Recently my awareness has been growing

[Ricardo]

(Somewhat off topic , but i'll oblige , no further though :P )

" Let me continue to mess with the can of worms. The big bang "energies" (light?) exploded from 7D, some of which arrive in 1D, are not "individuals". But we know (?) that any 1D being is a soul . What is a 1D soul like? (#1) How does a soul get appointed to 1D (#2) ? These are some of the "worms" that come to my mind... "

# 1 - " any 1D (...)" implies multitude , " a 1D soul (...) " also implies differentiation
further ,
# 2 - " appointed to 1D (...)" this implies violation of the free will principle.

 

[Wandering Star]

Does it matter that progress towards 7D is quicker in the short wave cycle or are there other reasons for its existence?

Well, that's something you could answer, since you have chosen to progress towards reunion in the short wave cycle.

You are in the short wave cycle, so it's kind of funny that your ego in this life wonders what it's for.

It seems that the love and affection that beings feel towards "God" is of such caliber, that the greatest desire of beings in evolution is to be as close to him as possible.

Who knows.

An example that occurred to me of a long wave cycle and a short wave cycle.

Long wave:

The person spends a million years opening and closing a door for people to pass through. Everyone who passes by kindly thanks you for opening the door for them.

One day the person discovers that the people who pass by can open the door for themselves, there is no need to open the door for them.

Short Wave:

After a thousand years of opening and closing the door for others to pass through, a guy comes along and before you can touch the doorknob to open it, the guy pushes you aside while saying "get out of the way you idiot!" and opens the door.

In just a thousand years you have learned that people can open the door themselves.

 

[bozadi]

# 1 - " any 1D (...)" implies multitude , " a 1D soul (...) " also implies differentiation

Still, where's "individuation"? Do you think "multitude" or "differentiation" compulsorily mean "individuation"?

I could also say "a 2D soul..." or "any 2D soul...", and that would also imply "multitude" and "differentiation", but does this necessarily imply "individuation" as a 3D concept?

As for "1D souls", yes, I assumed and still assume that there are more than one 1D soul. Do you believe that there's a single 1D soul? I don't claim that a "single 1D soul" would necessarily be absurd, but I just haven't thought like that up to now, maybe I will change my mind depending on the discussion here, on the statements or clues from the R&C cosmology or other sources.

# 2 - " appointed to 1D (...)" this implies violation of the free will principle.

Yes, I agree that the term "appointment" doesn't sound like an ideal term from a freewill point of view. I just try to understand the following statements:

Q: (L) Well, I have a book over on the shelf called "Messages from Michael"... this entity says that souls are being continually flung off from some sort of soul generator somewhere in the universe... what was this source?

A: Entity at 3rd incarnate.

Q: (L) Was this information valid in absolute terms?

A: No. Souls are already created.

Q: (L) You mean from the first instant of time (excuse the term)?

A: Yes.

Q: (L) Well, I have heard that dolphins, porpoises and whales have very advanced souls. Is that true?

A: All souls are advanced.

Q: Okay, do different individuals have connections to different archangels? (V) Yes, are our souls born from different archangel realms?

A: No. The soul was never created. Was/Is/Always will be.

(GB) Could you explain the process of the soul?

A: Soul is consciousness, period.

Q: (L) Is the human soul different from, say, animal souls?

A: Of course.

A: Soul smashing.

[...] (DD) What happens to a soul after it is smashed?

A: Primal matter. Start the cycle over. Millions or billions of years acquiring consciousness.

There is the soul imprint that all first density, second density, third density, and fourth density beings possess, as you already know; that is extracted. From that soul imprint a duplicate copy or cloning, if you will, which appears on fourth density, can then be made and studied and the soul imprint is then replaced into the original body at whatever density it was taken.

So, I both try to understand the concept of soul, and also its association with density levels.

 

[Wandering Star]

So, I both try to understand the concept of soul, and also its association with density levels.

Welcome to the club.

 

[bozadi]

As for the explanations on the long and short wave cycles by the C's, I'm puzzled by the following statement:

Of a negative nature, it also produces many negative experiences for these very same entities which otherwise would not exist because being of a first level and second level nature, flora and fauna would ordinarily experience a long term or long wave cycle on the physical plane as opposed to a short wave cycle physical and ethereal, as they do now because of their interaction with the human species in its short wave ethereal/physical cycle.

"....long wave cycle on the physical plane"??!! If the LWC means "completely ethereal", how come flora and fauna would experience the "LWC" on the physical plane? So, a completely ethereal LWC can be experienced on a physical plane, I suppose, if I'm not misinterpreting the explanation.

By the way, although I assume that the LWC will only allow STO, I don't think that 1D in the LWC will have anything to do with polarity. I assume, however, that some conditions will necessarily be different compared to "1D in the SWC", and this will make it easer to lean towards STO in 2D, in which, I think, some "rudimentary" experience of polarity is possible, and in 3D.

 

[bozadi]

Welcome to the club.

Mirth!!!

 

[bozadi]

I think time exists but not as we know it to in a fixed cyclical calendar controlled by moon phases and spinning around in a twist around a star.

I think "time" primarily refers to the "time" involved in "learning". This could explain its "variability and selectivity" So, in the sense that "learning exists", we can also say, apparently, that "time exists". But considering the fact that whatever is being learned is "already known" in a higher level, "time doesn't exist", because all is already known.

A: As we have told you before, if you will be patient just a moment, the universe is merely a school. And, a school is there for all to learn. That is why everything exists. There is no other reason. Now, if only you understood the true depth of that statement, you would begin to start to see, and experience for yourself, all the levels of density that it is possible to experience, all the dimensions that it is possible to experience, all awareness. When an individual understands that statement to its greatest possible depth, that individual becomes illumined. And, certainly you have heard of that. And, for one moment, which lasts for all eternity, that individual knows absolutely everything that there is to know.

Even our being a limited 3D entity is not an absolute fact, it's changeable, while our being 7D, the unlimited, is absolute, this will never change. We know all, because we are all. All is one.

Q: What is necessary?

M: To grow is necessary. To outgrow is necessary. To leave behind the good for the sake of the better is necessary.

Q: To what end?

M: The end is in the beginning. You end where you start — in the Absolute.

Q: Why all this trouble then? To come back to where I started?

M: Whose trouble? Which trouble? Do you pity the seed that is to grow and multiply till it becomes a mighty forest? Do you kill an infant to save him from the bother of living? What is wrong with life, ever more life? Remove the obstacles to growing and all your personal, social, economic and political problems will just dissolve. The universe is perfect as a whole and the part’s striving for perfection is a way of joy. Willingly sacrifice the imperfect to the perfect and there will be no more talk about good and evil.

Q: Yet we are afraid of the better and cling to the worse.

M: This is our stupidity, verging on insanity.

 

[bozadi]

The fact that "we are 3D" and the fact that "we are 7D" are probably directly related to the issue of "Time exists" and "Time doesn't exist".

When we solely accept the fact that "We are 3D", this suggests "Time exists", and it is essentially the "distance" between our current level (3D) and our target (7D). When we solely accept the fact that we are, just as everything is, 7D, then the "distance" (time) is no more.

As I said before, our identity as 3D (or 4D, 5D, or 6D) is not absolute, changeable, while our eternal identity as 7D is absolute and never changes. I think that's why time is "illusion", and timelessness is "reality".

But, of course, this doesn't make the progression through densities (by increasing one's awareness) meaningless or unnecessary. Diversity is said to be illusion, oneness is reality. I don't exactly know the relation between them but the two are somehow the same, as all is one.

A: Everything is real, therefore, illusion is reality.

Q: How powerful the illusion?

M: No doubt, because based on reality.

 

[axj]

Well, that's something you could answer, since you have chosen to progress towards reunion in the short wave cycle.

You are in the short wave cycle, so it's kind of funny that your ego in this life wonders what it's for.

@Wandering Star, I still find your messages unnecessarily confrontational and even condescending, even if you keep denying this.

I know that nobody likes having things like that pointed out, but in the context of doing the Work other perspectives can help us get closer to truth and clarity through networking.

You also contradict your own claim (that I or anyone in the short wave cycle could answer why it exists) by admitting that you do not know either:

It seems that the love and affection that beings feel towards "God" is of such caliber, that the greatest desire of beings in evolution is to be as close to him as possible.

Who knows.

 

[Wandering Star]

@Wandering Star, I still find your messages unnecessarily confrontational and even condescending, even if you keep denying this.

I know that nobody likes having things like that pointed out, but in the context of doing the Work other perspectives can help us get closer to truth and clarity through networking.

You also contradict your own claim (that I or anyone in the short wave cycle could answer why it exists) by admitting that you do not know either:

It was supposed to be funny.

My apologies.

 

[Wandering Star]

@Wandering Star, I still find your messages unnecessarily confrontational and even condescending, even if you keep denying this

You did ask the question, by the way.

You don't like my answers, that's fine, but that's your problem.