Brace Yourselves For War Between Iran and Israel

Obviously, Iran is right now trying to regroup and consider options. They are, no doubt, taking very seriously the possibility that Israel is actually hoping that Iran will respond strongly, and that doing so will bring in more direct US involvement, which Iran would probably like to avoid.

As usual, psychos like to try to put their victims in a 'damned if you do, damned if you don't' position.

This is precisely what the US did with Russia vis a vis the Ukraine war.
 
Yeah, there's little reason to think Israel won't succeed either.

We've been largely sustained by the Cs statements that Israel would eventually be either taken down by its neighbors fighting back or by 'environmental intervention'.

What we didn't consider is that, between now and then, Israel could become the leading world power (explicitly, and not just as 'the hidden power behind the thrones'):


Dugin, unsurprisingly, goes cryptically to the heart of the matter.


Along these lines, a lot of people fail to realise that the Axis of Resistance powers are basically standing up for all of normal humanity right now, despite any faults and flaws they may have.

Once the evil empire is finished dealing with enemies 'out there', what will they do? The only way they can get their pleasure will be to fully turn on all of us still living inside the empire. One struggles to imagine the cruel, sadistic, anti-human tyranny that would ensue under full, overt Jewish supremacist rule, but we don't have to look far for examples.

Maybe that's what it will take to wake people up.
 
It's no coincidence that this took place 10 days after a similar operation - also 'years in the making' - took place inside Russia. Now, like that op, this one was probably not as successful as Israeli media messaging - also prepped and ready-to-go beforehand - claims. Nonetheless, the 'coincidence' of military-intelligence actions using a similar methodology inside both Russia and Iran, along with the 'coincidence' of both taking place amid 'peace talks' between the US and Russia/Iran respectively, reveals the common denominator, the 'secret team' at work in both operations, the 'hidden hand' that is becoming increasingly visible...
It is interesting for sure. Well they've played their hand now - and anyone who can will learn from that.
Along those lines I've listened to The Durans take on it, and in short if the Iranian leadership can survive the turmoil/strikes - and not lash out in the way Israel wants, then they will win in the end. Just like Russia and Ukraine, and the sanctions that where 'meant to cripple and destroy Russia from within', we just have to wait and see if this attack destroys Iran or not.
If it doesn't, then the US will 'have to strike Iran' - then we may get oil prices through the roof and a demolition of the economy.
However, again, maybe Iran will pull it's punches like Russia has.
And like Russia, Iran may end up much stronger after this.
If the Iranian leadership hang on, then Israel and the US lose. In the long run at least.

For reference:
Once the evil empire is finished dealing with enemies 'out there', what will they do? The only way they can get their pleasure will be to fully turn on all of us still living inside the empire. One struggles to imagine the cruel, sadistic, anti-human tyranny that would ensue under full, overt Jewish supremacist rule, but we don't have to look far for examples.
Indeed. And they may still try it even if they don't 'defeat the enemy out there'. In which case it will be a mix of Ukraine and being press ganged into military service without a choice/only getting food rations if you 'go to war', Palestine and the conditions there (caged lines, starvation, disease, bombing from above, Palantir AI surveillance and 'pre-emptive strikes' etc), and COVID with the authoritarians being in charge and snitching on anyone not following the rules - off to the gulags/front lines for you.
Then, after that, maybe people will have had enough suffering.
 
Officially Iran has no nukes, and neither does Israel. Ok, so everyone knows Israel has many, but there's no reason to think they would use them against Iran, unless...

The thing about nukes is that in theory in modern warfare they provide a country with a deterrent against being overrun, invaded or destroyed through conventional means.

Thinking about the Iranian response (noting that Israel has vowed more continued attacks) - they share no common land border with Israel, hence it will have to be missiles, drones etc. They could opt for asymmetrical responses like closing the straits of Hormuz to oil shipments etc. But this would also hurt their allies as well. I guess there are intense backroom discussions right now between Russians, Chinese and Iranians.

Considering the internal situation in Iran of late - if the population feels that their government is not responding adequately to these attacks, then i think the situation will be ripe for an internal colour revolution considering how deeply Mossad has penetrated all levels of government and society in Iran. Then the million dollar question will be : what would the Supreme Leader of Iran do with their nukes, when they face the threat of being overthrown. We can only guess - but I dont think they will walk away like Assad did in Syria.

All the MSM reporting (including comments from Trump) is operating on the premise that Iran has no nukes. I keep thinking about the comment from the C's " you will be shocked" and how all of this is going to play out...

Another angle - lets hypothetically say that Iran is fully defeated and Israel is the new king of the world. Then you will have a situation where over a billion Muslims are "upset" with many residing outside the Middle East. Dugin is right - it is getting biblical and we could be deep inside the Apocalyptic scenario.
 
