that her music was going that seemed like someone was sculpting her into an icon for the culture war. She seemed to maintain some connection to the roots which made her popular, but something else was animating her, and her lifestyle had gradually drawn her into a sort of gilded prison that was a whole lot bigger and meaner than she was. If I had been one of her true fans I don't think I would be able to separate myself from the old Taylor and what she is now. I think it is her ability to connect and relate, or at least her former ability, which makes her so mesmerizing. I'm not ruling out that something similar was done to her like Jordan Peterson.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Trending content

Back
Top Bottom