Candace Owens

[Evan]

I hadn't been paying attention: the title of the interview originally is :
What Does Israel Have On Donald Trump? / Candace Ep 224, ici :

Candace Owens

The Candace podcast is back!

www.youtube.com

Netanyahu expected to push for plan to 'occupy' Gaza, Homeland Security gaslights us by denying tying FEMA funds to Israel stance, and Milo Yiannopoulos joins me for MAGA's funeral.


- I'm really sorry for the shock: even if everything changes every moment, is the expression used really valid?

If you’re referring to my being “triggered”, please let me clarify. I was jokingly referring to the misuse of the contraction “There’s” where it should be “There’re”. It’s a grammatical error. The sentence should read “There are less than 10 years left.” It reads like “There is less than”. Laura has her pet peeves, like affect versus effect. That’s one of mine.

 

[Deliverance]

I was jokingly referring

Yes, I see now, thanks for sharing.
So, know that the translators erase your worries, and from my side they make salads, in general... Boo-Hoo

 

[Cosmos]

It seems to me that Candace is currently on the forefront among others such as Ian Carroll and Tucker Carlson of pulling on strings that could indeed expose/undue some of the "deepest" held secrets of how at least some very significant (not only western) global elites have operated in the shadows for a long time while making it accessible to large numbers of people. And the fact that she is reaching so many people with it is probably the key difference which seems to make her so dangerous. In other words, it seems to me that especially Candace is exposing things to large audiences that are very dangerous not only for herself but for the old power structures that were in place on this globe for a long time. And what is happening also seems to significantly bridge the differences between "the left" and "the right" not only in the normal population but also in pretty famous and outspoken people on "both sides".

Of course, what she is doing likely just touches one aspect of it and the real movers and shakers on the human level (let alone the "Alien" level) are probably almost untouchably removed/hidden behind many layers of smoke screens. In other words: the real puppet masters on the human and Alien levels probably still feel quite safe. Even though Candace is rightfully and clearly pointing out that people like Macron, Brigitte and Epstein are just tools/puppets of much larger/stronger forces in the background that are pulling their strings. Having said that, I do think that she is right that what she embarked on does cause some rather panicked countermeasures, and we probably already see this starting to play out. I also think that this could very well lead to rather strong/significant crackdowns on "free speech" even going as far as mass arrests and worse things not only in America. IMO at least some elites could indeed feel so threatened by it that they could lay off their hidden tyranny and move towards pretty straight forward and open terror. It feels like something rather serious could happen at any time if that trend of "exposure of the truth" to large numbers of peoples continues in the direction it seems to go at the moment. And yes, Israel/Mossad is a pretty significant element of it that seems to get exposed quite clearly more and more by the day, but it is also just one element. I do think there is a good likelihood that if the trend is continuing like it does that what the PTB will try to do next (probably globally) will make the Covid madness look like small potatoes in comparison. It seems like we might be approaching the end stages of something, and it could very well be that the PTB feel so desperate that they will cause quite a lot more chaos. On the other hand, the PTB might have many tricks up their sleeves to crush trends like this without needing to go full terror, although it seems to me that this time around things might be quite a bit different and that they will find it hard if not impossible to put the genie back in the bottle.

But again, on the other hand, it is likely also true that a pretty large percentage of the population has no clue and will continue to have no clue, because, among other things, willful ignorance is at play. That portion of the population might never want to wake up at all in the first place, which could mean that the real PTB might rightfully feel safe no matter what happens.

Edit: 18.08.2025= Spelling

 

[Cosmos]

Repost from another thread:

I would encourage everyone that has followed Candace unpacking of the Brigitte/Macron story and now the Epstein story to read what I have summarized in several posts about an Ex-German-Elite member who has revealed some of his own past and the workings of very powerful families/circles and interest in the following thread. And pay special attention to things like him suggesting that publicly known families/names/interests and such (like the Rothschild family) are at best just low hanging fruit that is often used as red herrings for much more powerful circles/interests working in the background:

High-Level Ex-Member of German Elite Family Reveals Secrets of How Global Elites Operate: Nazi/CIA and MK-Ultra background​

 

[Cosmos]

[…]I wouldn't be surprised if there might be quite some narcissistic tendencies with her too, which is often the case with people that are that talented/well-spoken and have large audiences, but I think that this doesn't necessarily have to be something bad if people like that can channel those tendencies in good ways and have a solid foundation (and help) from close ones in order to stay on earth and not get overboard.[…]

Before I wrote the above post I wasn’t following Candace much and only recently started to take a closer look at what she does and who she surrounds herself with.

After having looked a bit closer now I would say that there is indeed a good chance that above average narcissistic tendencies shouldn’t be underestimated as a possibility. As said but even if that should be the case it doesn’t necessarily mean that such issues can’t be handled in healthy good ways.