From TG channel EurasianChoice:

Israel attacked nuclear facilities in Natanz, eliminated IRGC Commander Hossein Salami and Chief of the General Staff Mohammad Bagheri, using over 200 warplanes and hitting about 100 targets in eight provinces. The scale of the first strike, however, masks strategic restraint — Tel Aviv deliberately abandoned a prolonged campaign, realizing its counterproductivity to achieve the ultimate goal.

The true target of the American-Israeli tandem is not the Iranian nuclear program per se, but the political system of the Islamic Republic and its economic model. A regime change in Tehran would open access to 1.5 million barrels of Iranian oil per day, which today are supplied mainly to China through shadow schemes, accounting for 60-70% of the country's state budget. Iran's return to the orbit of Western influence would radically change the energy balance in the region and the global architecture of oil supplies.
The paradox of the Israeli strategy lies in the understanding that prolonged bombing would strengthen exactly the forces that need to be weakened. The effect of "rallying around the flag" would inevitably consolidate Iranian society against moderate and secular elites, temporarily putting aside the internal contradictions.

Instead, Israel chose surgical tactics — pinpoint strikes against the closest circle of 85-year-old Ayatollah Khamenei at a critical moment in the transition of power. The IRGC suffered unprecedented losses at the highest command level. The elimination of Salami is comparable to the neutralization of the chairman of the US Joint Chiefs of Staff, a blow that inevitably destabilizes the decision—making system in preparation for the transfer of power from an elderly leader.

The Iranian response (they claim that this is a strike by proxy forces from Iraq) in the form of more than 100 drones, all of which were intercepted by the Israeli air defense, confirmed the predictability of the Tehran reaction and the limited possibilities of retaliation. The symbolic "retaliation in the sheds" allows the regime to mobilize public opinion against "Zionists and Americans" while avoiding escalation that could provoke a full-scale conflict. Ayatollah Khamenei's promises of a "bitter fate" for Israel remain rhetorical in the face of the weakening of regional allies — Hezbollah in Lebanon and the Assad regime in Syria.

The ambivalence of the American position — Trump's distancing himself from the operation, while Israeli officials claim "full coordination" — creates room for diplomatic maneuver, while maintaining pressure on the Iranian govt. Oil markets reacted with a moderate rise to $74 per barrel, reflecting geopolitical risks without catastrophic expectations of a full-scale war.
The strategy of rare but painful strikes against the Iranian elite is designed for the long term and is based on an understanding of the mechanisms of political transformation: revolutions do not take place under bombs, but as a result of an internal crisis of the legitimacy of power. Israel is creating conditions for the natural disintegration of a system experiencing a succession crisis and facing growing popular discontent, while avoiding the effect of external consolidation that would inevitably arise with a prolonged military campaign.
Israel doesn't have the resources for a prolonged campaign. So:

They'll rely on US firepower, indirect and direct. Then hope to kick off a "color revolution".
This.
 
(Altair) How many nukes does Israel actually have?

A: 157

Q: (Joe) That's less than people suspect.

(L) Huh?

(Joe) People say 400. The number of 400 has been touted over the years as the number of nukes that they have.

(L) Well, they said 157.

(Joe) It's still enough, right?

(L) Yeah, that's a lot.

(Joe) How many does Iran have?

A: More.

So we know Iran already has more nukes than Isreal. This whole thing seems to be theater. What are the chances of both Isreal and Iran's leader's having the same bosses? One of the first things the Cassiopaeans told us was that there was already a one world government on this planet. I think a lot of these people think they have more power than they do, or are easily manipulated by people much smarter than them. There is also the case of them being parasitically infected and influenced by 4th D directly. If they are portals, this control is probably much easier as well, if not effortless.

Popcorn out anyways, lets see where it all goes.
 
So we know Iran already has more nukes than Isreal. This whole thing seems to be theater. What are the chances of both Isreal and Iran's leader's having the same bosses?
Killing Iranian generals and nuclear scientists and bombing the Natanz nuclear facility, which could legitimately cause a radiation leak, would be very, very extreme for merely engaging in political theater.
 
Internal strife is short hand for what you mention above: paid and organized agitation. And is about to get ramped up tomorrow with the nation-wide 'No Kings Day' "protest". But, none of that precludes the triggered, pathologized and non-paid left (even if they are not the majority of US citizens) from getting on the bandwagon and acting out too - as they have for many months.

