Canadian Orwellian world: Lockdowns, vaccines passports and more

Hiking in the woods ban in Nova Scotia now with a penalty of $25 000. Meanwhile, the fine for impaired driving is $1000, the fine for assault or sexual assault is $5000.
One man has already allegedly been fined $28k for walking in the woods. Canada is truly lost.

 
One man has already allegedly been fined $28k for walking in the woods. Canada is truly lost.

Here's the story posted in the Toronto Sun.


Interestingly, the same guy, Jeff Evens, was arrested for participating in the Freedom Convoy. Here's a post from Dec. 14, 2024.

Jeff was convicted of Mischief and Obstruct for attempting to stand sentry at the National War Memorial during the police clearing operation of peaceful Freedom Convoy protesters.

 
In the province of New Brunswick the government there is telling people to stay out of the woods.

In Newfoundland the fines for a first offence of starting any fire have gone from $75 to $50,000!
 
I remember Danielle Smith saying in some media that 60% plus (exact number 69%? maybe) of Alberta's wild fires last year were human caused. Some of those fires set intentionally, if I recall - there were charges being laid - maybe I misremember that last part. S

So keeping people out of the woods, these fines being exhorbitant, is suspicious to me. I think, "What's going on in the woods that none of us are supposed to know about?" We're supposed to accept it is Climate Change and if anybody goes into the woods investigation may show that it's not Climate Change. Nobody would want to remove the fact that fires are human-caused as a plausible reason for conflagration, now would they?

My suspicious reasoning springs from a deeply paranoid thinking process. Chuckling as I type this because what's the world come to that I actually consider this question, however 'briefly'.

Now I'm hearing Laura's voice on the most recent talk with Jay and Hunter, saying it's the times of Sodom and Gomorrah that we're living in. This lifts some of the burden of emotional reaction and being perplexed or appalled at what's happening. From this recent video interview, 'The Human Experiment: A Deep Dive Into Humanity's Origins and Purpose with Laura Knight-Jadczyk'.


The Centre cannot hold. Yeats' poem, The Second Coming, written after WWI and before the Black and Tans were sent into Ireland to quell the uprising comes to mind. There is a Centre that can hold, but there is an evident one that looks highly impaired and getting worse every day.


William Butler Yeats


Turning and turning in the widening gyre
The falcon cannot hear the falconer;
Things fall apart; the centre cannot hold;
Mere anarchy is loosed upon the world,
The blood-dimmed tide is loosed, and everywhere
The ceremony of innocence is drowned;
The best lack all conviction, while the worst
Are full of passionate intensity.
Surely some revelation is at hand;

Surely the Second Coming is at hand.
The Second Coming! Hardly are those words out
When a vast image out of Spiritus Mundi
Troubles my sight: somewhere in sands of the desert
A shape with lion body and the head of a man,
A gaze blank and pitiless as the sun,
Is moving its slow thighs, while all about it
Reel shadows of the indignant desert birds.
The darkness drops again; but now I know
That twenty centuries of stony sleep
Were vexed to nightmare by a rocking cradle,
And what rough beast, its hour come round at last,
Slouches towards Bethlehem to be born?
 
I remember Danielle Smith saying in some media that 60% plus (exact number 69%? maybe) of Alberta's wild fires last year were human caused. Some of those fires set intentionally, if I recall - there were charges being laid - maybe I misremember that last part.

So keeping people out of the woods, these fines being exhorbitant, is suspicious to me. I think, "What's going on in the woods that none of us are supposed to know about?" We're supposed to accept it is Climate Change and if anybody goes into the woods investigation may show that it's not Climate Change. Nobody would want to remove the fact that fires are human-caused as a plausible reason for conflagration, now would they?

....
Note as I read one of the posted articles, Scott Tingley, Manager of Forest Protection in NS, says nearly all forest fires are caused by people, even if unintentionally. Good. When last year we had so much awful smoke from fires all around the Provinces the CBC and probably other news outlets were pronouncing that the fires result from 'Climate Change!'. Now this link is a CBC report.

https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/nova-scotia/woods-ban-criticism-1.7604618
 
Is this the beginning of climate lockdowns???
Another test.

Re vaccines et cetera and furthermore

A: It will end when Canadians say so.

Q: (L) Well, why is Canada doing this?

A: Experiment on "tough" people.

Canada is truly lost.
It is certainly not looking good.