Having said that, I found her choice of people she seems to be either friends with or decides to interview possibly a bit revealing in that regard:

- Tate brothers
- Russell Brand
- Kanye West

All of which I think are likely people that are at the very least situated on a very high narcissistic spectrum.

Sometimes the company people keep might reveal something about their own characters. Doesn’t have to be that way but it shouldn’t be excluded as possibility.

Obviously, Candace is very extroverted, loud, outspoken and verbally skilled and that seems to often be an indication of such tendencies as well. I wouldn’t be surprised if she was always that way and never really had much of the things normal people struggle with: such as self doubt.

Putting the above speculations aside though, as I said elsewhere, from those highly visible people out there she (at least on the surface) appears to be one of the most grounded and actually able to critically correct her own thinking and have some humility. And she seems less likely as some of the others to be and/or become nuts. While doing a pretty good job in cutting through BS and arriving at reasonable conclusions.

So, I’m hoping that she will stay on the ground and hopefully grows up in some ways while avoiding the obvious traps people like that are especially vulnerable to fall into: such as trusting their own thinking WAY too much and going overboard.

 

[Miracle]

Having said that, I found her choice of people she seems to be either friends with or decides to interview possibly a bit revealing in that regard:

- Tate brothers
- Russell Brand
- Kanye West

All of which I think are likely people that are at the very least situated on a very high narcissistic spectrum.

A different take on this is that she's quite daring and brave. To me, those two qualities scream a whole heck of a lot louder than narcissism when viewing Candace. Candace was basically the only one who stood with Kayne West in the middle of him being cancelled when he was calling out Puff Daddy and others for being federal agents, having his personal trainer threaten to put him in an insane asylum, speaking out against "Black Lives Matter", meeting with Trump, and otherwise pointing out that the media industry is being run by jews. If I were Kayne, I'd be friends with Candace too.

 

[Beau]

A different take on this is that she's quite daring and brave. To me, those two qualities scream a whole heck of a lot louder than narcissism when viewing Candace. Candace was basically the only one who stood with Kayne West in the middle of him being cancelled when he was calling out Puff Daddy and others for being federal agents, having his personal trainer threaten to put him in an insane asylum, speaking out against "Black Lives Matter", meeting with Trump, and otherwise pointing out that the media industry is being run by jews. If I were Kayne, I'd be friends with Candace too.

Yeah. I wanted to defend Kanye too when I read that post. Not sure why Cosmos lumped him in there with Tate. Brand isn't that bad either. Just because someone exhibits narcissistic behaviors, it doesn't make them a bad person nor should Candace be "guilty by association." Kanye and Brand got messed up by fame, but they are sharp.

 

[Ricardo]

Tried to listen to Candance Owens interview of Russel Brand , since i knew the name and was superficially aware of him , couldn't stand long into it , it's not just me right ? that guy's insufferable way of speaking made it difficult to stand hearing him for more than a few minutes. Link Candace & Russel @ Rumble.

 

[Beau]

Tried to listen to Candance Owens interview of Russel Brand , since i knew the name and was superficially aware of him , couldn't stand long into it , it's not just me right ? that guy's insufferable way of speaking made it difficult to stand hearing him for more than a few minutes. Link Candace & Russel @ Rumble.

Understandable, but doesn't really speak to Brand's quality as a human. I don't particularly care for his style of speaking either, but I can look past that and see that he speaks up about things that many others won't.

 

[Alejo]

Understandable, but doesn't really speak to Brand's quality as a human. I don't particularly care for his style of speaking either, but I can look past that and see that he speaks up about things that many others won't.

Same here, though his heart and mind seem to be in the right place.

 

[SlipNet]

Kanye's ok, but I tend to agree with Ricardo's assessment of Brand. He's been all over the media in the UK for 20 years, and to be quite honest I find him annoying. He's also got a sleazy past too, fancying and shagging 16 year old girls may not be illegal here, but it's nonetheless a pretty bad look for a bloke of his age. I appreciate that he's matured and moved on to better things, but he'll always be "that guy who fancies schoolgirls" to many of us in the UK. FWIW.

 

[Beau]

I appreciate that he's matured and moved on to better things, but he'll always be "that guy who fancies schoolgirls" to many of us in the UK.

Sure, and that's fair. But Candace is a Christian and one big part of Christianity is forgiving others for their sins. She's even defending Harvey Weinstein because she sees someone who got railroaded by the justice system. She is not afraid to support or defend someone if she believes the truth is on her side, and that is a bravery more people should possess.

 

[Alejo]

Sure, and that's fair. But Candace is a Christian and one big part of Christianity is forgiving others for their sins. She's even defending Harvey Weinstein because she sees someone who got railroaded by the justice system. She is not afraid to support or defend someone if she believes the truth is on her side, and that is a bravery more people should possess.

Yes, not to mention the ability to look past the headlines.

 

[SlipNet]

Sure, and that's fair. But Candace is a Christian and one big part of Christianity is forgiving others for their sins. She's even defending Harvey Weinstein because she sees someone who got railroaded by the justice system. She is not afraid to support or defend someone if she believes the truth is on her side, and that is a bravery more people should possess.

That's also a fair point. I suppose in many respects the UK is not really a particularly Christian country any longer, and people here have a tendency to really loathe "nonces" as they're called here. He deserves the chance to turn his life around, and he seems to have done so in fairness. I still find him annoying though, his manner of speaking is overpowering, and he has a tendency to not let anyone else get a word in edge ways.

Fair play though to Candace; as a Christian, she sure does walk it like she talks it, and she's a rare one in that respect. And, yes indeed, she's really, really brave.

 

[Cosmos]

I think it goes without saying that narcissistic tendencies (even if they might be on the more extreme end) don‘t have to equate to people being “bad“ at all. That would be quite black and white and people individually can be very different. And yes what people like Kanye, Brand, Owens and maybe even the Tates have done or are doing can certainly be called brave.

In what I said above and in this post here, I think it is reasonable to say that Trump has similar tendencies/qualities as well. Having said that, I also think we shouldn’t forget that some people are just naturally very extroverted and/or narcissistic in some ways for example from an early age or later on in life (for many very varied reasons) and that what ordinary people would find very difficult or brave might not be so hard for such people. In some cases ordinary people might be projecting too much into such people and assuming that they themselves are pretty similar and therefore assume that those brave people must find things very difficult too, that they would be struggling with. I think that doesn’t have to be the case at all.

Also there is the factor of life mission and lessons learned in other lifetimes that shouldn’t be overlooked: Some of those people might have mission were exactly the tendencies/qualities they have now are needed to achieve good ends. In fact, humanity might need such “brave“ people from time to time to “lead the way“.

Having said that I do think we should be careful to assume or project too much into such people. And also be aware that most people can always change throughout life. And what is written in Political Ponerology should not be forgotten either (and no, I‘m not implying that any of those people are “Psychopaths“. Just that we should be careful and understand that even well meaning people (sometimes with issues themselves) could be aiding things at some point into bad directions).

Let’s bring up the three/four mentioned people again:

- Tate brothers
- Russell Brand
- Kanye West

From now on until the last paragraph I‘m only referring to those people and NOT Candace or Trump in what I‘m saying.

People here already expressed things like being annoyed about the way some of those people speak and/or behave and that they can’t stand listening to some of those people for long even if they say true things. I do think such reactions shouldn’t be ignored since there might be at times almost instinctual reasons why we can “dislike“ or feel “drained“ by the way some people speak/behave and/or interact in interpersonal interactions.

I think it is always a good idea to try to imagine how you would feel and asses a person if you would imagine you were sitting alone with them on a table and they interact with you (preferably over a longer stretch of time) in the ways we can see them behave out there. And/or trying to imagine personally doing something together with them over longer periods. So, if you try to do that, how would you think would you assess and/or feel about any of those people above (putting aside any knowledge/notion of them being famous and/or important)?

I can tell you that I feel drained and strange hearing all of those three/four people speak in interviews pretty quickly, not because they really say something wrong (in fact, the opposite is often the case), but for example because of their speaking manners and the way of interacting with others. In short I think it is highly likely that I would feel similar when interacting with them personally and would keep them at arms length mostly. I wouldn’t want to interact with them that often.

I think all of those three/four mentioned people above might have some tendencies in common:

- A god complex
- Almost manic/nuts way of thinking and/or behaving
- Seemingly at the very least on the edge of going overboard and/or becoming nuts
- Verbally very talented
- Strong tendency to talk over people
- tendency to view normal people as sheeple and/or stupid and/or below them
- often thinking they have some good if not great ideas of “what needs to be done“ in politics and/or society in order “to make things better“
- very extroverted
- somewhat monotonic way of speaking
- loud
- often what seems to be rather extreme emotional thinking
- pretty quick thinkers and then pretty quick in translating that into speech. Which might sometimes be an indication of not very deep thinking and/or not questioning oneself.

Be it as it may, I do think we shouldn’t dismiss the idea that the company people keep can sometimes tell us something. Sometimes is not always. Yes, that doesn’t have to mean much especially in professions like politics for example but I do think there is something to the phenomena: with whom people personally feel attracted to interact and/or be friends with, could be an indication. I have noticed that over the years out there quite frequently: Some people just seem to be attracted to each other and not seldomly they seem to be on a similar “wave length“ in some ways.