Added:

Recent clashes and conflicts involving U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) have occurred across several U.S. cities, primarily in response to immigration raids and enforcement actions under the Trump administration. These protests, which began in Los Angeles, have spread to at least 40 cities across 23 states as of June 12, 2025. Below is a summary of key locations and incidents based on available information:
  • Los Angeles, California:
    • Protests erupted following ICE raids starting around June 6, 2025, targeting areas like the Fashion District, Westlake, and Paramount (e.g., a Home Depot parking lot). Clashes involved protesters throwing rocks, bottles, and Molotov cocktails, with law enforcement responding with tear gas, flash-bang grenades, and less-lethal munitions. Over 400 arrests were reported by the Los Angeles Police Department (LAPD), with incidents including burning cars and blocking the 101 Freeway. The Trump administration deployed 2,000–4,000 National Guard troops and 700 Marines, prompting a curfew in downtown L.A. and criticism from local officials like Mayor Karen Bass and Governor Gavin Newsom, who called it an overreach.
  • Austin, Texas:
    • On June 9, 2025, hundreds protested near the Texas State Capitol and the J.J. Pickle Federal Building, which houses an ICE office. Clashes resulted in 13 arrests, with four police officers injured by rocks and bottles. Authorities used pepper spray and tear gas after protesters attempted to deface federal property with graffiti.
  • New York City, New York:
    • Protests occurred in Lower Manhattan outside federal immigration headquarters, with over 115 arrests since early June 2025, including 22 on June 7 for blocking vans and 86 on June 10. Clashes involved water bottles thrown at police, with demonstrations near Trump Tower and the Manhattan Detention Center.
  • Chicago, Illinois:
    • Thousands marched on June 10, 2025, with protests turning violent as some vandalized police vehicles, leading to 17 arrests, including four felony charges for aggravated battery.
  • San Francisco, California:
    • On June 8–9, 2025, protests in the Mission District saw 154 arrests on June 8 after vandalism, though June 9 demonstrations were largely peaceful.
  • Santa Ana, California:
    • Hundreds protested on June 9, 2025, after ICE raids, with clashes involving fireworks, rocks, and bottles thrown at officers, who used tear gas. At least 31 people were detained in ICE facilities.
  • Spokane, Washington:
    • On June 11, 2025, over 30 protesters were arrested after clashes outside an ICE office, with police using pepper balls. A curfew was imposed from 9:30 p.m. to 5 a.m.
  • Dallas, Texas:
    • On June 9, 2025, a protest was declared an unlawful assembly, with one arrest after demonstrators clashed with police.
  • Atlanta, Georgia:
    • Over 1,000 protesters gathered on June 10, 2025, along Buford Highway, with six arrests after clashes with law enforcement.
  • Philadelphia, Pennsylvania:
    • On June 10, 2025, clashes outside the Federal Detention Center led to 14 arrests, with two officers and two protesters sustaining minor injuries.
  • Other Cities:
    • Protests were reported in San Antonio, Houston, Seattle, Boston, Washington, D.C., Denver, Las Vegas, St. Louis, Raleigh, Eugene, and Minneapolis, among others, with varying degrees of conflict. For example, San Antonio saw peaceful rallies, while Denver protests involved graffiti and traffic disruptions.


Things are ramping up here in California and not just in Los Angeles. I have friends and former co-workers who live in LA, San Francisco and the San Jose area. They claim it's far worse than leaders like Mayor Bass, Governor Newsom and the media are claiming.

The nationwide No Kings protest tomorrow is well-financed, well-coordinated and well-publicized. Funding, gas masks, shields, weaponry - thus far clubs and pallets of bricks staged at strategic locations - are being handed out like candy. Obviously the PTB are hoping for synchronized chaos and deadly events in the Middle East, Ukraine and the US. The latter of which can be organic or false flags. Probably a bit of both. Trump and his Administration will be blamed for the chaos no matter what is done to try and contain it.

I predict California and much of the USA is gonna be in political shambles by the end of the Summer of Love 2.O. Trump has been boxed into a corner domestically and worldwide. No amount of bravado or shouts of USA, USA, USA from his supporters can stop what's coming. Trump failed despite his so-called better intentions than say an overt puppet President. Summed up in one of Trump's favorite one word statements: Sad.
 
Killing Iranian generals and nuclear scientists and bombing the Natanz nuclear facility, which could legitimately cause a radiation leak, would be very, very extreme for merely engaging in political theater.
It's real and serious looking for sure, but on the flipside it may be a continuation of "just business, nothing personal".

I had a strong emotional reaction to it this morning, usually those reactions are wrong, and a sign that I'm being played.

Considering it more now, people have brought up some good points in this thread.

The attack shares the same fingerprints as the "Ukranian" attack on Russian bases last week. Massively overblown in the media and on social media, hysteria all round. Turns out it was only a handful of jets damaged.