Their experiment with covid softened people up. The counter organic rising of the Truckers terrified the PTB in Ottawa, and many people are still stewing over what the see and hear. Nova Scotia is not going unnoticed in this latest to trigger climate lockdowns (it is generally to f the people over - excuse my f reference).

Noticed this concerning Nova Scotia in the National Post - 'Dear Diary' :-)
NS-fire-ban-1.jpg


In Dear Diary, the National Post satirically re-imagines a week in the life of a newsmaker. This week, Tristin Hopper takes a journey inside the thoughts of the Nova Scotia wilderness ban.

Monday​

I like to look at society as like a large school classroom. When students are quiet, orderly and devoted to their task, a classroom is an ideal environment for civic betterment. But when chaos and delinquency are allowed free reign, it becomes a vortex of destruction and wasted potential.

It is reasonable that these principles should also apply in the macro sense. If Nova Scotians remain selfishly devoted to inherently flammable activities such as fishing, camping and walking in the general presence of trees, then corrective action is in order.

Tuesday​

Even when human activity is successfully purged from a wilderness environment, there is still the risk that fires can be ignited by human activity. An abandoned glass bottle can concentrate the sun’s rays in the same way as a magnifying glass, causing a pinpoint of light exceeding 200 degrees Celsius. A nine-volt battery can spontaneously spark without any humans present. We must even assume that an unattended laptop could feasibly be stolen by deer, bears, crows or other wildlife and employed in such a way as to combust the machine’s internal lithium-ion battery.

Thus, until we can receive a significant amount of rain, beverages will be limited to plastic and/or metallic drinking vessels, standard cell batteries will need to be surrendered to the nearest peace officer and public usage of laptops, mobile phones or other devices will be strictly prohibited. Violators can expect fines of up to $40,000

Wednesday​

The Government of Nova Scotia appreciates the public’s cooperation with these measures, and remains devoted to the various guarantees enshrined in the Charter of Rights and Freedoms.

With that said, these remain extraordinary emergency circumstances, and the normal guarantees of free association and other such civil liberties do not apply in instances of restricted travel zones being invoked under the Forest Act (see Section 25).

Until hot, dry conditions can subside, we will be prohibiting any further discussion of this matter, as well as mentions of the words “liberty,” “freedom” or “autonomy.” The penalty for violating these restrictions is a $50,000 fine and/or a jail term not to exceed five years.

Thursday​


Despite this government’s extremely reasonable measures taken to preserve the integrity and safety of our forested areas, we continue to receive reports of violations. In one particularly corrosive excuse, these violators asserted that “this is Canada, it’s literally all forest, and you’re probably going to have to enter the forest at some point if you’re doing almost anything.”

Clearly we are up against an unreasonable cultural expectation of forests and outdoor areas generally. But outside is a privilege, not a right. As a temporary measure until temperatures can cool sufficiently, we will be prohibiting movies, music and other media products inclined to tempt Nova Scotians towards such actions. This will include an immediate ban on radio plays of Take Me Home Country Roads, Patio Lanterns and all post-1966 cover versions of Going Up the Country.

Violators can expect fines of $100,000 and a mandatory 15 years of hard labour.

Friday​


This crisis will not alleviate until we flatten the curve on water usage and the basic human use of fire, both of which now clearly stand as existential threats to our way of life. If Nova Scotia does not take drastic action now, the entire province will become a mass of charred carbon where no signs of life will exist for at least 1,000 years.

In observance of extreme drought conditions, Nova Scotians will be limited to 300 ml of water, per person, per day. Water contained within food will be deducted from the daily total at an officer’s discretion. Any private employment of fire in any capacity is now banned; this includes recreational use of electricity without a prior permit. Permits are also banned, as they require the employment of highly flammable paper.

Violators to any of the above will received one (1) consecutive life sentence for each violation and a fine of at least $76 billion.
 
Climate lockdown experiment is what comes to mind when I see the hiking ban. The east coast is a liberal stronghold(apparently), might as well test it on their loyal supporters first to see how they react. I won't be surprised to see it spread throughout the country. It will lead in to things like only being allowed to be X amount of space outside of your designated slave pen. Once AI comes online they will be able to track every movement and charge you extra for going "out of bounds" for the "carbon emissions you produce" (or something like that).

In BC, they are now attempting to basically steal privately owned land and hand it to first nations.

I understand they are under the same hierarchial corruption as we are, but I think this will be another avenue they take all over the country to ensure the working class population owns nothing and stays entrenched in tax slavery. All while enriching parasites who produce nothing.

When the C's say that it will stop when "Canadians say so" I have a hard time imagining a scenario where that is even possible, at this point. You have "khalistanians" opening up embessy's in Canada, who are likely going to be fed a bunch of tax dollars for whatever reason. Pretty much all positions of authority and administration are infiltrated by non Canadians or OP's, our young can't even get jobs to support themselves.. the average canadian family pays 42% of their income to taxes.. which are then used to launder and redistribute to non canadians and leeches.

It is actually hilarious how backwards this country is. The fact that half of these things even go on without people being accutely aware or concerned is just wild.

 
Every day, I hear something a little more ridiculous. This time it's tiny home owners on their own property in the Okanagan Valley regional District.


Now there are some places in Nova Scotia that ban smoking outside, because "wildfires".

 
Hiking in the woods ban in Nova Scotia now with a penalty of $25 000. Meanwhile, the fine for impaired driving is $1000, the fine for assault or sexual assault is $5000.
Is this the beginning of climate lockdowns???

Nova Scotia has now approved glyphosate spraying on 3,577 acres of drought-striken, fire-prone forest.

The reddit conversation around this is actually good for a change. The conversation seems to center around glyphosate killing everything except the spruce trees for logging purposes. They ban people from enjoying the forests because it'll destroy the forests, but then the destroy the forests anyway. This is a major trial balloon I think. How can people take any of this seriously?



seasea40 -
Here's my summary:

Spraying woodlands increases the amount of flammable material, but Tim Houston refuses to answer Bousquet's question as to if spraying has been temporarily banned.

This year the full spray permits are no longer listed on the website. Pesticide Applications Approvals | Pests and Pesticides

An example of the full spray approvals that were posted in previous years (..i think..) https://novascotia.ca/nse/pesticide-spray/docs/2024-3556893.pdf

In 2023 maps to the spray sites were removed from the website at industry's behest under executive director of Forest Nova Scotia, Stephen Moore who has now been promoted to Tim Houston's dicrector of communications.
 
Last edited:
Every day, I hear something a little more ridiculous. This time it's tiny home owners on their own property in the Okanagan Valley regional District.

Regional districts (RD) have accrued a great deal of power, yet for land owners they have never been easy to work with going way back. If in the ALR (Agriculture Land Reserve), it is especially hard.

In this case cited, the By-Law ticket looked to be nonconforming with building codes, which can leave one thinking, what codes, and how do you know if never on the property on in the house. The only code one might think of, is that the couple never had a building permit to begin with (It could be that the property is on in the ALR, too, and the grey water aspect is a problem). That said, there should be room to make adjustments with the owners, give them some time and let them come up with a plan, but they are a ruthless lot - all by the book, the code and nothing else.

My first run in with the RD was in 1993. Had bought an old house built in 1908 - a bit of a nightmare that, but sweet property with trees in a quite community. When going to renovate, I had to draw up plans and send them into the RD, who immediatly said, no, sorry, the house is too close to the road and you will need a variance (essentially a round table of officials one does not know, who that are 150 km away will decide by consensus). It took 5 months and they finally said, okay. After that, made friends with a building inspector who was forgiving for many people (good chap), but still did his job for the RD. Again, that is all changed.

A word of advise for anyone looking for land in BC, buy it outside the RD's boundaries where it is more free hold land. If building something inside, one will need a big purse and a thousand permits that force construction to be done only in their way.

As for the Okanogan, Kamloops, Shuswap - and elsewhere RD's, just ask people who lost homes in the last few years due to wildfires, to see just how hard it is to build back - it is not better.

Edit: if one wants to know how they view properties, they have oblique aerial photos in hi-res of every single property. They can zoom in and out and count roofs. The RD wants to determine taxes owed, so they study properties for anything not listed and will send out By-Law if not satisfied.
 
Not much of a surprise. Pierre Poilievre regains his seat in the HoC with a decisive win (against 213(!) other candidates thanks to the "Long Ballot Committee") in Alberta. Almost 60% voter turnout (unofficial). What was a surprise was how many votes Critchley got, though tempered after realising how much coverage she was given on mainstream media.

Battle River-Crowfoot Election Results.jpg
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom