Trump Elected: The True MAGA Era Begins, Now What?

[SummerLite]

Many believe including me, there isn't anything there. Here is an interesting clip from a much longer report explaining what may have happened to the gold in Fort Knox. The Rockefeller family sold it off to European speculators in the 1970's. Now there's a lot of curiosity about all the gold being removed from the Bank of London into the US, Is there a connection to the missing Knox gold, I wonder. It sounds like the London Bank is being cleared out of its gold.

Owner of a Arizona mint describes gold being shipped from London Bank to US since Christmas. The tariff explanation appears to be a red herring, if you've heard that. Is President Trump, who alludes to gold often, up to something?

https://twitter.com/x/status/1891562170036404249

The gold at Fort Knox hasn't been revalued since its $45 an oz. price and is of different qualities, some from the mid 1800's is less pure, if its still there. The gold was still present during this 1974 filming but hasn't been seen since is my understanding,

Fort Knox & Trump’s Secret Gold Move—The Financial Reset NO ONE Is Ready For?

Join me live as we dive into today’s top news stories, offering insightful analysis and uncovering what the mainstream media doesn't want you to know. To learn more about investing in gold & silver vi

rumble.com

I have an explanation for why all this gold is coming into the US from Europe. Here is Martin Armstrong's take on it, sounds reasonable but bleak if things unfold as he suspects.

Capital is unsafe in Europe as the war drums beat louder by the day. Looming tariffs have many questioning if they will spread to precious metals and smart money has selected the USA as its safe haven. Moreover, gold is selling at a premium in the US leading to an uptick in arbitrage. Gold has been on the rise since the outbreak of the Ukrainian war and we’ve seen a 10% rise in the past year alone. Now, the Bank of England is working quickly to move a large portion of its gold reserves from London to New York.

Gold prices have been about $20 lower per troy oz in London compared to New York. J.P. Morgan, for example, moved $4 billion in gold reserves from London to NYC this February. The central bank is especially eager to send its reserves off to America. London’s largest gold reserve currently holds 310 tonnes of gold or 420,000 gold bars. England only owns 5.4% of its gold holdings with major banking institutions and foreign central banks accounting for the bulk.

The London Bullion Market Associated stated that 150 tonnes of gold were shipped out to the Big Apple in January alone, with 100 tonnes of that coming directly from the Bank of England’s massive vaults. Transporting tangible assets is no easy feat, even for a central bank. The Bank of England stockpiles massive gold bars weighing 400 troy oz each. New York’s gold exchange only accepts smaller ingots of 100 oz, so the bullion must be sent to Swiss refiners to be melted and recast.

There is a rush to get gold out amid war and geopolitical tensions. Swiss exports of gold to the US reached a 13-year high this January and has no signs of slowing. The risk of war in Europe is very real and that can take gold prices up dramatically. Banks are often severely restricted during times of war and it certainly would not be as simple to move precious metals across the Atlantic.

In both world World Wars, capital fled Europe for the US, strengthening the dollar and driving up gold demand as a hedge against uncertainty. Gold doesn’t necessarily move with inflation but reacts to geopolitical instability and loss of trust in institutions. If conflict escalates in Europe, capital outflows could once again drive gold higher, similar to historical patterns. There is a reason we are witnessing a mass exodus of gold into the US. As far as a matter of confidence is concerned, DOGE’s search into Fort Knox could have many questioning if gold is indeed safe in the US. We are certainly living in a time of mass political uncertainty.

Home | Armstrong Economics

www.armstrongeconomics.com

The DISTURBING Reason Gold is Flooding into the U.S.—Martin Armstrong EXPOSES the Truth

Join me for an important discussion with Martin Armstrong. To learn more about investing in gold & silver visit - http://goldwithseth.com, or call 626-654-1906 For high quality storable foods and seed

rumble.com

 

[luc]

One thing I'm trying to wrap my head around (and I'm not the only one) is why on earth are the Europeans so hell-bent on continuing the war in Ukraine. I mean, before Trump it looked like they are basically US vassals, doing their bidding even while it's totally against their own interests. But now that the US has changed course, why double down? It would be one thing to rhetorically "ease out" of the whole thing instead of just abandoning it immediately to keep up appearances and not rock the boat. But there's a crazy determination here that I find hard to explain.

Plain old hatred for Russia? Rogue CIA/Deep State still running the show in Europe? Money laundering? The only thing that really makes sense to me is that the EU elite seeks to centralize more power in Brussels (they always do), and "building a European army" is a great tool for that (the army is a pipe dream, but it sure would shift a lot of money and power to Brussels). But even then, it seems strange. NPC firmware update failed and now the device is bricked!?

 

[axj]

The point I wanted to make here is the judges attempting to stop Trump are breaking the law themselves. They don't have constitutional powers over the Executive branch and are trying to use a power they don't have, corrupt as can be. Their removal from office is in the works in several cases. This issue may end up in the Supreme Court where they should be quickly shot down since the separation of powers is very clear in this matter.

Federal courts do have the authority to rule on actions of the Executive branch. They have been established to reduce the workload of the Supreme Court and are basically an extension of it (Source).

All court rulings for and against the Trump administration have been by federal judges or the Supreme Court, just as it is supposed to be.

 

[Jefferson]

One thing I'm trying to wrap my head around (and I'm not the only one) is why on earth are the Europeans so hell-bent on continuing the war in Ukraine. I mean, before Trump it looked like they are basically US vassals, doing their bidding even while it's totally against their own interests. But now that the US has changed course, why double down? It would be one thing to rhetorically "ease out" of the whole thing instead of just abandoning it immediately to keep up appearances and not rock the boat. But there's a crazy determination here that I find hard to explain.

Plain old hatred for Russia? Rogue CIA/Deep State still running the show in Europe? Money laundering? The only thing that really makes sense to me is that the EU elite seeks to centralize more power in Brussels (they always do), and "building a European army" is a great tool for that (the army is a pipe dream, but it sure would shift a lot of money and power to Brussels). But even then, it seems strange. NPC firmware update failed and now the device is bricked!?

The same thoughts have been in my mind. Particularly now, when these countries in Europe no longer have an ally or solid trading partner with the US or Russia and are really between a rock and a hard place. There will be obvious repercussions with the citizens. All of those reasons you’ve mentioned are valid. What keeps coming to mind is that those in power, or at least acting as spokespersons, are mind-controlled or non-human undergrounders. Is it just the plain old ordinary reasons or is something else going on here? It could be a question for the Cs if it helps in some way.

 

[Cosmos]

One thing I'm trying to wrap my head around (and I'm not the only one) is why on earth are the Europeans so hell-bent on continuing the war in Ukraine. I mean, before Trump it looked like they are basically US vassals, doing their bidding even while it's totally against their own interests. But now that the US has changed course, why double down? It would be one thing to rhetorically "ease out" of the whole thing instead of just abandoning it immediately to keep up appearances and not rock the boat. But there's a crazy determination here that I find hard to explain.

Plain old hatred for Russia? Rogue CIA/Deep State still running the show in Europe? Money laundering? The only thing that really makes sense to me is that the EU elite seeks to centralize more power in Brussels (they always do), and "building a European army" is a great tool for that (the army is a pipe dream, but it sure would shift a lot of money and power to Brussels). But even then, it seems strange. NPC firmware update failed and now the device is bricked!?

My bet is that the global deepstate has switched focus to Europe in order to keep the overall goals/plans going as long as America is a bit handicapped in that regard because of Trump (which might be the one world government the C‘s talked about in control there of both the US and EU). So they continue the main global deepstate agenda by simply switching power/focus on the main (paid and bought for) puppet governments in Europe (such as Germany, France and Britain). In other words: a switching tactic by the one world government as long as America is handicapped in order to still be in control and in line of the overall global agenda:

On another note:

I can’t help to think that maybe Germany (followed by France and Britain) are the pawns of the global deepstate, which couldn’t, this time around, fully control America, so, they are now “switching back“ to getting their agendas through, by somewhat bypassing America for the time being, and continuing through the main powers in Europe. While one of the main targets/enemies seems to continue to be Russia and others.

 

[dredger]

One thing I'm trying to wrap my head around (and I'm not the only one) is why on earth are the Europeans so hell-bent on continuing the war in Ukraine.

Can't it be explained mainly by "blackmailed" ?
Also their personal money interrest : they receive their royalties for pushing for war, no war no royalties.
This war is a huge financial diversion of taxpayers' money, mainly to the military-industrial complex, for which nato acts as a commercial agent, but a special agent which also threatens and murders those who might threaten their swindle.
I would say that for those corrupted politicians it's a question of survival, simply, something like having the choice between "Betray your country or die"

 

[Cosmos]

My bet is that the global deepstate has switched focus to Europe in order to keep the overall goals/plans going as long as America is a bit handicapped in that regard because of Trump (which might be the one world government the C‘s talked about in control there of both the US and EU). So they continue the main global deepstate agenda by simply switching power/focus on the main (paid and bought for) puppet governments in Europe (such as Germany, France and Britain). In other words: a switching tactic by the one world government as long as America is handicapped in order to still be in control and in line of the overall global agenda:

And by the way, that might be one key reason why the recent elections in Germany had to be rigged (which isn’t sure but seems likely to me). They need a working puppet government in Germany, the largest power in Europe, especially when they can’t fully control America at the moment. Conversely, that could mean that they maybe wouldn’t have needed to necessarily rigg the german elections (at least to the same extent) if they would have had a reliable puppet government in the US at that same moment in time.

 

[dredger]

And by the way, that might be one key reason why the recent elections in Germany had to be rigged (which isn’t sure but seems likely to me). They need a working puppet government in Germany, the largest power in Europe, especially when they can’t fully control America at the moment. Conversely, that could mean that they maybe wouldn’t have needed to necessarily rigg the german elections (at least to the same extent) if they would have had a reliable puppet government in the US at that same moment in time.

Yes Germany is one key if not the key country on which they are "obliged" to keep their grasps on. But it's in fact all EU countries, look what is happening in Romania, and also, look how unahppy they are with one country, Hungaria, which resists them (+ one other little country i do not remember the name here). It's not that little countries are important by themselves, what they fear the most is the "contagiousness" of the rejection movement. We can say now without any doubt that EU became the central battlefield, and usually, what is seen on a battlefield is not nice, thus, time to buckle up for EU people ... but don't forget the pop'corns too ^^

 

[Nienna]

One thing I'm trying to wrap my head around (and I'm not the only one) is why on earth are the Europeans so hell-bent on continuing the war in Ukraine. I mean, before Trump it looked like they are basically US vassals, doing their bidding even while it's totally against their own interests. But now that the US has changed course, why double down? It would be one thing to rhetorically "ease out" of the whole thing instead of just abandoning it immediately to keep up appearances and not rock the boat. But there's a crazy determination here that I find hard to explain.

Plain old hatred for Russia? Rogue CIA/Deep State still running the show in Europe? Money laundering? The only thing that really makes sense to me is that the EU elite seeks to centralize more power in Brussels (they always do), and "building a European army" is a great tool for that (the army is a pipe dream, but it sure would shift a lot of money and power to Brussels). But even then, it seems strange. NPC firmware update failed and now the device is bricked!?

I've been wondering the same thing.

While reading some of the very good speculations here, it brings to mind that most of the EU is in the total grip of the WEF/globalists and doing their bidding.

 

[Ricardo]

A answer for the continuation of war in Ukraine is of course the portal , but this raises the question of , there being differences in control/outcome , of whom controls it , so is there a difference between U.S. pathocratic control and E.U. pathocratic control ? ( and moreover vis-a-vis Consortium ? )

Session 26 February 2022 :

(...)

Q: (L) So, there's a portal in Ukraine?

A: Yes

(...)

 

[T.C.]

Maybe it’s about the end of NATO. There was an interview or a speech given by someone in the EU who said that NATO were in charge of the collective EU response to covid. So it has power over EU countries to make them do what it wants or needs.

If things carry on the way they’re going, with the US’ rapprochement with Russia, there’ll be no need for NATO. So keeping the war going in Ukraine is existential for NATO.

 

[Windmill knight]

One thing I'm trying to wrap my head around (and I'm not the only one) is why on earth are the Europeans so hell-bent on continuing the war in Ukraine. I mean, before Trump it looked like they are basically US vassals, doing their bidding even while it's totally against their own interests. But now that the US has changed course, why double down? It would be one thing to rhetorically "ease out" of the whole thing instead of just abandoning it immediately to keep up appearances and not rock the boat. But there's a crazy determination here that I find hard to explain.

Yeah, in the Spanish radio show we've been wondering about this too again and again. I can only think of two things. First, the European leaders have a personal interest - they are bought or blackmailed, or both - so they would very much rather be vassals as long as they can keep cashing in (and to hell with their countries). Second, they still hope that Trump will be taken out, in which case things could go 'back to normal' rather fast. Just because he dodged one or two bullets doesn't mean he will dodge a third one, and unfortunately that's all it takes.

 

[irjO]

Yeah, in the Spanish radio show we've been wondering about this too again and again. I can only think of two things. First, the European leaders have a personal interest - they are bought or blackmailed, or both - so they would very much rather be vassals as long as they can keep cashing in (and to hell with their countries). Second, they still hope that Trump will be taken out, in which case things could go 'back to normal' rather fast. Just because he dodged one or two bullets doesn't mean he will dodge a third one, and unfortunately that's all it takes.

At this point I would assume that to just to maintain the “show” or the chaos going. That can’t stop for them (the consortium or elite people).

 

[Esote]

I think the core of our civilization, as is the case with all others, is lessons. In other words, a civilization is the organized site of battle between light and darkness at a given time, in a given place, for a given people. And it transforms according to certain objective criteria. There sure is a lot darkness and madness nowadays, but there is also light and reason if you look for it.

Light and reason is definitely not into what is depicted from this Trump's video, which is just evil AFAIK

 

[dredger]

One other thought i had in mind while reading the last comments is the following :
They need a war because they well see that if this continues like this they'll loose their grasp on the EU countries. Under a war they will impose curfews, like during covid. A war means drastic reduction of liberties and many other exceptionnal "powers" they'll, with no doubt, try to use. Looks like they are desperate. I don't think they'll succeed.

I remember a recent session with the C's that they answered that Russia would strike back at a moment and that nobody would dare move on after that. Now that the US would probably not react if this happen, or react by saying something like "we warned you", this kind of situation may happen in the coming months.