The "MAGA" team, no matter how much they love Israel, doesn't want oil prices to start trending up again. And probably neither does the wider US establishment, considering that it would benefit Russia, a major oil supplier who does not have to use the strait of Hormuz.

Trump, as expected, is going in hard with the whole art of the deal thing, which never looks like it will work, but somehow often does.

Stocks are not falling off a cliff, VIX is calm, and oil is still trading well within it's 2 year range, indicating that big, smart money is not exactly panicking here.

Amidst all this is another data point that keeps coming to mind: The Yemeni's recent quiet sinking of multiple US warships. An Achilles' heel perhaps, and a sign that the balance of power is not so tilted as we think.

Anyway we'll see, maybe it's just business as usual. The bombs have to be dropped, the money printer has to keep printing, and as the Duran guys put it, the washing machine has to keep on spinning.
 
Killing Iranian generals and nuclear scientists and bombing the Natanz nuclear facility, which could legitimately cause a radiation leak, would be very, very extreme for merely engaging in political theater.
Incoming reports.

From RT Russian Telegram Channel
The IAEA has reported radioactive contamination by alpha particles inside the facility in Iran's Natanz after Israeli strikes.

Grossi stressed that radiation levels outside the facility remain unchanged.
From RT Russian Telegram Channel
1749831364880.png
Israel carried out strikes near the Iranian nuclear facility in Fordow, two explosions were recorded, the Fars agency reports.
 
Trump, as expected, is going in hard with the whole art of the deal thing, which never looks like it will work, but somehow often does.
This kind of "art of the deal" won't end well, more and more people and within MAGA also, did not vote for it. they are also being manipulated.
Didn't Trump distrusted CNN?
I just spoke with @realDonaldTrump on the phone. The President told me the US supports Israel and called the strikes on Iran last night “a very successful attack.”
“We of course support Israel, obviously and supported it like nobody has ever supported it,” Trump said during our brief phone call.
“Iran should have listened to me when I said - you know I gave them, I don’t know if you know but I gave them a 60-day warning and today is day 61,” he added.
“They should now come to the table to make a deal before it’s too late. It will be too late for them. You know the people I was dealing with are dead, the hardliners,” the president said. He would not specify which people he was referring to.
Asked if this was a result of Israel’s attack last night, President Trump responded sarcastically: “They didn’t die of the flu; they didn’t die of Covid.”
 
Iran, if pressed against the wall, could just announce to the world that they have nukes, hundreds of them, and that they will only use them for self defense when there's no other choice just like anyone else with nukes. They would join the "mutually assured destruction" club and potentially prevent further US/Israeli attacks on its soil. On the other hand, it could lead to sanctions, and if Israel is bold enough and gets enough intel, a targeted attack on its nuclear facilities (although the idea is that Israel doesn't know where those are at the moment or else they would've done so already).

It would definitely be a "shock" to the world. Maybe they haven't done so because they think Israel is crazy enough to start WW3 over it, and so they're avoiding this by keeping them a secret until absolutely necessary. But my guess is that if faced with their own destruction, they will reveal having them as a last ditch deterrent. If the destruction is from an engineered color-revolution, then the nukes won't be much help, and may actually make things worse. A nuclear country marred by internal instability and at risk of being overthrown by radical factions would absolutely give US/Israel a pretext to do something drastic. Of course since Iran is already seen as "radical" by Israel/US then anything could happen if Iran reveals their cards.

So there's risks either way - a rock and a hard place, as usual. Their best bet is to keep calm but somehow keep their own population from losing faith and losing face. Just like in Russia - there's always a call for a counter-attack, but a lack of response doesn't have to result in internal turmoil if the population is united, informed, and has trust and faith in their leadership. In other words, a non-response doesn't have to be "weakness" or "cowardice", and if the population isn't made of radical uneducated egotists then they can understand that and stand together.

The actual damage of Israel's attack isn't anything that can't be easily repaired. People just need stand strong and be objective about the situation as much as possible and not make it worse than it is. And honestly, who knows, if Iran can hold out, Russia could give them more assistance once they're done with Ukraine, which hopefully won't be too long from now. And maybe Israel knows this and chose to do it before Russia wins and can focus on strengthening its alliances elsewhere.

Either way - this is always a test/lesson of how well the country treats its population. Are they properly informed, cared for - materially and spiritually? If so, then "color revolutions" would be pretty much impossible. So Iran's future partly depends on whether they have done right by their own people, just as Russia's future, or anywhere else. United we stand and all that! But united in knowledge/STO principles is much stronger than united by propaganda/fear/ponerization.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom